May 2014 - Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-dev] Improving Pharo By Example

by kilon alios

ok here is my latest commit log "finished the Preface chapter, looks ok , but I may make corrections later on. I removed a dead link and also removed tooltip icon from original PBE cause it display it in seperate space from the text so it does not work as it should. Please note also that I found a bug with todo annotation @@ it keeps outputing to html though it should not. Another thing to note as I have informed people in irc is that paragraphs do not intend as they should(space in front of them) in html output. I have also add additional info for the Pharo community like irc, and stackoverflow. I have replaced the reference to squeak source with smalltalkhub and I did some other minor corrections here and there that should be evident by the commit log." so Preface chapter is finished, moving on to next chapter. Will keep an eye on this one to make sure it has no errors inside. On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Damien Cassou <damien.cassou(a)gmail.com>wrote: > On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 10:49 PM, kilon alios <kilon.alios(a)gmail.com> > wrote: > > just for your information emacs pillar mode gives me errors on make && > make > > install > > > in Emacs, you don't have to execute make at all. Just do M-x > package-install and select Pillar. If Pillar is not in the list, you > need to read http://melpa.milkbox.net/#/getting-started > > -- > Damien Cassou > http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st > > "Success is the ability to go from one failure to another without > losing enthusiasm." > Winston Churchill > >

May 7, 2014

Re: [Pharo-dev] Making screenshots programmatically for book

by Stephan Eggermont

Damien wrote: >FYI, it is possible to include Smalltalk code in Pillar files that will be executed when the Pillar file is compiled. This Smalltalk >code can write to a stream in order to generate dynamic content. I use it to generate a part of Pillar documentation Ha, that sounds like exactly what I need. Thank you. Stephan

May 7, 2014

Re: [Pharo-dev] System-Hashing and SecureHashAlgorithm ?

by Sven Van Caekenberghe

On 07 May 2014, at 16:43, phil(a)highoctane.be wrote: > hashStage1 is a LargePositiveInteger... > > Quite different thing. No, not really 123 asByteArrayOfSize: 4 #[0 0 0 123] #[0 0 0 123] asInteger 123

May 7, 2014

Re: [Pharo-dev] System-Hashing and SecureHashAlgorithm ?

by Esteban Lorenzano

On 07 May 2014, at 16:43, phil(a)highoctane.be wrote: > > On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 4:34 PM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven(a)stfx.eu> wrote: > #asString ? #hex ? > > BTW, the result of hashing *is* always binary ... > > I filed out the old one from the 1.4 image and there is a different implementation... > > sha1 := SecureHashAlgorithm new. > hashStage1 := sha1 hashMessage: password. > > hashStage1 is a LargePositiveInteger... > > Quite different thing. yes, but it was wrong :) Esteban > > Phil > > On 07 May 2014, at 16:20, phil(a)highoctane.be wrote: > > > Yes but it doesn't look like compatible. > > > > I replaced the call by SHA1 new hashMessage: 'azerty' and this gives a ByteArray where SecureHashAlgorithm in 1.4 gives a stirng apparently. > > > > I'll look in a 1.4 > > > > Phil > > > > On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 4:08 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > it is SHA1 (a class in pharo-core) > > > > On 07 May 2014, at 16:06, phil(a)highoctane.be wrote: > > > > > Where is that package gone ? > > > > > > It is a dependency of StdMySql. > > > > > > TIA > > > Phil > > > > > > > > > > <SecureHashAlgorithm.st>

May 7, 2014

Re: [Pharo-dev] System-Hashing and SecureHashAlgorithm ?

by phil＠highoctane.be

On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 4:34 PM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven(a)stfx.eu> wrote: > #asString ? #hex ? > > BTW, the result of hashing *is* always binary ... > I filed out the old one from the 1.4 image and there is a different implementation... sha1 := SecureHashAlgorithm new. hashStage1 := sha1 hashMessage: password. hashStage1 is a LargePositiveInteger... Quite different thing. Phil > > On 07 May 2014, at 16:20, phil(a)highoctane.be wrote: > > > Yes but it doesn't look like compatible. > > > > I replaced the call by SHA1 new hashMessage: 'azerty' and this gives a > ByteArray where SecureHashAlgorithm in 1.4 gives a stirng apparently. > > > > I'll look in a 1.4 > > > > Phil > > > > On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 4:08 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm(a)gmail.com> > wrote: > > it is SHA1 (a class in pharo-core) > > > > On 07 May 2014, at 16:06, phil(a)highoctane.be wrote: > > > > > Where is that package gone ? > > > > > > It is a dependency of StdMySql. > > > > > > TIA > > > Phil > > > > > > > > >

May 7, 2014

Re: [Pharo-dev] System-Hashing and SecureHashAlgorithm ?

by Sven Van Caekenberghe

#asString ? #hex ? BTW, the result of hashing *is* always binary ... On 07 May 2014, at 16:20, phil(a)highoctane.be wrote: > Yes but it doesn't look like compatible. > > I replaced the call by SHA1 new hashMessage: 'azerty' and this gives a ByteArray where SecureHashAlgorithm in 1.4 gives a stirng apparently. > > I'll look in a 1.4 > > Phil > > On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 4:08 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm(a)gmail.com> wrote: > it is SHA1 (a class in pharo-core) > > On 07 May 2014, at 16:06, phil(a)highoctane.be wrote: > > > Where is that package gone ? > > > > It is a dependency of StdMySql. > > > > TIA > > Phil > > >

May 7, 2014

Re: [Pharo-dev] System-Hashing and SecureHashAlgorithm ?

by phil＠highoctane.be

Yes but it doesn't look like compatible. I replaced the call by SHA1 new hashMessage: 'azerty' and this gives a ByteArray where SecureHashAlgorithm in 1.4 gives a stirng apparently. I'll look in a 1.4 Phil On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 4:08 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm(a)gmail.com>wrote: > it is SHA1 (a class in pharo-core) > > On 07 May 2014, at 16:06, phil(a)highoctane.be wrote: > > > Where is that package gone ? > > > > It is a dependency of StdMySql. > > > > TIA > > Phil > > >

May 7, 2014

Re: [Pharo-dev] System-Hashing and SecureHashAlgorithm ?

by Esteban Lorenzano

it is SHA1 (a class in pharo-core) On 07 May 2014, at 16:06, phil(a)highoctane.be wrote: > Where is that package gone ? > > It is a dependency of StdMySql. > > TIA > Phil

May 7, 2014

System-Hashing and SecureHashAlgorithm ?

by phil＠highoctane.be

Where is that package gone ? It is a dependency of StdMySql. TIA Phil

May 7, 2014

Re: [Pharo-dev] dbxtalk working on pharo 3.0

by Mariano Martinez Peck

On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 4:18 PM, Michael Roland <mroland98343(a)gmail.com>wrote: > > > On Thursday, February 13, 2014 10:26:55 AM UTC-5, Tudor Girba wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I just retried DBXTalk, and it now magically works! >> >> Does anyone know why? :) >> >> I did this: >> Gofer new >> smalltalkhubUser: 'DBXTalk' project: 'DBXTalkDriver'; >> package: 'ConfigurationOfOpenDBXDriver'; >> load. >> #ConfigurationOfOpenDBXDriver asClass loadBleedingEdge. >> >> Anyway, the only glitch I found is that the OpenDBX current wrongly >> returns "NBPharoOpenDBX class" instead of the instance. >> >> I could not figure out where the initialization bug comes from, but I >> worked around it with: >> NBPharoOpenDBX installAsCurrent. >> >> I tested the functionality with an Oracle backend, and it just worked. >> >> Thanks! >> >> Doru >> >> >> -- >> www.tudorgirba.com >> >> "Every thing has its own flow" >> > > I tried DBXTalk today on Pharo 3 and got the NBPharoOpenDBX class error > too. > This is my understanding of what causes the error. > > > The value returned by OpenDBX class>>#current is initialized in > ConfigurationOfOpenDBXDriver>>#setNBOpenDBX. > > #setNBOpenDBX has one line: > (Smalltalk at: #OpenDBX) current: (Smalltalk at: #NBPharoOpenDBX). > > This sets OpenDBX Current to an NBPharoOpenDBX class instead of an > NBPharoOpenDBX instance. > > Changing the statement to: > (Smalltalk at: #NBPharoOpenDBX) installAsCurrent > > indirectly sets OpenDBX Current to an instance of NBPharoOpenDBX so that > OpenDBX class>>#current will correctly return an instance of > NBPharoOpenDBX. > > Using OpenDBX class>>#installAsCurrent is needed because the OpenDBX class > has > two class variables: CurrentLibraryFactory and Current. > CurrentLibraryFactory stores a class and Current stores an instance of > that class. > The only way to set CurrentLibraryFactory is with the OpenDBX > class>>#installAsCurrent method. > Using OpenDBX class>>#current: to set the instance directly can leave the > CurrentLibraryFactory and Current variables out of sync. > > Thanks! Michael was this committed to the repo? -- Mariano http://marianopeck.wordpress.com

May 7, 2014