June 2014 - Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-dev] Inspecting an OrderPreservingDictionary > entries show as nil and self prints entries

by Sven Van Caekenberghe

I now see that OrderPreservingDictionary is in its own package, Collections-OrderPreservingDictionary The method should be added there in a normal protocol. Maybe in the form of ^ Smalltalk at: #EyeDictionaryInspector On 24 Jun 2014, at 22:22, Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven(a)stfx.eu> wrote: > Like all the #inspectorClass methods, *Spec-inspector, it was just an oversight. > > On 24 Jun 2014, at 21:52, stepharo <stepharo(a)free.fr> wrote: > >> Where which package? >> Because we should track it and publish a new package. >> >> >> Stef >> On 24/6/14 17:54, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote: >>> We need to add >>> >>> OrderPreservingDictionary class>>#inspectorClass >>> ^ EyeDictionaryInspector >>> >>> On 24 Jun 2014, at 17:49, phil(a)highoctane.be wrote: >>> >>>> Kind of weird. >>>> >>>> Anyone knowing how to deal with that? Bug? >>>> >>>> Phil >>> >>> >> >> >

June 25, 2014

Re: [Pharo-dev] Cloudfork HMAC-SHA256 in System-Hashing

by Norbert Hartl

Wouldn't it be wonderful if we could install packages from a ticket in the image? Something like - get 3.0 image - fix from issue 12345 and issue 45678 and... - install own own packages - deploy It would be so well documented :) Norbert Am 25.06.2014 um 08:47 schrieb Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven(a)stfx.eu>: > I only did it in 3.0 > The file out is attached to the slice - it is 100% standalone > > On 25 Jun 2014, at 00:45, Norbert Hartl <norbert(a)hartl.name> wrote: > >> thank you, Sven. Did you try this in 3.0, too. I would need it there! >> >> Norbert >> >>> Am 25.06.2014 um 00:11 schrieb Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven(a)stfx.eu>: >>> >>> https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/13395/Add-SHA256-HashFunction >>> >>> cleaned up, documented, properly packaged. >>> >>> Passes some test vectors. >>> >>> I changed the handling of the empty stream. >>> >>>> On 24 Jun 2014, at 23:03, Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven(a)stfx.eu> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi Jan, >>>> >>>> I loaded just the class CFSHA256 and it worked perfectly (I didn't expect anything else). >>>> >>>> I tried some examples from Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sha256#Examples_of_SHA-2_variants) >>>> >>>> (CFSHA256 hashMessage: 'The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog') hex. 'd7a8fbb307d7809469ca9abcb0082e4f8d5651e46d3cdb762d02d0bf37c9e592' >>>> >>>> (CFSHA256 hashMessage: 'The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog.') hex. 'ef537f25c895bfa782526529a9b63d97aa631564d5d789c2b765448c8635fb6c' >>>> >>>> So I will rename the class to SHA256, moving it to System-Hashing and add SHA256Tests for starters. >>>> >>>> Sven >>>> >>>>> On 20 Jun 2014, at 17:01, Jan van de Sandt <jvdsandt(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hello, >>>>> >>>>> I added the SHA256 class to Cloudfork a few years ago. The class was mostly copied from the Cryptography [1] project. >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> Jan. >>>>> >>>>> [1] http://www.squeaksource.com/Cryptography/ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 10:56 AM, FranÃ§ois Stephany <tulipe.moutarde(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> Max, >>>>> >>>>> Yes, it's usable as the SHA1 package already there (without HMAC so). I'm no expert in those stuff but I don't get "SHA256 base implementation". Someone with more knowledge can probably tell ;) >>>>> >>>>> Sven, >>>>> >>>>> The bare minimum to load it is: >>>>> >>>>> Gofer it >>>>> smalltalkhubUser: 'JanVanDeSandt' project: 'Cloudfork'; >>>>> package: 'Cloudfork-Common'; >>>>> package: 'Cloudfork-Pharo-Platform'; >>>>> load. >>>>> >>>>> The implementation is in Cloudfork-Pharo-Platform. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 6:20 PM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven(a)stfx.eu> wrote: >>>>> I want to have a look, if you tell me where to look... >>>>> >>>>>> On 19 Jun 2014, at 18:03, Max Leske <maxleske(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 19.06.2014, at 17:59, FranÃ§ois Stephany <tulipe.moutarde(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Does it make sense from a license point of view and practical point of view to include the CloudFork HMAC-SHA256 implementation (CFSH256 class) in the System-Hashing package (in where there's already SHA1 and MD5) ? >>>>>> >>>>>> Can Cloudfork HMAC-SHA256 be easily parameterized with, say, an SHA256 base implementation? Or does it require extra stuff? In the former case I probably wouldnât add it. In the latter case itâs open for discussion. Personally, I think it belongs into a separate package, not into System-Hashing. >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>> Max >>> >>> >> > >

June 25, 2014

Re: [Pharo-dev] ctrl+a is seen as ctrl+home windows

by Tudor Girba

I confirm that it fixes the symptom. I just cannot understand how it does so. Any idea? Doru On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 9:22 AM, Nicolai Hess <nicolaihess(a)web.de> wrote: > 2014-06-25 8:58 GMT+02:00 Guillermo Polito <guillermopolito(a)gmail.com>: > > There is a problem in the whole keyboard events: they treat keys as >> characters and vice versa. And that's not always true: >> - the backspace key is a key, but currently the image interprets it as a >> character because we only use keypress events in general. >> - the shift key is a key, and since current image does not use keyup nor >> keydown, we cannot know if JUST a shift is pressed normally. >> >> >> On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 8:53 AM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven(a)stfx.eu> >> wrote: >> >>> I don't know anything about event handling, but I once had a look at >>> Character constants, and found this: >>> >>> Character class>>#home >>> ^ self value: 1 >>> >>> How about that ?? This is wrong IMHO, ASCII / Unicode value 1 is SOH >>> (Start of header), sometimes typed as CTRL-A. And there are other strange >>> constants like that there. >>> >>> On 25 Jun 2014, at 08:42, Tudor Girba <tudor(a)tudorgirba.com> wrote: >>> >>> > Hi, >>> > >>> > I am on Windows, using Pharo 3.0, and I am trying to get the >>> keybindings to work in Rubric using Windows convention (so, Ctrl instead of >>> Cmd as a modifier), >>> > >>> > It worked reasonably well, but the problem is that somehow Ctrl+a is >>> mapped to Ctrl+Home. The problem is not specific to Rubric as I can detect >>> the same behavior in the regular PluggableTextMorph. >>> > >>> > Does anyone have an idea of where the problem comes from? >>> > >>> > Doru >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > -- >>> > www.tudorgirba.com >>> > >>> > "Every thing has its own flow" >>> >>> >>> >> > > ctrl+a has the same strange behavior as ctrl+d > ctrl+a -> ctrl+home > ctrl+d -> ctrl+end > > look at KeyboardEvent>>#hasSpecialCTRLKeyValue > I am not exactly sure why it is handled that way. > Replace the method with > > hasSpecialCTRLKeyValue > ^ self controlKeyPressed and: [ keyValue <= 26 ] > > now, ctr+a and ctr+d working as expected. > But I don't know about the side-effects. > > > nicolai > > -- www.tudorgirba.com "Every thing has its own flow"

June 25, 2014

[pharo-project/pharo-core]

by GitHub

Branch: refs/tags/40041 Home: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-core

June 25, 2014

[pharo-project/pharo-core] 936ca7: 40041

by GitHub

Branch: refs/heads/4.0 Home: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-core Commit: 936ca7be7ef7fac04aa931e72d8e0efec31f411d https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-core/commit/936ca7be7ef7fac04aa931e7… Author: Jenkins Build Server <board(a)pharo-project.org> Date: 2014-06-25 (Wed, 25 Jun 2014) Changed paths: A ScriptLoader40.package/ScriptLoader.class/instance/pharo - scripts/script41.st A ScriptLoader40.package/ScriptLoader.class/instance/pharo - updates/update40041.st M ScriptLoader40.package/ScriptLoader.class/instance/public/commentForCurrentUpdate.st A System-Hashing.package/SHA256.class/README.md A System-Hashing.package/SHA256.class/class/accessing/blockSize.st A System-Hashing.package/SHA256.class/class/accessing/hashSize.st A System-Hashing.package/SHA256.class/class/constants/h0.st A System-Hashing.package/SHA256.class/class/constants/h1.st A System-Hashing.package/SHA256.class/class/constants/h2.st A System-Hashing.package/SHA256.class/class/constants/h3.st A System-Hashing.package/SHA256.class/class/constants/h4.st A System-Hashing.package/SHA256.class/class/constants/h5.st A System-Hashing.package/SHA256.class/class/constants/h6.st A System-Hashing.package/SHA256.class/class/constants/h7.st A System-Hashing.package/SHA256.class/class/constants/roundConstants.st A System-Hashing.package/SHA256.class/definition.st A System-Hashing.package/SHA256.class/instance/accessing/finalHash.st A System-Hashing.package/SHA256.class/instance/accessing/hashStream_.st A System-Hashing.package/SHA256.class/instance/private/expandedBlock_.st A System-Hashing.package/SHA256.class/instance/private/initializeTotals.st A System-Hashing.package/SHA256.class/instance/private/initializeTotalsArray.st A System-Hashing.package/SHA256.class/instance/private/processBuffer_.st A System-Hashing.package/SHA256.class/instance/private/processFinalBuffer_bitLength_.st A System-Hashing.package/SHA256.class/instance/private/storeLength_in_.st A Tests.package/SHA256Tests.class/README.md A Tests.package/SHA256Tests.class/definition.st A Tests.package/SHA256Tests.class/instance/testing/testFips180Example1.st A Tests.package/SHA256Tests.class/instance/testing/testFips180Example2.st A Tests.package/SHA256Tests.class/instance/testing/testFips180Example3.st A Tests.package/SHA256Tests.class/instance/testing/testWikipediaExample1.st A Tests.package/SHA256Tests.class/instance/testing/testWikipediaExample2.st A Tests.package/SHA256Tests.class/instance/testing/testWikipediaExampleEmpty.st Log Message: ----------- 40041 13395 Add SHA256 HashFunction https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/13395 13379 ReleaseTests #testObsoleteClasses failing: AnObsoleteSourceWebBrowser https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/13379 http://files.pharo.org/image/40/40041.zip

June 25, 2014

Re: [Pharo-dev] Spec Button Shortcut Indication

by Benjamin

> The difference is the C that is underlined. Is this intentional ? Itâs intentional that the C is underlined. > > Is there a way to have a shortcut, but not the underlining ? This is not planned, but itâs doable :) If you dig in ButtonModel, you should find if easily (or maybe in MorphicButtonAdapter) Ben

June 25, 2014

Re: [Pharo-dev] Inspecting an OrderPreservingDictionary > entries show as nil and self prints entries

by Norbert Hartl

Am 25.06.2014 um 09:54 schrieb Marcus Denker <marcus.denker(a)inria.fr>: > > On 25 Jun 2014, at 09:49, Norbert Hartl <norbert(a)hartl.name> wrote: > >> >> Am 25.06.2014 um 09:01 schrieb Marcus Denker <marcus.denker(a)inria.fr>: >> >>> >>> On 24 Jun 2014, at 21:52, stepharo <stepharo(a)free.fr> wrote: >>> >>>> Where which package? >>>> Because we should track it and publish a new package. >>>> >>>> >>> We should think about have an OrderedDictionary in the base systemâ¦ >>> >> SmallDictionary is an ordered dictionary. >> > But it gets quite slow for large dictionariesâ¦ (it searches linearly always). > Sure. I just wanted to say if someone has an urgent need like I had a few weeks ago when I needed it to fix the mongo driver. Norbert

June 25, 2014

Re: [Pharo-dev] Inspecting an OrderPreservingDictionary > entries show as nil and self prints entries

by Henrik Johansen

On 25 Jun 2014, at 9:26 , phil(a)highoctane.be wrote: > On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 9:01 AM, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker(a)inria.fr> wrote: > > On 24 Jun 2014, at 21:52, stepharo <stepharo(a)free.fr> wrote: > > > Where which package? > > Because we should track it and publish a new package. > > > > > We should think about have an OrderedDictionary in the base systemâ¦ > > It is very useful indeed. Question: what are the consequences of using OrderedDictionary vs Dictionary? I read the class comment but would welcome some additional info. > > Phil Depends on the implementation, but in general the consequences are worse performance (and potentially memory use) for large (10+ entries? Havenât benched) Collections. If itâs done the naive way, as an OrderedCollection of Association with an expanded access protocol, O(n) rather than O(1) access is the big one. If done with pairing Dictionary/OrderedCollection internally to provide O(1) access, additional memory/insertion/removal overhead. Cheers, Henry

June 25, 2014

Re: [Pharo-dev] Inspecting an OrderPreservingDictionary > entries show as nil and self prints entries

by Marcus Denker

On 25 Jun 2014, at 09:49, Norbert Hartl <norbert(a)hartl.name> wrote: > > Am 25.06.2014 um 09:01 schrieb Marcus Denker <marcus.denker(a)inria.fr>: > >> >> On 24 Jun 2014, at 21:52, stepharo <stepharo(a)free.fr> wrote: >> >>> Where which package? >>> Because we should track it and publish a new package. >>> >>> >> We should think about have an OrderedDictionary in the base systemâ¦ >> > SmallDictionary is an ordered dictionary. > But it gets quite slow for large dictionariesâ¦ (it searches linearly always). Marcus

June 25, 2014

[pharo-project/pharo-core]

by GitHub

Branch: refs/tags/40040 Home: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-core

June 25, 2014