March 2013 - Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-project] Penelope is in town! (or how to have access to the new issue tracker)

by Guillermo Polito

BTW, just curious, who's the mother? On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 6:42 PM, Guillermo Polito <guillermopolito(a)gmail.com > wrote: > Nice!! :) > > On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 6:38 PM, Nicolas Petton <petton.nicolas(a)gmail.com>wrote: > >> Hi! >> >> Ben and I finally put the Penelope monkey online! >> You can access to all issues at http://bugs.pharo.org and register there >> to get access to Fogbugz. >> >> Cheers, >> Nico > > >

March 19, 2013

Re: [Pharo-project] Penelope is in town! (or how to have access to the new issue tracker)

by Guillermo Polito

Nice!! :) On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 6:38 PM, Nicolas Petton <petton.nicolas(a)gmail.com>wrote: > Hi! > > Ben and I finally put the Penelope monkey online! > You can access to all issues at http://bugs.pharo.org and register there > to get access to Fogbugz. > > Cheers, > Nico

March 19, 2013

[Pharo-project] Penelope is in town! (or how to have access to the new issue tracker)

by Nicolas Petton

Hi! Ben and I finally put the Penelope monkey online! You can access to all issues at http://bugs.pharo.org and register there to get access to Fogbugz. Cheers, Nico

March 19, 2013

Re: [Pharo-project] one-click is dead, now we have platform specific builds

by Sven Van Caekenberghe

On 19 Mar 2013, at 18:29, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm(a)gmail.com> wrote: > tbh, one-click was just cool for mac users... windows and linux users (specially newcomers) where having bad reaction with the structure that the one-click enforces. > > The new scripts produces structures that can fit better into the platforms where they will run. > > You can check them here: http://files.pharo.org/platform/ > > of course, a lot of improvements are possible, this is just the first step :) > > Esteban Yes, excellent idea. Thanks for just doing it ;-) The One-Click concept was/is cool, but it is more a barrier than a solution it seems. Having a single download that 'just works' and feels native is very important. Sven

March 19, 2013

[Pharo-project] one-click is dead, now we have platform specific builds

by Esteban Lorenzano

tbh, one-click was just cool for mac users... windows and linux users (specially newcomers) where having bad reaction with the structure that the one-click enforces. The new scripts produces structures that can fit better into the platforms where they will run. You can check them here: http://files.pharo.org/platform/ of course, a lot of improvements are possible, this is just the first step :) Esteban

March 19, 2013

Re: [Pharo-project] WhatsUp from: 2013-03-18 until: 2013-03-31

by Damien Pollet

On 18 March 2013 21:45, Guillermo Polito <guillermopolito(a)gmail.com> wrote: > - Keymappings 101 tuto in blog (for 2.0, cause in 3.0 the api coould > change a bit :) > I just read your postâ¦ question: is it possible to define semi-modal sequences? Let me explain: modes are (hidden) states in the system that influence how it interprets inputs. Typical example is capslock: depending on its state, pressing the A key will give you a or A. Having too many or unclear modes is bad, because you have to track their state in your mind, or take a specific action to know which mode you're in. In contrast, a semi-mode is when you need continuous physical action to maintain it; typical example is the modifier keys like shift alt ctrlâ¦ Semi-modes are a much better compromise (ideally there would be no modes anywhere, but that's not very realistic in practice). To get back to my point, a semi-modal sequence would be: ($a asShortcut, $b asShortcut) ctrl "[press ctrl] a b [release ctrl]" as opposed to: $a asShortcut ctrl, $b asShortcut ctrl "maybe release ctrl in the middle" where if you press ctrl-a and get interrupted, you're going to be confused when ctrl-b does not do what it's supposed to do as a standalone shortcutâ¦ if you're an emacs user, think ctrl-G, if you're a vim user, think spurious i's in your filesâ¦ -- Damien Pollet type less, do more [ | ] http://people.untyped.org/damien.pollet

March 19, 2013

Re: [Pharo-project] Pharo inbox changed

by Nicolas Petton

Yep, I'll do my best (Esteban said "promised", different point of view ;) ) to have project inboxes working by next week. Cheers, Nico On Mar 19, 2013, at 1:03 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > we changed the Pharo inbox location to smalltalkhub > > http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~Pharo/Pharo30Inbox > > the bad news: since sthub still does not accepts open commits, you need to be added to the repository to commit slices (sorry about that) > > even more bad news (with a bit of good ones): Nico has promised to have inbox branch (the always public) working for next week, so we will move again the inbox as soon as the functionality is ready. The good part is that when ready, you will not need to be included into the inbox project). > > Esteban -- Nicolas Petton http://www.nicolas-petton.fr

March 19, 2013

Re: [Pharo-project] [update 3.0] #30003

by Marcus Denker

On Mar 19, 2013, at 3:55 PM, Benjamin <benjamin.vanryseghem.pharo(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Wich one is the one providing me the latest version of the image ? > > Ben > > On Mar 19, 2013, at 3:26 PM, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker(a)inria.fr> wrote: > >> >> On Mar 19, 2013, at 3:21 PM, Benjamin <benjamin.vanryseghem.pharo(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> As far as I know, these jobs are integration related. >>> >> >> Yes, and one of them runs all tests, one of them pushed the result to files.pharo.org. >> >> What else is wanted? The last one (step 4). Marcus

March 19, 2013

Re: [Pharo-project] [update 3.0] #30003

by Benjamin

Wich one is the one providing me the latest version of the image ? Ben On Mar 19, 2013, at 3:26 PM, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker(a)inria.fr> wrote: > > On Mar 19, 2013, at 3:21 PM, Benjamin <benjamin.vanryseghem.pharo(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> As far as I know, these jobs are integration related. >> > > Yes, and one of them runs all tests, one of them pushed the result to files.pharo.org. > > What else is wanted? > >> Ben >> >> On Mar 19, 2013, at 12:55 PM, Camille Teruel <camille.teruel(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> On 19 mars 2013, at 12:54, Benjamin wrote: >>> >>>> So where is the Pharo3.0 jenkins job ? :) >>> >>> https://ci.inria.fr/pharo/view/3.0/ ? >>> >>>> >>>> Ben >>>> >>>> On Mar 19, 2013, at 12:51 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> infrastructure is working :) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Mar 19, 2013, at 12:45 PM, Pavel Krivanek <pavel.krivanek(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Does it make sense to make updates when we have no working infrastructure? :-) >>>>>> >>>>>> -- Pavel >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 12:38 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> 30003 >>>>>>> ----- >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 10046 Spec new version >>>>>>> https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/10046 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Diff information: >>>>>>> http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~Pharo/Pharo30/diff/Spec-Layout-EstebanLorenzano… >>>>>>> http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~Pharo/Pharo30/diff/Spec-Core-EstebanLorenzano.90 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >

March 19, 2013

[Pharo-project] Eating our own dogfood: New VM

by Camillo Bruni

I caught myself already last week not using the new VMs from http://files.pharo.org/vm/pharo It would be nice if you could discard the old cogVMs and use the new builds from our build server. AFAIK Esteban has been the only one in our team that did this :P

March 19, 2013