February 2015 - Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

[pharo-project/pharo-core]

by GitHub

Branch: refs/tags/40498 Home: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-core

Feb. 23, 2015

[pharo-project/pharo-core] 6e105e: 40498

by GitHub

Branch: refs/heads/4.0 Home: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-core Commit: 6e105eaf2fe849f630afc1aae35355b855ad1399 https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-core/commit/6e105eaf2fe849f630afc1aa… Author: Jenkins Build Server <board(a)pharo-project.org> Date: 2015-02-23 (Mon, 23 Feb 2015) Changed paths: A ScriptLoader40.package/ScriptLoader.class/instance/pharo - scripts/script498.st A ScriptLoader40.package/ScriptLoader.class/instance/pharo - updates/update40498.st M ScriptLoader40.package/ScriptLoader.class/instance/public/commentForCurrentUpdate.st Log Message: ----------- 40498 14961 instantiation is misspelled in PharoSyntaxTutorial https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/14961 14947 Missing allChildrenMatching: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/14947 14971 MorphicTransform: Better Argument Names https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/14971 http://files.pharo.org/image/40/40498.zip

Feb. 23, 2015

Re: [Pharo-dev] CI Server still down...

by Sven Van Caekenberghe

> On 23 Feb 2015, at 15:52, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker(a)inria.fr> wrote: > >> >> On 23 Feb 2015, at 15:27, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker(a)inria.fr> wrote: >> >> >>> On 23 Feb 2015, at 15:17, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker(a)inria.fr> wrote: >>> >>> So I restarted the slaves, but now the Jenkins is down: >>> >>> https://ci.inria.fr/pharo/ >>> >>> I already restarted it once, it does not start up again. >>> >>> >> >> >> It seems to work now. >> > > and update 497 has been doneâ¦ this means: we are back in business! > > Marcus Thanks, Marcus !

Feb. 23, 2015

Re: [Pharo-dev] [pharo-project/pharo-core] 3fabea: 40497

by Sven Van Caekenberghe

Cool, we're back in business ;-) > On 23 Feb 2015, at 15:52, GitHub <noreply(a)github.com> wrote: > > Branch: refs/heads/4.0 > Home: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-core > Commit: 3fabea9dab3061c6749f77aef01dc44bad73167c > https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-core/commit/3fabea9dab3061c6749f77ae… > Author: Jenkins Build Server <board(a)pharo-project.org> > Date: 2015-02-23 (Mon, 23 Feb 2015) > > Changed paths: > A Kernel.package/Number.class/instance/converting/percent.st > A KernelTests.package/NumberTest.class/instance/tests/testPercent.st > A RPackage-SystemIntegration.package/extension/String/instance/asPackage.st > A RPackage-SystemIntegration.package/extension/String/instance/asPackageIfAbsent_.st > A RPackage-Tests.package/RPackageStringExtensionTest.class/README.md > A RPackage-Tests.package/RPackageStringExtensionTest.class/definition.st > A RPackage-Tests.package/RPackageStringExtensionTest.class/instance/tests/testAsPackage.st > A RPackage-Tests.package/RPackageStringExtensionTest.class/instance/tests/testAsPackageIfAbsent.st > A RPackage-Tests.package/RPackageStringExtensionTest.class/instance/tests/testAsPackageWithError.st > A ScriptLoader40.package/ScriptLoader.class/instance/pharo - scripts/script497.st > A ScriptLoader40.package/ScriptLoader.class/instance/pharo - updates/update40497.st > M ScriptLoader40.package/ScriptLoader.class/instance/public/commentForCurrentUpdate.st > M Spec-PolyWidgets.package/DateModel.class/instance/initialization/initializeWidgets.st > > Log Message: > ----------- > 40497 > 14949 String>>asPackage > https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/14949 > > 14957 Number>>#percent > https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/14957 > > 14958 DateModel>>#initializeWidgets error > https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/14958 > > http://files.pharo.org/image/40/40497.zip > >

Feb. 23, 2015

Re: [Pharo-dev] CI Server still down...

by Marcus Denker

> On 23 Feb 2015, at 15:27, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker(a)inria.fr> wrote: > > >> On 23 Feb 2015, at 15:17, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker(a)inria.fr <mailto:marcus.denker@inria.fr>> wrote: >> >> So I restarted the slaves, but now the Jenkins is down: >> >> https://ci.inria.fr/pharo/ <https://ci.inria.fr/pharo/> >> >> I already restarted it once, it does not start up again. >> >> > > > It seems to work now. > and update 497 has been doneâ¦ this means: we are back in business! Marcus

Feb. 23, 2015

Re: [Pharo-dev] Determine if a method is Jitted or not

by ClÃ©ment Bera

2015-02-23 15:08 GMT+01:00 Thierry Goubier <thierry.goubier(a)gmail.com>: > Hi Clement, > > 2015-02-23 14:46 GMT+01:00 ClÃ©ment Bera <bera.clement(a)gmail.com>: > >> >> Any method is jitted if when activated it's already in the global lookup >> cache and it's not already jitted (so mostly on second calls). >> > > Ok. > > >> >> The only limit is on the number of literals. A method with more than a >> certain number of literals (by default, 64) is not jitted. You can change >> this limit by starting the VM with a specific command line argument (I >> don't remember, something like --maxNumLiterals, you will find it when >> pressing --help I don't have access to a VM right now). Basically the limit >> is to 64 because the GC consume a lot of time in the machine code zone. >> Each literals require specific care because their addresses are directly in >> the generated code (Has the literal moved in memory, ...). >> > > 64 literals in a method... This means something like : > > aCompiledMethod numLiterals <= 64 > > Would reasonably tells me which methods will be jitted. > Yes. This is the code in VMMAker: ^(objectMemory literalCountOfMethodHeader: methodHeader) <= maxLiteralCountForCompile > > >> >> There's a few other things, such as a method with unknown bytecodes will >> not be jitted (so you can rely for example on the respondsToUnknownBytecode >> hook with interpreted methods), but I don't think it matters for you. >> > > And unknown bytecodes won't be generated by standard smalltalk code, > right? So it shouldn't matter to me. > No. But I wrote that just so you know if you start doing exotic things there are other constraints than just the number of literals. > > This is very helpful, thanks. > > Thierry >

Feb. 23, 2015

[pharo-project/pharo-core]

by GitHub

Branch: refs/tags/40497 Home: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-core

Feb. 23, 2015

[pharo-project/pharo-core] 3fabea: 40497

by GitHub

Branch: refs/heads/4.0 Home: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-core Commit: 3fabea9dab3061c6749f77aef01dc44bad73167c https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-core/commit/3fabea9dab3061c6749f77ae… Author: Jenkins Build Server <board(a)pharo-project.org> Date: 2015-02-23 (Mon, 23 Feb 2015) Changed paths: A Kernel.package/Number.class/instance/converting/percent.st A KernelTests.package/NumberTest.class/instance/tests/testPercent.st A RPackage-SystemIntegration.package/extension/String/instance/asPackage.st A RPackage-SystemIntegration.package/extension/String/instance/asPackageIfAbsent_.st A RPackage-Tests.package/RPackageStringExtensionTest.class/README.md A RPackage-Tests.package/RPackageStringExtensionTest.class/definition.st A RPackage-Tests.package/RPackageStringExtensionTest.class/instance/tests/testAsPackage.st A RPackage-Tests.package/RPackageStringExtensionTest.class/instance/tests/testAsPackageIfAbsent.st A RPackage-Tests.package/RPackageStringExtensionTest.class/instance/tests/testAsPackageWithError.st A ScriptLoader40.package/ScriptLoader.class/instance/pharo - scripts/script497.st A ScriptLoader40.package/ScriptLoader.class/instance/pharo - updates/update40497.st M ScriptLoader40.package/ScriptLoader.class/instance/public/commentForCurrentUpdate.st M Spec-PolyWidgets.package/DateModel.class/instance/initialization/initializeWidgets.st Log Message: ----------- 40497 14949 String>>asPackage https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/14949 14957 Number>>#percent https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/14957 14958 DateModel>>#initializeWidgets error https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/14958 http://files.pharo.org/image/40/40497.zip

Feb. 23, 2015

Re: [Pharo-dev] CI Server still down...

by Marcus Denker

> On 23 Feb 2015, at 15:17, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker(a)inria.fr> wrote: > > So I restarted the slaves, but now the Jenkins is down: > > https://ci.inria.fr/pharo/ <https://ci.inria.fr/pharo/> > > I already restarted it once, it does not start up again. > > It seems to work now. > I try againâ¦. > >> On 23 Feb 2015, at 14:49, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker(a)inria.fr <mailto:marcus.denker@inria.fr>> wrote: >> >> Ci is up againâ¦ we now need to restart the slaves. >> >>> On 20 Feb 2015, at 11:03, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker(a)inria.fr <mailto:marcus.denker@inria.fr>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> CI Servers are still down. >>> >>> Until they are up we can not do any integration nor run the automatic check >>> on submitted things. >>> >>> Marcus >> >

Feb. 23, 2015

Re: [Pharo-dev] CI Server still down...

by Marcus Denker

> On 23 Feb 2015, at 15:13, Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven(a)stfx.eu> wrote: > > The build queues are massive ... 600+ on contrib > Maybe they need to be reset ? > Yes, that would be good. I wonder if there is a way to do that without clicking 600 times? >> On 23 Feb 2015, at 14:49, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker(a)inria.fr> wrote: >> >> Ci is up againâ¦ we now need to restart the slaves. >> >>> On 20 Feb 2015, at 11:03, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker(a)inria.fr> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> CI Servers are still down. >>> >>> Until they are up we can not do any integration nor run the automatic check >>> on submitted things. >>> >>> Marcus >> >> > >

Feb. 23, 2015