December 2014 - Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

Woden and inspectors

by phil＠highoctane.be

I have been playing with Woden. That's a place where the GTInspector would be welcome to edit values.. See: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Nze9tnwYxY&feature=youtu.be Is there a way to have both the old and new inspector active? Phil

Dec. 4, 2014

Re: [Pharo-dev] Twittering Smalltalk

by Torsten Bergmann

>Do you have the links of all those tweets? I'd like to Storify some of them. All of them were from the ESUG twitter account. Â Â

Dec. 4, 2014

Re: [Pharo-dev] Twittering Smalltalk

by Esteban A. Maringolo

Do you have the links of all those tweets? I'd like to Storify some of them. Regards! El Thu Dec 04 2014 at 4:29:07 PM, Torsten Bergmann <astares(a)gmx.de> escribiÃ³: > See attachement, Pharo is on the right track ;) > > Bye > T.

Dec. 4, 2014

Re: [Pharo-dev] [ANN] Transition of Ubuntu PPA maintenance

by Tudor Girba

Thanks, Markus. This is great to hear. Cheers, Doru On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 9:46 PM, Markus Fritsche <mfritsche(a)reauktion.de> wrote: > Hello, > > The maintenance of the Ubuntu Pharo VM and .source Packages is being > transferred from Damien Cassou to myself, Markus Fritsche. By trade, I > am a Business Intelligence consultant, but always following what's going > on with smalltalk/ pharo. > > If you experience any problems with the ubuntu packages, please feel > free to contact me. I might not be able to help right away, but I'll try > my best! > > Best regards, > Markus > > -- www.tudorgirba.com "Every thing has its own flow"

Dec. 4, 2014

[ANN] Transition of Ubuntu PPA maintenance

by Markus Fritsche

Hello, The maintenance of the Ubuntu Pharo VM and .source Packages is being transferred from Damien Cassou to myself, Markus Fritsche. By trade, I am a Business Intelligence consultant, but always following what's going on with smalltalk/ pharo. If you experience any problems with the ubuntu packages, please feel free to contact me. I might not be able to help right away, but I'll try my best! Best regards, Markus

Dec. 4, 2014

Re: [Pharo-dev] [Pharo-users] Twittering Smalltalk

by Mariano Martinez Peck

Very nice indeed to read that. On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 5:15 PM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven(a)stfx.eu> wrote: > > > On 04 Dec 2014, at 20:28, Torsten Bergmann <astares(a)gmx.de> wrote: > > > > See attachement, Pharo is on the right track ;) > > +100 > > > Bye > > T.<TwitterOnSmalltalk.pdf> > > > -- Mariano http://marianopeck.wordpress.com

Dec. 4, 2014

Re: [Pharo-dev] Pharo+Git cons?

by Tudor Girba

Hi, I think that most browsers produced in Samlltalk look remarkably similar to the original one which was developed 30 years ago [1], even though it clearly isn't the best possible solution. I would like to get to one that does not necessarily resemble the current one, and in the process uncover new ways of developing software. This is a longer goal we have with GT, and I would like to get to something tangible in Pharo 5. [1] http://www.tudorgirba.com/presentations/dx Cheers, Doru On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 5:17 PM, Thierry Goubier <thierry.goubier(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > 2014-12-04 9:44 GMT+01:00 Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm(a)gmail.com>: > >> >> On 04 Dec 2014, at 09:24, Norbert Hartl <norbert(a)hartl.name> wrote: >> >> We need a better-than-git Smalltalk thing :) >> >> >> yeah, we need a lot of things. >> But who will put the bell on the cat's neck? >> just dreaming of what we *could* have will make us never have anythingâ¦ >> is not that horizons are bad, they are needed to show the path to follow. >> But not to accept the small improvements in the name of some super-goal >> we are never close (because, of course, horizons move constantly) is prone >> to immobility. >> > > Honestly, in that particular case, I really had the feeling for some time > that Pharo had chosen the super-goal instead of the incremental > improvement. It changed with the focus on libgit2, luckily :) > > If I want to troll again :):) (beware) > > I'm interested by the Nautilus vs OmniBrowser decision. I have an > hypothesis that this decision has value for anything looking like a > Moldable, Glamour-based, Browser . Because in my mind, the OB gui framework > and Glamour are along the same lines, and the OB GUI framework was missing > something which pushed Nautilus forward[1]. So, for those who have used OB > and Nautilus, or are using Squeak (where OB is still in use) and Pharo, > what do you think? > > [1] > http://marianopeck.wordpress.com/2012/02/26/nautilus-the-reborn-of-the-syst… > > Thierry > > >> >> Esteban >> > > -- www.tudorgirba.com "Every thing has its own flow"

Dec. 4, 2014

Re: [Pharo-dev] [Pharo-users] Twittering Smalltalk

by Sven Van Caekenberghe

> On 04 Dec 2014, at 20:28, Torsten Bergmann <astares(a)gmx.de> wrote: > > See attachement, Pharo is on the right track ;) +100 > Bye > T.<TwitterOnSmalltalk.pdf>

Dec. 4, 2014

Twittering Smalltalk

by Torsten Bergmann

See attachement, Pharo is on the right track ;) Bye T.

Dec. 4, 2014

[pharo-project/pharo-core]

by GitHub

Branch: refs/tags/40399 Home: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-core

Dec. 4, 2014