February 2013 - Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-project] Nautilus shortcuts

by Camillo Bruni

we will introduce the old shortcuts again with a setting, until then you have to learn them by heart ;). Most shortcuts are base on an action prefix + a suffix for the item you want to act on, it's not that difficult (but yes, more difficult than before): prefix: X => removing suffxin: M => Method T => Protocol C => Class P => Package so in that scheme alt-x alt-x doesn't make any sense ;) On 2013-02-03, at 07:00, Ben Coman <btc(a)openInWorld.com> wrote: > It appears in Nautilus that I've lost the <Alt-x> shortcut for deleting a method, and this has been replaced by a double-keystroke <Alt-x, Alt-m> which on first take I find a bit awkward. Probably I would adapt, however it would be easier to adapt to <Alt-x, Alt-x>. Would that be possible to have out of the box? >

Feb. 3, 2013

[Pharo-project] Nautilus shortcuts

by Ben Coman

It appears in Nautilus that I've lost the <Alt-x> shortcut for deleting a method, and this has been replaced by a double-keystroke <Alt-x, Alt-m> which on first take I find a bit awkward. Probably I would adapt, however it would be easier to adapt to <Alt-x, Alt-x>. Would that be possible to have out of the box?

Feb. 3, 2013

Re: [Pharo-project] updates files

by Marcus Denker

On Feb 2, 2013, at 9:33 PM, Camillo Bruni <camillobruni(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Can I remove the uncategorized update files fro 1.0 from gforge? > > http://pharo.gforge.inria.fr/updates/ > > seems like a part of them is duplicated. The standard location would be > > http://pharo.gforge.inria.fr/updates/pharo1.0/ > > no? > yes. Marcus

Feb. 2, 2013

[Pharo-project] updates files

by Camillo Bruni

Can I remove the uncategorized update files fro 1.0 from gforge? http://pharo.gforge.inria.fr/updates/ seems like a part of them is duplicated. The standard location would be http://pharo.gforge.inria.fr/updates/pharo1.0/ no?

Feb. 2, 2013

[Pharo-project] [update 2.0] #20507

by Marcus Denker

20507 ----- Issue 7400: BlockClosure #decompile should not reference Decompiler directly http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=7400 Issue 7392: completion was not working properly http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=7392 Diff information: http://ss3.gemstone.com/ss/Pharo20/NOCompletion-MarcusDenker.34.diff http://ss3.gemstone.com/ss/Pharo20/NECompletion-MarcusDenker.80.diff http://ss3.gemstone.com/ss/Pharo20/Keymapping-Core-MarcusDenker.140.diff http://ss3.gemstone.com/ss/Pharo20/Compiler-MarcusDenker.371.diff

Feb. 2, 2013

Re: [Pharo-project] Please review Issue 7390

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

thanks! I'm back to france and not totally leglagged nor frozen :) Stef On Feb 1, 2013, at 2:06 PM, Sean P. DeNigris wrote: > Issue 7390: FileDialogWindow answers wrong FileReference for selected file > http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=7390 > > This one is important because in 20503, directory repositories can not be > added via the MC browser. > > Steps to reproduce: > 1. In MC Browser, click +Repository, choose Directory > 2. Select a directory in the "File" (right) pane of the directory chooser, > and accept > > Problem: > The returned FileReference will be the path to the directory selected in the > left pane, with a printString of a FileDirectoryEntry appended to it - i.e. > garbage > > Fix in inbox: > SLICE-Issue-7390-FileDialogWindow-answers-wrong-FileReference-for-selected-file-SeanDeNigris.1 > > - Fix FileDialogWindow>>selectedAnyFileDirectory > - return the proper FileReference when a file is selected > - Refactor for clarity incl. adding temps > - Clean up comment > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Please-review-Issue-7390-tp4667063.html > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >

Feb. 2, 2013

[Pharo-project] [update 2.0] #20506

by Marcus Denker

20506 ----- Issue 7353: Problem with PickList http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=7353 Issue 7270: Failing test for RPackageCategorySynchronisationTest http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=7270 Issue 7399: cleanup uses of Compiler a little http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=7399 Diff information: http://ss3.gemstone.com/ss/Pharo20/Spec-Widgets-MarcusDenker.90.diff http://ss3.gemstone.com/ss/Pharo20/RPackage-SystemIntegration-MarcusDenker.… http://ss3.gemstone.com/ss/Pharo20/Kernel-MarcusDenker.1297.diff http://ss3.gemstone.com/ss/Pharo20/Compiler-MarcusDenker.369.diff

Feb. 2, 2013

[Pharo-project] [update 2.0] #20505

by Marcus Denker

20505 ----- Issue 7372: Deadcode http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=7372 Issue 7352: Changing a superclass removes the Class from the superclass subclasses http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=7352 Diff information: http://ss3.gemstone.com/ss/Pharo20/Network-Url-MarcusDenker.84.diff http://ss3.gemstone.com/ss/Pharo20/Network-Kernel-MarcusDenker.85.diff http://ss3.gemstone.com/ss/Pharo20/Monticello-MarcusDenker.750.diff http://ss3.gemstone.com/ss/Pharo20/Kernel-MarcusDenker.1295.diff

Feb. 2, 2013

Re: [Pharo-project] [squeak-dev] Re: [vwnc] Does anyone have a "new" string literal?

by S Krish

How about the Groovy way of using: """ quoted string that preserves all single tick ' occurences as is """ The 3 single or double quote encasing the text. Yes there is always the possibility of the text containing the same, just its less likely to occur.. On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 3:22 AM, Eliot Miranda <eliot.miranda(a)gmail.com>wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Colin Putney <colin(a)wiresong.com> wrote: > >> >> >> >> On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Eliot Miranda <eliot.miranda(a)gmail.com>wrote: >> >> >>> David Leibs has been pushing a well-thought-through facility he calls >>> (and other systems name) "quasi-quote". Here, a string literal contains >>> escape sequences, a little like printf, that allow one to substitute >>> values. Dave's syntax uses square brackets to escape into Smalltalk. >>> >> >> That's certainly a useful construct, but I don't think it addresses >> Terry's problem. He wants a string literal that can include $' and CR >> without escaping. Something like HEREDOC or Python's triple-double-quote >> string literals. >> > > If I had a brain I would have remembered the syntax and hence that it does > address Terry's point. The quote character for quasi-quote is ` (back > tick), so single ticks are literal inside a quasi-quote. > <blush>Sorry</blush> > >> >> Colin >> >> >> >> > > > -- > best, > Eliot >

Feb. 2, 2013

Re: [Pharo-project] [squeak-dev] Re: [vwnc] Does anyone have a "new" string literal?

by Eliot Miranda

On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Colin Putney <colin(a)wiresong.com> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Eliot Miranda <eliot.miranda(a)gmail.com>wrote: > > >> David Leibs has been pushing a well-thought-through facility he calls >> (and other systems name) "quasi-quote". Here, a string literal contains >> escape sequences, a little like printf, that allow one to substitute >> values. Dave's syntax uses square brackets to escape into Smalltalk. >> > > That's certainly a useful construct, but I don't think it addresses > Terry's problem. He wants a string literal that can include $' and CR > without escaping. Something like HEREDOC or Python's triple-double-quote > string literals. > If I had a brain I would have remembered the syntax and hence that it does address Terry's point. The quote character for quasi-quote is ` (back tick), so single ticks are literal inside a quasi-quote. <blush>Sorry</blush> > > Colin > > > > -- best, Eliot

Feb. 1, 2013