December 2013 - Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-dev] Responsible development

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

>>> We try now to have responsive UIs in the sense the tools like Nautilus try to >>> run things in a separate thread. >>> >>> I will do an experiment and fork each Nautilus opening to see if it can save my ass :P >> :) >> >> personnally I would be really against because just forking is just a way to have a lot more mess in the future. > > Why ? Because you do not know when you invariants should hold. Normally you expect them to hold once the system is loaded. Because loading for example act as an atomic action when you modify the system. Now if your thread can see and modify different versions of the state be prepared to have really strange and difficult bugs to find. I prefer to have cache than to have forked processes around. Stef

Dec. 2, 2013

Re: [Pharo-dev] Responsible development

by kilon alios

there is also performance concerns. I remember once there was that code for a fractal or something that let you define how many threads it would use. 1 thread was very slow , 5-6 threads very fast but more threads actually made code slower and slower the more threads I was adding. And those were REAL threads (meaning the could take advantage of multiple cores = real concurency) , not greenlets as the ones used by pharo and python. So there is always a catch. Concurrency is known to cause headache with the exception of Clojure and Erlang both seem to make their users very happy with their concurrency features. But both of these languages were based on concurrency and not added it in as another feature to have. These things are not easy to implement. I come from python , super popular language, tons of developer and loads of people complaining how concurrency is done. On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 9:14 PM, StÃ©phane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr>wrote: > > We try now to have responsive UIs in the sense the tools like Nautilus try > to > run things in a separate thread. > > I will do an experiment and fork each Nautilus opening to see if it can > save my ass :P > > :) > > personnally I would be really against because just forking is just a way > to have a lot more mess in the future. > > > > Ben > > On 02 Dec 2013, at 19:59, Yuriy Tymchuk <yuriy.tymchuk(a)me.com> wrote: > > > On 02 Dec 2013, at 17:42, Sean P. DeNigris <sean(a)clipperadams.com> wrote: > > Uko2 wrote > > Itâs not about stability of pharo 3, it about concurrency... This thread > doesnât seem to have any reason > > > Nothing is wasted. I appreciate your ideas. I never thought of these > benefits; I always took it for granted to run in one thread. > > > Even if everything runs in one thread it doesnât mean that you need to > block something. And I know that example with Nautilus or even with test > runner may be to hard. > > Letâs take moose for example. While it is importing a model everything > freezes. Is there a reason for that? I donât see any. In my opinion the > problem is that we are not used to run non-instant operations in a separate > process, because I do a lot of mistakes like this too. > > uko > > > > > ----- > Cheers, > Sean > -- > View this message in context: > http://forum.world.st/Responsible-development-tp4726686p4726763.html > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at > Nabble.com <http://nabble.com/>. > > > > > >

Dec. 2, 2013

Re: [Pharo-dev] Responsible development

by Eliot Miranda

On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 6:47 AM, phil(a)highoctane.be <phil(a)highoctane.be>wrote: > As Clement explained to be, the Cmd + . combo is only tested on VM > bytecode "backjumps". > It is also tested on every non-primitive send. > > So, if the bytecode is stuck with no backjumps, it is definitely stuck. > > I'd like to see where this occurs in the VM (maybe in the hope I could > have a slow, but interruptible VM at all times) - this could take the form > of a setting that gets turned on. > You can always send SIGUSR1 to the VM on linux and Mac OS. You'll need to open the console to see the output unless you run the VM from a terminal. But you can find out what it's doing. > > Phil > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 3:30 PM, Esteban A. Maringolo <emaringolo(a)gmail.com > > wrote: > >> 2013/12/2 Pavel Krivanek <pavel.krivanek(a)gmail.com>: >> > User interrupt (cmd + .) was not working? >> >> Most of the times for simple things it does, but sometimes it doesn't. >> >> Regards, >> >> Esteban A. Maringolo >> >> > -- best, Eliot

Dec. 2, 2013

Opal hook?

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

Hi when I load a class whose superclass is not in the image I have the impression that the system create a subclass from ProtoObject and I would like to be able to control the superclass. ProtoObject subclass: #Adaptor1Example instanceVariableNames: 'customers accountID address name phoneNumber' classVariableNames: '' poolDictionaries: '' category: 'Examples-Cookbook' Any idea where to look? Stef

Dec. 2, 2013

Re: [Pharo-dev] Responsible development

by Benjamin

On 02 Dec 2013, at 20:14, StÃ©phane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr> wrote: > >> We try now to have responsive UIs in the sense the tools like Nautilus try to >> run things in a separate thread. >> >> I will do an experiment and fork each Nautilus opening to see if it can save my ass :P > :) > > personnally I would be really against because just forking is just a way to have a lot more mess in the future. Why ? > >> >> Ben >> >> On 02 Dec 2013, at 19:59, Yuriy Tymchuk <yuriy.tymchuk(a)me.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> On 02 Dec 2013, at 17:42, Sean P. DeNigris <sean(a)clipperadams.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Uko2 wrote >>>>> Itâs not about stability of pharo 3, it about concurrency... This thread >>>>> doesnât seem to have any reason >>>> >>>> Nothing is wasted. I appreciate your ideas. I never thought of these >>>> benefits; I always took it for granted to run in one thread. >>> >>> Even if everything runs in one thread it doesnât mean that you need to block something. And I know that example with Nautilus or even with test runner may be to hard. >>> >>> Letâs take moose for example. While it is importing a model everything freezes. Is there a reason for that? I donât see any. In my opinion the problem is that we are not used to run non-instant operations in a separate process, because I do a lot of mistakes like this too. >>> >>> uko >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ----- >>>> Cheers, >>>> Sean >>>> -- >>>> View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Responsible-development-tp4726686p4726763.html >>>> Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>>> >>> >>> >> >

Dec. 2, 2013

Re: [Pharo-dev] Responsible development

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

> We try now to have responsive UIs in the sense the tools like Nautilus try to > run things in a separate thread. > > I will do an experiment and fork each Nautilus opening to see if it can save my ass :P :) personnally I would be really against because just forking is just a way to have a lot more mess in the future. > > Ben > > On 02 Dec 2013, at 19:59, Yuriy Tymchuk <yuriy.tymchuk(a)me.com> wrote: > >> >> On 02 Dec 2013, at 17:42, Sean P. DeNigris <sean(a)clipperadams.com> wrote: >> >>> Uko2 wrote >>>> Itâs not about stability of pharo 3, it about concurrency... This thread >>>> doesnât seem to have any reason >>> >>> Nothing is wasted. I appreciate your ideas. I never thought of these >>> benefits; I always took it for granted to run in one thread. >> >> Even if everything runs in one thread it doesnât mean that you need to block something. And I know that example with Nautilus or even with test runner may be to hard. >> >> Letâs take moose for example. While it is importing a model everything freezes. Is there a reason for that? I donât see any. In my opinion the problem is that we are not used to run non-instant operations in a separate process, because I do a lot of mistakes like this too. >> >> uko >> >>> >>> >>> >>> ----- >>> Cheers, >>> Sean >>> -- >>> View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Responsible-development-tp4726686p4726763.html >>> Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>> >> >> >

Dec. 2, 2013

Re: [Pharo-dev] Responsible development

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

>> > > Even if everything runs in one thread it doesnât mean that you need to block something. ? You run in one thread then either it runs or it does not :) When loading Moose in one process it will load model and not process UI. I see that you do not really grasp concurrency. > And I know that example with Nautilus or even with test runner may be to hard. > > Letâs take moose for example. While it is importing a model everything freezes. Is there a reason for that? I donât see any. It just depends if you want to let the user do something in parallel or not. For moose this is easy to fork the loading. Now for pharo since what you load can modify the running system this is a different story. > In my opinion the problem is that we are not used to run non-instant operations in a separate process, No :) The problem is that we do not have a nice way to protect the system from being executed and modified at the same time. Imagine that we would load the code in a separate structure in the parallel process and that once the code is loaded but not installed you have a fast way to install it. Then we could do loading on the side. You see the key aspect. Your UI in objective-C were not done to load Objective-C code that could modify the objective-C runtime!!! So if you want to build a simple user interface loading videos you can do it in a parallel process just using fork and paying a bit of attention. > because I do a lot of mistakes like this too. > > uko > >> >> >> >> ----- >> Cheers, >> Sean >> -- >> View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Responsible-development-tp4726686p4726763.html >> Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> > >

Dec. 2, 2013

Re: [Pharo-dev] Responsible development

by Benjamin

We try now to have responsive UIs in the sense the tools like Nautilus try to run things in a separate thread. I will do an experiment and fork each Nautilus opening to see if it can save my ass :P Ben On 02 Dec 2013, at 19:59, Yuriy Tymchuk <yuriy.tymchuk(a)me.com> wrote: > > On 02 Dec 2013, at 17:42, Sean P. DeNigris <sean(a)clipperadams.com> wrote: > >> Uko2 wrote >>> Itâs not about stability of pharo 3, it about concurrency... This thread >>> doesnât seem to have any reason >> >> Nothing is wasted. I appreciate your ideas. I never thought of these >> benefits; I always took it for granted to run in one thread. > > Even if everything runs in one thread it doesnât mean that you need to block something. And I know that example with Nautilus or even with test runner may be to hard. > > Letâs take moose for example. While it is importing a model everything freezes. Is there a reason for that? I donât see any. In my opinion the problem is that we are not used to run non-instant operations in a separate process, because I do a lot of mistakes like this too. > > uko > >> >> >> >> ----- >> Cheers, >> Sean >> -- >> View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Responsible-development-tp4726686p4726763.html >> Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> > >

Dec. 2, 2013

Re: [Pharo-dev] transcript is plain bad

by Esteban Lorenzano

yes, the transcript is ThreadSafeTranscript On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 8:00 PM, Yuriy Tymchuk <yuriy.tymchuk(a)me.com> wrote: > Buy the way, is absence of Transcript class - ok? > > I know how it all works now, but is it ok? :) > > uko > > > On 02 Dec 2013, at 19:58, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > yes, please :) > > > On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 7:56 PM, StÃ©phane Ducasse < > stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr> wrote: > >> >> > The return of the toothpick is near. o/ >> >> No I will finish my logger :) >> >> Stef >> >> > >

Dec. 2, 2013

Re: [Pharo-dev] transcript is plain bad

by Yuriy Tymchuk

Buy the way, is absence of Transcript class - ok? I know how it all works now, but is it ok? :) uko On 02 Dec 2013, at 19:58, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm(a)gmail.com> wrote: > yes, please :) > > > On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 7:56 PM, StÃ©phane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr> wrote: > > > The return of the toothpick is near. o/ > > No I will finish my logger :) > > Stef > >

Dec. 2, 2013