April 2014 - Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-dev] Bug in Spec layout?

by Martin Dias

Ben, Given that the number of columns is variable in my scenario... is there a way to set a fixed width to each column and display an horizontal scrollbar on bottom? You told me that's not supported by Spec, but maybe there is a way to workaround it inserting a Morph or something like that. Thanks, MartÃn On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 12:45 PM, Martin Dias <tinchodias(a)gmail.com> wrote: > I will try that, thanks Ben. > > MartÃn > > > > On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 11:33 AM, Benjamin < > benjamin.vanryseghem.pharo(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> This is a nightmare to solve :) >> >> a way to fix it is ti introduce another column for the two first widgets >> >> Ben >> >> On 09 Apr 2014, at 11:23, Martin Dias <tinchodias(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hello folks, >> >> When I evaluate in latest Pharo 3: >> >> DynamicComposableModel new >> instantiateModels: #( >> a TreeModel >> b TreeModel >> c TreeModel); >> openWithSpecLayout: >> (SpecLayout composed >> newColumn: [ :column | >> column >> newRow: [ :row | >> row newColumn: #a. >> row newColumn: #b. >> row newColumn: #c width: 80 ] ]; >> yourself) >> >> ===> >> >> <Screen Shot 2014-04-09 at 11.09.38 AM.png> >> >> Maybe I'm wrong: I expected that #a and #b have the same width. But it >> looks like the layout algorithm first splits the space half/half between #a >> and #b, and later it only shrinks #b to give the fixed space to #c. >> >> Should I report an issue? or specify layout in other way? >> >> Thanks, >> MartÃn >> >> >> >

April 9, 2014

Re: [Pharo-dev] Bug in Spec layout?

by Martin Dias

I will try that, thanks Ben. MartÃn On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 11:33 AM, Benjamin < benjamin.vanryseghem.pharo(a)gmail.com> wrote: > This is a nightmare to solve :) > > a way to fix it is ti introduce another column for the two first widgets > > Ben > > On 09 Apr 2014, at 11:23, Martin Dias <tinchodias(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > Hello folks, > > When I evaluate in latest Pharo 3: > > DynamicComposableModel new > instantiateModels: #( > a TreeModel > b TreeModel > c TreeModel); > openWithSpecLayout: > (SpecLayout composed > newColumn: [ :column | > column > newRow: [ :row | > row newColumn: #a. > row newColumn: #b. > row newColumn: #c width: 80 ] ]; > yourself) > > ===> > > <Screen Shot 2014-04-09 at 11.09.38 AM.png> > > Maybe I'm wrong: I expected that #a and #b have the same width. But it > looks like the layout algorithm first splits the space half/half between #a > and #b, and later it only shrinks #b to give the fixed space to #c. > > Should I report an issue? or specify layout in other way? > > Thanks, > MartÃn > > >

April 9, 2014

Re: [Pharo-dev] [Pharo3] Issue tracker status

by Marcus Denker

On 08 Apr 2014, at 10:58, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker(a)inria.fr> wrote: > âMust fixâ and higher: 20 Issues, 5 of those have fixes that need reviews down to 17, 3 need reviews. > https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/filters/64/3-0-TODO > > (this list should be empty before we release) > > There are overall 87 issues tagged for Pharo3: > down to 74 > https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/filters/99/3-0-All >

April 9, 2014

Re: [Pharo-dev] Bug in Spec layout?

by Benjamin

This is a nightmare to solve :) a way to fix it is ti introduce another column for the two first widgets Ben On 09 Apr 2014, at 11:23, Martin Dias <tinchodias(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Hello folks, > > When I evaluate in latest Pharo 3: > > DynamicComposableModel new > instantiateModels: #( > a TreeModel > b TreeModel > c TreeModel); > openWithSpecLayout: > (SpecLayout composed > newColumn: [ :column | > column > newRow: [ :row | > row newColumn: #a. > row newColumn: #b. > row newColumn: #c width: 80 ] ]; > yourself) > > ===> > > <Screen Shot 2014-04-09 at 11.09.38 AM.png> > > Maybe I'm wrong: I expected that #a and #b have the same width. But it looks like the layout algorithm first splits the space half/half between #a and #b, and later it only shrinks #b to give the fixed space to #c. > > Should I report an issue? or specify layout in other way? > > Thanks, > MartÃn

April 9, 2014

Bug in Spec layout?

by Martin Dias

Hello folks, When I evaluate in latest Pharo 3: DynamicComposableModel new instantiateModels: #( a TreeModel b TreeModel c TreeModel); openWithSpecLayout: (SpecLayout composed newColumn: [ :column | column newRow: [ :row | row newColumn: #a. row newColumn: #b. row newColumn: #c width: 80 ] ]; yourself) ===> [image: Inline image 2] Maybe I'm wrong: I expected that #a and #b have the same width. But it looks like the layout algorithm first splits the space half/half between #a and #b, and later it only shrinks #b to give the fixed space to #c. Should I report an issue? or specify layout in other way? Thanks, MartÃn

April 9, 2014

Re: [Pharo-dev] DBXTalk continued

by Norbert Hartl

Small correction. It is an ubuntu 14.04 running in virtualbox. Norbert Am 09.04.2014 um 10:45 schrieb Norbert Hartl <norbert(a)hartl.name>: > There were some success reports using DBXTalk in pharo 3.0. Sadly Iâm not that lucky to get it running properly. > > I loaded the latest version from smalltalkhub. I exchanged the version reference for TalkFFI to 1.4 (tested 1.5 as well no difference). I loaded bleddingEdge and did afterwards > > NBPharoOpenDBX installAsCurrent > > Running the tests I 118 run, 50 passes, 68 errors > > but the number changes when running the suite more often. There is a sporadic error âLost connection during queryâ which occurrs randomly thus the changing number in error fails. And the tests are trying to test more backends. I can see errors on the console saying that libraries cannot be found. I donât know yet if this influences the tests as well. > > The described scenario is running on an ubuntu 13.04 in virtualbox with a fresh 3.0 image. I was trying to install it on my Mac laptop but had too much problems convincing homebrew to build opendbx as 32 bit lib. So I thought it would be less pain to do it on linux which will be the deployment platform anyway. > > Has anybody seen similar problems. Or can any linux user tell me what library versions are used in the success case? > > thanks, > > Norbert > >

April 9, 2014

Re: [Pharo-dev] [Pharo-users] Pharo Consortium: New Gold Member Lam Research

by Sven Van Caekenberghe

On 09 Apr 2014, at 10:38, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker(a)inria.fr> wrote: > The Pharo Consortium is very happy to announce that Lam Research has joined the Consortium as a Gold Industrial Member. > > More about > - Lam Research: http://lamrc.com > - Pharo Consortium: http://consortium.pharo.org Again, great news ! > The goal of the Pharo Consortium is to allow companies to support the ongoing development and future of Pharo. > > Individuals can support Pharo via the Pharo Association: http://association.pharo.org

April 9, 2014

DBXTalk continued

by Norbert Hartl

There were some success reports using DBXTalk in pharo 3.0. Sadly Iâm not that lucky to get it running properly. I loaded the latest version from smalltalkhub. I exchanged the version reference for TalkFFI to 1.4 (tested 1.5 as well no difference). I loaded bleddingEdge and did afterwards NBPharoOpenDBX installAsCurrent Running the tests I 118 run, 50 passes, 68 errors but the number changes when running the suite more often. There is a sporadic error âLost connection during queryâ which occurrs randomly thus the changing number in error fails. And the tests are trying to test more backends. I can see errors on the console saying that libraries cannot be found. I donât know yet if this influences the tests as well. The described scenario is running on an ubuntu 13.04 in virtualbox with a fresh 3.0 image. I was trying to install it on my Mac laptop but had too much problems convincing homebrew to build opendbx as 32 bit lib. So I thought it would be less pain to do it on linux which will be the deployment platform anyway. Has anybody seen similar problems. Or can any linux user tell me what library versions are used in the success case? thanks, Norbert

April 9, 2014

Pharo Consortium: New Gold Member Lam Research

by Marcus Denker

The Pharo Consortium is very happy to announce that Lam Research has joined the Consortium as a Gold Industrial Member. More about - Lam Research: http://lamrc.com - Pharo Consortium: http://consortium.pharo.org The goal of the Pharo Consortium is to allow companies to support the ongoing development and future of Pharo. Individuals can support Pharo via the Pharo Association: http://association.pharo.org

April 9, 2014

[pharo-project/pharo-core]

by GitHub

Branch: refs/tags/30817 Home: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-core

April 9, 2014