April 2013 - Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-project] [FYI] Athens tutorial

by Tristan Bourgois

Very cool tutorial :) I show it at my works and they are impressed of the readability of Athens! Juste a remark about the text. I try to rotate the text and (I d'ont know if it's the good behavior). All the text rotate but the letter not. [image: Images intÃ©grÃ©es 1] Tristan 2013/4/4 Igor Stasenko <siguctua(a)gmail.com> > Hello, there > > i prepared a small tutorial for Athens, which i did today at PharoConf. > But the code i did can be reused by non-participants of conference :) > > Here the instructions. > > Download Pharo 2.0 > > wget -O - get.pharo.org | bash > > Run Pharo 2.0 > > ./pharo-ui Pharo.image > > In a workspace, evaluate (line after line) > > Gofer it smalltalkhubUser: 'Pharo' project: 'Athens'; configuration; load. > > ConfigurationOfAthens loadVersion: '2.0'. > > Gofer it smalltalkhubUser: 'Pharo' project: 'Athens'; > package:'Athens-Tutorial'; load. > > AthensTutorial new openWithSpec. > > > Took from here > https://gist.github.com/SergeStinckwich/44ca34b54cde83b687a3 > (just removed duplicates ;) > > Thanks, Serge for compiling it down ;) > > Once you load the code and have window open, skip step one (you already > did it), > and then just follow the steps by pressing doit button changing the > code , pressing doit again , going forwards etc .. and playing with > it. > I put some comments there to serve as a small description/detail. > > Any feedback & help & contributions & improvements is welcome. > > P.S. if you get a DNU at step 30, enable Freetype in settings and try > again. > > -- > Best regards, > Igor Stasenko. > >

April 9, 2013

Re: [Pharo-project] [3.0] Package the be removed: Network-URI

by Frank Shearar

Then let's ignore the ugliness of the past. I'd be happy with that. "Ignore the ugliness of the past" also means "don't make vague accusations against mysterious forces". Either explain, in the cold light of day, who did what and why they must not be allowed to exert such negative influence again, or... don't say anything. frank On 8 April 2013 21:46, stephane ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)free.fr> wrote: > Frank > > it was long time ago and there are things it is better to ignore because they were ugly. > Now for Pharo we have a vision and working hard to make it happens. > > Stef > >>> >>> There are right now three models of Urls in the system >>> -> Network-Url >>> -> Network-URI >>> -> ZnUrl >>> >>> The URI implementation was contributed by Impara to Squeak 3.9. >>> Back then the plan was to first add it and then spend do the effort >>> to replace Url *and* use it as a layer to abstract File access >> >> I'm one of the guys who didn't finish off the URI/URL work. If ZnUrl >> is fantastic, and general, and permits separate packages to add >> capabilities (supporting SIP URIs, for instance), then it sounds like >> just the thing to take as the gold standard. IIRC, Andreas and Bert >> beat on my approach to this, allowing external packages to add new URI >> schemas through a simple registry. >> >>> Sadly then due to politics I don't understand to this day, Impara was >>> forced to stop contributing to Squeak and URI never was put into use. >> >> I don't recall hearing anything about Impara being forced to stop >> contributing to Squeak. Do you have pointers to such discussions? IIRC >> "Impara" pretty much meant "Andreas Raab", and he carried on >> contributing to Squeak right up until his death, except when he was >> working too much on his day job. >> >> frank >> >>> I vote to take 3.0 as a chance to remove it. >>> >>> -> The tests (already removed) where in "expected failures" for more then >>> half of the tests >>> -> It is not used in the image. >>> -> Other users can just load it. >>> >>> If nobody has any real reason to keep it, we should remove it in one of >>> the next updates. >>> >>> Marcus >>> >>> >> > >

April 9, 2013

Re: [Pharo-project] ConfigurationOfSpec is outdated

by roberto.minelli＠usi.ch

Thank you Esteban. Holds the same also for Ring, right? Roby On Apr 9, 2013, at 1:25 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Spec now is included in the core of Pharo, and developed there. > While there are plans to split all the core of Pharo into smaller packages, there are not plans to keep a separated configuration. > So.. if you download Pharo 2.0, you will have a stable version of Spec. And if you want to work with the latest versions, you can download 3.0 alpha (but notice that it is alpha, do not expect incredible stability :) > > Esteban > > On Apr 9, 2013, at 1:15 PM, "roberto.minelli(a)usi.ch" <roberto.minelli(a)usi.ch> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I want to report that the ConfigurationOfSpec is outdated: In a nutshell, if you use the ConfigurationOfSpec located at http://ss3.gemstone.com/ss/Spec it loads older version of the Spec packages with respect to the packages already loaded in a Pharo 2.0 image. I've seen that there is a page on smalltalkhub about Spec, so I think you are planning to port Spec to STHub, right? >> >> Cheers, >> Roby > >

April 9, 2013

Re: [Pharo-project] Toothpick

by S Krish

*LoggingEvent* >> *printBasicsOn: aStream aStream nextPutAll: LoggingEvent timestampClass now asString; nextPutAll: ' '; nextPutAll: self levelString; nextPutAll: ' - '; nextPutAll: self messageString* I will like to see the timestamp printed out akin to the log4j output.. Also I had added a Logger class that will allow* multi channel logging* of the same log outputs: transcript, stream , file , socket, based on adding to a loggerCollection class instance variable. On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 1:20 PM, phil(a)highoctane.be <phil(a)highoctane.be>wrote: > Hi, > > No, it didn't. There are missing selectors for DateAndTime and the tests > aren't right in the first place. > > No, didn't change SqueakSource. Anyone is welcome to do so. > > Also, some FileSystem changes have to occur. > > Phil > > > 2013/4/9 Paul DeBruicker <pdebruic(a)gmail.com> > >> philippeback wrote >> > I've taken the Toothpick source (as mentioned in the Collaboractive >> book) >> > and put the packages in Smalltalk Hub. >> > >> > There were some things with trimming blanks which I fixed. >> > >> > Now, some tests aren't right (but because they use dates from 2006 and >> we >> > are in 2013) >> > >> > If someone could look in there, it would be nice. >> > >> > http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~philippeback/Toothpick >> > >> > Phil >> >> >> So just changing from 2006 to 2013 made the tests pass? >> >> >> Thanks for moving the repo. Did you edit the Squeaksource page to point >> at >> it? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://forum.world.st/Toothpick-tp4680310p4680345.html >> Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> >

April 9, 2013

Re: [Pharo-project] [3.0] Failing tests

by Camille Teruel

On 9 avr. 2013, at 14:20, Marcus Denker wrote: > Hi, > > There are now 3 tests failing (two are the same reason): > >>>> SmalllintManifestCheckerTest>>#testFalsePositiveOf > No idea, I looked at the failing test and could not understand what is the problem I'll have a look at it. > >>>> ReleaseTest>>#testObsoleteBehaviors >>>> ReleaseTest>>#testObsoleteClasses > > This is strange. The obsoletes are: > > AnObsoleteKMShortcut AnObsoleteKMModifiedShortcut AnObsoleteKMSingleKeyShortcut > > looking for who references them I found some strange Morph with a drawing error that references > those? Strangeâ¦ Yes I tried to follow strong references but I didn't find more tan you. > Marcus

April 9, 2013

[Pharo-project] [3.0] Failing tests

by Marcus Denker

Hi, There are now 3 tests failing (two are the same reason): >>> SmalllintManifestCheckerTest>>#testFalsePositiveOf No idea, I looked at the failing test and could not understand what is the problem >>> ReleaseTest>>#testObsoleteBehaviors >>> ReleaseTest>>#testObsoleteClasses This is strange. The obsoletes are: AnObsoleteKMShortcut AnObsoleteKMModifiedShortcut AnObsoleteKMSingleKeyShortcut looking for who references them I found some strange Morph with a drawing error that references those? Strangeâ¦ Marcus

April 9, 2013

[Pharo-project] [update 3.0] #30028

by Marcus Denker

30028 ----- 10247 testRejectThenCollect / testSelectThenCollect failing for Sets https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/10247 6648 Red Light when all test are green https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/6648 10242 Port to 3.0: Issue 10200 Date instance https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/10242 Diff information: http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~Pharo/Pharo30/diff/Nautilus-MarcusDenker.442 http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~Pharo/Pharo30/diff/KernelTests-MarcusDenker.482 http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~Pharo/Pharo30/diff/Kernel-MarcusDenker.1354 http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~Pharo/Pharo30/diff/CollectionsTests-MarcusDenke…

April 9, 2013

Re: [Pharo-project] ConfigurationOfSpec is outdated

by Esteban Lorenzano

Hi, Spec now is included in the core of Pharo, and developed there. While there are plans to split all the core of Pharo into smaller packages, there are not plans to keep a separated configuration. So.. if you download Pharo 2.0, you will have a stable version of Spec. And if you want to work with the latest versions, you can download 3.0 alpha (but notice that it is alpha, do not expect incredible stability :) Esteban On Apr 9, 2013, at 1:15 PM, "roberto.minelli(a)usi.ch" <roberto.minelli(a)usi.ch> wrote: > Hi, > > I want to report that the ConfigurationOfSpec is outdated: In a nutshell, if you use the ConfigurationOfSpec located at http://ss3.gemstone.com/ss/Spec it loads older version of the Spec packages with respect to the packages already loaded in a Pharo 2.0 image. I've seen that there is a page on smalltalkhub about Spec, so I think you are planning to port Spec to STHub, right? > > Cheers, > Roby

April 9, 2013

[Pharo-project] ConfigurationOfSpec is outdated

by roberto.minelli＠usi.ch

Hi, I want to report that the ConfigurationOfSpec is outdated: In a nutshell, if you use the ConfigurationOfSpec located at http://ss3.gemstone.com/ss/Spec it loads older version of the Spec packages with respect to the packages already loaded in a Pharo 2.0 image. I've seen that there is a page on smalltalkhub about Spec, so I think you are planning to port Spec to STHub, right? Cheers, Roby

April 9, 2013

Re: [Pharo-project] FAST presentation video on youtube

by Martin Dias

Yes, very nice! congratulations On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 1:01 PM, kilon <thekilon(a)yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > very well done presentation, congratulations and a very interesting > project. > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://forum.world.st/FAST-presentation-video-on-youtube-tp4680355p4680382.… > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >

April 9, 2013