April 2015 - Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-dev] Is Pharo Launcher Ready?

by Sean P. DeNigris

NorbertHartl wrote > Which ppa you are talking about Again, I didn't realize there were multiple packages. I thought the ppa /always/ installed the Launcher. Disregard. ----- Cheers, Sean -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Is-Pharo-Launcher-Ready-tp4819384p4819419.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

April 13, 2015

Re: [Pharo-dev] Is Pharo Launcher Ready?

by Dale Henrichs

By "download" ... I am referring to the zero conf downloads ... if zero conf downloads are not going to be impacted (again), then "never mind":) Dale On 4/13/15 1:28 PM, Dale Henrichs wrote: > > > On 4/13/15 10:01 AM, Sean P. DeNigris wrote: >> IIUC we are planning on making Pharo Launcher the default download. > Not sure whether this is the right thread or not... > > Keep in mind that the last time I tried to use the Pharo Launcher (a > couple of months ago) on ubunutu12.04 the Ubuntu packaged failed to be > found and I had to abandon my use of Pharo Launcher since Ubuntu12.04 > is still in common use ... my desktop at work, travis-ci (the big > problem for me) and elsewhere ... currently the downloads (outside of > those that depend upon the Ubuntu package) work just fine on > ubuntu12.04 (and of course Pharo runs just fine on ubuntu12.04), but > if the "default download" starts using the Pharo Launcher then those > of working on ubuntu12.04 will be forced to find alternate solutions > to downloading Pharo ... > > If "default download" is scoped to the be only the newer versions of > Pharo, like 4.0 or 5.0, then it would be fair to exclude Ubuntu12.04 > from the very convenient download scripts ... otherwise I'd like to > know right now so I can take defensive actions...like rewriting all of > my download scripts to use a safe mechanism based on ftp:) > > I'm going to have to touch those scripts anyway, because the vmLatest > url just stopped working one day last week, but I'd really not like to > have to rewrite my pharo download scripts every 2 months:), so if > there are plans to summarily drop download support for Ubuntu12.04 in > the near future, then I'd rather know about that before I touch my > scripts:) > > Dale

April 13, 2015

Re: [Pharo-dev] PharoV40.sources for 40606

by Nicolas Cellier

2015-04-13 17:38 GMT+02:00 Marcus Denker <marcus.denker(a)inria.fr>: > > On 13 Apr 2015, at 17:35, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker(a)inria.fr> wrote: > > > On 13 Apr 2015, at 16:52, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker(a)inria.fr> wrote: > > > On 13 Apr 2015, at 16:49, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker(a)inria.fr> wrote: > > > On 13 Apr 2015, at 16:35, Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven(a)stfx.eu> wrote: > > Yes, that is bad. > > Can you write a short mail or issue entry about what you did exactly, so > that others can try to debug this situation ? > > > I did > > PharoSourcesCondenser condenseNewSources > > and the after the class comment of LargePositiveInteger is empty, the > class comment of others are wrong. > (e.g. LargeNegativeInteger is > > "s > ^ separatorsâ > > > > The method sources seem to be ok: I can recompile everything with no > problem. > (that I tested already some weeks ago not to run into the famous âcondense > sources does not workâ issue > a day before the releaseâ¦ of course, it was not enough). > > > I think we fixed itâ¦ slice incoming. > > > https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/15336/Writing-a-new-souces-brakes-class-c… > > Marcus > > Very good idea to use brakes when changes are coming too fast ;)

April 13, 2015

Re: [Pharo-dev] Is Pharo Launcher Ready?

by Norbert Hartl

> Am 13.04.2015 um 19:58 schrieb Sean P. DeNigris <sean(a)clipperadams.com>: > > Marcus Denker-4 wrote >> Yes, but not for Pharo4. > > Then I think for now we should change the ppa to install an image+VM like > the rest. > Which ppa you are talking about. Please just don't touch the pharo-vm-core package :) Norbert

April 13, 2015

Re: [Pharo-dev] Is Pharo Launcher Ready?

by Dale Henrichs

On 4/13/15 10:01 AM, Sean P. DeNigris wrote: > IIUC we are planning on making Pharo Launcher the default download. Not sure whether this is the right thread or not... Keep in mind that the last time I tried to use the Pharo Launcher (a couple of months ago) on ubunutu12.04 the Ubuntu packaged failed to be found and I had to abandon my use of Pharo Launcher since Ubuntu12.04 is still in common use ... my desktop at work, travis-ci (the big problem for me) and elsewhere ... currently the downloads (outside of those that depend upon the Ubuntu package) work just fine on ubuntu12.04 (and of course Pharo runs just fine on ubuntu12.04), but if the "default download" starts using the Pharo Launcher then those of working on ubuntu12.04 will be forced to find alternate solutions to downloading Pharo ... If "default download" is scoped to the be only the newer versions of Pharo, like 4.0 or 5.0, then it would be fair to exclude Ubuntu12.04 from the very convenient download scripts ... otherwise I'd like to know right now so I can take defensive actions...like rewriting all of my download scripts to use a safe mechanism based on ftp:) I'm going to have to touch those scripts anyway, because the vmLatest url just stopped working one day last week, but I'd really not like to have to rewrite my pharo download scripts every 2 months:), so if there are plans to summarily drop download support for Ubuntu12.04 in the near future, then I'd rather know about that before I touch my scripts:) Dale

April 13, 2015

Re: [Pharo-dev] Inspect repo to gofer + question

by Andrei Chis

Hi, Cool :) Currently in glamour the label of the tab (titleAction:) and the action of the presentation (act:*) are the only way to add custom actions to a tab. When having actions that only should work with the selection of a presentation we usually add them only in the context menu of a presentation (using selectionAct:*) and not in the toolbar. You could then also add the load action to GoferResolvedReference objects (using the pragma gtInspectorAction) so it appears next to the browse action. Cheers, Andrei On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 9:33 PM, Torsten Bergmann <astares(a)gmx.de> wrote: > Hi Andrei, > > with "GT-InspectorExtensions-Core-TorstenBergmann.145" I added a simple > GT inspector extension to MCRepository. > > This way one can just inspect the repository string in a workspace > and use the tab "Gofer" to browse the contents or load a package > with an action icon (see screenshot). > > Is it (beside the label of the tab) possible to have a custom icon for > a tab? > > Thx > T. >

April 13, 2015

Inspect repo to gofer + question

by Torsten Bergmann

Hi Andrei, with "GT-InspectorExtensions-Core-TorstenBergmann.145" I added a simple GT inspector extension to MCRepository. This way one can just inspect the repository string in a workspace and use the tab "Gofer" to browse the contents or load a package with an action icon (see screenshot). Is it (beside the label of the tab) possible to have a custom icon for a tab? Thx T.

April 13, 2015

Re: [Pharo-dev] Is Pharo Launcher Ready?

by Torsten Bergmann

April 13, 2015

Re: [Pharo-dev] Is Pharo Launcher Ready?

by Sean P. DeNigris

Torsten Bergmann wrote > We should keep the PPA like it is with Launcher Never mind. I just realized that there seems to be a ppa for the vm and another for Launcher. ----- Cheers, Sean -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Is-Pharo-Launcher-Ready-tp4819384p4819396.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

April 13, 2015

Re: [Pharo-dev] Is Pharo Launcher Ready?

by Jigyasa Grover

In my opinion, though maintaining a uniformity would be great , but leaving the ppa to install launcher in Ubuntu would be just fine rather than VM + Image. Thanks Jigyasa On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 11:28 PM, Sean P. DeNigris <sean(a)clipperadams.com> wrote: > Marcus Denker-4 wrote > > Yes, but not for Pharo4. > > Then I think for now we should change the ppa to install an image+VM like > the rest. > > > > ----- > Cheers, > Sean > -- > View this message in context: > http://forum.world.st/Is-Pharo-Launcher-Ready-tp4819384p4819390.html > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at > Nabble.com. > >

April 13, 2015