February 2013 - Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-project] Weird behavior in Nautilus when doing a method rename

by Camillo Bruni

there is 1 certain bug, that is that you cannot see the changes of the refactoring: https://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=7547 the rest I would consider a bug as well. But in the terms of refactoring it might be "valid". It does preserve behavior by renaming also all implementors. How about this reasoning: Rename method => rename all senders (since you refactor) => you have to rename all implementors as well since you renamed all send sites otherwise you'll run for sure into a DNU I think I just convinced myself :D On 2013-02-20, at 09:26, "phil(a)highoctane.be" <phil(a)highoctane.be> wrote: > I was doing a Refactoring>rename of the initialize method in Nautilus > for the ClassMethodBrowser and then the changes browser proposed me to > change all classes with initialize. WTF? > > Phil >

Feb. 20, 2013

Re: [Pharo-project] subStrings: suggestion

by Camillo Bruni

On 2013-02-20, at 09:26, Frank Shearar <frank.shearar(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On 20 Feb 2013, at 0:49, Chris Cunningham <cunningham.cb(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 3:28 PM, Frank Shearar <frank.shearar(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> <snip> >>> It is indeed strange behavior, but I think we inherited that from squeak. >> >> No, Squeak has (since 2005) had still another behaviour: >> >> ';;;;' subStrings: ';' >> '1;2;3' subStrings: ';' #('1' '2' '3') >> >> (Note the ';' rather than $;, because Squeak's version takes a String >> of separators.) >> >> frank >> >> Yes, but it still has the odd behavior: >> >> ';;;;' subStrings: ';' => $( ) >> '1;2;;3' subStrings: ';' => #('1' '2' '3') >> >> And the separators don't have to be strings - they can be any collection of characters. >> >> Chris > > To make my point more clearly perhaps I should have shown that in Squeak you can't use a Character argument to subStrings:, in contrast to the examples. neither in Pharo.. so they are 100% the same, since I can go back to Pharo 1.0 without any version history of the method.

Feb. 20, 2013

Re: [Pharo-project] subStrings: suggestion

by Frank Shearar

On 20 Feb 2013, at 0:49, Chris Cunningham <cunningham.cb(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 3:28 PM, Frank Shearar <frank.shearar(a)gmail.com> wrote: > <snip> > > It is indeed strange behavior, but I think we inherited that from squeak. > > No, Squeak has (since 2005) had still another behaviour: > > ';;;;' subStrings: ';' > '1;2;3' subStrings: ';' #('1' '2' '3') > > (Note the ';' rather than $;, because Squeak's version takes a String > of separators.) > > frank > > Yes, but it still has the odd behavior: > > ';;;;' subStrings: ';' => $( ) > '1;2;;3' subStrings: ';' => #('1' '2' '3') > > And the separators don't have to be strings - they can be any collection of characters. > > Chris To make my point more clearly perhaps I should have shown that in Squeak you can't use a Character argument to subStrings:, in contrast to the examples. frank

Feb. 20, 2013

[Pharo-project] Weird behavior in Nautilus when doing a method rename

by phil＠highoctane.be

I was doing a Refactoring>rename of the initialize method in Nautilus for the ClassMethodBrowser and then the changes browser proposed me to change all classes with initialize. WTF? Phil

Feb. 20, 2013

Re: [Pharo-project] [Issue Tracker][2.0] Down to 5 entries!

by Sven Van Caekenberghe

On 20 Feb 2013, at 08:45, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker(a)inria.fr> wrote: > Just 5 issues leftâ¦ > > http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/list?can=2&q=milestone%3D2.0 > Great ! Sven

Feb. 20, 2013

Re: [Pharo-project] [Issue Tracker][2.0] Down to 5 entries!

by Max Leske

Great work guys!! On 20.02.2013, at 08:49, Camillo Bruni <camillobruni(a)gmail.com> wrote: > and we're green! > > https://ci.inria.fr/pharo/job/Pharo-2.0-Tests/lastCompletedBuild/testReport/ > > > On 2013-02-20, at 08:45, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker(a)inria.fr> wrote: > >> Just 5 issues leftâ¦ >> >> http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/list?can=2&q=milestone%3D2.0 >> >> >> > >

Feb. 20, 2013

Re: [Pharo-project] [Issue Tracker][2.0] Down to 5 entries!

by Camillo Bruni

and we're green! https://ci.inria.fr/pharo/job/Pharo-2.0-Tests/lastCompletedBuild/testReport/ On 2013-02-20, at 08:45, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker(a)inria.fr> wrote: > Just 5 issues leftâ¦ > > http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/list?can=2&q=milestone%3D2.0 > > >

Feb. 20, 2013

[Pharo-project] [Jenkins][2.0] We are Green!

by Marcus Denker

on mac and linux, on windows there are just the NB related tests failing that are known to be failing (we should add them as known failures): https://ci.inria.fr/pharo/job/Pharo-2.0-Tests/lastCompletedBuild/testReport/

Feb. 20, 2013

[Pharo-project] [Issue Tracker][2.0] Down to 5 entries!

by Marcus Denker

Just 5 issues leftâ¦ http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/list?can=2&q=milestone%3D2.0

Feb. 20, 2013

[Pharo-project] [update 2.0] #20559

by Marcus Denker

20559 ----- Issue 7492: Failing test: MCRepositoryAuthorizationTest>>#testStoredCredentialsUsesMostSpecific http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=7492 Issue 7341: Failing test: ReleaseTest>>#testInstalledMethodsWithIncorrectTrailerKind http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=7341 Diff information: http://ss3.gemstone.com/ss/Pharo20/Traits-MarcusDenker.458.diff http://ss3.gemstone.com/ss/Pharo20/Monticello-MarcusDenker.775.diff

Feb. 20, 2013