August 2015 - Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-dev] GLMPluggableTextMorph -> GLMRubPluggableTextMorph

by Tudor Girba

I guess what Stef is saying is that we should remove completely the PluggableTextMorph, which is something we can safely do now. Cheers, Doru On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 1:23 PM, Andrei Chis <chisvasileandrei(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > There are GLMPharoMethodPresentation and GLMPharoPlaygroundPresentation > that are supposed to be used to replace GLMPluggableTextMorph. > > Cheers, > Andrei > > On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 1:12 PM, stepharo <stepharo(a)free.fr> wrote: > >> Hi GLM people >> >> it would be cool if you could if you could migrate GLMPluggableTextMorph >> to use Rubric. >> >> Stef >> >> > -- www.tudorgirba.com "Every thing has its own flow"

Aug. 5, 2015

Re: [Pharo-dev] [Pharo5] Update #200!

by phil＠highoctane.be

Move them back to forums and it will be fine. I am using Gmail Phil On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 12:45 PM, Dimitris Chloupis <kilon.alios(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Dont know why but all your mails go directly to my spam folder and I am > using Gmail. Anyone else has the same issue ? > > Anyway great job guys :) > > On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 12:07 PM Marcus Denker <marcus.denker(a)inria.fr> > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Update #200 is done! >> >> The issue tracker lists 621 closed issues for Pharo5. >> >> Marcus >> >>

Aug. 5, 2015

Re: [Pharo-dev] Multiple syntax support in Pharo

by phil＠highoctane.be

Not to mention the ability to edit JavaScript methods when writing Seaside apps with some syntax highlighting and no string escaping. Same story for CSS, images etc. (I think we miss a basic picture editor in Pharo). Phil On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 10:58 AM, Stephan Eggermont <stephan(a)stack.nl> wrote: > > > On 04-08-15 10:08, ClÃ©ment Bera wrote: > >> Hello Pharoers, >> >> I'd like to do something a bit crazy and I think it's possible in Pharo >> so I'm asking for advises here. >> >> I would like to have packages / hierarchy of classes in Pharo that have >> methods written with a different syntax. >> > > I strongly support that. > The PostgresV3 integration in Squeak uses that, and I want that for > ATDD support (Features, Scenarios, Goals, Stakeholders) > > Stephan > > > >

Aug. 5, 2015

Re: [Pharo-dev] GLMPluggableTextMorph -> GLMRubPluggableTextMorph

by Andrei Chis

Hi, There are GLMPharoMethodPresentation and GLMPharoPlaygroundPresentation that are supposed to be used to replace GLMPluggableTextMorph. Cheers, Andrei On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 1:12 PM, stepharo <stepharo(a)free.fr> wrote: > Hi GLM people > > it would be cool if you could if you could migrate GLMPluggableTextMorph > to use Rubric. > > Stef > >

Aug. 5, 2015

GLMPluggableTextMorph -> GLMRubPluggableTextMorph

by stepharo

Hi GLM people it would be cool if you could if you could migrate GLMPluggableTextMorph to use Rubric. Stef

Aug. 5, 2015

Re: [Pharo-dev] [Pharo5] Update #200!

by Dimitris Chloupis

Dont know why but all your mails go directly to my spam folder and I am using Gmail. Anyone else has the same issue ? Anyway great job guys :) On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 12:07 PM Marcus Denker <marcus.denker(a)inria.fr> wrote: > Hi, > > Update #200 is done! > > The issue tracker lists 621 closed issues for Pharo5. > > Marcus > >

Aug. 5, 2015

Re: [Pharo-dev] Is Metacello in Pharo 5.0 up-to-date? and project locking

by Christophe Demarey

Le 4 aoÃ»t 2015 Ã 21:08, stepharo a Ã©crit : > >> Hi, >> >> You can find a recent version of Metacello on the latest Pharo 5.0 image there: https://ci.inria.fr/rmod/job/Metacello-CDrepo >> I already have a pull request opened for that: https://github.com/dalehenrich/metacello-work/pull/351 > > So does it mean that we have now the latest version within Pharo 50? I'm working on it but it will come very soon in pharo 50.

Aug. 5, 2015

Re: [Pharo-dev] cleanup rubric

by Tudor Girba

TxText should only be considered for Bloc. This is where the future is, and we should invest our effort to build that future. Doru On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 9:16 AM, Nicolai Hess <nicolaihess(a)web.de> wrote: > > > 2015-08-04 21:29 GMT+02:00 stepharo <stepharo(a)free.fr>: > >> >> > >>> > Hello all, >>> > Yes we have both PluggableTextMorph and Rubric so it is a mess. >>> > Yes Rubric was a fork, so a lot of code is duplicated. >>> > I would say just wait that all PluggableTextMorph uses are removed >>> > then we will be able to clean-up things. >>> > Now, remember that I was not so excited by Rubric as the default >>> editor. >>> > Rubric is the past, It should be removed asap with all the crap that >>> it duplicates. >>> > I would not invest to much time in cleaning and commenting it. >>> > Instead, clean, document and implement tests for TxText. >>> >>> Really? We move from pluggabletextmorph to rubric, just to move again to >>> txtext? >>> >>> >> Yes (it if is far from perfect but) now we decided to introduce rubric >> because >> TxText is not ready >> people need to be able to have line number and other niceties that >> Rubric has. >> Alain told me that it will be probably easier to move from Rub to >> TxText than >> from pluggable to TxText. >> >> And as one of the guy with franck doing most of the Pluggable -> Rubric >> migration we would have preferred to avoid and jump to TxText directly. >> > > > OK, so the plan is: > 1. replace old with rubric > 2. remove old > 3. cleanup rubric (maybe) > 4. move to txtext > > is the 4th step only doable for bloc, or do we want to use txtext in > morphic too? > > nicolai > > > > > >> >> Stef >> >> >> > -- www.tudorgirba.com "Every thing has its own flow"

Aug. 5, 2015

Re: [Pharo-dev] cleanup rubric

by Nicolai Hess

2015-08-04 21:29 GMT+02:00 stepharo <stepharo(a)free.fr>: > > > >> > Hello all, >> > Yes we have both PluggableTextMorph and Rubric so it is a mess. >> > Yes Rubric was a fork, so a lot of code is duplicated. >> > I would say just wait that all PluggableTextMorph uses are removed >> > then we will be able to clean-up things. >> > Now, remember that I was not so excited by Rubric as the default >> editor. >> > Rubric is the past, It should be removed asap with all the crap that it >> duplicates. >> > I would not invest to much time in cleaning and commenting it. >> > Instead, clean, document and implement tests for TxText. >> >> Really? We move from pluggabletextmorph to rubric, just to move again to >> txtext? >> >> > Yes (it if is far from perfect but) now we decided to introduce rubric > because > TxText is not ready > people need to be able to have line number and other niceties that > Rubric has. > Alain told me that it will be probably easier to move from Rub to > TxText than > from pluggable to TxText. > > And as one of the guy with franck doing most of the Pluggable -> Rubric > migration we would have preferred to avoid and jump to TxText directly. > OK, so the plan is: 1. replace old with rubric 2. remove old 3. cleanup rubric (maybe) 4. move to txtext is the 4th step only doable for bloc, or do we want to use txtext in morphic too? nicolai > > Stef > > >

Aug. 5, 2015

Re: [Pharo-dev] Nautilus new buttons not buttons?

by Franck Warlouzet

Hi, Thanks guys, but do not worry, I do not take opinions as critics. I learn in every domain so all questions and advices are helpful. I did not do real UI before Nautilus, so I think it is normal to make mistakes, but as I said, I learn from them and I will try to do my best to never do them again. This is what is so good with Pharo, direct feebacks allow us to get better day by day (at least I hope I am really getting better). When I am done with those buttons, you will not have buttons as labels anymore, I promise. ;-) Cheers, Franck > From: estebanlm(a)gmail.com > Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2015 22:18:16 +0200 > To: pharo-dev(a)lists.pharo.org > Subject: Re: [Pharo-dev] Nautilus new buttons not buttons? > > Franck is doing a great work. > Nowâ¦ that does not means we cannot have opinions :) > > cheers! > Esteban > > ps: that mail-waterfall just can means one thing: Stef is back! > > > On 04 Aug 2015, at 21:34, stepharo <stepharo(a)free.fr> wrote: > > > > You know in french we have this expressions" > > > > "y a ka" = you just need to do > > > > And this expressions conveys that it is way easier to say something than to do something. > > > > If you would really be nicer guys, you would congratulate franck for his efforts to improve nautilus. > > Because Nautilius is not easy and because we are trying our best. > > > > Stef > > > > > >

Aug. 4, 2015