October 2014 - Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-dev] pharo works fine on yosemite

by phil＠highoctane.be

Cool. I am still on Lion and was considering moving to the new shiny one. Thx for the report. Phil Le 19 oct. 2014 12:49, "Tudor Girba" <tudor(a)tudorgirba.com> a Ã©crit : > Hi, > > I just installed OS X Yosemite (10.10), and it looks like Pharo works just > fine. > > Cheers, > Doru > > > -- > www.tudorgirba.com > > "Every thing has its own flow" >

Oct. 19, 2014

pharo works fine on yosemite

by Tudor Girba

Hi, I just installed OS X Yosemite (10.10), and it looks like Pharo works just fine. Cheers, Doru -- www.tudorgirba.com "Every thing has its own flow"

Oct. 19, 2014

[pharo-project/pharo-core]

by GitHub

Branch: refs/tags/40311 Home: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-core

Oct. 19, 2014

[pharo-project/pharo-core] 7e3d20: 40311

by GitHub

Branch: refs/heads/4.0 Home: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-core Commit: 7e3d202a32741fac22952cdc42205959083c0656 https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-core/commit/7e3d202a32741fac22952cdc… Author: Jenkins Build Server <board(a)pharo-project.org> Date: 2014-10-19 (Sun, 19 Oct 2014) Changed paths: M Refactoring-Critics.package/RBSmalllintChecker.class/instance/private/checkMethodsForClass_.st A ScriptLoader40.package/ScriptLoader.class/instance/pharo - scripts/script311.st M ScriptLoader40.package/ScriptLoader.class/instance/pharo - updates/update40310.st A ScriptLoader40.package/ScriptLoader.class/instance/pharo - updates/update40311.st M ScriptLoader40.package/ScriptLoader.class/instance/public/commentForCurrentUpdate.st Log Message: ----------- 40311 14228 critic rules running on all methods of a class extended by a package https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/14228 http://files.pharo.org/image/40/40311.zip

Oct. 19, 2014

new Pharo Success story

by stepharo

Hi we just published a new success story: Pharo at CSOB http://pharo.org/success And yes we are interested in your sucess stories Stef PS: big thanks to Tomas and CSOB for letting us making this public.

Oct. 19, 2014

Re: [Pharo-dev] Question on Package comments [SO]

by Mark Bestley

On 18/10/2014 23:17, phil(a)highoctane.be wrote: > > Le 18 oct. 2014 20:48, "kilon alios" > <kilon.alios(a)gmail.com > <mailto:kilon.alios@gmail.com>> a Ã©crit : > > As I am earning my bread with Pharo for about a year now, I'd chime in. > > I had a look at that question and wondered why it was closed. > > It sounded harsh. > One main reason it was closed would be that it is asking for a recommendation of an off site (ie non SO) resource. SO likes the answers to be self contained so that when any links rot and don't provide an answer the SO answer is still there, they do accept links providing more details. Also in this case the answer will change over time as I suspect the current answer would be a range of sites and in future these might get concentrated into the books etc. > We need as many people as possible in the community to get traction. > > We should take special care of SO as it is not useful to abide their > policy but help us with our growth. It is part of the marketing. > -- Mark

Oct. 18, 2014

Re: [Pharo-dev] Question on Package comments [SO]

by phil＠highoctane.be

Le 18 oct. 2014 20:48, "kilon alios" <kilon.alios(a)gmail.com> a Ã©crit : > > I am not passion filled, if pharo was my passion I would have made a living out of it and work on it 24/7, I love pharo indeed and I enjoy using it but its far from making me passionate user. There are other things that make me passionate though. > As I am earning my bread with Pharo for about a year now, I'd chime in. I had a look at that question and wondered why it was closed. It sounded harsh. We need as many people as possible in the community to get traction. We should take special care of SO as it is not useful to abide their policy but help us with our growth. It is part of the marketing. Phil > My sarcasm should only be taken as a joke hence why I used the jedi and sith paradigm. Its my opinion and I can assure you I have no issue with people disagreeing with my opinion as I disagree with others. > > On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 8:52 PM, Sean P. DeNigris <sean(a)clipperadams.com> wrote: >> >> kilon.alios wrote >> > I sorry if I sound a bit too sarcastic >> >> Well the sarcasm seemed especially misguided since it's directed at other >> people trying to help and not at the original asker of the question, but I >> guess that's the price we pay for a passion-filled community ;) >> >> >> >> ----- >> Cheers, >> Sean >> -- >> View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Question-on-Package-comments-SO-tp4785191p4785317.html >> Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >

Oct. 18, 2014

Re: [Pharo-dev] Announcement Handlers Fail Silently?

by stepharo

I would have thought that on:ErrorDo: was guarding them. On 18/10/14 21:30, Sean P. DeNigris wrote: > It seems that exceptions get swallowed by the system in #30858. Is that > intended/still the case in 4.0? It makes it confusing to debug and develop > via the debugger... > > e.g.: > anAnnouncer > when: ItemAdded > do: [ :it | nil nonExistantMethod ]. > > fails silently, and the exception is not propagated to the UI i.e. no > debugger appears > > > > ----- > Cheers, > Sean > -- > View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Announcement-Handlers-Fail-Silently-tp4785326.html > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > >

Oct. 18, 2014

Announcement Handlers Fail Silently?

by Sean P. DeNigris

It seems that exceptions get swallowed by the system in #30858. Is that intended/still the case in 4.0? It makes it confusing to debug and develop via the debugger... e.g.: anAnnouncer when: ItemAdded do: [ :it | nil nonExistantMethod ]. fails silently, and the exception is not propagated to the UI i.e. no debugger appears ----- Cheers, Sean -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Announcement-Handlers-Fail-Silently-tp4785326.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Oct. 18, 2014

Re: [Pharo-dev] Question on Package comments [SO]

by kilon alios

I am not passion filled, if pharo was my passion I would have made a living out of it and work on it 24/7, I love pharo indeed and I enjoy using it but its far from making me passionate user. There are other things that make me passionate though. My sarcasm should only be taken as a joke hence why I used the jedi and sith paradigm. Its my opinion and I can assure you I have no issue with people disagreeing with my opinion as I disagree with others. On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 8:52 PM, Sean P. DeNigris <sean(a)clipperadams.com> wrote: > kilon.alios wrote > > I sorry if I sound a bit too sarcastic > > Well the sarcasm seemed especially misguided since it's directed at other > people trying to help and not at the original asker of the question, but I > guess that's the price we pay for a passion-filled community ;) > > > > ----- > Cheers, > Sean > -- > View this message in context: > http://forum.world.st/Question-on-Package-comments-SO-tp4785191p4785317.html > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at > Nabble.com. > >

Oct. 18, 2014