August 2013 - Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-dev] method vs. selector consistency?

by Esteban A. Maringolo

2013/8/29 Denis Kudriashov <dionisiydk(a)gmail.com>: > And now Package should be used instead Class category. Am I right? +1 This one puzzles me.

Aug. 29, 2013

Re: [Pharo-dev] method vs. selector consistency?

by Denis Kudriashov

And now Package should be used instead Class category. Am I right? 2013/8/29 Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm(a)gmail.com> > they are "protocols" > method category is the old non-accurate name :) > > Esteban > > On Aug 29, 2013, at 1:44 PM, btc(a)openInWorld.com wrote: > > > StÃ©phane Ducasse wrote: > >> methodsInCategory: aName "Answer a list of the methods of the > receiver that are in category named aName" > >> > >> | aColl | > >> aColl := Set withAll: (self organization listAtCategoryNamed: > aName). > >> ^ aColl asArray sort > >> > >> > >> allMethodsInCategory: aName "Answer a list of all the methods of the > receiver and all its superclasses that are in the category named aName" > >> > >> | aColl | > >> aColl := OrderedCollection new. > >> self withAllSuperclasses do: [:aClass | aColl > addAll: (aClass organization listAtCategoryNamed: aName) ]. > >> ^ aColl asSet asArray sort > >> > >> > >> uncategorizedMethods > >> ^ self methodsInCategory: Protocol unclassified > >> > >> all these methods returns selectors and not compiled methods. > >> > >> So I would like to rename them accordingly. > >> What do you think? > >> > >> Stef > >> > >> > > When writing about Smalltalk, I am often confused about whether I should > call them Method Categories or Protocols ? > > I actually prefer the latter, partly because it reads better in prose > not having to write Class Categories and Method Categories every time, and > just Categories and Protocols. > > Are the terms interchangeable? What is the official stance? > > > > cheers -ben > > > > > > >

Aug. 29, 2013

Re: [Pharo-dev] method vs. selector consistency?

by Esteban Lorenzano

they are "protocols" method category is the old non-accurate name :) Esteban On Aug 29, 2013, at 1:44 PM, btc(a)openInWorld.com wrote: > StÃ©phane Ducasse wrote: >> methodsInCategory: aName "Answer a list of the methods of the receiver that are in category named aName" >> >> | aColl | >> aColl := Set withAll: (self organization listAtCategoryNamed: aName). >> ^ aColl asArray sort >> >> >> allMethodsInCategory: aName "Answer a list of all the methods of the receiver and all its superclasses that are in the category named aName" >> >> | aColl | >> aColl := OrderedCollection new. >> self withAllSuperclasses do: [:aClass | aColl addAll: (aClass organization listAtCategoryNamed: aName) ]. >> ^ aColl asSet asArray sort >> >> >> uncategorizedMethods >> ^ self methodsInCategory: Protocol unclassified >> >> all these methods returns selectors and not compiled methods. >> >> So I would like to rename them accordingly. >> What do you think? >> >> Stef >> >> > When writing about Smalltalk, I am often confused about whether I should call them Method Categories or Protocols ? > I actually prefer the latter, partly because it reads better in prose not having to write Class Categories and Method Categories every time, and just Categories and Protocols. > Are the terms interchangeable? What is the official stance? > > cheers -ben > >

Aug. 29, 2013

Re: [Pharo-dev] method vs. selector consistency?

by btc＠openinworld.com

StÃ©phane Ducasse wrote: > methodsInCategory: aName > "Answer a list of the methods of the receiver that are in category named aName" > > | aColl | > aColl := Set withAll: (self organization listAtCategoryNamed: aName). > ^ aColl asArray sort > > > allMethodsInCategory: aName > "Answer a list of all the methods of the receiver and all its > superclasses that are in the category named aName" > > | aColl | > aColl := OrderedCollection new. > self withAllSuperclasses do: [:aClass | > aColl addAll: (aClass organization listAtCategoryNamed: aName) ]. > ^ aColl asSet asArray sort > > > uncategorizedMethods > ^ self methodsInCategory: Protocol unclassified > > all these methods returns selectors and not compiled methods. > > So I would like to rename them accordingly. > What do you think? > > Stef > > When writing about Smalltalk, I am often confused about whether I should call them Method Categories or Protocols ? I actually prefer the latter, partly because it reads better in prose not having to write Class Categories and Method Categories every time, and just Categories and Protocols. Are the terms interchangeable? What is the official stance? cheers -ben

Aug. 29, 2013

[OT] Drawing Dynamic Visualizations

by Torsten Bergmann

see http://vimeo.com/66085662

Aug. 29, 2013

Does something for that exist

by Friedrich Dominicus

Well laziness gets the upper half from me and I wonder if there is a software available in Smalltalk which takes an xsd fiel and generates an xml-writer from it which than adheres to the xsd descriptions. In my opinion this is too usefule to not been implemented yet ;-) Regards Friedrich

Aug. 29, 2013

Re: [Pharo-dev] method vs. selector consistency?

by Igor Stasenko

On 29 August 2013 09:09, StÃ©phane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr> wrote: > methodsInCategory: aName > "Answer a list of the methods of the receiver that are in category > named aName" > > | aColl | > aColl := Set withAll: (self organization listAtCategoryNamed: > aName). > ^ aColl asArray sort > > > allMethodsInCategory: aName > "Answer a list of all the methods of the receiver and all its > superclasses that are in the category named aName" > > | aColl | > aColl := OrderedCollection new. > self withAllSuperclasses do: [:aClass | > aColl addAll: (aClass organization listAtCategoryNamed: > aName) ]. > ^ aColl asSet asArray sort > > > uncategorizedMethods > ^ self methodsInCategory: Protocol unclassified > > all these methods returns selectors and not compiled methods. > > So I would like to rename them accordingly. > What do you think? > > Stef > yes, if they return selectors, the name should talk about selectors.. -- Best regards, Igor Stasenko.

Aug. 29, 2013

[update 3.0] #30357

by Marcus Denker

30357 ----- 11126 Unused CI packages load by default in pharo https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/11126

Aug. 29, 2013

Re: [Pharo-dev] It was a productive and nice sprint.

by Tudor Girba

Yes! I would love to have such a tool. Doru On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 9:32 AM, Igor Stasenko <siguctua(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On 29 August 2013 08:53, StÃ©phane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr>wrote: > >> in the bug tracker >> >> Igor spent the day chasing bad registration hanging around and fixing the >> tools to let him >> get there. >> >> > unfortunately i didn't managed to chase them all. > found couple leaks, but there are more which still escaping :( > > what i want to do is to write small tracer which will search for local > roots of set of objects. > > >> stef >> >> On Aug 29, 2013, at 7:00 AM, Tudor Girba <tudor(a)tudorgirba.com> wrote: >> >> Thank you! >> >> Where can I see the pointer explorer? >> >> Doru >> >> >> >> >> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 9:00 PM, StÃ©phane Ducasse < >> stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr> wrote: >> >>> Thanks all for your good energy. >>> I will push some of the fixes in the stream too :) >>> >>> For the non participating guys we got >>> - compiler fixes >>> - faster tests >>> - cleans in morphic >>> - better pointer explorer >>> - critics browser working >>> - grease better configuration >>> - and many moreâ¦ >>> >>> Stef >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> www.tudorgirba.com >> >> "Every thing has its own flow" >> >> >> > > > -- > Best regards, > Igor Stasenko. > -- www.tudorgirba.com "Every thing has its own flow"

Aug. 29, 2013

Re: [Pharo-dev] It was a productive and nice sprint.

by Igor Stasenko

On 29 August 2013 08:53, StÃ©phane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr> wrote: > in the bug tracker > > Igor spent the day chasing bad registration hanging around and fixing the > tools to let him > get there. > > unfortunately i didn't managed to chase them all. found couple leaks, but there are more which still escaping :( what i want to do is to write small tracer which will search for local roots of set of objects. > stef > > On Aug 29, 2013, at 7:00 AM, Tudor Girba <tudor(a)tudorgirba.com> wrote: > > Thank you! > > Where can I see the pointer explorer? > > Doru > > > > > On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 9:00 PM, StÃ©phane Ducasse < > stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr> wrote: > >> Thanks all for your good energy. >> I will push some of the fixes in the stream too :) >> >> For the non participating guys we got >> - compiler fixes >> - faster tests >> - cleans in morphic >> - better pointer explorer >> - critics browser working >> - grease better configuration >> - and many moreâ¦ >> >> Stef >> > > > > -- > www.tudorgirba.com > > "Every thing has its own flow" > > > -- Best regards, Igor Stasenko.

Aug. 29, 2013