June 2013 - Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

[regression reporter]regression occurred

by no-reply＠ci.inria.fr

https://ci.inria.fr/pharo/job/Pharo-3.0-Update-Step-2-Validation/./label=li… 1 regressions found. KernelTests.Classes.ClassDescriptionTest.testUnCategorizedMethods

June 17, 2013

[update 3.0] #30200

by Marcus Denker

30200 ----- 7069 Filing out extension package in Nautilus produces empty file https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/7069 10915 String class>>#readFrom: is broken and untested https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/10915 10917 Add method for creating anonymous classes https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/10917 10920 TimeProfiler >> #blockCode uses strange printing strategy https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/10920 10921 Smalltalk vm headlessOption returns wrong value with latest VM https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/10921 Diff information: http://smalltalkhub.com/mc/Pharo/Pharo30/main/Traits-MarcusDenker.507.diff http://smalltalkhub.com/mc/Pharo/Pharo30/main/Tools-MarcusDenker.1143.diff http://smalltalkhub.com/mc/Pharo/Pharo30/main/System-Support-MarcusDenker.8… http://smalltalkhub.com/mc/Pharo/Pharo30/main/Nautilus-MarcusDenker.472.diff http://smalltalkhub.com/mc/Pharo/Pharo30/main/Kernel-MarcusDenker.1479.diff http://smalltalkhub.com/mc/Pharo/Pharo30/main/CollectionsTests-MarcusDenker… http://smalltalkhub.com/mc/Pharo/Pharo30/main/Collections-Strings-MarcusDen…

June 17, 2013

Re: [Pharo-dev] Zinc problem with PUT requests

by Sean P. DeNigris

Sven Van Caekenberghe-2 wrote >>>> The problem you reported can easily be fixed by loading the latest >>>> version of Zinc-Seaaside (the one in the StHub image is very old) > ... > I don't maintain the build, but all these problems where fixed some time > ago. The image I downloaded from Jenkins has loaded baseline 0.9.1 of sthub, which seems to be the latest defined in ConfigurationOfSmalltalkHub from http://smalltalkhub.com/mc/NicolasPetton/SmalltalkHub/main . I checked http://www.squeaksource.com/ZincHTTPComponents, which is the repo mentioned at http://zn.stfx.eu/zn/index.html, and the only packages available for update are Zinc-Character-Encoding-Core-SvenVanCaekenberghe.21, Zinc-HTTP-SvenVanCaekenberghe.371, and Zinc-Resource-Meta-Core-SvenVanCaekenberghe.53. Updating the first two didn't help, and the last one broke the MCWorkingCopyBrowser with MessageNotUnderstood: ZnUrl>>enforceKnownScheme Help!!!! This is too high a bar for user contributions. If I can't figure this out, what is the chance that someone outside our core community can?! ----- Cheers, Sean -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-dev-Zinc-problem-with-PUT-requests-tp4688705p46… Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

June 17, 2013

Re: [Pharo-dev] Smark doc/use?

by Camillo Bruni

On 2013-06-17, at 00:03, Stefan Marr <smalltalk(a)stefan-marr.de> wrote: > Hi Camillo: > > On 16 Jun 2013, at 23:31, Camillo Bruni <camillobruni(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> humm seems like you introduced some invalid dependencies: >> >> https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-contribution/job/SMark/PHARO=20,VERSION=stable,VM… > > Thanks! Forgot to migrate the NAS Parallel Benchmarksâ¦ > > Fixed it. > > Is there a way, I could get email notifications for broken builds? jup, I added it, be prepared to get spammed ;) > Thanks > Stefan > > PS: The NPB port currently includes only the integer sorting benchmark, and it's broken on Pharo. My best guess being that we have closures instead of blocks. While the RoarVM images still use blocks. Never got around to fix it.

June 16, 2013

Re: [Pharo-dev] Smark doc/use?

by Stefan Marr

Hi Camillo: On 16 Jun 2013, at 23:31, Camillo Bruni <camillobruni(a)gmail.com> wrote: > humm seems like you introduced some invalid dependencies: > > https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-contribution/job/SMark/PHARO=20,VERSION=stable,VM… Thanks! Forgot to migrate the NAS Parallel Benchmarksâ¦ Fixed it. Is there a way, I could get email notifications for broken builds? Thanks Stefan PS: The NPB port currently includes only the integer sorting benchmark, and it's broken on Pharo. My best guess being that we have closures instead of blocks. While the RoarVM images still use blocks. Never got around to fix it. -- Stefan Marr Software Languages Lab Vrije Universiteit Brussel Pleinlaan 2 / B-1050 Brussels / Belgium http://soft.vub.ac.be/~smarr Phone: +32 2 629 2974 Fax: +32 2 629 3525

June 16, 2013

Re: [Pharo-dev] Smark doc/use?

by Camillo Bruni

On 2013-06-16, at 22:28, Stefan Marr <smalltalk(a)stefan-marr.de> wrote: > Hi Stef: > > > On 16 Jun 2013, at 20:52, StÃ©phane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr> wrote: > >> note also that ConfigurationOfBenchmarking >> - refers to SqueakSource >> - refers to Scripting but scripting is not in the smalltalkhub/StefanMarr/SMark/main > > The repo now includes a few commits that haven't been uploaded before. > They should also fix the reference and make it point to SmalltalkHub. > > I don't plan to rename the configuration at the moment. The original intention was to use a more general name, because it includes also the Computer Language Benchmark Game package. Which is not strictly speaking SMark. > And, a number of my projects depend on the current configuration. > > If you feel the need for a specific ConfigurationOfSMark, that for instance does not include the Computer Language Benchmarks, feel free to commit one. humm seems like you introduced some invalid dependencies: https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-contribution/job/SMark/PHARO=20,VERSION=stable,VM…

June 16, 2013

Re: [Pharo-dev] Smark doc/use?

by Stefan Marr

Hi Stef: On 16 Jun 2013, at 20:43, StÃ©phane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr> wrote: >> I am not aware of a blog post or similar things. > > it is coming :) see the attachment. Just a general remark: I am not sure what Camillo's opinion is, but he had a substantial part in SMark, and if you need to mention names, he should certainly be included. >> The benchmark SMarkSuite has also a comment, which gives minimal information of how to use it. >> Note that I use SMark mostly from the command line. So, it only has a limited set of convenience methods. >> Most of the time, I use `SMarkHarness run:` as in the example below. > > what do you think about initializing the runner of a suite to the be the default one? > This way we could do > > SmarkLoops new runBenchmark: #benchArrayAccess. I think you would rather want something like: SMarkSuite class >> #runOnly: aSymbol "aSymbol should refer to a benchmark method. Example: SMarkLoops runOnly: #benchFloatLoop " ^ self defaultRunner execute: (self new runOnly: aSymbol) > What is the <omniUnenforced>? > "Hint for the OMOP that it is part of the meta infrastructure" > I kind of get that this is a kind of annotation for your phd thesis. Yes. It is a hint for the VM or bytecode transformation that this methods does not need to be subject to the metaobject protocol. Since it does not really hurt, I did not spend the effort to keep it out of SMark. Best regards Stefan -- Stefan Marr Software Languages Lab Vrije Universiteit Brussel Pleinlaan 2 / B-1050 Brussels / Belgium http://soft.vub.ac.be/~smarr Phone: +32 2 629 2974 Fax: +32 2 629 3525

June 16, 2013

Re: [Pharo-dev] Smark doc/use?

by Stefan Marr

Hi Stef: On 16 Jun 2013, at 20:52, StÃ©phane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr> wrote: > note also that ConfigurationOfBenchmarking > - refers to SqueakSource > - refers to Scripting but scripting is not in the smalltalkhub/StefanMarr/SMark/main The repo now includes a few commits that haven't been uploaded before. They should also fix the reference and make it point to SmalltalkHub. I don't plan to rename the configuration at the moment. The original intention was to use a more general name, because it includes also the Computer Language Benchmark Game package. Which is not strictly speaking SMark. And, a number of my projects depend on the current configuration. If you feel the need for a specific ConfigurationOfSMark, that for instance does not include the Computer Language Benchmarks, feel free to commit one. Best regards Stefan -- Stefan Marr Software Languages Lab Vrije Universiteit Brussel Pleinlaan 2 / B-1050 Brussels / Belgium http://soft.vub.ac.be/~smarr Phone: +32 2 629 2974 Fax: +32 2 629 3525

June 16, 2013

Re: [Pharo-dev] Smark doc/use?

by Camillo Bruni

There is another approach done by JuanPablo for Rizel running on the new Pharo CLI infrastructure. So we can definitely hack together and merge the two approaches :) On 2013-06-16, at 21:07, StÃ©phane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr> wrote: > Camillo > > it looks like SMarkHarness is a good candidate for having a nice commandline handler. May be we could pair program one :) > > Stef >> actually that is related to a bug in 3.0 :/ >> >> => https://pharo.fogbugz.com/default.asp?10920 >> >> >> On 2013-06-16, at 19:50, Camillo Bruni <camillobruni(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>> #profile: is supposed to open the profiler on the given benchmark. >>> let me fix that :) >>> >>> On 2013-06-16, at 19:16, StÃ©phane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr> wrote: >>> >>>> SMarkLoops profile: #benchArrayAccess >>>> >>>> does not work >>>> >>>> I was wondering if this is the class side version of runBenchmark: >>>> >>>> Stef >>>> >>>> >>>> On Jun 16, 2013, at 12:12 PM, StÃ©phane Ducasse <Stephane.Ducasse(a)inria.fr> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I started to read the code (and its self-documentation aspect is not totally there). >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> (SMarkLoops new runOnly: #benchFloatLoop) run >>>>> >>>>> Stefan I started to comment the code so are you interested in the commits? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Stef >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Hi camillo/Stefan >>>>>> >>>>>> I would like to know how to use SMark and document it. >>>>>> Do you have a start of a blog/doc/slide that I can use as a start? >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm thinking that I could use the implementation of Trie of Benoit and the one of Cuis >>>>>> as an example to do some benchs. >>>>>> Since I'm not fluent in benchmarks, I think that this the occasion to learn. >>>>>> >>>>>> Stef >> > >

June 16, 2013

Re: [Pharo-dev] Smark doc/use?

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

Camillo it looks like SMarkHarness is a good candidate for having a nice commandline handler. May be we could pair program one :) Stef > actually that is related to a bug in 3.0 :/ > > => https://pharo.fogbugz.com/default.asp?10920 > > > On 2013-06-16, at 19:50, Camillo Bruni <camillobruni(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> #profile: is supposed to open the profiler on the given benchmark. >> let me fix that :) >> >> On 2013-06-16, at 19:16, StÃ©phane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr> wrote: >> >>> SMarkLoops profile: #benchArrayAccess >>> >>> does not work >>> >>> I was wondering if this is the class side version of runBenchmark: >>> >>> Stef >>> >>> >>> On Jun 16, 2013, at 12:12 PM, StÃ©phane Ducasse <Stephane.Ducasse(a)inria.fr> wrote: >>> >>>> I started to read the code (and its self-documentation aspect is not totally there). >>>> >>>> >>>> (SMarkLoops new runOnly: #benchFloatLoop) run >>>> >>>> Stefan I started to comment the code so are you interested in the commits? >>>> >>>> >>>> Stef >>>> >>>> >>>>> Hi camillo/Stefan >>>>> >>>>> I would like to know how to use SMark and document it. >>>>> Do you have a start of a blog/doc/slide that I can use as a start? >>>>> >>>>> I'm thinking that I could use the implementation of Trie of Benoit and the one of Cuis >>>>> as an example to do some benchs. >>>>> Since I'm not fluent in benchmarks, I think that this the occasion to learn. >>>>> >>>>> Stef >

June 16, 2013