June 2014 - Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-dev] issue validation for pharo40

by Esteban Lorenzano

yesterday I fixed a problem in the monkey (it was going to look for slices to old inbox) but looks not enoughâ¦ tomorrow I will take a closer look. Esteban On 08 Jun 2014, at 05:23, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker(a)inria.fr> wrote: > > On 07 Jun 2014, at 22:18, Nicolai Hess <nicolaihess(a)web.de> wrote: > >> I guess you all already know, that the issuevalidator doesn't work for >> slices from pharo40 inbox. Is there anything we can do? >> > > Yes, It is on my TODO for next weekâ¦ (just came back from holidays). > > Marcus > >

June 8, 2014

Re: [Pharo-dev] Pipe operator

by Nicolas Cellier

2014-06-08 12:12 GMT+02:00 Norbert Hartl <norbert(a)hartl.name>: > What is that extension? > > Norbert > > I'm curious too :) I recently proposed to enable caret as a binary selector, maybe there's been a confusion... I remember a discussion about using ;; as pipe "operator" (it's more syntax sugar than operator), in august 2007 or so. But it was not me. http://bugs.squeak.org/view.php?id=6649 > Am 08.06.2014 um 09:27 schrieb stepharo <stepharo(a)free.fr>: > > if you are talking about the extension made by nicolas cellier: probably. > > Stef > > On 8/6/14 00:10, S. Garth Holland wrote: > > Will Pharo ever get the pipe opeator? > > http://www.reddit.com/r/smalltalk/comments/27k27b/chaining_messages/ > > /Garth > > > >

June 8, 2014

Re: [Pharo-dev] Pipe operator

by Norbert Hartl

What is that extension? Norbert > Am 08.06.2014 um 09:27 schrieb stepharo <stepharo(a)free.fr>: > > if you are talking about the extension made by nicolas cellier: probably. > > Stef > >> On 8/6/14 00:10, S. Garth Holland wrote: >> Will Pharo ever get the pipe opeator? >> >> http://www.reddit.com/r/smalltalk/comments/27k27b/chaining_messages/ >> >> /Garth >

June 8, 2014

Re: [Pharo-dev] Pipe operator

by Norbert Hartl

I think you need to be more specific. The word pipe is misleading and not mentioned in the reddit post. The solution in that post is not an operator but a pattern you can implement easily yourself. To be more monadic like it wouldn't be this like in the example item safeChain recipient; address; street. Here you need to make sure all messages are chained (using the ; in smalltalk is actually chaining) on the proxy. If the proxy does not return the requested value but again a proxy with that value it would come closer. But not sure what you meant. Norbert > Am 08.06.2014 um 00:10 schrieb "S. Garth Holland" <steve9571952(a)hotmail.com>: > > Will Pharo ever get the pipe opeator? > > http://www.reddit.com/r/smalltalk/comments/27k27b/chaining_messages/ > > /Garth > >

June 8, 2014

Re: [Pharo-dev] some random git docs

by kilon alios

git also has excellent documentation http://git-scm.com/doc On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 12:37 PM, Ben Coman <btc(a)openinworld.com> wrote: > > I am using git for the first time (for documentation) and was trying to > understand the options for merging and conflict handling, and found some > stuff I thought might be generally useful to others - in particular what > "rebasing" was and when it might be appropriate - which I didn't have a > clue before. So here they are... > > http://blog.wuwon.id.au/2010/09/painless-merge-conflict-resolution-in.html > > http://softwareswirl.blogspot.com.au/2009/04/truce-in-merge- > vs-rebase-war.html > > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/457927/git-workflow- > and-rebase-vs-merge-questions > > http://differential.io/blog/best-way-to-merge-a-github-pull-request > > cheers -ben > > > >

June 8, 2014

some random git docs

by Ben Coman

I am using git for the first time (for documentation) and was trying to understand the options for merging and conflict handling, and found some stuff I thought might be generally useful to others - in particular what "rebasing" was and when it might be appropriate - which I didn't have a clue before. So here they are... http://blog.wuwon.id.au/2010/09/painless-merge-conflict-resolution-in.html http://softwareswirl.blogspot.com.au/2009/04/truce-in-merge-vs-rebase-war.h… http://stackoverflow.com/questions/457927/git-workflow-and-rebase-vs-merge-… http://differential.io/blog/best-way-to-merge-a-github-pull-request cheers -ben

June 8, 2014

Re: [Pharo-dev] issue validation for pharo40

by Marcus Denker

On 07 Jun 2014, at 22:18, Nicolai Hess <nicolaihess(a)web.de> wrote: > I guess you all already know, that the issuevalidator doesn't work for > slices from pharo40 inbox. Is there anything we can do? > Yes, It is on my TODO for next weekâ¦ (just came back from holidays). Marcus

June 8, 2014

Re: [Pharo-dev] Pipe operator

by stepharo

if you are talking about the extension made by nicolas cellier: probably. Stef On 8/6/14 00:10, S. Garth Holland wrote: > Will Pharo ever get the pipe opeator? > > http://www.reddit.com/r/smalltalk/comments/27k27b/chaining_messages/ > > /Garth > >

June 8, 2014

Re: [Pharo-dev] issue validation for pharo40

by stepharo

> I guess you all already know, that the issuevalidator doesn't work for > slices from pharo40 inbox. Is there anything we can do? I do not know where the code is. Probably reading the configuration of the jenkins slave for 30 is the way to go and updating it to 40. Stef

June 8, 2014

Re: [Pharo-dev] Pipe operator

by Ben Coman

June 8, 2014