June 2013 - Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-dev] Clickable web links inside class comments , possible ?

by dimitris chloupis

make that two of us :D ________________________________ From: Marcus Denker <marcus.denker(a)inria.fr> To: Pharo Development List <pharo-dev(a)lists.pharo.org> Cc: dimitris chloupis <thekilon(a)yahoo.co.uk> Sent: Sunday, 9 June 2013, 18:44 Subject: Re: [Pharo-dev] Clickable web links inside class comments , possible ? On Jun 9, 2013, at 5:26 PM, phil(a)highoctane.be wrote: Well, if comments would come back from changes files that would be one thing already... > > >https://pharo.fogbugz.com/default.asp?10860#78933 > > > I do not understand what this issue has to do with the clickable web links. Marcus

June 9, 2013

Re: [Pharo-dev] Clickable web links inside class comments , possible ?

by phil＠highoctane.be

well, if basic comments have issues (first with historical then with change files) I don't give a damn about links. That's what. BTW links were in Squeak and removed since textmorph changes led to that. No issue with that BTW. I may just have a bad day... Le 9 juin 2013 17:45, "Marcus Denker" <marcus.denker(a)inria.fr> a Ã©crit : > > On Jun 9, 2013, at 5:26 PM, phil(a)highoctane.be wrote: > > Well, if comments would come back from changes files that would be one > thing already... > > https://pharo.fogbugz.com/default.asp?10860#78933 > > > I do not understand what this issue has to do with the clickable web links. > > Marcus > >

June 9, 2013

Re: [Pharo-dev] Clickable web links inside class comments , possible ?

by Marcus Denker

On Jun 9, 2013, at 5:26 PM, phil(a)highoctane.be wrote: > Well, if comments would come back from changes files that would be one thing already... > > https://pharo.fogbugz.com/default.asp?10860#78933 > I do not understand what this issue has to do with the clickable web links. Marcus

June 9, 2013

[update 3.0] #30189

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

30189 ----- 30188 (new attempt after the double 30188) Issue 10745 [ENH]: MethodContext>>#callChainAnySatisfy: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/default.asp?10745 Issue 10838 an MCOrganizationDefinition should only remove empty categories during unload https://pharo.fogbugz.com/default.asp?10838 Issue 10853 AlainTreeModel: Want menu on tree items only https://pharo.fogbugz.com/default.asp?10853 Diff information: http://smalltalkhub.com/mc/Pharo/Pharo30/main/Spec-Widgets-StephaneDucasse.… http://smalltalkhub.com/mc/Pharo/Pharo30/main/Monticello-StephaneDucasse.81… http://smalltalkhub.com/mc/Pharo/Pharo30/main/Kernel-StephaneDucasse.1473.d…

June 9, 2013

Re: [Pharo-dev] Clickable web links inside class comments , possible ?

by phil＠highoctane.be

Well, if comments would come back from changes files that would be one thing already... https://pharo.fogbugz.com/default.asp?10860#78933 On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 5:00 PM, dimitris chloupis <thekilon(a)yahoo.co.uk>wrote: > As the titles says is it possible to have clickable web links inside the > comment of a class so when I click it the default web browser pops open in > the webpage , or am I asking too much ? > > >

June 9, 2013

Re: [Pharo-dev] [update 3.0] #30188

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

Now apparently is in 30188 10867 enabled: cleans post fix https://pharo.fogbugz.com/default.asp?10867 is in so I will (re)integrate in the following integration 10745 [ENH]: MethodContext>>#callChainAnySatisfy: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/default.asp?10745 10838 an MCOrganizationDefinition should only remove empty categories during unload https://pharo.fogbugz.com/default.asp?10838 10853 AlainTreeModel: Want menu on tree items only https://pharo.fogbugz.com/default.asp?10853 => this means in particular that the update description is desynchronized. But I do not know why. On Jun 9, 2013, at 5:01 PM, StÃ©phane Ducasse <Stephane.Ducasse(a)inria.fr> wrote: > So apparently there is really a bug because the update 30188 produced a bogus script scriptnil???? > And now I cannot integrate anymore because the scriptXXX is used to verify if the image is in sync with the file. > So I renamed scriptnil > - to be the correct one script287 to avoid to rollback > > and commited a new version of scriptLoader. > > update30188 > "self new update30188" > self withUpdateLog: '10745 [ENH]: MethodContext>>#callChainAnySatisfy: > https://pharo.fogbugz.com/default.asp?10745 > > 10838 an MCOrganizationDefinition should only remove empty categories during unload > https://pharo.fogbugz.com/default.asp?10838 > > 10853 AlainTreeModel: Want menu on tree items only > https://pharo.fogbugz.com/default.asp?10853'. > self loadTogether: self scriptnil merge: false. > ^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > ScriptLoader new cleanRepositories. > self flushCaches. > > => > > update30188 > "self new update30188" > self withUpdateLog: '10745 [ENH]: MethodContext>>#callChainAnySatisfy: > https://pharo.fogbugz.com/default.asp?10745 > > 10838 an MCOrganizationDefinition should only remove empty categories during unload > https://pharo.fogbugz.com/default.asp?10838 > > 10853 AlainTreeModel: Want menu on tree items only > https://pharo.fogbugz.com/default.asp?10853'. > self loadTogether: self script287 merge: false. > ScriptLoader new cleanRepositories. > self flushCaches. > > > On Jun 9, 2013, at 4:48 PM, StÃ©phane Ducasse <Stephane.Ducasse(a)inria.fr> wrote: > >> I removed the update 189 from the latest Scriptloader version (217) >> I published a new version 218 (with only the update30188 method). >> >> In the pharo-update git I remove the 30189-Pha-Update.cs >> >> >> Now I will redo the previous updates >> >> Stef > >

June 9, 2013

Re: [Pharo-dev] [update 3.0] #30188

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

So apparently there is really a bug because the update 30188 produced a bogus script scriptnil???? And now I cannot integrate anymore because the scriptXXX is used to verify if the image is in sync with the file. So I renamed scriptnil - to be the correct one script287 to avoid to rollback and commited a new version of scriptLoader. update30188 "self new update30188" self withUpdateLog: '10745 [ENH]: MethodContext>>#callChainAnySatisfy: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/default.asp?10745 10838 an MCOrganizationDefinition should only remove empty categories during unload https://pharo.fogbugz.com/default.asp?10838 10853 AlainTreeModel: Want menu on tree items only https://pharo.fogbugz.com/default.asp?10853'. self loadTogether: self scriptnil merge: false. ^^^^^^^^^^^^ ScriptLoader new cleanRepositories. self flushCaches. => update30188 "self new update30188" self withUpdateLog: '10745 [ENH]: MethodContext>>#callChainAnySatisfy: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/default.asp?10745 10838 an MCOrganizationDefinition should only remove empty categories during unload https://pharo.fogbugz.com/default.asp?10838 10853 AlainTreeModel: Want menu on tree items only https://pharo.fogbugz.com/default.asp?10853'. self loadTogether: self script287 merge: false. ScriptLoader new cleanRepositories. self flushCaches. On Jun 9, 2013, at 4:48 PM, StÃ©phane Ducasse <Stephane.Ducasse(a)inria.fr> wrote: > I removed the update 189 from the latest Scriptloader version (217) > I published a new version 218 (with only the update30188 method). > > In the pharo-update git I remove the 30189-Pha-Update.cs > > > Now I will redo the previous updates > > Stef

June 9, 2013

Clickable web links inside class comments , possible ?

by dimitris chloupis

As the titles says is it possible to have clickable web links inside the comment of a class so when I click it the default web browser pops open in the webpage , or am I asking too much ?

June 9, 2013

Re: [Pharo-dev] [update 3.0] #30188

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

I removed the update 189 from the latest Scriptloader version (217) I published a new version 218 (with only the update30188 method). In the pharo-update git I remove the 30189-Pha-Update.cs Now I will redo the previous updates Stef

June 9, 2013

Re: [Pharo-dev] [update 3.0] #30188

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

Marcus how do we proceed? I can investigate wihch fixes where produced in the second 30188 and redo them, then redo the 189 What do you think? >>> so how do we sync before I do something. >>> >>> when I run the scripts of esteban >>> ./integrate >>> >>> the staged file is not empty and I do not understand why >>> because to me it should be empty. >>> right now I have and it looks totally bogus. >>> >>> #Pharo3.0^M30184-Pha-Update.cs^M30185-Pha-Update.cs^M30186-Pha-Update.cs^M30187-Pha-Update.cs^M30188-Pha-Update.cs^M30188-Pha-Update.cs >>> >> Yes, it should be empty but it works even like this. It looks just at the last entry. > > ok so I was not completely wrong. > So we sync and I will continue to integrate. > >> >> Marcus >> >> > >

June 9, 2013