January 2013 - Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

[Pharo-project] [Issue Tracker] [Action Needed] Show Stoppers 2.0

by Marcus Denker

Hi, We should stat to get serious to evaluate the remaining issues that are tagged 2.0. http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/list?can=2&q=milestone%3D2.0 Which of the are true show stoppers? This means, is the issue of a severity that, just for this single issue, we can not release 2.0? By definition, all problems that are already in 1.4 do not qualify for this, as we did already release 1.4 and the world did not stop spinning. The same is for "nice to have" issues. "It would be nice if.." is not a show stopper. Marcus

Jan. 29, 2013

[Pharo-project] Soup works in 2.0

by Torsten Bergmann

Jan. 29, 2013

[Pharo-project] nativeboost google groups

by Torsten Bergmann

Jan. 29, 2013

Re: [Pharo-project] nativeboost google groups

by Ciprian Teodorov

Hi guys, I somehow agree with Camillo on the noise part... but at the same time "noise" depends on what you are interested to see. Maybe the solution is to have some kind of a mailing list or discussion medium that is organized by categories... or projects But besides forums (which I don't really like) i don't know other solutions... On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 8:30 AM, S Krish <krishnamachari.sudhakar(a)gmail.com>wrote: > I too prefer one mail chain... > > > On Tuesday, January 29, 2013, StÃ©phane Ducasse wrote: > >> but this is always good to know the limit of key infrastructure of pharo. >> So now we will not know it, only if we register to the google group. >> >> Stef >> >> > it's mostly offtopic low-level stuff which has nothing to do with Pharo >> per se. >> > >> > hence separate mailing list, plus it's much easier to separate >> discussions ;). >> > >> > >> > On 2013-01-28, at 23:55, StÃ©phane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr> >> wrote: >> >> why? >> >> because this is cool to see that there is activity around NB >> >> >> >> Stef >> >> >> >>> I thought it might be a good idea to outsource the nativeboost >> discussions from the main mailinglist. >> >>> So I started a new google groups: >> >>> >> >>> https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!forum/nativeboost >> >>> nativeboost(a)googlegroups.com >> >>> >> >>> cami >> >> >> >> >> > >> > >> >> >> -- Dr. Ciprian TEODOROV IngÃ©nieur DÃ©veloppement CAO tÃ©l : 06 08 54 73 48 mail : ciprian.teodorov(a)gmail.com www.teodorov.ro

Jan. 29, 2013

Re: [Pharo-project] nativeboost google groups

by S Krish

I too prefer one mail chain... On Tuesday, January 29, 2013, StÃ©phane Ducasse wrote: > but this is always good to know the limit of key infrastructure of pharo. > So now we will not know it, only if we register to the google group. > > Stef > > > it's mostly offtopic low-level stuff which has nothing to do with Pharo > per se. > > > > hence separate mailing list, plus it's much easier to separate > discussions ;). > > > > > > On 2013-01-28, at 23:55, StÃ©phane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr<javascript:;>> > wrote: > >> why? > >> because this is cool to see that there is activity around NB > >> > >> Stef > >> > >>> I thought it might be a good idea to outsource the nativeboost > discussions from the main mailinglist. > >>> So I started a new google groups: > >>> > >>> https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!forum/nativeboost > >>> nativeboost(a)googlegroups.com <javascript:;> > >>> > >>> cami > >> > >> > > > > > > >

Jan. 29, 2013

Re: [Pharo-project] TxText configuration

by Denis Kudriashov

Hello 2013/1/29 Camillo Bruni <camillobruni(a)gmail.com> > Who's in charge of the development of TxText right now? > It would like the maintainers on the ci-job description: > > https://ci.inria.fr/rmod/job/TxText/ > > > thanks :) > > Last changes is my and I continue development (slowly). But I know nothing about ci-jobs. What I can do? Also Tristan Bourgois join development. And sombody (Igor) should add him to contributors.

Jan. 29, 2013

Re: [Pharo-project] how can we create project in SmalltalkHub

by Tudor Girba

Hi, I already created the Moose team. Cheers, Doru On Jan 29, 2013, at 1:09 AM, StÃ©phane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr> wrote: > Hi guys > > I mean projects that are not under StephaneDucasse. > Should I create a Moose team to create the Moose Project? > > Stef > -- www.tudorgirba.com "Sometimes the best solution is not the best solution."

Jan. 29, 2013

Re: [Pharo-project] pharo-project.org down?

by Sean P. DeNigris

Paul DeBruicker wrote > I can't access it. It's up now... -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/pharo-project-org-down-tp4666036p4666041.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Jan. 29, 2013

Re: [Pharo-project] CommandShell and OSProcess updated for Pharo 2.0

by Sean P. DeNigris

David T. Lewis wrote > I have updated CommandShell for Pharo 2.0, and made a few additional > updates to OSProcess also. In addition to CommandShell-Piping... Thanks again, David. OSProcess & Piping are absolutely essential, and CommandShell is really cool. It's so important that we have them working well :) -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/The-monkey-is-back-in-town-tp4658091p4666040.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Jan. 29, 2013

[Pharo-project] pharo-project.org down?

by Paul DeBruicker

I can't access it. http://downforeveryoneorjustme.com/www.pharo-project.org says its down

Jan. 29, 2013