April 2013 - Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-project] DateAndTime bug: we should do something about it

by Norbert Hartl

funny, I wanted to look at it in my actual 2.0 working image and I don't have a single occurrence of it. It is a 2.0 image? Norbert Am 12.04.2013 um 23:08 schrieb Igor Stasenko <siguctua(a)gmail.com>: > I tried to find the cause but failed... > > this thing is annoying.. > > lets look at the code and brainstorm, about: > 1) what happening > 2) how we can fix it > > because i am out of ideas.. > and having this crap replicating itself in our images is not tolerable. > > -- > Best regards, > Igor Stasenko. > <Screen Shot 2013-04-12 at 11.05.49 PM.png>

April 12, 2013

Re: [Pharo-project] DateAndTime bug: we should do something about it

by phil＠highoctane.be

+1. No clue either. But discovered the terminate process shortcut to kill them faster... Coping over solving ... 2013/4/12 Igor Stasenko <siguctua(a)gmail.com> > I tried to find the cause but failed... > > this thing is annoying.. > > lets look at the code and brainstorm, about: > 1) what happening > 2) how we can fix it > > because i am out of ideas.. > and having this crap replicating itself in our images is not tolerable. > > -- > Best regards, > Igor Stasenko. >

April 12, 2013

[Pharo-project] DateAndTime bug: we should do something about it

by Igor Stasenko

I tried to find the cause but failed... this thing is annoying.. lets look at the code and brainstorm, about: 1) what happening 2) how we can fix it because i am out of ideas.. and having this crap replicating itself in our images is not tolerable. -- Best regards, Igor Stasenko.

April 12, 2013

Re: [Pharo-project] [update 3.0] #30038

by Marcus Denker

On Apr 12, 2013, at 11:06 PM, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker(a)inria.fr> wrote: > > On Apr 12, 2013, at 11:04 PM, stephane ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)free.fr> wrote: > >> strange I could not get the diff on System-Support >> > All diffs are broken with SmalltalkHub. > > There is already a bug tracker entry: > > https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/10093 > Hmm.. actually not that much. They where when I check last timeâ¦ ;-) > >> On Apr 12, 2013, at 4:56 PM, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker(a)inria.fr> wrote: >> >>> 30038 >>> ----- >>> >>> 10278 Bug in semantic annotator >>> https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/10278 >>> >>> 10279 fix an undeclared in #condenseSources >>> https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/10279 >>> >>> 10258 DivideByZero in SystemProgressMorph >>> https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/10258 >>> >>> 10275 DNU on code completion >>> https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/10275 >>> >>> >>> >>> Diff information: >>> http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~Pharo/Pharo30/diff/System-Support-MarcusDenker.… >>> http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~Pharo/Pharo30/diff/NECompletion-MarcusDenker.108 >>> http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~Pharo/Pharo30/diff/AST-Core-MarcusDenker.125 >>> http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~Pharo/Pharo30/diff/AST-Semantic-MarcusDenker.25 >>> >>> >> >> > >

April 12, 2013

Re: [Pharo-project] Question on announcements when renaming a RPackage

by stephane ducasse

On Apr 12, 2013, at 2:42 PM, Goubier Thierry <thierry.goubier(a)cea.fr> wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm looking at announcements seen when renaming a RPackage. From the Nautilus renamePackage code, I see that this goes straight to RPackageOrganizer>>renamePackage:in: > > In the two announcers to be followed in those cases, i.e. SystemAnnouncer and RPackage organizer announcer, I see three events I kind of expected, but not two I expected. > > In RPackage organizer announcer, I see > a RPackageUnregistered > a RPackageRenamed > a RPackageCreated > Where the system announcer shows only : > a RPackageRenamed > And that there is no mention of a CategoryAdded and a CategoryRemoved events. Do those categories still exist? > > Yes, they do. Opening Browser (the original thing), I see that the system category with the old package name is still there, and the new system category as well but... there was no > CategoryAdded <- Why? > CategoryRemoved <- of course, no deletion of the old category :) > announcements. because this was not done :) > So, a few questions: > - is this a bug? yes > - will Monticello keep creating categories anyway (but not RPackage methods) I do not know :) > - does it matter that its incoherent now given that we will get rid of system categories one day > - does it matter because there are only a handfull of guys hacking at the IDE and that as long as one browser manages to hold it together, it's fine ;) > > Thanks to Nautilus for documenting indirectly how to use RPackage :) > > Thierry > -- > Thierry Goubier > CEA list > Laboratoire des Fondations des SystÃ¨mes Temps RÃ©el EmbarquÃ©s > 91191 Gif sur Yvette Cedex > France > Phone/Fax: +33 (0) 1 69 08 32 92 / 83 95 >

April 12, 2013

Re: [Pharo-project] [update 3.0] #30038

by Marcus Denker

On Apr 12, 2013, at 11:04 PM, stephane ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)free.fr> wrote: > strange I could not get the diff on System-Support > All diffs are broken with SmalltalkHub. There is already a bug tracker entry: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/10093 > On Apr 12, 2013, at 4:56 PM, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker(a)inria.fr> wrote: > >> 30038 >> ----- >> >> 10278 Bug in semantic annotator >> https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/10278 >> >> 10279 fix an undeclared in #condenseSources >> https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/10279 >> >> 10258 DivideByZero in SystemProgressMorph >> https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/10258 >> >> 10275 DNU on code completion >> https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/10275 >> >> >> >> Diff information: >> http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~Pharo/Pharo30/diff/System-Support-MarcusDenker.… >> http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~Pharo/Pharo30/diff/NECompletion-MarcusDenker.108 >> http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~Pharo/Pharo30/diff/AST-Core-MarcusDenker.125 >> http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~Pharo/Pharo30/diff/AST-Semantic-MarcusDenker.25 >> >> > >

April 12, 2013

[Pharo-project] [regression reporter]regression occurred

by no-reply＠ci.inria.fr

https://ci.inria.fr/pharo/job/Pharo-3.0-Update-Step-2-Validation/./label=wi… 1 regressions found. KernelTests.Chronology.DateTest.testDateAndTimeNow

April 12, 2013

[Pharo-project] [regression reporter]regression occurred

by no-reply＠ci.inria.fr

https://ci.inria.fr/pharo/job/Pharo-3.0-Update-Step-2-Validation/./label=ma… 1 regressions found. KernelTests.Chronology.DateTest.testDateAndTimeNow

April 12, 2013

Re: [Pharo-project] [update 3.0] #30038

by stephane ducasse

strange I could not get the diff on System-Support On Apr 12, 2013, at 4:56 PM, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker(a)inria.fr> wrote: > 30038 > ----- > > 10278 Bug in semantic annotator > https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/10278 > > 10279 fix an undeclared in #condenseSources > https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/10279 > > 10258 DivideByZero in SystemProgressMorph > https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/10258 > > 10275 DNU on code completion > https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/10275 > > > > Diff information: > http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~Pharo/Pharo30/diff/System-Support-MarcusDenker.… > http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~Pharo/Pharo30/diff/NECompletion-MarcusDenker.108 > http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~Pharo/Pharo30/diff/AST-Core-MarcusDenker.125 > http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~Pharo/Pharo30/diff/AST-Semantic-MarcusDenker.25 > >

April 12, 2013

[Pharo-project] [regression reporter]regression occurred

by no-reply＠ci.inria.fr

https://ci.inria.fr/pharo/job/Pharo-3.0-Update-Step-2-Validation/./label=li… 1 regressions found. KernelTests.Chronology.DateTest.testDateAndTimeNow

April 12, 2013