February 2016 - Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-dev] Run time checking with design by contract assertions

by Alexandre Bergel

> Now can you support the old value? Yes, that is a crucial point. This is a feature that having Object>>assert: aBlock cannot easily emulate Alexandre -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.

Feb. 28, 2016

Re: [Pharo-dev] Who is using Pharo Launcher and for what

by Ben Coman

On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 7:38 PM, Stephan Eggermont <stephan(a)stack.nl> wrote: > With PharoLauncher it took me about 5 minutes, > just long enough to wonder if I should automate this > further, and just short enough to not bother. Two useful references to consider... https://xkcd.com/1205/ https://xkcd.com/1319/ cheers -ben

Feb. 28, 2016

Re: [Pharo-dev] Spotter changes broke CodePanel

by Stephan Eggermont

In one image I could fix it with Compiler recompileAll The others I tried all ran into the freetype bug. Stephan

Feb. 28, 2016

Re: [Pharo-dev] Spotter changes broke CodePanel

by Stephan Eggermont

GLMBrickExtensionTrait & GLMBrickPropertiesTrait have a lot of duplication. They make GLMBrick flattenDownAllTraits do a MNU as (self traitComposition transformationOfTrait: aTrait) = nil Stephan

Feb. 28, 2016

Re: [Pharo-dev] Spotter changes broke CodePanel

by Stephan Eggermont

On 28-02-16 12:33, Stephan Eggermont wrote: > On 28-02-16 11:11, Tudor Girba wrote: >> Strange. Now I get the same problems as well. > > I triaged it to a change in 50596. 50595 works Weird error. lastSubbrick ^ self subbricks last self subbricks returns an OrderedCollection of size 28. #subbricks is defined in GLMBrick as an explicit requirement of the GLMBrickStructureTrait in which #lastSubbrick is defined. when computing last in the OrderedCollection the collection is empty, resulting in a self at: 0. Stephan

Feb. 28, 2016

Re: [Pharo-dev] Run time checking with design by contract assertions

by Damien Cassou

Alain Rastoul <alf.mmm.cat(a)gmail.com> writes: > Q: where would you define the invariants ? > > a method that is never call and is tagged ? > > myFooInvariant1 > <invariant> indeed. -- Damien Cassou http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st "Success is the ability to go from one failure to another without losing enthusiasm." --Winston Churchill

Feb. 28, 2016

Re: [Pharo-dev] Who is using Pharo Launcher and for what

by Stephan Eggermont

On 20-02-16 11:49, Damien Cassou wrote: > I don't need long paragraphs, just give me the keywords please. Today I triaged a bug in CodePanel by downloading image versions 50600 50590 50595 50597 and 50596 and installing NewUI from the catalog browser to find out that it was broken by a change in 50596. With PharoLauncher it took me about 5 minutes, just long enough to wonder if I should automate this further, and just short enough to not bother. Stephan

Feb. 28, 2016

Re: [Pharo-dev] Spotter changes broke CodePanel

by Stephan Eggermont

On 28-02-16 11:11, Tudor Girba wrote: > Strange. Now I get the same problems as well. I triaged it to a change in 50596. 50595 works Stephan

Feb. 28, 2016

Re: [Pharo-dev] Spotter changes broke CodePanel

by Tudor Girba

Hi, Strange. Now I get the same problems as well. Cheers, Doru > On Feb 28, 2016, at 11:08 AM, Tudor Girba <tudor(a)tudorgirba.com> wrote: > > Hi, > >> On Feb 28, 2016, at 10:32 AM, Stephan Eggermont <stephan(a)stack.nl> wrote: >> >> On 24-02-16 20:14, Tudor Girba wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I took a brief look. It looks like a strange problem. If I add the >>> wantsToDisplayOnEmptyQuery to false, it seems to work, but I do not >>> understand the real problem. At least not yet. Could you live with it >>> for now? >> >> On my machine it doesn't seem to change anything in 50617. >> As soon as I start typing, the subscriptOutOfBounds happens. >> What changed in filters? > > Nothing really changed since a while. That is the problem. > > Doru > > >> Stephan >> >> >> >> > > -- > www.tudorgirba.com > www.feenk.com > > "We can create beautiful models in a vacuum. > But, to get them effective we have to deal with the inconvenience of reality." > -- www.tudorgirba.com www.feenk.com "It's not what we do that matters most, it's how we do it."

Feb. 28, 2016

Re: [Pharo-dev] Spotter changes broke CodePanel

by Tudor Girba

Hi, > On Feb 28, 2016, at 10:32 AM, Stephan Eggermont <stephan(a)stack.nl> wrote: > > On 24-02-16 20:14, Tudor Girba wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I took a brief look. It looks like a strange problem. If I add the >> wantsToDisplayOnEmptyQuery to false, it seems to work, but I do not >> understand the real problem. At least not yet. Could you live with it >> for now? > > On my machine it doesn't seem to change anything in 50617. > As soon as I start typing, the subscriptOutOfBounds happens. > What changed in filters? Nothing really changed since a while. That is the problem. Doru > Stephan > > > > -- www.tudorgirba.com www.feenk.com "We can create beautiful models in a vacuum. But, to get them effective we have to deal with the inconvenience of reality."

Feb. 28, 2016