July 2013 - Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

[regression reporter]regression occurred

by no-reply＠ci.inria.fr

https://ci.inria.fr/pharo/job/Pharo-3.0-Update-Step-2-Validation/label=win/… 1 regressions found. Tests.Release.ReleaseTest.testUndeclared

July 17, 2013

[regression reporter]regression occurred

by no-reply＠ci.inria.fr

https://ci.inria.fr/pharo/job/Pharo-3.0-Update-Step-2-Validation/label=linu… 1 regressions found. Tests.Release.ReleaseTest.testUndeclared

July 17, 2013

[regression reporter]regression occurred

by no-reply＠ci.inria.fr

https://ci.inria.fr/pharo/job/Pharo-3.0-Update-Step-2-Validation/label=mac/… 1 regressions found. Tests.Release.ReleaseTest.testUndeclared

July 17, 2013

Re: [Pharo-dev] [DOC] Building and deploying

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

On Jul 16, 2013, at 4:42 PM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven(a)stfx.eu> wrote: > > On 15 Jul 2013, at 20:19, Paul Davidowitz <pdavidow(a)fastmail.fm> wrote: > >> Very nice, but perhaps in a future tutorial the mode of presentation can >> be TDDâ¦ > > Thanks. > > Yes, it would be good if someone wrote a beautiful tutorial with a focus on TDD. > > For this subject and this tutorial, the tests are more functional tests than unit tests. I feel that it would be hard to do a web app fully TDD. But who knows, I like to read nice tutorials and learn something new as well ;-) +1 I know this feeling. > > Sven

July 17, 2013

Re: [Pharo-dev] Penelope - Fail to create account

by Mariano Vicente

In my case is a spanish art seller. Saludos, Mariano On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 2:36 PM, Carla F. Griggio <carla.griggio(a)gmail.com>wrote: > Not in my case, carlagriggio(a)gmail.com is a biologist from Brazil :P > > > On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 3:40 AM, Clara Allende <clari.allende(a)gmail.com>wrote: > >> Just write your mail without dots, its the same for gmail (I've been >> there already) >> >> Sent from Gmail for Android >> On 17 Jul 2013 01:14, "Carla F. Griggio" <carla.griggio(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Me :( >>> I could see the issues by entering each category listed in the home >>> page, but still it was uncomfortable to feel that I should know before hand >>> in which category the issue I was looking for could be listed. >>> I wanted to register to post issues with my name and I couldn't (and in >>> the login form there should be a link explaining how to register, not only >>> for asking a lost password). >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Carla >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 1:06 AM, Mariano Vicente <m.vicent(a)gmail.com>wrote: >>> >>>> Hi. >>>> I tried create my user in penelope [1], so I can see the issues in >>>> fogbugz. and this fails when i added the email, I think the problems are >>>> the dots in my email adress. >>>> >>>> Anybody have had the same problem? >>>> >>>> [1] http://bugs.pharo.org/issues?_k=DBsCrRwP1TgaBEDb >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Mariano >>>> >>> >>> >

July 17, 2013

[update 3.0] #30276

by Marcus Denker

30276 ----- 7300 Finder raise an error on asking for implementors https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/7300 10348 GroupAlreadyExists vs. GroupsAlreadyExists confusion https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/10348 11180 Add a filter to the config browser https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/11180 11172 notEmpty should be isNotEmpty https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/11172 Diff information: http://smalltalkhub.com/mc/Pharo/Pharo30/main/Tools-MarcusDenker.1177.diff http://smalltalkhub.com/mc/Pharo/Pharo30/main/Nautilus-MarcusDenker.492.diff http://smalltalkhub.com/mc/Pharo/Pharo30/main/GroupManager-MarcusDenker.43.… http://smalltalkhub.com/mc/Pharo/Pharo30/main/Collections-Abstract-MarcusDe…

July 17, 2013

Re: [Pharo-dev] Penelope - Fail to create account

by Carla F. Griggio

Not in my case, carlagriggio(a)gmail.com is a biologist from Brazil :P On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 3:40 AM, Clara Allende <clari.allende(a)gmail.com>wrote: > Just write your mail without dots, its the same for gmail (I've been there > already) > > Sent from Gmail for Android > On 17 Jul 2013 01:14, "Carla F. Griggio" <carla.griggio(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> Me :( >> I could see the issues by entering each category listed in the home page, >> but still it was uncomfortable to feel that I should know before hand in >> which category the issue I was looking for could be listed. >> I wanted to register to post issues with my name and I couldn't (and in >> the login form there should be a link explaining how to register, not only >> for asking a lost password). >> >> Cheers, >> Carla >> >> >> On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 1:06 AM, Mariano Vicente <m.vicent(a)gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> Hi. >>> I tried create my user in penelope [1], so I can see the issues in >>> fogbugz. and this fails when i added the email, I think the problems are >>> the dots in my email adress. >>> >>> Anybody have had the same problem? >>> >>> [1] http://bugs.pharo.org/issues?_k=DBsCrRwP1TgaBEDb >>> >>> Regards, >>> Mariano >>> >> >>

July 17, 2013

Re: [Pharo-dev] buttons for browsing in the debugger

by Andrei Vasile Chis

> > In general what I learned: You find an obscure, not useful, not used > feature in the code base that complexities everything. > > option 1) Ask the list. > Result: 5 people will suddenly realize that they can not live > without that strange feature they never heard about before. > > option 2) Just kill it. > Result: the World is a happier place. > > ;-) > > But seriously I used that Strategy 2) a lot in the past :-) > > Sounds like a good plan :)

July 17, 2013

Re: [Pharo-dev] buttons for browsing in the debugger

by Andrei Vasile Chis

-1 but i don't like it in form of extra buttons row, which makes > debugger UI too bloated. > They will be accessible from the context menu of the stack. > > > Andrei > > > > -- > Best regards, > Igor Stasenko. > >

July 17, 2013

Re: [Pharo-dev] buttons for browsing in the debugger

by Frank Shearar

On 17 July 2013 15:18, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker(a)inria.fr> wrote: > > On Jul 17, 2013, at 4:11 PM, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker(a)inria.fr> wrote: > >> >> On Jul 17, 2013, at 3:58 PM, Andrei Vasile Chis <chisvasileandrei(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> If the debugging option ExtraDebuggerButtons is set to true a second row containing some actions for browsing code (senders, implementors, versions, etc) will be added under the one with >>> the stepInto, stepOver, etc buttons. >>> >>> Do you use this feature? >> >> I don't think so. > > In general what I learned: You find an obscure, not useful, not used feature in the code base that complexities everything. > > option 1) Ask the list. > Result: 5 people will suddenly realize that they can not live without that strange feature they never heard about before. > > option 2) Just kill it. > Result: the World is a happier place. > > ;-) > > But seriously I used that Strategy 2) a lot in the past :-) It'll quickly flush out whether or not the feature really is important! frank > Marcus > > >

July 17, 2013