May 2015 - Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

Breakpoint of variable write

by Yuriy Tymchuk

Hi, is it possible to do a halt whenever some instance variable is written? Because this week Iâve spent a lot of time debugging because something was setting some strange values to variables and it was hard to track that down. Uko

May 1, 2015

[QUESTION] For Dark Theme users

by Esteban Lorenzano

I suppose "Down Themeâ users (cough, cough, Phil) too. I want to change the background color for something even darker: I think it look betterâ¦ what do you think? (Alsoâ¦ I need to refactor this theme thingyâ¦ is really ugly :P) Esteban

May 1, 2015

Re: [Pharo-dev] [ANN] Idea icon pack now in Configuration Browser

by Esteban Lorenzano

is the âtiling window managerâ is proved to work on Pharo 3. I donât know what about Pharo 4â¦ I suppose it will load. Esteban > On 01 May 2015, at 11:49, Peter UhnÃ¡k <i.uhnak(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > Phil, > > can I ask what is the sidebar on the left? It looks interesting. > > Peter > > On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm(a)gmail.com <mailto:estebanlm@gmail.com>> wrote: > thanks, I fix it. > please keep informing me the problems as they arise, is hard to test all the system to be sure :) > > Esteban > > > >> On 30 Apr 2015, at 15:17, phil(a)highoctane.be <mailto:phil@highoctane.be> wrote: >> >> Little glitch: refreshIcon method missing and leading to issues. >> >> Put this in: >> >> refreshIcon >> ^ icons >> at: #'refreshIcon' >> ifAbsentPut:[ Form fromBinaryStream: (Base64MimeConverter mimeDecodeToBytes: self refreshIconContents readStream) ]. >> >> Works now. >> >> There may be other icons like that. >> >> Phil >> >> On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 1:29 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm(a)gmail.com <mailto:estebanlm@gmail.com>> wrote: >> oops. >> sorry, is fixed nowâ¦ can you re-try it? >> >> Esteban >> >>> On 30 Apr 2015, at 12:37, phil(a)highoctane.be <mailto:phil@highoctane.be> wrote: >>> >>> The Gofer stanza works. >>> >>> But >>> >>> Then DNU IdeaUIThermeIcons>>icons >>> >>> glamorousRight >>> ^ self icons >>> at: #'glamorousRight' >>> ifAbsentPut:[ Form fromBinaryStream: (Base64MimeConverter mimeDecodeToBytes: self glamorousRightIconContents readStream) ]. >>> >>> ?? >>> >>> Pharo3.0 >>> Latest update: #30864 >>> >>> Phil >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 12:20 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm(a)gmail.com <mailto:estebanlm@gmail.com>> wrote: >>> sorry, answered to fastâ¦ it was: >>> >>> the same >>> you can execute same scriptâ¦ it is proved to work on Pharo 3 without problems (the other Esteban tested it :P) >>> >>> Esteban >>> >>> >>> > On 30 Apr 2015, at 12:19, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm(a)gmail.com <mailto:estebanlm@gmail.com>> wrote: >>> > >>> > the same >>> > >>> >> On 30 Apr 2015, at 12:18, phil(a)highoctane.be <mailto:phil@highoctane.be> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> Wowâ >>> >> >>> >> Nice. >>> >> >>> >> Any way to load that in a 3.0? >>> >> >>> >> Phil >>> > >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> > >

May 1, 2015

Re: [Pharo-dev] can or: be redefined?

by Thierry Goubier

Le 01/05/2015 11:50, Marcus Denker a Ã©crit : > >> On 01 May 2015, at 11:48, stepharo <stepharo(a)free.fr> wrote: >> >> >> >>> >>> To make the whole thing easier to understand we need to distinguish the two bugs. >>> >>> 1) or: is somehow special. No, it is not. We fixed that, but the fix was broken. >> See my other mail. >> I would add two different kind of rules to help people and slow the use of redefinition of special selectors. > > > I do not understand why. I side with Marcus there. Why? You now have a compiler which does not make those selectors special, and you want to keep them special? Thierry > > Marcus > >

May 1, 2015

Re: [Pharo-dev] can or: be redefined?

by Marcus Denker

> On 01 May 2015, at 11:49, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker(a)inria.fr> wrote: > > >> On 01 May 2015, at 11:46, stepharo <stepharo(a)free.fr> wrote: >> >> We should at least have a rules stating "pay attentino you use an optimised selector". Im not sure what should be form of the warning but we should make progress >> > > why? > >> I see two cases >> - the dev uses a non optimized version and the warning tell him that it would be better to use the optimised >> ifNil....of whatever case >> >> - when defining a method with such selector: >> warn them because we should avoid them. > > I somehow feel that I did not manage to explain the whole thing in a way that it was understandable. Can we discuss that on the whiteboard next week? Marcus

May 1, 2015

Re: [Pharo-dev] can or: be redefined?

by Marcus Denker

> On 01 May 2015, at 11:48, stepharo <stepharo(a)free.fr> wrote: > > > >> >> To make the whole thing easier to understand we need to distinguish the two bugs. >> >> 1) or: is somehow special. No, it is not. We fixed that, but the fix was broken. > See my other mail. > I would add two different kind of rules to help people and slow the use of redefinition of special selectors. I do not understand why. Marcus

May 1, 2015

Re: [Pharo-dev] can or: be redefined?

by Marcus Denker

> On 01 May 2015, at 11:46, stepharo <stepharo(a)free.fr> wrote: > > We should at least have a rules stating "pay attentino you use an optimised selector". Im not sure what should be form of the warning but we should make progress > why? > I see two cases > - the dev uses a non optimized version and the warning tell him that it would be better to use the optimised > ifNil....of whatever case > > - when defining a method with such selector: > warn them because we should avoid them. Why? Marcus

May 1, 2015

Re: [Pharo-dev] [ANN] Idea icon pack now in Configuration Browser

by Peter UhnÃ¡k

Phil, can I ask what is the sidebar on the left? It looks interesting. Peter On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm(a)gmail.com> wrote: > thanks, I fix it. > please keep informing me the problems as they arise, is hard to test all > the system to be sure :) > > Esteban > > > > On 30 Apr 2015, at 15:17, phil(a)highoctane.be wrote: > > Little glitch: refreshIcon method missing and leading to issues. > > Put this in: > > refreshIcon > ^ icons > at: #'refreshIcon' > ifAbsentPut:[ Form fromBinaryStream: (Base64MimeConverter > mimeDecodeToBytes: self refreshIconContents readStream) ]. > > Works now. > > There may be other icons like that. > > Phil > > On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 1:29 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm(a)gmail.com> > wrote: > >> oops. >> sorry, is fixed nowâ¦ can you re-try it? >> >> Esteban >> >> On 30 Apr 2015, at 12:37, phil(a)highoctane.be wrote: >> >> The Gofer stanza works. >> >> But >> >> Then DNU IdeaUIThermeIcons>>icons >> >> glamorousRight >> ^ self icons >> at: #'glamorousRight' >> ifAbsentPut:[ Form fromBinaryStream: (Base64MimeConverter >> mimeDecodeToBytes: self glamorousRightIconContents readStream) ]. >> >> ?? >> >> Pharo3.0 >> Latest update: #30864 >> >> Phil >> >> >> On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 12:20 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm(a)gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> sorry, answered to fastâ¦ it was: >>> >>> the same >>> you can execute same scriptâ¦ it is proved to work on Pharo 3 without >>> problems (the other Esteban tested it :P) >>> >>> Esteban >>> >>> >>> > On 30 Apr 2015, at 12:19, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm(a)gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> > >>> > the same >>> > >>> >> On 30 Apr 2015, at 12:18, phil(a)highoctane.be wrote: >>> >> >>> >> Wowâ >>> >> >>> >> Nice. >>> >> >>> >> Any way to load that in a 3.0? >>> >> >>> >> Phil >>> > >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> > > >

May 1, 2015

Re: [Pharo-dev] can or: be redefined?

by stepharo

> > To make the whole thing easier to understand we need to distinguish the two bugs. > > 1) or: is somehow special. No, it is not. We fixed that, but the fix was broken. See my other mail. I would add two different kind of rules to help people and slow the use of redefinition of special selectors. > > This is now fixed in 50026. > > 2) someone wrote or: [] where no block was supposed to be. > > The reason for that is lint rule RBIfTrueBlocksRule, which statically enforces blocks as parameters for > all of or: and: and ifTrue:â¦ we should: > > - remove the [] in that method > - remove the rule RBIfTrueBlocksRule as it makes no sense anymore, it is from a time when or: was special. > > DONE. > > Marcus > > > > > > > >

May 1, 2015

Re: [Pharo-dev] can or: be redefined?

by stepharo

We should at least have a rules stating "pay attentino you use an optimised selector". Im not sure what should be form of the warning but we should make progress I see two cases - the dev uses a non optimized version and the warning tell him that it would be better to use the optimised ifNil....of whatever case - when defining a method with such selector: warn them because we should avoid them. Stef Le 1/5/15 10:15, Marcus Denker a Ã©crit : >> On 01 May 2015, at 10:08, stepharo <stepharo(a)free.fr> wrote: >> >> Marcus we who >> uld add a rule for the or: [b] >> > Not possible as it is correct if the receiver is a boolean. > > Marcus > > >

May 1, 2015