March 2014 - Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-dev] ComposableModel>>initialExtent

by Benjamin

The first answer is: ComposableModel was not a subclass of model at first :P Ben On 12 Mar 2014, at 13:09, Laurent Laffont <laurent.laffont(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to have tests green for TWM. I found: > > ComposableModel>>initialExtent > ^ nil > > on superclass Model there's > > Model>>initialExtent > ^ RealEstateAgent standardWindowExtent > > that sounds good. So I don't understand why ComposableModel redefine #initialExtent to answer nil. Any explanation ? > > Laurent >

March 12, 2014

Re: [Pharo-dev] [squeak-dev] Squeaksource down

by David T. Lewis

On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 09:54:05AM -0400, David T. Lewis wrote: > On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 05:35:29AM -0700, Sean P. DeNigris wrote: > > http://www.downforeveryoneorjustme.com/http://www.squeaksource.com > > > > Thanks Sean, > > squeaksource.com is currently off line. This may be related to some DNS > issues that are currently affecting most squeak.org services, although > I cannot say for sure. > The squeaksource.com service is back on line now. Background: The SqueakSource image had grown to about 1GB in size due to a runaway Seaside connection, resulting in out of memory failures. I do not know the root cause, but it is possible that it was related to some DNS issues that we are currently dealing with on squeak.org. If anyone has made updates to user accounts in the last 10 hours or so (e.g. add a developer to an existing project), those changes will probably need to be re-entered. Dave

March 12, 2014

Re: [Pharo-dev] Still something on squeaksource?

by Sebastian Sastre

On Mar 12, 2014, at 12:10 PM, Pharo4Stef <pharo4Stef(a)free.fr> wrote: > I incrementally move what I need. I think that this is a good pattern. > > Stef +1 is efficient Also replicating some of the things on github

March 12, 2014

Re: [Pharo-dev] Still something on squeaksource?

by Pharo4Stef

I incrementally move what I need. I think that this is a good pattern. Stef On 12 Mar 2014, at 14:34, Yuriy Tymchuk <yuriy.tymchuk(a)me.com> wrote: > Because right now Iâm experiencing difficulties with some projects as squeeksource returns 503. Maybe we should move everything to smalltalkhub? > > Uko

March 12, 2014

Re: [Pharo-dev] ****REALLY IMPORTANT**** the Pharo market place NEEDS YOU

by Sebastian Sastre

On Mar 12, 2014, at 10:57 AM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven(a)stfx.eu> wrote: > make it even easier for people to learn about what is available using a nice, sexy catalog you browse. Call it marketing, sales, a store, a marketplace, the name does not matter a lot (but I agree, if no actual sales for money are involved, and it would not, the name should not be confusing). I matter exactly as much as your care about getting people confused and expectations broken So I fear for shoots in the foot

March 12, 2014

Re: [Pharo-dev] ****REALLY IMPORTANT**** the Pharo market place NEEDS YOU

by Sven Van Caekenberghe

Hmm, we're getting a bit off topic, I fear. There are lots of very useful packages available for Pharo (and tons more historic ones). They become easier to use/find if: - they are in a public monticello repository - they have documentation (internal and external) - they have a metacello configuration - they have their metacello configuration where the configuration browser can find them - they have a CI job - they have metacello catalog methods (very new) What Stef wants it to make it even easier for people to learn about what is available using a nice, sexy catalog you browse. Call it marketing, sales, a store, a marketplace, the name does not matter a lot (but I agree, if no actual sales for money are involved, and it would not, the name should not be confusing). So, let's make the catalog real ! On 12 Mar 2014, at 14:41, Sebastian Sastre <sebastian(a)flowingconcept.com> wrote: > > On Mar 12, 2014, at 10:27 AM, Esteban A. Maringolo <emaringolo(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> If it's not on sale, I wouldn't name it market nor store. :) > > +1 > > Which leads to the question: > > can my company sell a product there? how? what are the steps? > > I donât want to sound brutal here but market is raw, so I say this as a realist friend: > > If thatâs not clear first, then naming it "store" would not make it one > > Said that, itâs certainly an innovation in our niche worth exploring. > > U8 is trying that model, not sure about resultsâ¦ > > so low expectations, but starting has a lot of merit > > Without the start you donât even have the chance > > So, looking forward to hear news about this > > > > PS: hey.. BTW.. releasing a crazy idea hereâ¦ what about making the other part of a market? I mean the demand. Do we even know what the demand is or would be? A Pharo market place would have a place to submit a demand? like making an offer to pay X for mapping some Y API for example? > > Would that make sense?

March 12, 2014

Re: [Pharo-dev] [squeak-dev] Squeaksource down

by David T. Lewis

On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 05:35:29AM -0700, Sean P. DeNigris wrote: > http://www.downforeveryoneorjustme.com/http://www.squeaksource.com > Thanks Sean, squeaksource.com is currently off line. This may be related to some DNS issues that are currently affecting most squeak.org services, although I cannot say for sure. Dave

March 12, 2014

Re: [Pharo-dev] Still something on squeaksource?

by Frank Shearar

On 12 March 2014 13:34, Yuriy Tymchuk <yuriy.tymchuk(a)me.com> wrote: > Because right now Iâm experiencing difficulties with some projects as squeeksource returns 503. Maybe we should move everything to smalltalkhub? The box on which squeaksource.com is hosted is currently undergoing maintenance. Chris Cunnington's keeping squeak-dev informed as he works through doing what he needs to do, but yes, squeaksource.com is currently unavailable. (I should add that David Lewis has worked really hard on updating squeaksource.com: its historical instabilities should be a thing of the past. The current outage is not squeaksource's fault :) ) frank > Uko

March 12, 2014

Re: [Pharo-dev] ****REALLY IMPORTANT**** the Pharo market place NEEDS YOU

by Sebastian Sastre

On Mar 12, 2014, at 10:27 AM, Esteban A. Maringolo <emaringolo(a)gmail.com> wrote: > If it's not on sale, I wouldn't name it market nor store. :) +1 Which leads to the question: can my company sell a product there? how? what are the steps? I donât want to sound brutal here but market is raw, so I say this as a realist friend: If thatâs not clear first, then naming it "store" would not make it one Said that, itâs certainly an innovation in our niche worth exploring. U8 is trying that model, not sure about resultsâ¦ so low expectations, but starting has a lot of merit Without the start you donât even have the chance So, looking forward to hear news about this PS: hey.. BTW.. releasing a crazy idea hereâ¦ what about making the other part of a market? I mean the demand. Do we even know what the demand is or would be? A Pharo market place would have a place to submit a demand? like making an offer to pay X for mapping some Y API for example? Would that make sense?

March 12, 2014

Still something on squeaksource?

by Yuriy Tymchuk

Because right now Iâm experiencing difficulties with some projects as squeeksource returns 503. Maybe we should move everything to smalltalkhub? Uko

March 12, 2014