August 2014 - Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

About Smalltalkhub

by Nicolas Petton

Hi guys, I'm just back from 2 weeks offline, and I just saw that SmalltalkHub has some issues. I just restarted everything as packets were dropped, and I'll have a deeper look tomorrow to see why it's behaving that strangely. Cheers, Nico

Aug. 6, 2014

Re: [Pharo-dev] [GTInspector] Showing object state using a tree

by Pablo R. Digonzelli

Thanks Ing. Pablo Digonzelli Software Solutions IP-Solutiones SRL Metrotec SRL 25 de Mayo 521 Email: pdigonzelli(a)softsargentina.com pdigonzelli(a)gmail.com Cel: 5493815982714 ----- Mensaje original ----- De: "Tudor Girba" <tudor(a)tudorgirba.com> Para: "Pharo Development List" <pharo-dev(a)lists.pharo.org> Enviados: MiÃ©rcoles, 6 de Agosto 2014 2:09:32 Asunto: Re: [Pharo-dev] [GTInspector] Showing object state using a tree You can install GToolkit in a Pharo 3.0 image like this: http://www.humane-assessment.com/blog/installing-gtoolkit Doru On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 5:30 AM, Pablo R. Digonzelli < pdigonzelli(a)gmail.com > wrote: Great!. How can i install GtInspector in a pharo image? TIA Ing. Pablo Digonzelli Software Solutions IP-Solutiones SRL Metrotec SRL 25 de Mayo 521 Email: pdigonzelli(a)softsargentina.com pdigonzelli(a)gmail.com Cel: 5493815982714 De: "Tudor Girba" < tudor(a)tudorgirba.com > Para: "Discusses Development of Pharo" < pharo-dev(a)lists.pharo.org > Enviados: Martes, 5 de Agosto 2014 11:06:21 Asunto: [Pharo-dev] [GTInspector] Showing object state using a tree Hi, The GTInspector now shows the state of an object in a tree view (screenshots below). This tree view focuses on the internal structure of an object. For example, when looking at a dictionary object you will see the "array" and the "tally" attributes and not the key value pairs. Those can be accessed from another presentation of a dictionary object. So the tree is meant to be used together with the finder and the other presentations of on object. Let us know what you think. Cheers, Andrei & Doru -- www.tudorgirba.com "Every thing has its own flow" -- www.tudorgirba.com "Every thing has its own flow"

Aug. 6, 2014

Re: [Pharo-dev] Anybody using Yosemite?

by Max Leske

Pharo worked fine for me while I was using Yosemite. Didnât see any odd behavior (although there were some problems with my shell environment. Not sure where they came from). Max On 06.08.2014, at 14:05, Yuriy Tymchuk <yuriy.tymchuk(a)me.com> wrote: > Yes, OS X is not Pharo :) > > On 06 Aug 2014, at 14:01, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> there shouldnât be a problem, at least for what I know at the moment. >> Iâm tempted to do the upgrade tooâ¦ but I will prefer until they release. Apple has an impressive record of âI should better wait to first updateâ momentsâ¦ :P >> >> Esteban >> >> On 06 Aug 2014, at 13:58, Yuriy Tymchuk <yuriy.tymchuk(a)me.com> wrote: >> >>> Considering right now. And so I want to know if I can work with Pharo on it >>> >>> Uko. >>> >>> On 06 Aug 2014, at 13:56, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> not yet >>>> do you? >>>> >>>> Esteban >>>> >>>> On 06 Aug 2014, at 13:46, Yuriy Tymchuk <yuriy.tymchuk(a)me.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> just want to ask the other Pharo developers are you using Yosemite beta, and do you have any problems with it? >>>>> >>>>> Uko >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> > >

Aug. 6, 2014

review issue 13767 packagetree changes visible selection even if okToChange is false

by Nicolai Hess

please, can someone test and review issue 13767. Integrating this change is helpful for the next nautilus refactoring steps. nicolai

Aug. 6, 2014

Re: [Pharo-dev] Anybody using Yosemite?

by Yuriy Tymchuk

Yes, OS X is not Pharo :) On 06 Aug 2014, at 14:01, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm(a)gmail.com> wrote: > there shouldnât be a problem, at least for what I know at the moment. > Iâm tempted to do the upgrade tooâ¦ but I will prefer until they release. Apple has an impressive record of âI should better wait to first updateâ momentsâ¦ :P > > Esteban > > On 06 Aug 2014, at 13:58, Yuriy Tymchuk <yuriy.tymchuk(a)me.com> wrote: > >> Considering right now. And so I want to know if I can work with Pharo on it >> >> Uko. >> >> On 06 Aug 2014, at 13:56, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> not yet >>> do you? >>> >>> Esteban >>> >>> On 06 Aug 2014, at 13:46, Yuriy Tymchuk <yuriy.tymchuk(a)me.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> just want to ask the other Pharo developers are you using Yosemite beta, and do you have any problems with it? >>>> >>>> Uko >>> >>> >> >> > >

Aug. 6, 2014

Re: [Pharo-dev] Anybody using Yosemite?

by Esteban Lorenzano

there shouldnât be a problem, at least for what I know at the moment. Iâm tempted to do the upgrade tooâ¦ but I will prefer until they release. Apple has an impressive record of âI should better wait to first updateâ momentsâ¦ :P Esteban On 06 Aug 2014, at 13:58, Yuriy Tymchuk <yuriy.tymchuk(a)me.com> wrote: > Considering right now. And so I want to know if I can work with Pharo on it > > Uko. > > On 06 Aug 2014, at 13:56, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> not yet >> do you? >> >> Esteban >> >> On 06 Aug 2014, at 13:46, Yuriy Tymchuk <yuriy.tymchuk(a)me.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> just want to ask the other Pharo developers are you using Yosemite beta, and do you have any problems with it? >>> >>> Uko >> >> > >

Aug. 6, 2014

Re: [Pharo-dev] Anybody using Yosemite?

by Yuriy Tymchuk

Considering right now. And so I want to know if I can work with Pharo on it Uko. On 06 Aug 2014, at 13:56, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm(a)gmail.com> wrote: > not yet > do you? > > Esteban > > On 06 Aug 2014, at 13:46, Yuriy Tymchuk <yuriy.tymchuk(a)me.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> just want to ask the other Pharo developers are you using Yosemite beta, and do you have any problems with it? >> >> Uko > >

Aug. 6, 2014

Re: [Pharo-dev] Anybody using Yosemite?

by Esteban Lorenzano

not yet do you? Esteban On 06 Aug 2014, at 13:46, Yuriy Tymchuk <yuriy.tymchuk(a)me.com> wrote: > Hi, > > just want to ask the other Pharo developers are you using Yosemite beta, and do you have any problems with it? > > Uko

Aug. 6, 2014

Anybody using Yosemite?

by Yuriy Tymchuk

Hi, just want to ask the other Pharo developers are you using Yosemite beta, and do you have any problems with it? Uko

Aug. 6, 2014

Re: [Pharo-dev] Does anybody have an idea why when I open a transcript and recompile a method I get

by Camille Teruel

On 6 aoÃ»t 2014, at 12:53, ClÃ©ment Bera <bera.clement(a)gmail.com> wrote: > What is interesting is to be able to reimplement #ifTrue:ifFalse: and co in any object in the system and to use it. > > Now in practice it is difficult performance wise. And why performance would be a problem? If ever it is used intensively and performance *become* a problem we can cache the deoptimized methods somewhere. > As an experiment we overrided mustBeBooleanIn: so #ifTrue:ifFalse: and co would work on any object. However this hack is slow and interesting only for experiments IMO. > I asked in the bug report to add a setting... But no one answered and it was integrated. Marcus said we'll add a setting later. So add a setting! I'm still confused about what the problem is here... Because even if it's enabled by default it cannot break anything. > > 2014-08-06 8:31 GMT+02:00 stepharo <stepharo(a)free.fr>: > Ok thanks. > I do not see why this is interesting to have that. > > https://pharo.fogbugz.com/default.asp?13779 > > > > On 5/8/14 21:24, ClÃ©ment Bera wrote: >> Because someone activated the method "mustBeBooleanMagicIn:" by default whereas it was just a hack to experiment. >> >> Basically you have an optimized message sent to a non boolean. For over a week now, in this case the code is executed as a DoIt with a non optimized message instead of raising the mustBeBoolean error. >> >> >> 2014-08-05 18:40 GMT+02:00 stepharo <stepharo(a)free.fr>: >> Hi guys >> >> Does anybody have an idea why when I open a transcript and recompile a method I get >> >> >> UndefinedObject>>ExecuteUnOptimizedIn: (model is Undeclared) >> >> UndefinedObject>>ExecuteUnOptimizedIn: (model is Undeclared) >> >> UndefinedObject>>ExecuteUnOptimizedIn: (scroller is Undeclared) >> >> Stef >> >> > >

Aug. 6, 2014