January 2015 - Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-dev] Fwd: libSDL2 and OSWindow

by Esteban Lorenzano

Ah, yesâ¦ I still didn't commit the changes needed. replace this method: SDL2 class>>findSDL2 "In Linux, try to use the linked version." OSSDL2Driver hasPlugin. "Look for SDL2 using different names." #( 0 "Static" SDL2 'libSDL2-2.0.0.dylib' "Mac" 'libSDL2-2.0.so.0' "Linux 1" 'libSDL2-2.0.so.0.2.1' "Linux 2" 'SDL2.dll' "Windows" ) do: [ :eachName | [ (self checkLibraryName: eachName) ifTrue: [ ^ eachName ] ] ifError: [nil] ]. self error: 'Failed to find SDL2 library.â Esteban > On 26 Jan 2015, at 10:03, Nicolai Hess <nicolaihess(a)web.de> wrote: > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Nicolai Hess <nicolaihess(a)web.de <mailto:nicolaihess@web.de>> > Date: 2015-01-26 10:03 GMT+01:00 > Subject: Re: [Pharo-dev] libSDL2 and OSWindow > To: Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm(a)gmail.com <mailto:estebanlm@gmail.com>> > > > 2015-01-26 9:39 GMT+01:00 Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm(a)gmail.com <mailto:estebanlm@gmail.com>>: > Using which version of the vm? > > the "latest". I load a fresh vm and image yesterday with : get.pharo.org/40+vmLatest <http://get.pharo.org/40+vmLatest>. on windows 7 (32Bit) and Ubuntu 14.04 (64 Bit). > > > > With latest it should be working. At least, it worked for me before I left for vacations. > > Esteban > > > On 25 Jan 2015, at 22:52, Nicolai Hess <nicolaihess(a)web.de <mailto:nicolaihess@web.de>> wrote: > > > > What is the current state of the SDL2 / OSWindow integration? > > There are some *open* bugtracker entries, although SDL and OSWindow *are* in the > > latest vm+image. > > > > On Ubuntu 14.04 64Bit > > OSWindow new does not work, it complains it can not find libSDL2, but it is there > > > > On Windows 7 > > OSWindow new opens a window that is mainly off the screen, only the bottom right corner > > is visible. > > > > > > > > nicolai > > > > >

Jan. 26, 2015

Re: [Pharo-dev] athens font rendering and subpixel antialiasing

by Henrik Johansen

> On 25 Jan 2015, at 9:38 , Nicolai Hess <nicolaihess(a)web.de> wrote: > > It looks like this gray-scale vs. colored subpixel antialiasing is an issue on windows. > I did the same test on linux (Ubuntu 14.04) (screenshot attached). > But still, the font rendering with the freetype plugin (morphic way) looks better than > the athens one. > > any ideas/help? > > > <world_menu_athens.png><world_menu_morphic.png> Looks like 2 major differences to me; - No kerning (custom distance between character pairs, not defined solely by glyph size, o - r pair is pretty obvious) Not familiar with the athens path, in FreeTypeFonts this is handled image-side. - Pixel fitting. (The aliasing going on at the top of characters) Put Hinting: None in FreeType advanced features, and you will probably see something similar to the Athens rendering. Cheers, Henry

Jan. 26, 2015

Re: [Pharo-dev] GTInspector does not refresh printString

by Andrei Chis

On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 7:23 AM, HernÃ¡n Morales Durand < hernan.morales(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Is this fixed? I couldn't find an entry case in fogbugz. > Here is the issue: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/14569/GTInspector-should-do-live-updates-… It's not fixed yet. Cheers, Andrei > > I remember the UpdatingStringMorph used a #stepTime: method, which I > suppose you could borrow to implement the timer. It would be cool to have a > configurable step time for refreshing contents. > > Cheers, > > HernÃ¡n > > > 2015-01-13 9:26 GMT-03:00 stepharo <stepharo(a)free.fr>: > > >> >>> I was doing a lecture and this is really sad to get all features gone. >>> >> >> I think this is not so fair :). >> >> >> indeed but reopening an inspector is a pain. >> >> >> >>> So I had to reinspect again. >>> >> >> Yes. As Andrei said, it is a bug that will be fixed. >> >> >>> In addition GTInspector bubble is a pain because sometimes you really >>> want to keep the result and not inpect it. >>> >> Did you see my request to get that enter put the bubble contents into >>> the text pane? >>> >> >> Did you see the reply? :) >> >> >> No where it is? >> >> >> >>> I'm sorry but I cannot use GT as it is now. >>> >> >> That's a pity. >> >> >> but this is a reality. >> >> >> >> And I'm working on the new version of Pharo by example and it would be >>> good to >>> have something full working. >>> >> >> Besides these two problems, do you have others? >> >> >> I got confused with the inspector of arrays because we have to click on >> an extra pane to see them if I recall. >> It was so painfull with all the other problems that I stop to use GT to >> avoid a huge frustration and get my job done. >> >> >> >> Cheers, >> Doru >> >> >> >> >>> Stef >>> >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Andrei >>> >>> On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 12:14 PM, stepharo <stepharo(a)free.fr> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi >>>> >>>> GTInspector does not change the printString representation when we >>>> change the printOn:. >>>> Am I the only one to see this behavior? >>>> >>>> Stef >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> www.tudorgirba.com >> >> "Every thing has its own flow" >> >> >> >

Jan. 26, 2015

Re: [Pharo-dev] Any way to avoid the filmification effect in GTInspector?

by Tudor Girba

Hi, On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 10:18 AM, HernÃ¡n Morales Durand < hernan.morales(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > 2015-01-26 5:54 GMT-03:00 Tudor Girba <tudor(a)tudorgirba.com>: > >> There is no way at the moment. >> >> Just out of curiosity, why do you need to select an item if you do not >> want to see the details? >> >> > This is for two reasons > > 1) I have items with big strings inside and it takes too long to load in > the new inspector sub-window. > Why should it take too long? Is it because printString is too expensive? In that case, perhaps you might want to make printString cheaper and offer a separate presentation for your object that shows the full contents. > 2) I select the item to send a message to it, or bring a pop-up menu to > remove the item (I have implemented it in the old inspector and I would > like to port it to Pharo 4) > This implies that you actually need a custom presentation. For such a custom presentation you can suppress the propagation of selection. If you tell me your use case in more details I can try to guide you. Cheers, Doru > > HernÃ¡n > > >> Doru >> >> On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 7:30 AM, HernÃ¡n Morales Durand < >> hernan.morales(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> For example >>> >>> Process allInstances inspect. >>> >>> I am using #40460, and I want to select an item in a list and continue >>> to see the list. >>> >>> I have tried to set the "Number of inspector panes" to 1, but that only >>> shift the selected object sub-window. >>> >>> HernÃ¡n >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> www.tudorgirba.com >> >> "Every thing has its own flow" >> > > -- www.tudorgirba.com "Every thing has its own flow"

Jan. 26, 2015

Re: [Pharo-dev] Issue 12970 - 16 steps to get through #halt - PROPOSED FIX

by Nicolai Hess

2015-01-25 0:22 GMT+01:00 Sean P. DeNigris <sean(a)clipperadams.com>: > Ben Coman wrote > > Anyone see a problem with removing > > that last condition? > > Off the top of my head... Yes that doesn't seem like a good idea. You don't > want to find yourself inside Halt. You want to be in your code. But isn't it already like that in case of #haltOnce ? > Although the > change makes this weird exceptional-sounding case better, it looks like a > hack that will make halts more annoying in general. The question is why you > end up deeply buried in the internals of Halt and how to prevent that in > this odd case. > > > > ----- > Cheers, > Sean > -- > View this message in context: > http://forum.world.st/Issue-12970-16-steps-to-get-through-halt-PROPOSED-FIX… > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at > Nabble.com. > >

Jan. 26, 2015

Re: [Pharo-dev] Any way to avoid the filmification effect in GTInspector?

by HernÃ¡n Morales Durand

2015-01-26 5:54 GMT-03:00 Tudor Girba <tudor(a)tudorgirba.com>: > There is no way at the moment. > > Just out of curiosity, why do you need to select an item if you do not > want to see the details? > > This is for two reasons 1) I have items with big strings inside and it takes too long to load in the new inspector sub-window. 2) I select the item to send a message to it, or bring a pop-up menu to remove the item (I have implemented it in the old inspector and I would like to port it to Pharo 4) HernÃ¡n > Doru > > On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 7:30 AM, HernÃ¡n Morales Durand < > hernan.morales(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> For example >> >> Process allInstances inspect. >> >> I am using #40460, and I want to select an item in a list and continue to >> see the list. >> >> I have tried to set the "Number of inspector panes" to 1, but that only >> shift the selected object sub-window. >> >> HernÃ¡n >> >> > > > -- > www.tudorgirba.com > > "Every thing has its own flow" >

Jan. 26, 2015

Fwd: libSDL2 and OSWindow

by Nicolai Hess

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Nicolai Hess <nicolaihess(a)web.de> Date: 2015-01-26 10:03 GMT+01:00 Subject: Re: [Pharo-dev] libSDL2 and OSWindow To: Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm(a)gmail.com> 2015-01-26 9:39 GMT+01:00 Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm(a)gmail.com>: > Using which version of the vm? > the "latest". I load a fresh vm and image yesterday with : get.pharo.org/40+vmLatest. on windows 7 (32Bit) and Ubuntu 14.04 (64 Bit). > With latest it should be working. At least, it worked for me before I left > for vacations. > > Esteban > > > On 25 Jan 2015, at 22:52, Nicolai Hess <nicolaihess(a)web.de> wrote: > > > > What is the current state of the SDL2 / OSWindow integration? > > There are some *open* bugtracker entries, although SDL and OSWindow > *are* in the > > latest vm+image. > > > > On Ubuntu 14.04 64Bit > > OSWindow new does not work, it complains it can not find libSDL2, but it > is there > > > > On Windows 7 > > OSWindow new opens a window that is mainly off the screen, only the > bottom right corner > > is visible. > > > > > > > > nicolai > > > >

Jan. 26, 2015

Re: [Pharo-dev] Any way to avoid the filmification effect in GTInspector?

by Tudor Girba

There is no way at the moment. Just out of curiosity, why do you need to select an item if you do not want to see the details? Doru On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 7:30 AM, HernÃ¡n Morales Durand < hernan.morales(a)gmail.com> wrote: > For example > > Process allInstances inspect. > > I am using #40460, and I want to select an item in a list and continue to > see the list. > > I have tried to set the "Number of inspector panes" to 1, but that only > shift the selected object sub-window. > > HernÃ¡n > > -- www.tudorgirba.com "Every thing has its own flow"

Jan. 26, 2015

Re: [Pharo-dev] libSDL2 and OSWindow

by Esteban Lorenzano

Using which version of the vm? With latest it should be working. At least, it worked for me before I left for vacations. Esteban > On 25 Jan 2015, at 22:52, Nicolai Hess <nicolaihess(a)web.de> wrote: > > What is the current state of the SDL2 / OSWindow integration? > There are some *open* bugtracker entries, although SDL and OSWindow *are* in the > latest vm+image. > > On Ubuntu 14.04 64Bit > OSWindow new does not work, it complains it can not find libSDL2, but it is there > > On Windows 7 > OSWindow new opens a window that is mainly off the screen, only the bottom right corner > is visible. > > > > nicolai >

Jan. 26, 2015

Re: [Pharo-dev] Anonymous classes should be browseable

by HernÃ¡n Morales Durand

2015-01-26 5:04 GMT-03:00 Nicolai Hess <nicolaihess(a)web.de>: > 2015-01-26 7:44 GMT+01:00 HernÃ¡n Morales Durand <hernan.morales(a)gmail.com> > : > >> I want to discuss case 14789 ( >> https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/14789/Nautilus-assumes-a-class-always-und…) >> because a class should be browseable even without a definition. Anonymous >> classes are still classes. >> >> If Nautilus project cannot deal with the whole Smalltalk power then it is >> poorly designed and I wonder what's the advantage over the old >> OmniBrowser... >> >> HernÃ¡n >> >> > > Can you show what the old OmniBrowser is displaying for > Behavior new new browse > > See attach (Image is Pharo 1.2.2 #12353). The Behavior definition is not updated but one can browse the behaviors opening first the Instances Browser and then finding the class. Code is here: http://www.smalltalkhub.com/#!/~hernan/LightweightClasses > I can not check this in Pharo, as I could not find a way to load > OmniBrowser in that image. > I doubt it could be ported back without significan effort :( > nicolai > >

Jan. 26, 2015