March 2013 - Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-project] bump: pharo wikipedia page sucks

by Frank Shearar

You mean in the sense of the "conflict of interest" that Wikipedians love to throw around? (Ron Teitelbaum had to deal with lots of pain when writing up Andreas' page.) frank On 28 March 2013 12:21, stephane ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)free.fr> wrote: > I could but I do not want people bash me if I focus on Pharo on that page. > > Stef > > On Mar 28, 2013, at 1:03 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> have you seen it? >> >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pharo >> >> it is old, small, non-accurate and well... it could receive a lot of love :) >> (the weird thing is that the image is actually a 2.0 image, he) >> >> Can anyone adopt the page and update it? >> >> thanks, >> Esteban >> >> ps: also... we have a lot of spanish speakers in this list (including myself). It is a shame that we do not have a spanish version :) > >

March 28, 2013

Re: [Pharo-project] Pharo inbox changed

by Camillo Bruni

On 2013-03-28, at 13:29, "Sean P. DeNigris" <sean(a)clipperadams.com> wrote: > EstebanLM wrote >> yes, I agree with everything... we will fix it soon :) > > Great, I know everyone is working hard. I like the progress even if it hurts > sometimes :) > > > EstebanLM wrote >> Sean, you are part of Pharo team members, you should be able to upload to >> inbox anyway > > I don't know. I keep getting 403s. I wanted to try to manually upload it > from the StHub web interface, but don't see how... the slice-maker does not copy the repository :/ so you have to go an make sure all the repositories have your credentials :(

March 28, 2013

Re: [Pharo-project] Pharo inbox changed

by Benjamin

And as Nico like to say, smalltalkhub is open source :) So maybe it's also the role of a community :) Ben On Mar 28, 2013, at 1:29 PM, "Sean P. DeNigris" <sean(a)clipperadams.com> wrote: > EstebanLM wrote >> yes, I agree with everything... we will fix it soon :) > > Great, I know everyone is working hard. I like the progress even if it hurts > sometimes :) > > > EstebanLM wrote >> Sean, you are part of Pharo team members, you should be able to upload to >> inbox anyway > > I don't know. I keep getting 403s. I wanted to try to manually upload it > from the StHub web interface, but don't see how... > > > > ----- > Cheers, > Sean > -- > View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-inbox-changed-tp4677312p4678751.html > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >

March 28, 2013

Re: [Pharo-project] Pharo inbox changed

by Sean P. DeNigris

EstebanLM wrote > yes, I agree with everything... we will fix it soon :) Great, I know everyone is working hard. I like the progress even if it hurts sometimes :) EstebanLM wrote > Sean, you are part of Pharo team members, you should be able to upload to > inbox anyway I don't know. I keep getting 403s. I wanted to try to manually upload it from the StHub web interface, but don't see how... ----- Cheers, Sean -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-inbox-changed-tp4677312p4678751.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

March 28, 2013

Re: [Pharo-project] bump: pharo wikipedia page sucks

by Esteban Lorenzano

lol On Mar 28, 2013, at 1:21 PM, stephane ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)free.fr> wrote: > I could but I do not want people bash me if I focus on Pharo on that page. > > Stef > > On Mar 28, 2013, at 1:03 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> have you seen it? >> >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pharo >> >> it is old, small, non-accurate and well... it could receive a lot of love :) >> (the weird thing is that the image is actually a 2.0 image, he) >> >> Can anyone adopt the page and update it? >> >> thanks, >> Esteban >> >> ps: also... we have a lot of spanish speakers in this list (including myself). It is a shame that we do not have a spanish version :) > >

March 28, 2013

Re: [Pharo-project] Platform and portable versions for Pharo 2.0 too

by Sean P. DeNigris

Marcus Denker-4 wrote > Pleaseâ¦ this now does *not* need to be done. Please. Please. Pleaseâ¦ I totally understand that we're all exhausted. This is an investment in our future relaxation :) If the users need it, it needs to be done. The reason we have to do so much work is that the community is the size it is. If there is not an influx of new users, the situation will not change. ----- Cheers, Sean -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Platform-and-portable-versions-for-Pharo-2-0-too-tp46… Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

March 28, 2013

Re: [Pharo-project] bump: pharo wikipedia page sucks

by stephane ducasse

I could but I do not want people bash me if I focus on Pharo on that page. Stef On Mar 28, 2013, at 1:03 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > have you seen it? > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pharo > > it is old, small, non-accurate and well... it could receive a lot of love :) > (the weird thing is that the image is actually a 2.0 image, he) > > Can anyone adopt the page and update it? > > thanks, > Esteban > > ps: also... we have a lot of spanish speakers in this list (including myself). It is a shame that we do not have a spanish version :)

March 28, 2013

Re: [Pharo-project] Pharo inbox changed

by Marcus Denker

On Mar 28, 2013, at 1:15 PM, Sean P. DeNigris <sean(a)clipperadams.com> wrote: > EstebanLM wrote >> the bad news: since sthub still does not accepts open commits, you need to >> be added to the repository to commit slices (sorry about that) > > WTF! This seems totally wrong and bad and evil and... ;) I know we love > StHub, but this is unsustainable. Unless StHub is adding open commits today, > why not put the inbox on ss3 temporarily. I feel we will lose a /lot/ of > help this way. Not everyone is willing to go through/knows about the > communication process of being added... > > p.s. please add me :) > yes, and we would like to have fixed that last week, too, butâ¦.. Marcus

March 28, 2013

Re: [Pharo-project] Platform and portable versions for Pharo 2.0 too

by Marcus Denker

On Mar 28, 2013, at 1:17 PM, Sean P. DeNigris <sean(a)clipperadams.com> wrote: > Marcus Denker-4 wrote >> Sorryâ¦ we are working already on too many things and there has to be a >> boundary >> somewhere. > > I don't think this is the right place to draw it. I'm going to work now, but > I'll do it later. I guess I could just take the nightly ones and manually > stick in the release image, right? Pleaseâ¦ this now does *not* need to be done. Please. Please. Pleaseâ¦ (I am dead) Marcus

March 28, 2013

Re: [Pharo-project] Pharo inbox changed

by Esteban Lorenzano

yes, I agree with everything... we will fix it soon :) Sean, you are part of Pharo team members, you should be able to upload to inbox anyway cheers, Esteban On Mar 28, 2013, at 1:15 PM, "Sean P. DeNigris" <sean(a)clipperadams.com> wrote: > EstebanLM wrote >> the bad news: since sthub still does not accepts open commits, you need to >> be added to the repository to commit slices (sorry about that) > > WTF! This seems totally wrong and bad and evil and... ;) I know we love > StHub, but this is unsustainable. Unless StHub is adding open commits today, > why not put the inbox on ss3 temporarily. I feel we will lose a /lot/ of > help this way. Not everyone is willing to go through/knows about the > communication process of being added... > > p.s. please add me :) > > > > ----- > Cheers, > Sean > -- > View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-inbox-changed-tp4677312p4678741.html > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >

March 28, 2013