June 2013 - Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-dev] Lowecase class names

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

Do not expect us to change the classbuilder in 2.0 :) I agree with marcus Stef >>> I thought so. Attached hack removes it. >>> >> >> Of course a complete rewrite of the class builder is ready for integrationâ¦ >> >> https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-contribution/job/Slot/ >> >> So the question is if it makes sense to add this one? > > Hm...I'm not sure what you mean. Let put it this way? Any chance > 2.0 will allow lowercase class names? If not, fine with me, I'll patch > ClassBuilder before loading my packages. > > Jan >

June 6, 2013

Re: [Pharo-dev] [regression reporter]regression occurred

by Marcus Denker

>> > > I recreated a work image (20605), tested and saw the two failures: > > FileSystem.Tests.Disk.FileHandleTest.testTruncate > Refactoring.Tests.Changes.RBRefactoringChangeTests.testPerformChangeComment > > Then loaded SLICE-Issue-10411-flush-after-nextChunkPut-ThierryGoubier.1 (the changes are visible :)) > > And ended with those two tests green. > > (But with > Refactoring.Tests.Changes.RBRefactoringChangeTests.tesValidTraitComposition(|2|3|4) failures) > > Now, 606 isn't available, no? I use get.pharo.org/20 Ah, then that is the problemâ¦ normally it is pushed automatically, but this seems to have failed. I think we should just wait till the infrastructure is back and then redo the build. Marcus

June 6, 2013

Re: [Pharo-dev] [Screencast]: Pharo Smalltalk's New TxText: The Power of Clean Code

by Denis Kudriashov

2013/6/6 Sean P. DeNigris <sean(a)clipperadams.com> > https://vimeo.com/67752734 Cool. Did you publish code? > > > Very short and simple video describing my experience while implementing > replacing a text morph's cursor with a block cursor to signify vim normal > mode. Shows how I was able to accomplish something in a few minutes which > seemed impossible with TextEditor and friends. > > Things are getting really exciting around here :) > We talk with Alain about Rubric and in near future we will have selection as morph's. So we can tune selection border width, color, present it with ellipse and etc. > > > > ----- > Cheers, > Sean > -- > View this message in context: > http://forum.world.st/Screencast-Pharo-Smalltalk-s-New-TxText-The-Power-of-… > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at > Nabble.com. > >

June 6, 2013

Re: [Pharo-dev] [regression reporter]regression occurred

by Goubier Thierry

Le 06/06/2013 10:33, Marcus Denker a Ã©crit : > > On Jun 6, 2013, at 10:25 AM, Goubier Thierry <thierry.goubier(a)cea.fr> wrote: > >> Le 06/06/2013 08:32, Marcus Denker a Ã©crit : >>> >>> On Jun 5, 2013, at 4:10 PM, Goubier Thierry <thierry.goubier(a)cea.fr> wrote: >>> >>>> Le 05/06/2013 16:04, Marcus Denker a Ã©crit : >>>>> >>>>> On Jun 5, 2013, at 4:03 PM, Goubier Thierry <thierry.goubier(a)cea.fr> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Le 05/06/2013 15:56, Marcus Denker a Ã©crit : >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Jun 5, 2013, at 2:39 PM, no-reply(a)ci.inria.fr wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> https://ci.inria.fr/pharo/job/Pharo-2.0-Tests/./Run=run%201,VM=vm,label=lin… >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 3 regressions found. >>>>>>>> FileSystem.Tests.Disk.FileHandleTest.testTruncate >>>>>>>> Refactoring.Tests.Changes.RBRefactoringChangeTests.testPerformChangeComment >>>>>>>> Tests.Monticello.MCClassDefinitionTest.testLoadAndUnload >>>>>>>> >>> >>> Ok, so we have 2 independent issues; >>> >>> 1) testTruncate failing on recent Ubuntu in both 2.0 and 3.0 >>> >>> https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/10852 >>> >>> 2) The slice I integrated was wrong / not complete: >>> >>> FileSystem.Tests.Disk.FileHandleTest.testTruncate >>> Refactoring.Tests.Changes.RBRefactoringChangeTests.testPerformChangeComment >>> >>> >>> https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/10415 >>> >>> For this, I think the best would be to submit the missing code in some machine readable form >>> as I right now am a bit confused about what exactly "adding the right flush methods" means. >> >> As far as I can browse, SLICE-Issue-10411-flush-after-nextChunkPut-ThierryGoubier.1 contains the correct code. >> > When I merge it in 2.0 606 I do not see any change.. > >> Do you want me to retry generating a slice? > > Maybe something is wrong with the image that was used to run the tests? Maybe that one actually was 605? > > Marcus I recreated a work image (20605), tested and saw the two failures: FileSystem.Tests.Disk.FileHandleTest.testTruncate Refactoring.Tests.Changes.RBRefactoringChangeTests.testPerformChangeComment Then loaded SLICE-Issue-10411-flush-after-nextChunkPut-ThierryGoubier.1 (the changes are visible :)) And ended with those two tests green. (But with Refactoring.Tests.Changes.RBRefactoringChangeTests.tesValidTraitComposition(|2|3|4) failures) Now, 606 isn't available, no? I use get.pharo.org/20 Thierry -- Thierry Goubier CEA list Laboratoire des Fondations des SystÃ¨mes Temps RÃ©el EmbarquÃ©s 91191 Gif sur Yvette Cedex France Phone/Fax: +33 (0) 1 69 08 32 92 / 83 95

June 6, 2013

Re: [Pharo-dev] [regression reporter]regression occurred

by Marcus Denker

On Jun 6, 2013, at 10:25 AM, Goubier Thierry <thierry.goubier(a)cea.fr> wrote: > Le 06/06/2013 08:32, Marcus Denker a Ã©crit : >> >> On Jun 5, 2013, at 4:10 PM, Goubier Thierry <thierry.goubier(a)cea.fr> wrote: >> >>> Le 05/06/2013 16:04, Marcus Denker a Ã©crit : >>>> >>>> On Jun 5, 2013, at 4:03 PM, Goubier Thierry <thierry.goubier(a)cea.fr> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Le 05/06/2013 15:56, Marcus Denker a Ã©crit : >>>>>> >>>>>> On Jun 5, 2013, at 2:39 PM, no-reply(a)ci.inria.fr wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> https://ci.inria.fr/pharo/job/Pharo-2.0-Tests/./Run=run%201,VM=vm,label=lin… >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 3 regressions found. >>>>>>> FileSystem.Tests.Disk.FileHandleTest.testTruncate >>>>>>> Refactoring.Tests.Changes.RBRefactoringChangeTests.testPerformChangeComment >>>>>>> Tests.Monticello.MCClassDefinitionTest.testLoadAndUnload >>>>>>> >> >> Ok, so we have 2 independent issues; >> >> 1) testTruncate failing on recent Ubuntu in both 2.0 and 3.0 >> >> https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/10852 >> >> 2) The slice I integrated was wrong / not complete: >> >> FileSystem.Tests.Disk.FileHandleTest.testTruncate >> Refactoring.Tests.Changes.RBRefactoringChangeTests.testPerformChangeComment >> >> >> https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/10415 >> >> For this, I think the best would be to submit the missing code in some machine readable form >> as I right now am a bit confused about what exactly "adding the right flush methods" means. > > As far as I can browse, SLICE-Issue-10411-flush-after-nextChunkPut-ThierryGoubier.1 contains the correct code. > When I merge it in 2.0 606 I do not see any change.. > Do you want me to retry generating a slice? Maybe something is wrong with the image that was used to run the tests? Maybe that one actually was 605? Marcus

June 6, 2013

Re: [Pharo-dev] [regression reporter]regression occurred

by Goubier Thierry

Le 06/06/2013 08:32, Marcus Denker a Ã©crit : > > On Jun 5, 2013, at 4:10 PM, Goubier Thierry <thierry.goubier(a)cea.fr> wrote: > >> Le 05/06/2013 16:04, Marcus Denker a Ã©crit : >>> >>> On Jun 5, 2013, at 4:03 PM, Goubier Thierry <thierry.goubier(a)cea.fr> wrote: >>> >>>> Le 05/06/2013 15:56, Marcus Denker a Ã©crit : >>>>> >>>>> On Jun 5, 2013, at 2:39 PM, no-reply(a)ci.inria.fr wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> https://ci.inria.fr/pharo/job/Pharo-2.0-Tests/./Run=run%201,VM=vm,label=lin… >>>>>> >>>>>> 3 regressions found. >>>>>> FileSystem.Tests.Disk.FileHandleTest.testTruncate >>>>>> Refactoring.Tests.Changes.RBRefactoringChangeTests.testPerformChangeComment >>>>>> Tests.Monticello.MCClassDefinitionTest.testLoadAndUnload >>>>>> > > Ok, so we have 2 independent issues; > > 1) testTruncate failing on recent Ubuntu in both 2.0 and 3.0 > > https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/10852 > > 2) The slice I integrated was wrong / not complete: > > FileSystem.Tests.Disk.FileHandleTest.testTruncate > Refactoring.Tests.Changes.RBRefactoringChangeTests.testPerformChangeComment > > > https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/10415 > > For this, I think the best would be to submit the missing code in some machine readable form > as I right now am a bit confused about what exactly "adding the right flush methods" means. As far as I can browse, SLICE-Issue-10411-flush-after-nextChunkPut-ThierryGoubier.1 contains the correct code. Do you want me to retry generating a slice? Thierry -- Thierry Goubier CEA list Laboratoire des Fondations des SystÃ¨mes Temps RÃ©el EmbarquÃ©s 91191 Gif sur Yvette Cedex France Phone/Fax: +33 (0) 1 69 08 32 92 / 83 95

June 6, 2013

[regression reporter]regression occurred

by no-reply＠ci.inria.fr

https://ci.inria.fr/pharo/job/Pharo-3.0-Update-Step-2-Validation/./label=li… 1 regressions found. Zodiac.Tests.ZdcSecureSocketStreamTests.testIsNativeSSLPluginPresent

June 6, 2013

Re: [Pharo-dev] [update 3.0] #30181

by Camillo Bruni

strange all of a sudden the access rights on the EC2 instance changed :/ I chmod'ed everything so it seem to pass now... On 2013-06-06, at 10:08, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker(a)inria.fr> wrote: > With the shaky infrastructure it will take a while till it gets through the pipelineâ¦ > > Right now it fails on step 1: > > https://ci.inria.fr/pharo/job/Pharo-3.0-Update-Step-1-Tracker/404/ > > "FATAL: Unable to produce a script file" > > On Jun 6, 2013, at 10:06 AM, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker(a)inria.fr> wrote: > >> 30181 >> ----- >> >> 10842 Recategorize AST interpreter visit methods >> https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/10842 >> >> 10850 Fix openWorldWithSpec >> https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/10850 >> >> Diff information: >> http://smalltalkhub.com/mc/Pharo/Pharo30/main/Spec-Widgets-MarcusDenker.190… >> http://smalltalkhub.com/mc/Pharo/Pharo30/main/Spec-Core-MarcusDenker.130.di… >> http://smalltalkhub.com/mc/Pharo/Pharo30/main/AST-Interpreter-Core-MarcusDe… >> http://smalltalkhub.com/mc/Pharo/Pharo30/main/AST-Core-MarcusDenker.163.diff >> > >

June 6, 2013

Re: [Pharo-dev] [update 3.0] #30181

by Marcus Denker

With the shaky infrastructure it will take a while till it gets through the pipelineâ¦ Right now it fails on step 1: https://ci.inria.fr/pharo/job/Pharo-3.0-Update-Step-1-Tracker/404/ "FATAL: Unable to produce a script file" On Jun 6, 2013, at 10:06 AM, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker(a)inria.fr> wrote: > 30181 > ----- > > 10842 Recategorize AST interpreter visit methods > https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/10842 > > 10850 Fix openWorldWithSpec > https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/10850 > > Diff information: > http://smalltalkhub.com/mc/Pharo/Pharo30/main/Spec-Widgets-MarcusDenker.190… > http://smalltalkhub.com/mc/Pharo/Pharo30/main/Spec-Core-MarcusDenker.130.di… > http://smalltalkhub.com/mc/Pharo/Pharo30/main/AST-Interpreter-Core-MarcusDe… > http://smalltalkhub.com/mc/Pharo/Pharo30/main/AST-Core-MarcusDenker.163.diff >

June 6, 2013

[update 3.0] #30181

by Marcus Denker

30181 ----- 10842 Recategorize AST interpreter visit methods https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/10842 10850 Fix openWorldWithSpec https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/10850 Diff information: http://smalltalkhub.com/mc/Pharo/Pharo30/main/Spec-Widgets-MarcusDenker.190… http://smalltalkhub.com/mc/Pharo/Pharo30/main/Spec-Core-MarcusDenker.130.di… http://smalltalkhub.com/mc/Pharo/Pharo30/main/AST-Interpreter-Core-MarcusDe… http://smalltalkhub.com/mc/Pharo/Pharo30/main/AST-Core-MarcusDenker.163.diff

June 6, 2013