May 2013 - Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-dev] beware of the new issue checker/monkey

by Sven Van Caekenberghe

On 13 May 2013, at 18:06, Camillo Bruni <camillobruni(a)gmail.com> wrote: > We finally managed to get the first, sane output on this issue: > > https://pharo.fogbugz.com/default.asp?10115& > > so beware: > - no more new uncategorized methods are allowed > - no more new classes without comments > > ... and more to come! ;) Excellent ! > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-dev mailing list > Pharo-dev(a)lists.pharo.org > http://lists.pharo.org/mailman/listinfo/pharo-dev_lists.pharo.org

May 13, 2013

Re: [Pharo-dev] Nabble is back online

by Marcus Denker

On May 13, 2013, at 6:09 PM, DeNigris Sean <sean(a)clipperadams.com> wrote: > Nabble is again mirroring the (now new) dev and user lists :) > Very good! Nable users that got an unsubscribe mail form the old list need to re-submit to the new if they want to be able to send mail directly to the list. (Sadly Mailman does not distinguish people that unsubscribe from those that switch to "no mail"â¦ and I did not want to subscribe all those who actively unsubscribe for real). Marcus

May 13, 2013

Re: [Pharo-project] XPath issue ?

by Esteban Lorenzano

Hi, This is for sure not useful at all, but I make the same mistake into PetitXml and PetitXPath (skipping the first element) :) in the Petit parsers, now it is fixed... you can try that or check it to fix the XPath parser (which I didn't know it exists, btw) cheers, Esteban On May 8, 2013, at 11:23 PM, Herve Verjus <herve.verjus(a)univ-savoie.fr> wrote: > Dear All, > > I try a very simple example: > > mydoc.xml document: > > > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?> > > <first> > <second> > <item type="attvalue">nodevalue</item> > </second> > </first> > > > And the Pharo code found in the book.pharo-project.org: > > | doc results | > doc := XMLDOMParser parseFileNamed: 'mydoc.xml'. > results := ( XPath for: 'first' ) in: doc. > results explore > > > As a result, I obtain an empty OrderedCollection...It should contain an element. Then a make some changes using different XPath expressions (i.e. '/first/second/item/@type", etc.) but no way. > > Then I discover the first element of the XPath expression must not be the root of the XML doc. If I change the mydoc.xml, introducing a new root element: > > > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?> > > <foo> > <first> > <second> > <item type="attvalue">nodevalue</item> > </second> > </first> > </foo> > > Everything is ok (the same code as above). Here, XPath assumes that the first tag we are looking for is not the root of the doc, otherwise it fails. I'm not so sure but it seems that such implementation doesn't follow the XPath specs. I tried another example from http://www.w3schools.com/xpath/xpath_syntax.asp and same results: I obtain an empty collection when using an XPath expression beginning with the 'bookstore' tag, the root element of the doc: > > | doc results | > doc := XMLDOMParser parseFileNamed: 'books.xml'. > results := ( XPath for: '/bookstore' ) in: doc. > results explore > > Maybe, I missed something... > > Note: I have had to replace the isTag (deprecated) with isElement in some piece of XPath code. > > Cheers, > > Herve >

May 13, 2013

Nabble is back online

by DeNigris Sean

Nabble is again mirroring the (now new) dev and user lists :)

May 13, 2013

Re: [Pharo-dev] test (will Nabble pick this up)

by Sean P. DeNigris

Yes! Nabble is again mirroring the (now new) dev list :) ----- Cheers, Sean -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Re-Pharo-dev-test-will-Nabble-pick-this-up-tp4687063p… Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

May 13, 2013

beware of the new issue checker/monkey

by Camillo Bruni

We finally managed to get the first, sane output on this issue: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/default.asp?10115& so beware: - no more new uncategorized methods are allowed - no more new classes without comments ... and more to come! ;)

May 13, 2013

Re: [Pharo-dev] test (will Nabble pick this up)

by DeNigris Sean

> please ignore

May 13, 2013

Re: [Pharo-dev] test (will Nabble pick this up)

by DeNigris Sean

> please ignore

May 13, 2013

test (will Nabble pick this up)

by DeNigris Sean

please ignore

May 13, 2013

[Pharo-project] [regression reporter]regression occurred

by no-reply＠ci.inria.fr

https://ci.inria.fr/pharo/job/Pharo-3.0-Update-Step-2-Validation/./label=wi… 1 regressions found. Zinc.Tests.ZnClientTests.testRedirect

May 13, 2013