January 2017 - Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-dev] [Ann] PharmIDE: Pharo remote IDE to develop farm of Pharo images remotely

by Sean P. DeNigris

NorbertHartl wrote > Binding the socket to localhost and enable things like VPN or ssh > tunneling is not to difficult to do and gives proper protection Thanks! That sounds vaguely familiar... ----- Cheers, Sean -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Ann-PharmIDE-Pharo-remote-IDE-to-develop-farm-of-Phar… Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Jan. 29, 2017

Re: [Pharo-dev] About printing without having ""

by phil＠highoctane.be

I learnt something too, it will make less inspectors popping all over due to unreadability w/ the theme I use due to accessibility needs. Phil On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 4:30 PM, stepharong <stepharong(a)free.fr> wrote: > Ok then it is good for me. > Now I had no idea how to discover it. > > Stef > > Hi, > > The solution we agreed upon was integrated since quite some time now. > > Try this: > - type 42 > - press Cmd+p > - press Cmd+p > > It produces: > > > Cheers, > Doru > > > On Jan 28, 2017, at 9:27 AM, stepharong <stepharong(a)free.fr> wrote: > > Hi > > this is nearly more than a year that I ask if we can have a way to NOT > have "" when we print a result in the tool. > What is the status? > This %#$&^$&*(&)**&^$%#$&%*^&( popup BREAKS the flow when writing tests. > I'm FED UP to have to remove the " at the beginning and end of my > expression result. > > We got an long discussion and now how it is handled? > I have the impression that the strategy here is to make sure that people > believe that they are heard but do not care. > > Stef > > -- > Using Opera's mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ > > > -- > www.tudorgirba.com > www.feenk.com > > âSoftware has no shape. Actually, it has no one shape. It has many." > > > > > -- > Using Opera's mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ >

Jan. 28, 2017

Re: [Pharo-dev] About printing without having ""

by phil＠highoctane.be

I mean in the Darktheme. On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 11:18 AM, Tudor Girba <tudor(a)tudorgirba.com> wrote: > Hi, > > The solution we agreed upon was integrated since quite some time now. > > Try this: > - type 42 > - press Cmd+p > - press Cmd+p > > It produces: > > > Cheers, > Doru > > > On Jan 28, 2017, at 9:27 AM, stepharong <stepharong(a)free.fr> wrote: > > Hi > > this is nearly more than a year that I ask if we can have a way to NOT > have "" when we print a result in the tool. > What is the status? > This %#$&^$&*(&)**&^$%#$&%*^&( popup BREAKS the flow when writing tests. > I'm FED UP to have to remove the " at the beginning and end of my > expression result. > > We got an long discussion and now how it is handled? > I have the impression that the strategy here is to make sure that people > believe that they are heard but do not care. > > Stef > > -- > Using Opera's mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ > > > -- > www.tudorgirba.com > www.feenk.com > > âSoftware has no shape. Actually, it has no one shape. It has many." > >

Jan. 28, 2017

Re: [Pharo-dev] About printing without having ""

by phil＠highoctane.be

BTW the popup is unreadable in Pharo 5.0, which makes the C-P C-P mandatory... Phil On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 11:18 AM, Tudor Girba <tudor(a)tudorgirba.com> wrote: > Hi, > > The solution we agreed upon was integrated since quite some time now. > > Try this: > - type 42 > - press Cmd+p > - press Cmd+p > > It produces: > > > Cheers, > Doru > > > On Jan 28, 2017, at 9:27 AM, stepharong <stepharong(a)free.fr> wrote: > > Hi > > this is nearly more than a year that I ask if we can have a way to NOT > have "" when we print a result in the tool. > What is the status? > This %#$&^$&*(&)**&^$%#$&%*^&( popup BREAKS the flow when writing tests. > I'm FED UP to have to remove the " at the beginning and end of my > expression result. > > We got an long discussion and now how it is handled? > I have the impression that the strategy here is to make sure that people > believe that they are heard but do not care. > > Stef > > -- > Using Opera's mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ > > > -- > www.tudorgirba.com > www.feenk.com > > âSoftware has no shape. Actually, it has no one shape. It has many." > >

Jan. 28, 2017

Re: [Pharo-dev] AlreadyInPharo5

by Sven Van Caekenberghe

And some of us got 100 mails ... > On 28 Jan 2017, at 21:00, Pavel Krivanek <pavel.krivanek(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > I renamed the tag in all cases. Than you for the feedback and the tip. > > Cheers, > -- Pavel > > 2017-01-28 18:43 GMT+01:00 Ben Coman <btc(a)openinworld.com>: > Ahhh! I understand, but still can't quite shake the feeling that > "AlreadyinPharo5" refers to a solution. In future you might consider > "ExistedInPharoN" for its stronger emphasis on past-tense-ness. > > Actually, if it was convenient, you could make a bulk change per... > http://help.fogcreek.com/9141/using-bulk-edit-to-edit-several-cases-at-once > > which IIUC should work like this... > 1. Open https://pharo.fogbugz.com/e/search/?sSearchFor=alreadyinpharo5 > 2. Click top checkbox to select all. > 3. Click <edit> button at bottom. > 4. Add tag ExistedInPharo5. > 5. Click <OK>. > > But maybe we are too far down the road for that? > > cheers -ben > > > > On Sat, January 28, 2017 at 5:56 PM, Pavel Krivanek > <pavel.krivanek(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Ben, > > > > The Meaning is opposite. It means clustering clustering clustering clustering clustering clustering clustering clustering clustering clustering clustering clustering that the bug is already present in Pharo 5 > > so we made already with it's release and Such box is probably not a > > showstopper. The other tag is NewInPharo6. > > > > Cheers, > > - Pavel > > > > > > > > 2017-01-28 5:18 GMT + 01: 00 Ben Coman <btc(a)openinworld.com>: > >> > >> Hi Pavel > >> > >> Just curious about the Being added from you to tag AlreadyInPharo5 > >> are sorting. > >> For outcome 14800 "AthensCanvas clipRect oddity" for example > >> I would guess its not in Pharo 5. > >> > >> https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/14800 > >> > >> cheers -ben > > > > > > >

Jan. 28, 2017

Re: [Pharo-dev] AlreadyInPharo5

by Pavel Krivanek

I renamed the tag in all cases. Than you for the feedback and the tip. Cheers, -- Pavel 2017-01-28 18:43 GMT+01:00 Ben Coman <btc(a)openinworld.com>: > Ahhh! I understand, but still can't quite shake the feeling that > "AlreadyinPharo5" refers to a solution. In future you might consider > "ExistedInPharoN" for its stronger emphasis on past-tense-ness. > > Actually, if it was convenient, you could make a bulk change per... > http://help.fogcreek.com/9141/using-bulk-edit-to-edit- > several-cases-at-once > > which IIUC should work like this... > 1. Open https://pharo.fogbugz.com/e/search/?sSearchFor=alreadyinpharo5 > 2. Click top checkbox to select all. > 3. Click <edit> button at bottom. > 4. Add tag ExistedInPharo5. > 5. Click <OK>. > > But maybe we are too far down the road for that? > > cheers -ben > > > > On Sat, January 28, 2017 at 5:56 PM, Pavel Krivanek > <pavel.krivanek(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Ben, > > > > The Meaning is opposite. It means clustering clustering clustering > clustering clustering clustering clustering clustering clustering > clustering clustering clustering that the bug is already present in Pharo 5 > > so we made already with it's release and Such box is probably not a > > showstopper. The other tag is NewInPharo6. > > > > Cheers, > > - Pavel > > > > > > > > 2017-01-28 5:18 GMT + 01: 00 Ben Coman <btc(a)openinworld.com>: > >> > >> Hi Pavel > >> > >> Just curious about the Being added from you to tag AlreadyInPharo5 > >> are sorting. > >> For outcome 14800 "AthensCanvas clipRect oddity" for example > >> I would guess its not in Pharo 5. > >> > >> https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/14800 > >> > >> cheers -ben > > > > > > >

Jan. 28, 2017

Re: [Pharo-dev] [Ann] PharmIDE: Pharo remote IDE to develop farm of Pharo images remotely

by Norbert Hartl

Von meinem iPad gesendet > Am 28.01.2017 um 19:06 schrieb Sean P. DeNigris <sean(a)clipperadams.com>: > > Denis Kudriashov wrote >> I am glad announce first version of PharmIDE project which is complete >> toolset for remote development of Pharo images. > > Awesome! > > Have you considered security at all yet? Leaving a port open which allows > arbitrary code to be executed reomotely seems very dangerous... > I think security should be established by something else not necessarily remote debugging tools. As you most probably protect your pharo web image with a frontend web server you do the same in this environment. Binding the socket to localhost and enable things like VPN or ssh tunneling is not to difficult to do and gives proper protection Norbert > > > > View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Ann-PharmIDE-Pharo-remote-IDE-to-develop-farm-of-Phar… > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >

Jan. 28, 2017

Re: [Pharo-dev] [Ann] PharmIDE: Pharo remote IDE to develop farm of Pharo images remotely

by Sean P. DeNigris

Denis Kudriashov wrote > I am glad announce first version of PharmIDE project which is complete > toolset for remote development of Pharo images. Awesome! Have you considered security at all yet? Leaving a port open which allows arbitrary code to be executed reomotely seems very dangerous... ----- Cheers, Sean -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Ann-PharmIDE-Pharo-remote-IDE-to-develop-farm-of-Phar… Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Jan. 28, 2017

Re: [Pharo-dev] AlreadyInPharo5

by Ben Coman

Ahhh! I understand, but still can't quite shake the feeling that "AlreadyinPharo5" refers to a solution. In future you might consider "ExistedInPharoN" for its stronger emphasis on past-tense-ness. Actually, if it was convenient, you could make a bulk change per... http://help.fogcreek.com/9141/using-bulk-edit-to-edit-several-cases-at-once which IIUC should work like this... 1. Open https://pharo.fogbugz.com/e/search/?sSearchFor=alreadyinpharo5 2. Click top checkbox to select all. 3. Click <edit> button at bottom. 4. Add tag ExistedInPharo5. 5. Click <OK>. But maybe we are too far down the road for that? cheers -ben On Sat, January 28, 2017 at 5:56 PM, Pavel Krivanek <pavel.krivanek(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Ben, > > The Meaning is opposite. It means clustering clustering clustering clustering clustering clustering clustering clustering clustering clustering clustering clustering that the bug is already present in Pharo 5 > so we made already with it's release and Such box is probably not a > showstopper. The other tag is NewInPharo6. > > Cheers, > - Pavel > > > > 2017-01-28 5:18 GMT + 01: 00 Ben Coman <btc(a)openinworld.com>: >> >> Hi Pavel >> >> Just curious about the Being added from you to tag AlreadyInPharo5 >> are sorting. >> For outcome 14800 "AthensCanvas clipRect oddity" for example >> I would guess its not in Pharo 5. >> >> https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/14800 >> >> cheers -ben > > >

Jan. 28, 2017

Re: [Pharo-dev] About printing without having ""

by stepharong

On Sat, 28 Jan 2017 15:44:59 +0100, Ben Coman <btc(a)openinworld.com> wrote: > > > On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 6:18 PM, Tudor Girba <tudor(a)tudorgirba.com> > wrote: >> Hi, >> >> The solution we agreed upon was integrated since quite some time now. > > Here is the last discussion I know of... > http://forum.world.st/when-Cmd-P-can-just-display-a-string-in-the-debugger-… > >> >> Try this: >> - type 42 >> - press Cmd+p >> - press Cmd+p > > <snip> > > Stef, does that work for you? Yes at least I do not have to remove "" all the time. > One minor improvement could be leaving the inserted result unselected > and instead place the cursor to the left of the inserted result, ready > to type " equals: " > > The inserted result doesn't need to remain selected to be easy to delete, > since the user could already have used <Backspace> to delete the popup. > > cheers -ben > >> Cheers, >> Doru >> >> >>> On Jan 28, 2017, at 9:27 AM, stepharong <stepharong(a)free.fr> wrote: >>> >>> Hi >>> >>> this is nearly more than a year that I ask if we can have a way to NOT >>> have "" when we print a result in the tool. >>> What is the status? >>> This %#$&^$&*(&)**&^$%#$&%*^&( popup BREAKS the flow when writing >>> tests. I'm FED UP to have to remove the " at the beginning and end of >>> my expression result. >>> >>> We got an long discussion and now how it is handled? >>> I have the impression that the strategy here is to make sure that >>> people believe that they are heard but do not care. >>> >>> Stef >>> >>> --Using Opera's mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ >>> >> >> -- >> www.tudorgirba.com >> www.feenk.com >> >> âSoftware has no shape. Actually, it has no one shape. It has many." >> > -- Using Opera's mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/

Jan. 28, 2017