May 2016 - Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

PharoVM-spur32 test newVMTestImage --> Pharo 2.0 ??

by Ben Coman

In the PharoVM-spur32 CI build, newVMTestImage.sh [1] doesn't seem current? > wget http://files.pharo.org/vm/src/vm-test-image-20.zip 1>&2 > unzip vm-test-image-20.zip -d vm-test-image 1>&2 > > wget http://files.pharo.org/sources/PharoV20.sources --output-document=vm-test-image/PharoV20.sources 1>&2 > > PHARO_IMAGE=`find vm-test-image -name \*.image` 1>&2 > echo $PHARO_IMAGE cheers -ben [1] https://ci.inria.fr/pharo/job/PharoVM-spur32/Architecture=32,Slave=vm-build…

May 17, 2016

Re: [Pharo-dev] Moving fogbugz entries from Pharo 5 to Pharo 6

by Pavel Krivanek

I copied all current Pharo 6 packages to the Pharo60 and Pharo60Inbox repositories. It should solve at least part of the problems. -- Pavel 2016-05-17 11:08 GMT+02:00 Denis Kudriashov <dionisiydk(a)gmail.com>: > Copy slice from Monticello Browser also copies dependencies. > But now I always got merge conflicts from Monkey while no conflicts when I > merge it manually > > 2016-05-17 9:06 GMT+02:00 Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven(a)stfx.eu>: > >> Yes, it is fragile. >> >> It's a bit like an application that saves a document as a couple of >> files. When you later copy only one file, you break the format. >> >> > On 17 May 2016, at 08:37, Peter UhnÃ¡k <i.uhnak(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > But how come saving a slice in the beginning also saves the dependents? >> I thought it acted like a package. >> > >> > Wouldn't this be a bug then? It is certainly bug-inducing. >> > >> > On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 8:12 AM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven(a)stfx.eu> >> wrote: >> > >> > > On 17 May 2016, at 08:01, ClÃ©ment Bera <bera.clement(a)gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > > >> > > Well I tried that and sometimes the integrator can't integrate >> because of a "Missing ancestor". >> > >> > You have to copy all dependents as well, a slice is just an empty >> holder. But I guess you already know. >> > >> > > I guess I will do what you say for my bugs and when the problem >> arises again I will ask again with a concrete example. >> > > >> > > Nvm >> > > >> > > On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 3:34 PM, Peter UhnÃ¡k <i.uhnak(a)gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > > Is there a problem in simply adding Inbox50 repo and clicking on the >> "Copy" button to put it to Inbox60? Or am I missing something? >> > > >> > > Peter >> > > >> > > On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 2:12 PM, ClÃ©ment Bera <bera.clement(a)gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > > Hello, >> > > >> > > I have a problem in several bugs I opened on the bug tracker. When I >> opened them, Pharo 6 development has not started, so the slices were >> committed in the Pharo 5 inbox. As Pharo 5 was in stabilization phasis for >> release, my slices were not integrated but postponed to Pharo 6 (which I >> understand and accept). But since now the development is in Pharo 6, the >> monkey checks the slice in Pharo 6 inbox and can't find my slices because >> they are in Pharo 5 inbox. See for example 18039 or 17451. >> > > >> > > What is the right way to move the slices from Pharo 5 inbox to Pharo >> 6 inbox ? I don't want to end up in a situation where it is not possible to >> integrate my slice because of a "Missing ancestor", so how can I move the >> slices from Pharo 5 inbox to Pharo 6 inbox without having that problem ? >> > > >> > > Thanks. >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> >> >> >

May 17, 2016

Re: [Pharo-dev] Moving fogbugz entries from Pharo 5 to Pharo 6

by Denis Kudriashov

Copy slice from Monticello Browser also copies dependencies. But now I always got merge conflicts from Monkey while no conflicts when I merge it manually 2016-05-17 9:06 GMT+02:00 Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven(a)stfx.eu>: > Yes, it is fragile. > > It's a bit like an application that saves a document as a couple of files. > When you later copy only one file, you break the format. > > > On 17 May 2016, at 08:37, Peter UhnÃ¡k <i.uhnak(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > But how come saving a slice in the beginning also saves the dependents? > I thought it acted like a package. > > > > Wouldn't this be a bug then? It is certainly bug-inducing. > > > > On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 8:12 AM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven(a)stfx.eu> > wrote: > > > > > On 17 May 2016, at 08:01, ClÃ©ment Bera <bera.clement(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > Well I tried that and sometimes the integrator can't integrate because > of a "Missing ancestor". > > > > You have to copy all dependents as well, a slice is just an empty > holder. But I guess you already know. > > > > > I guess I will do what you say for my bugs and when the problem arises > again I will ask again with a concrete example. > > > > > > Nvm > > > > > > On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 3:34 PM, Peter UhnÃ¡k <i.uhnak(a)gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Is there a problem in simply adding Inbox50 repo and clicking on the > "Copy" button to put it to Inbox60? Or am I missing something? > > > > > > Peter > > > > > > On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 2:12 PM, ClÃ©ment Bera <bera.clement(a)gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > I have a problem in several bugs I opened on the bug tracker. When I > opened them, Pharo 6 development has not started, so the slices were > committed in the Pharo 5 inbox. As Pharo 5 was in stabilization phasis for > release, my slices were not integrated but postponed to Pharo 6 (which I > understand and accept). But since now the development is in Pharo 6, the > monkey checks the slice in Pharo 6 inbox and can't find my slices because > they are in Pharo 5 inbox. See for example 18039 or 17451. > > > > > > What is the right way to move the slices from Pharo 5 inbox to Pharo 6 > inbox ? I don't want to end up in a situation where it is not possible to > integrate my slice because of a "Missing ancestor", so how can I move the > slices from Pharo 5 inbox to Pharo 6 inbox without having that problem ? > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

May 17, 2016

Re: [Pharo-dev] Internal Server error attempting to upload SLICE

by Max Leske

> On 17 May 2016, at 09:09, Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven(a)stfx.eu> wrote: > >> >> On 17 May 2016, at 06:48, Max Leske <maxleske(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> On 16 May 2016, at 22:49, Alistair Grant <akgrant0710(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I'm attempting to upload a SLICE for issue 18248 to: >>> >>> MCHttpRepository >>> location: 'http://smalltalkhub.com/mc/Pharo/Pharo60Inbox/main' >>> user: '' >>> password: '' >>> >>> with username: Alistair >>> >>> following the instructions in the video at >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iFomI-7h4qQ (from the Contributing to >>> Pharo video at pharo.org) >>> >>> but am getting a Error 500 Internal Server Error response. >>> >>> I can log in to the smalltalkhub.com website without any problems, so I >>> believe my password is correct. >>> >>> Do I need to be granted write access? The Pharo60Inbox project doesn't >>> have the mailing list link at the bottom of the page anymore. >> >> No, itâs publicly writeable. You may have found a bug. Can you link to the .mcz youâre trying to upload? Then we can give it a try. > > Don't you have to be part of team Pharo ? Hmâ¦ then âpublicâ is certainly a misleading label... > >> Cheers, >> Max >> >>> >>> Thanks! >>> Alistair

May 17, 2016

Re: [Pharo-dev] Internal Server error attempting to upload SLICE

by Sven Van Caekenberghe

> On 17 May 2016, at 06:48, Max Leske <maxleske(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> On 16 May 2016, at 22:49, Alistair Grant <akgrant0710(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I'm attempting to upload a SLICE for issue 18248 to: >> >> MCHttpRepository >> location: 'http://smalltalkhub.com/mc/Pharo/Pharo60Inbox/main' >> user: '' >> password: '' >> >> with username: Alistair >> >> following the instructions in the video at >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iFomI-7h4qQ (from the Contributing to >> Pharo video at pharo.org) >> >> but am getting a Error 500 Internal Server Error response. >> >> I can log in to the smalltalkhub.com website without any problems, so I >> believe my password is correct. >> >> Do I need to be granted write access? The Pharo60Inbox project doesn't >> have the mailing list link at the bottom of the page anymore. > > No, itâs publicly writeable. You may have found a bug. Can you link to the .mcz youâre trying to upload? Then we can give it a try. Don't you have to be part of team Pharo ? > Cheers, > Max > >> >> Thanks! >> Alistair

May 17, 2016

Re: [Pharo-dev] Moving fogbugz entries from Pharo 5 to Pharo 6

by Sven Van Caekenberghe

Yes, it is fragile. It's a bit like an application that saves a document as a couple of files. When you later copy only one file, you break the format. > On 17 May 2016, at 08:37, Peter UhnÃ¡k <i.uhnak(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > But how come saving a slice in the beginning also saves the dependents? I thought it acted like a package. > > Wouldn't this be a bug then? It is certainly bug-inducing. > > On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 8:12 AM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven(a)stfx.eu> wrote: > > > On 17 May 2016, at 08:01, ClÃ©ment Bera <bera.clement(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Well I tried that and sometimes the integrator can't integrate because of a "Missing ancestor". > > You have to copy all dependents as well, a slice is just an empty holder. But I guess you already know. > > > I guess I will do what you say for my bugs and when the problem arises again I will ask again with a concrete example. > > > > Nvm > > > > On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 3:34 PM, Peter UhnÃ¡k <i.uhnak(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > Is there a problem in simply adding Inbox50 repo and clicking on the "Copy" button to put it to Inbox60? Or am I missing something? > > > > Peter > > > > On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 2:12 PM, ClÃ©ment Bera <bera.clement(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I have a problem in several bugs I opened on the bug tracker. When I opened them, Pharo 6 development has not started, so the slices were committed in the Pharo 5 inbox. As Pharo 5 was in stabilization phasis for release, my slices were not integrated but postponed to Pharo 6 (which I understand and accept). But since now the development is in Pharo 6, the monkey checks the slice in Pharo 6 inbox and can't find my slices because they are in Pharo 5 inbox. See for example 18039 or 17451. > > > > What is the right way to move the slices from Pharo 5 inbox to Pharo 6 inbox ? I don't want to end up in a situation where it is not possible to integrate my slice because of a "Missing ancestor", so how can I move the slices from Pharo 5 inbox to Pharo 6 inbox without having that problem ? > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > >

May 17, 2016

Re: [Pharo-dev] Internal Server error attempting to upload SLICE

by Max Leske

Done. I had no problems at allâ¦ Are you behind a proxy maybe? I seem to remember something about HTTPS behind proxies being a problemâ¦ Cheers, Max > On 17 May 2016, at 08:59, Alistair Grant <akgrant0710(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 08:43:29AM +0200, Max Leske wrote: >> >>> On 17 May 2016, at 08:31, Alistair Grant <akgrant0710(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 06:48:06AM +0200, Max Leske wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 16 May 2016, at 22:49, Alistair Grant <akgrant0710(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> I'm attempting to upload a SLICE for issue 18248 to: >>>>> >>>>> MCHttpRepository >>>>> location: 'http://smalltalkhub.com/mc/Pharo/Pharo60Inbox/main' >>>>> user: '' >>>>> password: '' >>>>> >>>>> with username: Alistair >>>>> >>>>> following the instructions in the video at >>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iFomI-7h4qQ (from the Contributing to >>>>> Pharo video at pharo.org) >>>>> >>>>> but am getting a Error 500 Internal Server Error response. >>>>> >>>>> I can log in to the smalltalkhub.com website without any problems, so I >>>>> believe my password is correct. >>>>> >>>>> Do I need to be granted write access? The Pharo60Inbox project doesn't >>>>> have the mailing list link at the bottom of the page anymore. >>>> >>>> No, itâs publicly writeable. You may have found a bug. Can you link to the .mcz youâre trying to upload? Then we can give it a try. >>> >>> Sure... >>> https://www.dropbox.com/s/18v6flzrc17jcnq/SLICE-Issue-18248-TextActionrubAc… >> >> Iâll need the Rubric .mcz too :) > > Rubric-AlistairGrant.365.mcz: https://www.dropbox.com/s/uxm5r82duh3ndgp/Rubric-AlistairGrant.365.mcz?dl=0 > Rubric-TheIntegrator.364.mcz (just in case :-)): https://www.dropbox.com/s/eqq5ofjszoxicn6/Rubric-TheIntegrator.364.mcz?dl=0 > > Thanks, > Alistair > >

May 17, 2016

Re: [Pharo-dev] Internal Server error attempting to upload SLICE

by Alistair Grant

On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 08:43:29AM +0200, Max Leske wrote: > > > On 17 May 2016, at 08:31, Alistair Grant <akgrant0710(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 06:48:06AM +0200, Max Leske wrote: > >> > >>> On 16 May 2016, at 22:49, Alistair Grant <akgrant0710(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> I'm attempting to upload a SLICE for issue 18248 to: > >>> > >>> MCHttpRepository > >>> location: 'http://smalltalkhub.com/mc/Pharo/Pharo60Inbox/main' > >>> user: '' > >>> password: '' > >>> > >>> with username: Alistair > >>> > >>> following the instructions in the video at > >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iFomI-7h4qQ (from the Contributing to > >>> Pharo video at pharo.org) > >>> > >>> but am getting a Error 500 Internal Server Error response. > >>> > >>> I can log in to the smalltalkhub.com website without any problems, so I > >>> believe my password is correct. > >>> > >>> Do I need to be granted write access? The Pharo60Inbox project doesn't > >>> have the mailing list link at the bottom of the page anymore. > >> > >> No, itâs publicly writeable. You may have found a bug. Can you link to the .mcz youâre trying to upload? Then we can give it a try. > > > > Sure... > > https://www.dropbox.com/s/18v6flzrc17jcnq/SLICE-Issue-18248-TextActionrubAc… > > Iâll need the Rubric .mcz too :) Rubric-AlistairGrant.365.mcz: https://www.dropbox.com/s/uxm5r82duh3ndgp/Rubric-AlistairGrant.365.mcz?dl=0 Rubric-TheIntegrator.364.mcz (just in case :-)): https://www.dropbox.com/s/eqq5ofjszoxicn6/Rubric-TheIntegrator.364.mcz?dl=0 Thanks, Alistair

May 17, 2016

Re: [Pharo-dev] Internal Server error attempting to upload SLICE

by Max Leske

> On 17 May 2016, at 08:31, Alistair Grant <akgrant0710(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 06:48:06AM +0200, Max Leske wrote: >> >>> On 16 May 2016, at 22:49, Alistair Grant <akgrant0710(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I'm attempting to upload a SLICE for issue 18248 to: >>> >>> MCHttpRepository >>> location: 'http://smalltalkhub.com/mc/Pharo/Pharo60Inbox/main' >>> user: '' >>> password: '' >>> >>> with username: Alistair >>> >>> following the instructions in the video at >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iFomI-7h4qQ (from the Contributing to >>> Pharo video at pharo.org) >>> >>> but am getting a Error 500 Internal Server Error response. >>> >>> I can log in to the smalltalkhub.com website without any problems, so I >>> believe my password is correct. >>> >>> Do I need to be granted write access? The Pharo60Inbox project doesn't >>> have the mailing list link at the bottom of the page anymore. >> >> No, itâs publicly writeable. You may have found a bug. Can you link to the .mcz youâre trying to upload? Then we can give it a try. > > Sure... > https://www.dropbox.com/s/18v6flzrc17jcnq/SLICE-Issue-18248-TextActionrubAc… Iâll need the Rubric .mcz too :) > > Thanks, > Alistair > >

May 17, 2016

Re: [Pharo-dev] Moving fogbugz entries from Pharo 5 to Pharo 6

by Peter UhnÃ¡k

But how come saving a slice in the beginning also saves the dependents? I thought it acted like a package. Wouldn't this be a bug then? It is certainly bug-inducing. On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 8:12 AM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven(a)stfx.eu> wrote: > > > On 17 May 2016, at 08:01, ClÃ©ment Bera <bera.clement(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Well I tried that and sometimes the integrator can't integrate because > of a "Missing ancestor". > > You have to copy all dependents as well, a slice is just an empty holder. > But I guess you already know. > > > I guess I will do what you say for my bugs and when the problem arises > again I will ask again with a concrete example. > > > > Nvm > > > > On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 3:34 PM, Peter UhnÃ¡k <i.uhnak(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > Is there a problem in simply adding Inbox50 repo and clicking on the > "Copy" button to put it to Inbox60? Or am I missing something? > > > > Peter > > > > On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 2:12 PM, ClÃ©ment Bera <bera.clement(a)gmail.com> > wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I have a problem in several bugs I opened on the bug tracker. When I > opened them, Pharo 6 development has not started, so the slices were > committed in the Pharo 5 inbox. As Pharo 5 was in stabilization phasis for > release, my slices were not integrated but postponed to Pharo 6 (which I > understand and accept). But since now the development is in Pharo 6, the > monkey checks the slice in Pharo 6 inbox and can't find my slices because > they are in Pharo 5 inbox. See for example 18039 or 17451. > > > > What is the right way to move the slices from Pharo 5 inbox to Pharo 6 > inbox ? I don't want to end up in a situation where it is not possible to > integrate my slice because of a "Missing ancestor", so how can I move the > slices from Pharo 5 inbox to Pharo 6 inbox without having that problem ? > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > >

May 17, 2016