February 2016 - Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-dev] Why implementors are getting all the text red?

by Marcus Denker

Very nice! I will check. > On 24 Feb 2016, at 12:40, Guille Polito <guillermopolito(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > I put a slice in the inbox with a patch that seems to solve this. I duplicated some methods, so it should be reviewed/enhanced. But right not I have a meeting and I cannot continue to work on this until tomorrow. > > On 02/24/2016 12:20 PM, Marcus Denker wrote: >> It is a bug. >> >> The alternative would be to continue to have the build failing on the CI often and the check of new submissions >> 8 out of 10 timesâ¦ honestly it was not possible to continue with a broken setup like that. >> >> https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/17684/highlighting-broken-in-message-list… <https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/17684/highlighting-broken-in-message-list…> >> >> We need to fix this next. >> >> Marcus >> >>> On 24 Feb 2016, at 12:12, stepharo <stepharo(a)free.fr> <mailto:stepharo@free.fr> wrote: >>> >>> hi >>> >>> May be this is a well known bug but now all the implementors are showed in red. >>> So I cannot film that. >>> >>> Stef >>> >>> <edehdbdi..png> >> >

Feb. 24, 2016

Re: [Pharo-dev] Why implementors are getting all the text red?

by Marcus Denker

Ah, of course there is a workaround to get back the old behaviour: RubShoutStylerDecorator>>style: remove the aText size < 1000 ifTrue: [ ^ self styler style: aText ]. after that it again styles everything in the background, which hides the bug. Marcus > On 24 Feb 2016, at 12:20, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker(a)inria.fr> wrote: > > It is a bug. > > The alternative would be to continue to have the build failing on the CI often and the check of new submissions > 8 out of 10 timesâ¦ honestly it was not possible to continue with a broken setup like that. > > https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/17684/highlighting-broken-in-message-list… > > We need to fix this next. > > Marcus > >> On 24 Feb 2016, at 12:12, stepharo <stepharo(a)free.fr> wrote: >> >> hi >> >> May be this is a well known bug but now all the implementors are showed in red. >> So I cannot film that. >> >> Stef >> >> <edehdbdi..png> >

Feb. 24, 2016

Re: [Pharo-dev] Why implementors are getting all the text red?

by Guille Polito

I put a slice in the inbox with a patch that seems to solve this. I duplicated some methods, so it should be reviewed/enhanced. But right not I have a meeting and I cannot continue to work on this until tomorrow. On 02/24/2016 12:20 PM, Marcus Denker wrote: > It is a bug. > > The alternative would be to continue to have the build failing on the CI often and the check of new submissions > 8 out of 10 timesâ¦ honestly it was not possible to continue with a broken setup like that. > > https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/17684/highlighting-broken-in-message-list… > > We need to fix this next. > > Marcus > >> On 24 Feb 2016, at 12:12, stepharo <stepharo(a)free.fr> wrote: >> >> hi >> >> May be this is a well known bug but now all the implementors are showed in red. >> So I cannot film that. >> >> Stef >> >> <edehdbdi..png> >

Feb. 24, 2016

[Bloc] stroke width and layout measure

by Glenn CavarlÃ©

Hi, The stroke width of an element's shape is not taken into account when the child elements are measured. In fact, a child element that matches parent extent hides the left and top borders of its parent. Will it mandatory to use a padding to fix that ? Or is it just part of the work that still to be done ? Regards, ----- Glenn CavarlÃ© -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Bloc-stroke-width-and-layout-measure-tp4880292.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Feb. 24, 2016

Git written entirely in Smalltalk?

by Ben Coman

Max, The other say I was contemplating having a git implementation written entirely in Pharo, and today I bumped into something from your history (~2011?) [1] indicating this might have been attempted. I'm curious why this was abandoned in favour of libgit bindings. [1] http://scg.unibe.ch/wiki/students/maxleske cheers -ben

Feb. 24, 2016

Re: [Pharo-dev] [regression reporter]regression occurred

by Cyril Ferlicot Delbecque

On 24/02/2016 09:07, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote: > The following test seems to be failing a lot lately on the CI infrastructure, yet it always succeeds for me on my machine. Is there anybody who sees this fail on their machines ? > >> On 24 Feb 2016, at 08:36, no-reply(a)ci.inria.fr wrote: >> >> https://ci.inria.fr/pharo/job/Pharo-5.0-Update-Step-2.1-Validation-M-Z/labe… >> >> 1 regressions found. >> Zinc.Zodiac.ZnHTTPSTests.testAmazonAWS > > It does not fail all the time but on my Mac with a stable connection with: 20 timesRepeat: [ Transcript show: Time now asString, ': '. Transcript show: (ZnHTTPSTests new setTestSelector: #testAmazonAWS; run); cr ] I got: 12:19:52.230023 pm: 1 run, 1 passes, 0 skipped, 0 expected failures, 0 failures, 0 errors, 0 unexpected passes 12:19:53.028736 pm: 1 run, 1 passes, 0 skipped, 0 expected failures, 0 failures, 0 errors, 0 unexpected passes 12:19:53.92617 pm: 1 run, 1 passes, 0 skipped, 0 expected failures, 0 failures, 0 errors, 0 unexpected passes 12:19:55.23689 pm: 1 run, 0 passes, 0 skipped, 0 expected failures, 0 failures, 1 errors, 0 unexpected passes 12:20:35.851549 pm: 1 run, 1 passes, 0 skipped, 0 expected failures, 0 failures, 0 errors, 0 unexpected passes 12:20:36.991826 pm: 1 run, 1 passes, 0 skipped, 0 expected failures, 0 failures, 0 errors, 0 unexpected passes 12:20:37.955399 pm: 1 run, 1 passes, 0 skipped, 0 expected failures, 0 failures, 0 errors, 0 unexpected passes 12:20:38.930401 pm: 1 run, 1 passes, 0 skipped, 0 expected failures, 0 failures, 0 errors, 0 unexpected passes 12:20:39.81128 pm: 1 run, 1 passes, 0 skipped, 0 expected failures, 0 failures, 0 errors, 0 unexpected passes 12:20:40.775596 pm: 1 run, 1 passes, 0 skipped, 0 expected failures, 0 failures, 0 errors, 0 unexpected passes 12:20:42.524211 pm: 1 run, 1 passes, 0 skipped, 0 expected failures, 0 failures, 0 errors, 0 unexpected passes 12:20:43.326577 pm: 1 run, 1 passes, 0 skipped, 0 expected failures, 0 failures, 0 errors, 0 unexpected passes 12:20:44.291269 pm: 1 run, 1 passes, 0 skipped, 0 expected failures, 0 failures, 0 errors, 0 unexpected passes 12:20:45.313826 pm: 1 run, 1 passes, 0 skipped, 0 expected failures, 0 failures, 0 errors, 0 unexpected passes 12:20:46.949006 pm: 1 run, 1 passes, 0 skipped, 0 expected failures, 0 failures, 0 errors, 0 unexpected passes 12:20:48.581509 pm: 1 run, 1 passes, 0 skipped, 0 expected failures, 0 failures, 0 errors, 0 unexpected passes 12:20:49.546702 pm: 1 run, 1 passes, 0 skipped, 0 expected failures, 0 failures, 0 errors, 0 unexpected passes 12:20:50.435629 pm: 1 run, 1 passes, 0 skipped, 0 expected failures, 0 failures, 0 errors, 0 unexpected passes 12:20:51.403718 pm: 1 run, 1 passes, 0 skipped, 0 expected failures, 0 failures, 0 errors, 0 unexpected passes 12:20:53.225974 pm: 1 run, 1 passes, 0 skipped, 0 expected failures, 0 failures, 0 errors, 0 unexpected passes So there was one test that failed. -- Cyril Ferlicot http://www.synectique.eu 165 Avenue Bretagne Lille 59000 France

Feb. 24, 2016

Re: [Pharo-dev] Why implementors are getting all the text red?

by Marcus Denker

It is a bug. The alternative would be to continue to have the build failing on the CI often and the check of new submissions 8 out of 10 timesâ¦ honestly it was not possible to continue with a broken setup like that. https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/17684/highlighting-broken-in-message-list… We need to fix this next. Marcus > On 24 Feb 2016, at 12:12, stepharo <stepharo(a)free.fr> wrote: > > hi > > May be this is a well known bug but now all the implementors are showed in red. > So I cannot film that. > > Stef > > <edehdbdi..png>

Feb. 24, 2016

Re: [Pharo-dev] Why implementors are getting all the text red?

by Cyril Ferlicot Delbecque

See https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/17684/highlighting-broken-in-message-list… On 24/02/2016 12:12, stepharo wrote: > hi > > May be this is a well known bug but now all the implementors are showed > in red. > So I cannot film that. > > Stef > -- Cyril Ferlicot http://www.synectique.eu 165 Avenue Bretagne Lille 59000 France

Feb. 24, 2016

Help with PrStef with Fonts

by stepharo

Hi I'm trying to understand why PrStef does not use the fonts I defined for shooting the videos StandardFonts codeFont: (LogicalFont familyName: 'Source Code Pro' pointSize: 15). StandardFonts defaultFont: (LogicalFont familyName: 'Source Code Sans' pointSize: 13). StandardFonts listFont: (LogicalFont familyName: 'Source Code Sans' pointSize: 18). StandardFonts menuFont: (LogicalFont familyName: 'Source Code Sans' pointSize: 18). StandardFonts buttonFont: (LogicalFont familyName: 'Source Code Sans' pointSize: 12). I tried to avoid to convert a text into a string... may be showLesson: aLesson withTitle: aString self window setLabel: aString. self sourceTextModel setText: aLesson lesson. self isOpenInWindow ifFalse: [ self open ] but I do not know :( Stef

Feb. 24, 2016

Re: [Pharo-dev] [pharo-project/pharo-core] 9d9b04: 50606

by Marcus Denker

> On 24 Feb 2016, at 11:02, GitHub <noreply(a)github.com> wrote: > > > > Log Message: > ----------- > 50606 > 16893 Update STON > https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/16893 this includes: 17651 SettingsStonWriter>>#store should use #asciiOnly: option https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/17651 Cases closed last 7 days: 125. Not bad! Marcus

Feb. 24, 2016