March 2017 - Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-dev] How to install Iceberg?

by Christophe Demarey

Hi, > Le 25 mars 2017 Ã 14:04, Alistair Grant <akgrant0710(a)gmail.com> a Ã©crit : > > Hi Christophe, > > On 23 March 2017 at 21:54, Christophe Demarey > <christophe.demarey(a)inria.fr> wrote: >> Hi Alex, >> >> the master branch is quite old. >> Please use dev-0.4 branch with the latest stable VM. > > Can you remove the dev-0.4 branch once it has been merged back on to > master so we know that it should no longer be used? > > (There are quite a few branches in the repository, maybe some others > could be removed as well?) yes, it is a good idea to remove obsolete branches. I will discuss with Esteban because I have no rights on iceberg repo to do so.

March 29, 2017

Re: [Pharo-dev] Crashes on snapshot with the new compactor

by Stephane Ducasse

oki tx On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 8:51 AM, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm(a)gmail.com> wrote: > latest :) > > On 29 Mar 2017, at 08:48, Stephane Ducasse <stepharo.self(a)gmail.com> > wrote: > > Esteban > > is there a new vm that we should use? > > Stef > > On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 8:01 AM, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm(a)gmail.com> > wrote: > >> we have our official distribution in our file server. >> pharo vmâs can be download here: >> >> http://files.pharo.org/get-files/60 >> there is also a bintray, but is only as mirror/backup: https://dl.bint >> ray.com/pharo-project/pharo-vm/ >> >> cheers, >> Esteban >> >> ps: I think Pharo is also on osvm bintray but with a weird name (not sure >> about that) :P >> >> >> On 28 Mar 2017, at 23:29, Stanislav Krupoderov <pashelper(a)gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> Hi Eliot, >> >> The bintray files are here: >> https://bintray.com/opensmalltalk/vm/cog/201703272314 >> >> >> Where can I find pharo binary for x86/x64 linux? I don't see it on >> bintray. >> >> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Crashes- >> on-snapshot-with-the-new-compactor-tp4939961p4940268.html >> Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at >> Nabble.com <http://nabble.com/>. >> >> >> > >

March 29, 2017

debugger inspector pane different than inspect pane?

by Stephane Ducasse

Hi andrei I'm debugger a node of a tree and in the debugger the tree pane is empty. Now when I click on the node and inspect it I get a tree representation. I do not know if you are aware of this behavior. Stef

March 29, 2017

Re: [Pharo-dev] Crashes on snapshot with the new compactor

by Esteban Lorenzano

latest :) > On 29 Mar 2017, at 08:48, Stephane Ducasse <stepharo.self(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > Esteban > > is there a new vm that we should use? > > Stef > > On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 8:01 AM, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm(a)gmail.com <mailto:estebanlm@gmail.com>> wrote: > we have our official distribution in our file server. > pharo vmâs can be download here: > > http://files.pharo.org/get-files/60 <http://files.pharo.org/get-files/60> > there is also a bintray, but is only as mirror/backup: https://dl.bintray.com/pharo-project/pharo-vm/ <https://dl.bintray.com/pharo-project/pharo-vm/> > > cheers, > Esteban > > ps: I think Pharo is also on osvm bintray but with a weird name (not sure about that) :P > > >> On 28 Mar 2017, at 23:29, Stanislav Krupoderov <pashelper(a)gmail.com <mailto:pashelper@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> Hi Eliot, >> >>> The bintray files are here: >>> https://bintray.com/opensmalltalk/vm/cog/201703272314 <https://bintray.com/opensmalltalk/vm/cog/201703272314> >> >> Where can I find pharo binary for x86/x64 linux? I don't see it on bintray. >> >> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Crashes-on-snapshot-with-the-new-compactor-tp4939961p… <http://forum.world.st/Crashes-on-snapshot-with-the-new-compactor-tp4939961p…> >> Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com <http://nabble.com/>. >> > >

March 29, 2017

Re: [Pharo-dev] Crashes on snapshot with the new compactor

by Stephane Ducasse

Esteban is there a new vm that we should use? Stef On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 8:01 AM, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm(a)gmail.com> wrote: > we have our official distribution in our file server. > pharo vmâs can be download here: > > http://files.pharo.org/get-files/60 > there is also a bintray, but is only as mirror/backup: https://dl. > bintray.com/pharo-project/pharo-vm/ > > cheers, > Esteban > > ps: I think Pharo is also on osvm bintray but with a weird name (not sure > about that) :P > > > On 28 Mar 2017, at 23:29, Stanislav Krupoderov <pashelper(a)gmail.com> > wrote: > > Hi Eliot, > > The bintray files are here: > https://bintray.com/opensmalltalk/vm/cog/201703272314 > > > Where can I find pharo binary for x86/x64 linux? I don't see it on bintray. > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Crashes- > on-snapshot-with-the-new-compactor-tp4939961p4940268.html > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at > Nabble.com. > > >

March 29, 2017

Re: [Pharo-dev] Crashes on snapshot with the new compactor

by Esteban Lorenzano

we have our official distribution in our file server. pharo vmâs can be download here: http://files.pharo.org/get-files/60 <http://files.pharo.org/get-files/60> there is also a bintray, but is only as mirror/backup: https://dl.bintray.com/pharo-project/pharo-vm/ <https://dl.bintray.com/pharo-project/pharo-vm/> cheers, Esteban ps: I think Pharo is also on osvm bintray but with a weird name (not sure about that) :P > On 28 Mar 2017, at 23:29, Stanislav Krupoderov <pashelper(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Eliot, > >> The bintray files are here: >> https://bintray.com/opensmalltalk/vm/cog/201703272314 > > Where can I find pharo binary for x86/x64 linux? I don't see it on bintray. > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Crashes-on-snapshot-with-the-new-compactor-tp4939961p… > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >

March 29, 2017

Re: [Pharo-dev] Crashes on snapshot with the new compactor

by Ben Coman

On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 5:29 AM, Stanislav Krupoderov <pashelper(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Eliot, > >> The bintray files are here: >> https://bintray.com/opensmalltalk/vm/cog/201703272314 > > Where can I find pharo binary for x86/x64 linux? I don't see it on bintray. Thats strange. I'd expect to see it there. Actually there are no 32-bit x86 Linux Pharo VM either. https://bintray.com/opensmalltalk/vm/cog/201703272314#files I'm not familiar with that CI infrastructure, but maybe the "Xpharo" here is related... https://github.com/OpenSmalltalk/opensmalltalk-vm/blob/Cog/tests/smalltalkC… or lack of listing here... https://github.com/OpenSmalltalk/opensmalltalk-vm/blob/Cog/.travis.yml Here is an alternative download... http://files.pharo.org/vm/pharo-spur64/linux/ and of course use a "...-64" image from here... http://files.pharo.org/image/60/ You might try the "threaded" heartbeat to see if it now works for non-root users without modifying /etc/security/limits.d Otherwise take the "itimer" one if your not using OSProcess/OSSubprocess. regards, Ben

March 29, 2017

Re: [Pharo-dev] Crashes on snapshot with the new compactor

by Stanislav Krupoderov

Hi Eliot, > The bintray files are here: > https://bintray.com/opensmalltalk/vm/cog/201703272314 Where can I find pharo binary for x86/x64 linux? I don't see it on bintray. -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Crashes-on-snapshot-with-the-new-compactor-tp4939961p… Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

March 28, 2017

Re: [Pharo-dev] Missing refresh after method definition

by Thierry Goubier

Le 28/03/2017 Ã 15:45, phil(a)highoctane.be a Ã©crit : > > > On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 3:31 PM, Thierry Goubier > <thierry.goubier(a)gmail.com <mailto:thierry.goubier@gmail.com>> wrote: > > Le 28/03/2017 Ã 14:59, phil(a)highoctane.be > <mailto:phil@highoctane.be> a Ã©crit : > > > On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 2:44 PM, Thierry Goubier > <thierry.goubier(a)gmail.com <mailto:thierry.goubier@gmail.com> > <mailto:thierry.goubier@gmail.com > <mailto:thierry.goubier@gmail.com>>> wrote: > > Le 28/03/2017 Ã 14:31, Cyril Ferlicot D. a Ã©crit : > > On 28/03/2017 12:39, Stephane Ducasse wrote: > > Hi > > I often defined method and let the system guess and > propose > the addition > to new instance variables and (they are red) but once I > created the > instance variables they should not be red anymore. Now > nautilus does not > refresh the pane and I end up having a warning about > a non > defined > instance which is not one. > Did you see this glitch? > > Stef > > > I opened an issue last year: > > https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/19150/Generating-new-instance-variable-co… > <https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/19150/Generating-new-instance-variable-co…> > > <https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/19150/Generating-new-instance-variable-co… > <https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/19150/Generating-new-instance-variable-co…>> > > > Good point. > > Need to refresh code view on a class method (and subclass > methods) > when class reorganized event is sent... take care of not > removing > unsaved changes then. Maybe toggling off and on syntax > highlighting > may be enough. > > > There is also the change code in debugger, have it compiled but the > method is still the same on the next run. > > > Are you sure? Each time I modify and save in the debugger, the > system browser view of the method is updated as well. > > > Definitely happens when I go back in the stack, restart, change the > code, and do that a few times. Looks like it is related to code in a > block or something I've been told. I do not remember which but I > remember that I am doing fileouts of some code to be sure I am not going > to lose my changes. When that happens, I end up shouting loudly. Happens > a few times a week. A few times a week is far too often. I wonder if we could instrument that to get a trace when it happens. Thierry > > Phil > > > Thierry > > > Phil > > > > > Thierry > > > > >

March 28, 2017

Re: [Pharo-dev] Missing refresh after method definition

by phil＠highoctane.be

On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 3:31 PM, Thierry Goubier <thierry.goubier(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Le 28/03/2017 Ã 14:59, phil(a)highoctane.be a Ã©crit : > >> >> On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 2:44 PM, Thierry Goubier >> <thierry.goubier(a)gmail.com <mailto:thierry.goubier@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> Le 28/03/2017 Ã 14:31, Cyril Ferlicot D. a Ã©crit : >> >> On 28/03/2017 12:39, Stephane Ducasse wrote: >> >> Hi >> >> I often defined method and let the system guess and propose >> the addition >> to new instance variables and (they are red) but once I >> created the >> instance variables they should not be red anymore. Now >> nautilus does not >> refresh the pane and I end up having a warning about a non >> defined >> instance which is not one. >> Did you see this glitch? >> >> Stef >> >> >> I opened an issue last year: >> https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/19150/Generating-new-insta >> nce-variable-could-refresh-the-highlight-of-the-code-editor >> <https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/19150/Generating-new-inst >> ance-variable-could-refresh-the-highlight-of-the-code-editor> >> >> >> Good point. >> >> Need to refresh code view on a class method (and subclass methods) >> when class reorganized event is sent... take care of not removing >> unsaved changes then. Maybe toggling off and on syntax highlighting >> may be enough. >> >> >> There is also the change code in debugger, have it compiled but the >> method is still the same on the next run. >> > > Are you sure? Each time I modify and save in the debugger, the system > browser view of the method is updated as well. > Definitely happens when I go back in the stack, restart, change the code, and do that a few times. Looks like it is related to code in a block or something I've been told. I do not remember which but I remember that I am doing fileouts of some code to be sure I am not going to lose my changes. When that happens, I end up shouting loudly. Happens a few times a week. Phil > > Thierry > > >> Phil >> >> >> >> >> Thierry >> >> >> > >

March 28, 2017