May 2013 - Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-dev] SystemAnnouncer api question

by Igor Stasenko

On 27 May 2013 16:21, Igor Stasenko <siguctua(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On 27 May 2013 12:28, Henrik Johansen <henrik.s.johansen(a)veloxit.no> wrote: >> >> On May 27, 2013, at 11:44 AM, Henrik Johansen wrote: >> >>> >>> On May 25, 2013, at 1:11 PM, StÃ©phane Ducasse wrote: >>> >>>> Hi guys >>>> >>>> why there is no variant to on:send:to: >>>> "SystemAnnouncer uniqueInstance on: AddedLog send: #foo to: self. " >>>> that pass also the announcement? >>>> >>>> Just because it is better to use on:do;? >>>> >>>> Stef >>>> >>> Huh? >>> It should work do do >>> SystemAnnouncer uniqueInstance on: AddedLog send: #foo: to: self >>> >>> and get the announcement as argumentâ¦ >>> >>> or #foo:bar: >>> to get the announcer as well as the announcement. >>> >>> This is one of the reasons cull: is cool! ;) >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Henry >>> >> >> Speaking of SystemAnnouncerâ¦ >> In the latest dev image I've got: >> SystemAnnouncer uniqueInstance numberOfSubscriptions 1327 >> >> Most of which are weak subscriptions for RecentMessageList. >> >> RecentMessageList class >> cleanUp >> >> self allInstancesDo: [:rml| rml initialize]. >> >> is clearly wrong, as initialize registers subscriptions for the announcements (thus introducing duplicates), done every time you shut down the imageâ¦ >> >> maybe it should do >> self resetUniqueInstance instead? >> > > i think > RecentMessageList>>registerToAnnouncements > > should include > > SystemAnnouncer uniqueInstance unsubscribe: self. > > > like that, even if you call #initialize multiple times, it won't > create duplicates. > tried it, with the change: SystemAnnouncer uniqueInstance numberOfSubscriptions 467 RecentMessageList cleanUp SystemAnnouncer uniqueInstance numberOfSubscriptions 93 > -- > Best regards, > Igor Stasenko. -- Best regards, Igor Stasenko.

May 27, 2013

Re: [Pharo-dev] SystemAnnouncer api question

by Igor Stasenko

On 27 May 2013 12:28, Henrik Johansen <henrik.s.johansen(a)veloxit.no> wrote: > > On May 27, 2013, at 11:44 AM, Henrik Johansen wrote: > >> >> On May 25, 2013, at 1:11 PM, StÃ©phane Ducasse wrote: >> >>> Hi guys >>> >>> why there is no variant to on:send:to: >>> "SystemAnnouncer uniqueInstance on: AddedLog send: #foo to: self. " >>> that pass also the announcement? >>> >>> Just because it is better to use on:do;? >>> >>> Stef >>> >> Huh? >> It should work do do >> SystemAnnouncer uniqueInstance on: AddedLog send: #foo: to: self >> >> and get the announcement as argumentâ¦ >> >> or #foo:bar: >> to get the announcer as well as the announcement. >> >> This is one of the reasons cull: is cool! ;) >> >> Cheers, >> Henry >> > > Speaking of SystemAnnouncerâ¦ > In the latest dev image I've got: > SystemAnnouncer uniqueInstance numberOfSubscriptions 1327 > > Most of which are weak subscriptions for RecentMessageList. > > RecentMessageList class >> cleanUp > > self allInstancesDo: [:rml| rml initialize]. > > is clearly wrong, as initialize registers subscriptions for the announcements (thus introducing duplicates), done every time you shut down the imageâ¦ > > maybe it should do > self resetUniqueInstance instead? > i think RecentMessageList>>registerToAnnouncements should include SystemAnnouncer uniqueInstance unsubscribe: self. like that, even if you call #initialize multiple times, it won't create duplicates. -- Best regards, Igor Stasenko.

May 27, 2013

Re: [Pharo-dev] [Esug-list] [ANN] SmalltalkHub update

by Serge Stinckwich

Hourra it works ! Thank you Nicolas & Damien Now I want to be able to remove projects ;-) Regards On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 2:45 PM, Nicolas Petton <petton.nicolas(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Hi! > > I've just updated SmalltalkHub with new features and bug fixes, especially: > > - Packages can now be removed by the project owner > - MCZ files can also be removed one by one > > The update also includes a security fix with contributors discovered by Camillo. > > Most of the credit for this release goes to Damien, he implemented most of it, thanks Damien! > > PS: remember that you can now use the configuration of smalltalkhub to get your own instance or start contributing to it, or even but use the jenkins job: > https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-contribution/job/SmalltalkHub/ > > > Cheers, > Nico > _______________________________________________ > Esug-list mailing list > Esug-list(a)lists.esug.org > http://lists.esug.org/mailman/listinfo/esug-list_lists.esug.org > -- Serge Stinckwich UCBN & UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC) Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk http://www.doesnotunderstand.org/

May 27, 2013

[ANN] SmalltalkHub update

by Nicolas Petton

Hi! I've just updated SmalltalkHub with new features and bug fixes, especially: - Packages can now be removed by the project owner - MCZ files can also be removed one by one The update also includes a security fix with contributors discovered by Camillo. Most of the credit for this release goes to Damien, he implemented most of it, thanks Damien! PS: remember that you can now use the configuration of smalltalkhub to get your own instance or start contributing to it, or even but use the jenkins job: https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-contribution/job/SmalltalkHub/ Cheers, Nico

May 27, 2013

Re: [Pharo-dev] Memory leaks with Spec?

by ClÃ©ment Bera

2013/5/27 stephane ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)free.fr> > we found the problem. It is not spec but the EyeInspector polling update. > So we should find a solution. > Probably it should register WindowClosed and kill the process. > Actually the inspector is already registered on WindowClosed event. This bug was introduced by a recent update on spec/EyeInspector. There is a slice in inbox (put this morning) to revert the change that creates this bug. > > Stef > > > Le 25/05/2013 13:59, Benjamin a Ã©crit : > >> I am pretty sure to only use weak registration (why aren't all the > >> registration weak btw ??) > >> > >> It may be a problem somewhere else :( > > > > I hit that problem a while ago. I couldn't find where it was holding the > instances, even with the help of the strong pointer inspector :( (and > trying to put everything weak, and doing unregister when closing windows, > and...) > > > > The same code under plain Morphic has no memory leak. > > > > The only suspicion I had was looking at announcers on blocks... > > > > Thierry > > -- > > Thierry Goubier > > CEA list > > Laboratoire des Fondations des SystÃ¨mes Temps RÃ©el EmbarquÃ©s > > 91191 Gif sur Yvette Cedex > > France > > Phone/Fax: +33 (0) 1 69 08 32 92 / 83 95 > > > > > -- ClÃ©ment BÃ©ra Mate Virtual Machine Engineer BÃ¢timent B 40, avenue Halley 59650 *Villeneuve d'Ascq*

May 27, 2013

Re: [Pharo-dev] SystemAnnouncer api question

by Henrik Johansen

On May 27, 2013, at 11:44 AM, Henrik Johansen wrote: > > On May 25, 2013, at 1:11 PM, StÃ©phane Ducasse wrote: > >> Hi guys >> >> why there is no variant to on:send:to: >> "SystemAnnouncer uniqueInstance on: AddedLog send: #foo to: self. " >> that pass also the announcement? >> >> Just because it is better to use on:do;? >> >> Stef >> > Huh? > It should work do do > SystemAnnouncer uniqueInstance on: AddedLog send: #foo: to: self > > and get the announcement as argumentâ¦ > > or #foo:bar: > to get the announcer as well as the announcement. > > This is one of the reasons cull: is cool! ;) > > Cheers, > Henry > Speaking of SystemAnnouncerâ¦ In the latest dev image I've got: SystemAnnouncer uniqueInstance numberOfSubscriptions 1327 Most of which are weak subscriptions for RecentMessageList. RecentMessageList class >> cleanUp self allInstancesDo: [:rml| rml initialize]. is clearly wrong, as initialize registers subscriptions for the announcements (thus introducing duplicates), done every time you shut down the imageâ¦ maybe it should do self resetUniqueInstance instead? Cheers, Henry

May 27, 2013

Re: [Pharo-dev] libssl on Jenkins-Contribution

by Pavel Krivanek

thanks -- Pavel On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 11:28 AM, Camillo Bruni <camillobruni(a)gmail.com>wrote: > DONE: installed libssl1.0.0:i386 on > pharo-contribution-linux64-2.ci.inria.fr > > On 2013-05-27, at 11:22, Pavel Krivanek <pavel.krivanek(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > our slaves on Jenkins-Contribution server do not have 32bit libSSL > > installed so If I try to run all jobs there, I got this error: > > > > > ioLoadModule(/builds/workspace/PharoKernel3.0-ReloadByMonticello-Tests/phar > > o-vm/libSqueakSSL.so): > > libssl.so.1.0.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or > directory > > > > There are only 64bit slaves there. Can somehow install it? > > > > Cheers, > > -- Pavel > > >

May 27, 2013

Re: [Pharo-dev] SystemAnnouncer api question

by Henrik Johansen

On May 25, 2013, at 1:11 PM, StÃ©phane Ducasse wrote: > Hi guys > > why there is no variant to on:send:to: > "SystemAnnouncer uniqueInstance on: AddedLog send: #foo to: self. " > that pass also the announcement? > > Just because it is better to use on:do;? > > Stef > Huh? It should work do do SystemAnnouncer uniqueInstance on: AddedLog send: #foo: to: self and get the announcement as argumentâ¦ or #foo:bar: to get the announcer as well as the announcement. This is one of the reasons cull: is cool! ;) Cheers, Henry

May 27, 2013

Re: [Pharo-dev] libssl on Jenkins-Contribution

by Camillo Bruni

DONE: installed libssl1.0.0:i386 on pharo-contribution-linux64-2.ci.inria.fr On 2013-05-27, at 11:22, Pavel Krivanek <pavel.krivanek(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > our slaves on Jenkins-Contribution server do not have 32bit libSSL > installed so If I try to run all jobs there, I got this error: > > ioLoadModule(/builds/workspace/PharoKernel3.0-ReloadByMonticello-Tests/phar > o-vm/libSqueakSSL.so): > libssl.so.1.0.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory > > There are only 64bit slaves there. Can somehow install it? > > Cheers, > -- Pavel

May 27, 2013

libssl on Jenkins-Contribution

by Pavel Krivanek

Hi, our slaves on Jenkins-Contribution server do not have 32bit libSSL installed so If I try to run all jobs there, I got this error: ioLoadModule(/builds/workspace/PharoKernel3.0-ReloadByMonticello-Tests/phar o-vm/libSqueakSSL.so): libssl.so.1.0.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory There are only 64bit slaves there. Can somehow install it? Cheers, -- Pavel

May 27, 2013