January 2015 - Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-dev] Essay Topics

by Tudor Girba

Hi Richard, A note about the IDE: we put together a team that is working on building the future Pharo IDE. Our goal is not to reproduce existing IDE but created a new and integrated experience that plays to the strengths of Pharo. This is a rather ambitious project that will likely last a couple of years. You can see our current page here: http://gt.moosetechnology.org Regarding the philosophy, you can get some input by watching the "Designing for Developer Experience" talk: part 1 - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LKVPJU3W5Ys part 2 - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q9_JDpFq6qI part 3 - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s9IBGEOPLmY We think this is worth advertising. Please let me know if it is of interest to you. Cheers, Doru On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 2:23 PM, horrido <horrido.hobbies(a)gmail.com> wrote: > I haven't heard from anyone else, which concerns me a little. > > I remind everyone that this campaign is about you. Without your > participation, it cannot succeed. > > Just drop me a line and tell me which topic you're writing on. You may, if > you wish, create a new topic, as well. My list of topics was chosen based > on > the concerns I heard from other developers. Thanks. > > > horrido wrote > > Our first essay (in response to Topic #2)! > > > http://smalltalkrenaissance.wordpress.com/2015/01/06/smalltalk-in-business-… > > < > http://smalltalkrenaissance.wordpress.com/2015/01/06/smalltalk-in-business-… > > > > > > Please step up. We need more. > > > > Thanks. > > horrido wrote > >> As promised, here is my first list of essay topics. I would like to ask > >> you to submit an essay on one of these topics. Multiple submissions are > >> welcome; if they're good, they will all get published at Smalltalk > >> Renaissance. > >> > >> I will edit the articles for grammar and style. You should look good > >> after I'm done. > >> > >> There's no deadline, but obviously the sooner you can write them, the > >> better. SRP is a fast-moving campaign. > >> > >> If you have other suggestions for essay topics, please let me know. > >> > >> Without further ado, here are the topics... > >> > >> > >> Topic #1: > >> > >> How do modern IDEs, such as Eclipse and IntelliJ and Visual Studio, > >> compare with the tried-and-true Smalltalk development environment? > >> > >> ----- > >> Topic #2: > >> > >> It is the contention of some critics, including > >> Robert Martin <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YX3iRjKj7C0> > >> , that Smalltalk did not (does not?) address the needs of the > enterprise. > >> Present a counter-argument. > >> > >> Explain how Smalltalk can assist the enterprise in team development, in > >> large-scale development, and in integrating with existing (typically > >> Windows-based) infrastructures. > >> > >> Pay particular attention to the question of RDBMS usage, which is often > >> critical in the enterprise. > >> > >> ----- > >> Topic #3: > >> > >> Some critics complain that Smalltalk does not play well with existing > >> file-based tooling. > / > >> Duh! > / > >> Smalltalk is a "new" approach to IDEs and software engineering. We > >> should be advancing this paradigm with new tooling, rather than falling > >> back on the old again and again. Otherwise, things will never change for > >> the better. > >> > >> Make a case for why we should embrace this change now, rather than > >> waiting (for what?). > >> > >> Also, this > >> webpage <http://thoughtstorms.info/view/smalltalkunix/view/smalltalk> > >> poses an interesting argument against Smalltalk. Perhaps someone can > >> tackle it. > >> > >> ----- > >> Topic #4: > >> > >> In the age of multi-core processors and concurrency programming, how is > >> Smalltalk addressing the concerns of developers? > >> > >> ----- > >> Topic #5: > >> > >> How should we address the issue of compatibility (ie, fragmentation) > >> among various implementations of Smalltalk? Does this issue hamper the > >> creation of an ecosystem of libraries and shared code? > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://forum.world.st/Essay-Topics-tp4797847p4798569.html > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at > Nabble.com. > > -- www.tudorgirba.com "Every thing has its own flow"

Jan. 9, 2015

Re: [Pharo-dev] Cormas now open-source

by Tudor Girba

Interesting. Who developed it originally? Doru On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 4:02 PM, Serge Stinckwich <serge.stinckwich(a)gmail.com > wrote: > Dear all, > > the CORMAS modelling platform is now open-source and available under > the MIT licence. > CORMAS (Common-pool Resources and Multiagent Systems; Bousquet et al., > 1998) has been > developed to provide a multi-agent framework that can be used to > simulate the interactions > between a group of agents and a shared environment holding natural > resources. > > The code is written in VisualWorks 7.6 and a port to the Pharo/MOOSE > has started recently. > > If you are interested, you can join the mailing-list here: > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/cormas-dev > > All issues are here: https://github.com/cormas/cormas/issues > > An early dev version on Pharo can be loaded in the last MOOSE 5.0 image: > > Gofer new > url: 'http://smalltalkhub.com/mc/SergeStinckwich/CORMAS/main'; > package: 'ConfigurationOfCormas'; > load. > > (Smalltalk at: #ConfigurationOfCormas) loadDevelopment > > Regards, > -- > Serge Stinckwich > UCBN & UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC) > Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk > http://www.doesnotunderstand.org/ > > -- www.tudorgirba.com "Every thing has its own flow"

Jan. 9, 2015

Cormas now open-source

by Serge Stinckwich

Dear all, the CORMAS modelling platform is now open-source and available under the MIT licence. CORMAS (Common-pool Resources and Multiagent Systems; Bousquet et al., 1998) has been developed to provide a multi-agent framework that can be used to simulate the interactions between a group of agents and a shared environment holding natural resources. The code is written in VisualWorks 7.6 and a port to the Pharo/MOOSE has started recently. If you are interested, you can join the mailing-list here: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/cormas-dev All issues are here: https://github.com/cormas/cormas/issues An early dev version on Pharo can be loaded in the last MOOSE 5.0 image: Gofer new url: 'http://smalltalkhub.com/mc/SergeStinckwich/CORMAS/main'; package: 'ConfigurationOfCormas'; load. (Smalltalk at: #ConfigurationOfCormas) loadDevelopment Regards, -- Serge Stinckwich UCBN & UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC) Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk http://www.doesnotunderstand.org/

Jan. 9, 2015

Re: [Pharo-dev] Essay Topics

by horrido

Yes, but I'm trying to make SRP a focussed campaign. That means presenting a simple "here's a developer question â here's the answer" theme. SRP should not be a catch-all for Smalltalk resources, because there are already plenty of sites that do this. SRP should not be repetitive. Instead, SRP aims to present a clear, unambiguous message. The message is guided. The problem with sites such as Planet Smalltalk and world.st is that you have to *search* for the answers to questions. I don't have enough time to do that (neither do people who come here out of curiosity or interest). Your assistance would be appreciated. If there is an answer already published elsewhere, let me know and I'll try to work it in. But please, let's stay on topic. The worst thing we could do is to make Smalltalk Renaissance look confusing. By comparison, look at how Apple market their products. Their message is always clean, yet informative. Sven Van Caekenberghe-2 wrote > Richard, > > Many people in the Pharo community have written lots of stuff over the > years, at different level (introduction/tutorial to advanced/technical), > maybe you should try to point to those documents first. Extra indexing is > always good, it is PR after all. > > http://planet.smalltalk.org is another place to start looking for things. > > http://world.st is another PR initiative. > > HTH, > > Sven > >> On 09 Jan 2015, at 14:23, horrido < > horrido.hobbies@ > > wrote: >> >> I haven't heard from anyone else, which concerns me a little. >> >> I remind everyone that this campaign is about you. Without your >> participation, it cannot succeed. >> >> Just drop me a line and tell me which topic you're writing on. You may, >> if >> you wish, create a new topic, as well. My list of topics was chosen based >> on >> the concerns I heard from other developers. Thanks. >> >> >> horrido wrote >>> Our first essay (in response to Topic #2)! >>> http://smalltalkrenaissance.wordpress.com/2015/01/06/smalltalk-in-business-… >>> <http://smalltalkrenaissance.wordpress.com/2015/01/06/smalltalk-in-business-italian-style/> >>> >>> Please step up. We need more. >>> >>> Thanks. >>> horrido wrote >>>> As promised, here is my first list of essay topics. I would like to ask >>>> you to submit an essay on one of these topics. Multiple submissions are >>>> welcome; if they're good, they will all get published at Smalltalk >>>> Renaissance. >>>> >>>> I will edit the articles for grammar and style. You should look good >>>> after I'm done. >>>> >>>> There's no deadline, but obviously the sooner you can write them, the >>>> better. SRP is a fast-moving campaign. >>>> >>>> If you have other suggestions for essay topics, please let me know. >>>> >>>> Without further ado, here are the topics... >>>> >>>> >>>> Topic #1: >>>> >>>> How do modern IDEs, such as Eclipse and IntelliJ and Visual Studio, >>>> compare with the tried-and-true Smalltalk development environment? >>>> >>>> ----- >>>> Topic #2: >>>> >>>> It is the contention of some critics, including >>>> Robert Martin <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YX3iRjKj7C0> >>>> , that Smalltalk did not (does not?) address the needs of the >>>> enterprise. >>>> Present a counter-argument. >>>> >>>> Explain how Smalltalk can assist the enterprise in team development, in >>>> large-scale development, and in integrating with existing (typically >>>> Windows-based) infrastructures. >>>> >>>> Pay particular attention to the question of RDBMS usage, which is often >>>> critical in the enterprise. >>>> >>>> ----- >>>> Topic #3: >>>> >>>> Some critics complain that Smalltalk does not play well with existing >>>> file-based tooling. >> / >>>> Duh! >> / >>>> Smalltalk is a "new" approach to IDEs and software engineering. We >>>> should be advancing this paradigm with new tooling, rather than falling >>>> back on the old again and again. Otherwise, things will never change >>>> for >>>> the better. >>>> >>>> Make a case for why we should embrace this change now, rather than >>>> waiting (for what?). >>>> >>>> Also, this >>>> webpage >>>> <http://thoughtstorms.info/view/smalltalkunix/view/smalltalk> >>>> poses an interesting argument against Smalltalk. Perhaps someone can >>>> tackle it. >>>> >>>> ----- >>>> Topic #4: >>>> >>>> In the age of multi-core processors and concurrency programming, how is >>>> Smalltalk addressing the concerns of developers? >>>> >>>> ----- >>>> Topic #5: >>>> >>>> How should we address the issue of compatibility (ie, fragmentation) >>>> among various implementations of Smalltalk? Does this issue hamper the >>>> creation of an ecosystem of libraries and shared code? >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://forum.world.st/Essay-Topics-tp4797847p4798569.html >> Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at >> Nabble.com. -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Essay-Topics-tp4797847p4798579.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Jan. 9, 2015

Re: [Pharo-dev] Essay Topics

by Frank Shearar

On 9 January 2015 at 13:23, horrido <horrido.hobbies(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>> Topic #2: >>> >>> It is the contention of some critics, including >>> Robert Martin <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YX3iRjKj7C0> >>> , that Smalltalk did not (does not?) address the needs of the enterprise. >>> Present a counter-argument. Uncle Bob just doesn't know his history. Smalltalk suffered because it was _only_ in the enterprise (because, as someone on HN points out, no one else could afford the $10k/seat licence costs). I'm pretty sure James Robertson wrote about that, soon after Uncle Bob's facepalm-worthy talk. frank

Jan. 9, 2015

Re: [Pharo-dev] Essay Topics

by Sven Van Caekenberghe

Richard, Many people in the Pharo community have written lots of stuff over the years, at different level (introduction/tutorial to advanced/technical), maybe you should try to point to those documents first. Extra indexing is always good, it is PR after all. http://planet.smalltalk.org is another place to start looking for things. http://world.st is another PR initiative. HTH, Sven > On 09 Jan 2015, at 14:23, horrido <horrido.hobbies(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > I haven't heard from anyone else, which concerns me a little. > > I remind everyone that this campaign is about you. Without your > participation, it cannot succeed. > > Just drop me a line and tell me which topic you're writing on. You may, if > you wish, create a new topic, as well. My list of topics was chosen based on > the concerns I heard from other developers. Thanks. > > > horrido wrote >> Our first essay (in response to Topic #2)! >> http://smalltalkrenaissance.wordpress.com/2015/01/06/smalltalk-in-business-… >> <http://smalltalkrenaissance.wordpress.com/2015/01/06/smalltalk-in-business-…> >> >> Please step up. We need more. >> >> Thanks. >> horrido wrote >>> As promised, here is my first list of essay topics. I would like to ask >>> you to submit an essay on one of these topics. Multiple submissions are >>> welcome; if they're good, they will all get published at Smalltalk >>> Renaissance. >>> >>> I will edit the articles for grammar and style. You should look good >>> after I'm done. >>> >>> There's no deadline, but obviously the sooner you can write them, the >>> better. SRP is a fast-moving campaign. >>> >>> If you have other suggestions for essay topics, please let me know. >>> >>> Without further ado, here are the topics... >>> >>> >>> Topic #1: >>> >>> How do modern IDEs, such as Eclipse and IntelliJ and Visual Studio, >>> compare with the tried-and-true Smalltalk development environment? >>> >>> ----- >>> Topic #2: >>> >>> It is the contention of some critics, including >>> Robert Martin <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YX3iRjKj7C0> >>> , that Smalltalk did not (does not?) address the needs of the enterprise. >>> Present a counter-argument. >>> >>> Explain how Smalltalk can assist the enterprise in team development, in >>> large-scale development, and in integrating with existing (typically >>> Windows-based) infrastructures. >>> >>> Pay particular attention to the question of RDBMS usage, which is often >>> critical in the enterprise. >>> >>> ----- >>> Topic #3: >>> >>> Some critics complain that Smalltalk does not play well with existing >>> file-based tooling. > / >>> Duh! > / >>> Smalltalk is a "new" approach to IDEs and software engineering. We >>> should be advancing this paradigm with new tooling, rather than falling >>> back on the old again and again. Otherwise, things will never change for >>> the better. >>> >>> Make a case for why we should embrace this change now, rather than >>> waiting (for what?). >>> >>> Also, this >>> webpage <http://thoughtstorms.info/view/smalltalkunix/view/smalltalk> >>> poses an interesting argument against Smalltalk. Perhaps someone can >>> tackle it. >>> >>> ----- >>> Topic #4: >>> >>> In the age of multi-core processors and concurrency programming, how is >>> Smalltalk addressing the concerns of developers? >>> >>> ----- >>> Topic #5: >>> >>> How should we address the issue of compatibility (ie, fragmentation) >>> among various implementations of Smalltalk? Does this issue hamper the >>> creation of an ecosystem of libraries and shared code? > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Essay-Topics-tp4797847p4798569.html > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Jan. 9, 2015

Re: [Pharo-dev] The Smalltalk Revolution

by horrido

Okay, I think we're in agreement here. We should simply /show/ the world what we have to offer. Show them our frameworks and solutions. But in order to show them, they have to find us. That's what my article has done; that's what Reddit has done. You are absolutely correct, opportunities have opened up; they will find us. sebastian(a)flowingconcept.com wrote > It is true that Reddit and HN are the frontier but "battling" is a > terrible metaphor to embrace. > > You don't battle naysayers. Nobody has the money and emotional labor to do > it. You don't battle them because if you do and you win, you will be "full > of reason", less productive, with potentially transforming a naysayer in a > hater and no real gain (no wealth creation in the process). > > The alternative is to indirectly prove them wrong by simply showing that > Smalltalk is more than adequate to implement > <insert naysayer objection here> > Of course for that to happen you have to have a case, done with hard work > on those frameworks and solutions, otherwise the shoot goes to your foot > (and they will remember you as a bullshitter) > > This articles and discussions there are great to create opportunities for > those who do cool stuff and have cases to show them up. > > That can create wealth. > > So, for those who do, that's the wrong time to remain silent and discrete > and the right time to display what can be done. > > Act. > > If you can show cool stuff, act, case by case, it will elevates the whole > niche and position you as a reference on that > > from mobile > >> On 09/01/2015, at 03:08, horrido < > horrido.hobbies@ > > wrote: >> >> Well, I must say, my article really touched off a firestorm of >> controversy. >> The Reddit thread is *very* active! Hacker News is also fairly lively. >> This >> is where all of you do battle with the naysayers and critics. >> >> From my standpoint, my article did its job. It served as a lightning rod >> to >> draw in developers from all over the world, from every other programming >> language. *Now that we have their attention*, our job is to try our best >> to >> persuade them. >> >> If we can "sell" Smalltalk to enough people, we gain mindshare. Companies >> may hear about Smalltalk and possibly include it in their internal IT >> discussions. Smalltalk may even get back on the TIOBE language index! >> >> We must keep the public discourse alive. I encourage you to blog about >> it, >> write articles about it, comment on social media sites, etc. Because once >> things settle down, they will /forget/ about Smalltalk...again. >> >> >> horrido wrote >>> Yes, I posted to both Reddit and Hacker News simultaneously. Looks like >>> it >>> has a slower uptake at Hacker News: >>> https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8856503 >>> <https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8856503> >>> >>> Is it possible that I've finally succeeded in igniting a revolution? I >>> feel like Che Guevara. >> >>> >>> > sebastian@ > wrote >>>> It was posted already on Hacker News or Reddit? >>>> >>>> If not, it sounds like is the right time to do that >>>> >>>> >>>>> On Jan 8, 2015, at 5:03 PM, horrido < >> >>>> horrido.hobbies@ >> >>>> > wrote: >>>>> >>>>> WHOA! My article is *ON FIRE!* Seven hours into publication and it has >>>>> achieved a staggering 2.7K views, 1.1K reads, and 9 recommendations. >>>>> It's >>>>> catching up to my best article ever, " The Case for Go Web Frameworks >>>>> <https://medium.com/@richardeng/the-case-for-go-web-frameworks-a791fcd79d47 >>>>> <https://medium.com/@richardeng/the-case-for-go-web-frameworks-a791fcd79d47>> >>>>> ", which had 3.9K views and 2.4K reads. >>>>> >>>>> Who would've thought that Smalltalk would be such a hot topic?! I am >>>>> truly >>>>> flabbergasted. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> horrido wrote >>>>>> In >>>>> * >>>>>> the 3 hours >>>>> * >>>>>> since this article was published at Medium, it has garnered >>>>> * >>>>>> 178 views >>>>> * >>>>>> and >>>>> * >>>>>> 96 reads >>>>> * >>>>>> , and counting! This makes it easily the most "hot" article I've ever >>>>>> written. It is currently at the top of >>>>>> Medium's front page <https://medium.com/> >>>>>> which is reserved for "hot" or "trending" articles. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks to everyone! >>>>>> horrido wrote >>>>>>> https://medium.com/@richardeng/the-smalltalk-revolution-ee245c281f51 >>>>>>> <https://medium.com/@richardeng/the-smalltalk-revolution-ee245c281f51> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I welcome your comments. It's not too late to edit the piece. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> View this message in context: >>>>> http://forum.world.st/The-Smalltalk-Revolution-tp4798320p4798436.html >>>>> <http://forum.world.st/The-Smalltalk-Revolution-tp4798320p4798436.html> >>>>> Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at >>>>> Nabble.com <http://nabble.com/>. >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://forum.world.st/The-Smalltalk-Revolution-tp4798320p4798499.html >> Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at >> Nabble.com. >> -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/The-Smalltalk-Revolution-tp4798320p4798570.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Jan. 9, 2015

Re: [Pharo-dev] Essay Topics

by horrido

I haven't heard from anyone else, which concerns me a little. I remind everyone that this campaign is about you. Without your participation, it cannot succeed. Just drop me a line and tell me which topic you're writing on. You may, if you wish, create a new topic, as well. My list of topics was chosen based on the concerns I heard from other developers. Thanks. horrido wrote > Our first essay (in response to Topic #2)! > http://smalltalkrenaissance.wordpress.com/2015/01/06/smalltalk-in-business-… > <http://smalltalkrenaissance.wordpress.com/2015/01/06/smalltalk-in-business-…> > > Please step up. We need more. > > Thanks. > horrido wrote >> As promised, here is my first list of essay topics. I would like to ask >> you to submit an essay on one of these topics. Multiple submissions are >> welcome; if they're good, they will all get published at Smalltalk >> Renaissance. >> >> I will edit the articles for grammar and style. You should look good >> after I'm done. >> >> There's no deadline, but obviously the sooner you can write them, the >> better. SRP is a fast-moving campaign. >> >> If you have other suggestions for essay topics, please let me know. >> >> Without further ado, here are the topics... >> >> >> Topic #1: >> >> How do modern IDEs, such as Eclipse and IntelliJ and Visual Studio, >> compare with the tried-and-true Smalltalk development environment? >> >> ----- >> Topic #2: >> >> It is the contention of some critics, including >> Robert Martin <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YX3iRjKj7C0> >> , that Smalltalk did not (does not?) address the needs of the enterprise. >> Present a counter-argument. >> >> Explain how Smalltalk can assist the enterprise in team development, in >> large-scale development, and in integrating with existing (typically >> Windows-based) infrastructures. >> >> Pay particular attention to the question of RDBMS usage, which is often >> critical in the enterprise. >> >> ----- >> Topic #3: >> >> Some critics complain that Smalltalk does not play well with existing >> file-based tooling. / >> Duh! / >> Smalltalk is a "new" approach to IDEs and software engineering. We >> should be advancing this paradigm with new tooling, rather than falling >> back on the old again and again. Otherwise, things will never change for >> the better. >> >> Make a case for why we should embrace this change now, rather than >> waiting (for what?). >> >> Also, this >> webpage <http://thoughtstorms.info/view/smalltalkunix/view/smalltalk> >> poses an interesting argument against Smalltalk. Perhaps someone can >> tackle it. >> >> ----- >> Topic #4: >> >> In the age of multi-core processors and concurrency programming, how is >> Smalltalk addressing the concerns of developers? >> >> ----- >> Topic #5: >> >> How should we address the issue of compatibility (ie, fragmentation) >> among various implementations of Smalltalk? Does this issue hamper the >> creation of an ecosystem of libraries and shared code? -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Essay-Topics-tp4797847p4798569.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Jan. 9, 2015

Re: [Pharo-dev] The Smalltalk Revolution

by horrido

24 hours into publication, my article has achieved a phenomenal 10K views, 4K reads, and 11 recommendations, making it one of the most popular articles of its kind at Medium (geek-oriented, programming-oriented). We must use the momentum we've built up to our advantage. Over the next little while, I expect a lot of visitors to our nexus of social media sites (WordPress, Twitter, Facebook, Google+, LinkedIn). *We only get one chance to show our stuff, to explain why they should give Smalltalk a try.* Moreover, if we can keep up this new level of awareness, I guarantee you that /eventually/ the IT press will notice Smalltalk (and Smalltalk Renaissance) and write us up. *This is exactly what we want!!!* Let's harness the power of our passion and conviction to raise public consciousness and make 2015 the Year of Smalltalk! horrido wrote > WHOA! My article is * > ON FIRE! * > Seven hours into publication and it has achieved a staggering 2.7K views, > 1.1K reads, and 9 recommendations. It's catching up to my best article > ever, " > The Case for Go Web Frameworks > <https://medium.com/@richardeng/the-case-for-go-web-frameworks-a791fcd79d47> > ", which had 3.9K views and 2.4K reads. > > Who would've thought that Smalltalk would be such a hot topic?! I am truly > flabbergasted. > horrido wrote >> In * >> the 3 hours * >> since this article was published at Medium, it has garnered * >> 178 views * >> and * >> 96 reads * >> , and counting! This makes it easily the most "hot" article I've ever >> written. It is currently at the top of >> Medium's front page <https://medium.com/> >> which is reserved for "hot" or "trending" articles. >> >> Thanks to everyone! >> horrido wrote >>> https://medium.com/@richardeng/the-smalltalk-revolution-ee245c281f51 >>> <https://medium.com/@richardeng/the-smalltalk-revolution-ee245c281f51> >>> >>> I welcome your comments. It's not too late to edit the piece. >>> >>> Thanks. -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/The-Smalltalk-Revolution-tp4798320p4798566.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Jan. 9, 2015

Re: [Pharo-dev] The Smalltalk Revolution

by Atlas

I am curious. Which frameworks can we expect to see? -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/The-Smalltalk-Revolution-tp4798320p4798561.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Jan. 9, 2015