January 2013 - Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-project] Adding SCTP support to the VM/Network-Kernel

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

> Hi, > > I require SCTP support for my work. I have implemented very basic > support in the unix version of the SocketPlugin[1], made modifications > to the CMake generation, the VMMaker part of the SocketPlugin and the > Network-Kernel. Basic manual testing shows that I can open a connection > read/write using the normal and specialized selectors. The Smalltalk bits > can be found here[2]. Thanks a lot :) > > What is the process to get a feature like this integrated? Is there > a precedence of emitting CMake rules to check for libraries/headers > to be present? - publish it on git - have some tests - send a mail to the mailing-list - sign the license agreements - enter a bug entry - sync with esteban and igor. > holger > > > [1] https://gitorious.org/~zecke/cogvm/zeckes-cogvm/commit/24bb6fd2c16661373567… > [2] http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~hfreyther2/sctp/source >

Jan. 29, 2013

Re: [Pharo-project] nativeboost google groups

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

Yes this what what my why? question was implying. Stef On Jan 29, 2013, at 9:06 AM, Torsten Bergmann wrote: > Hi Camillo, > > <just kidding> > OK I now created a google group for mophic, I also created one for zinc, for filesystem > and since it is now all there please stop using this mailinglist... > </just kidding> > > Sorry - couldnt resist ;) > > But with your action on creating a google group for NB I'm now not sure if Igor > and others continue to use the mailinglist here or the group you just created. > This is what I meant with confusion ... > > Wouldnt it have been better to first discuss this here on the list if it is > necessary to outsource and others feel the need to have a separate place to discuss > NB deeper. > From my side I'm totally fine to keep it here - especially since most NB related > discussions will influence Pharos direction anyway. > > As you know the separate issue tracker is historic - but I agree with you that we > should discuss where to maintain NB issues now after that NB is integrated > and part of the image. > > Thanks > T. > > > > > > > >

Jan. 29, 2013

Re: [Pharo-project] Monticello class V.S. classSide

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

Damien I do not understand your question. What do you mean? Stef On Jan 29, 2013, at 6:23 AM, Damien Cassou wrote: > What is the difference between 'class' and 'classSide'? > > We believe this is one symptom of a major problem > > -- > Damien Cassou > http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st > > "Success is the ability to go from one failure to another without > losing enthusiasm." > Winston Churchill > <monticello-classSide.png>

Jan. 29, 2013

Re: [Pharo-project] CommandShell and OSProcess updated for Pharo 2.0

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

I can write a configuration if you want. Stef On Jan 29, 2013, at 12:14 AM, David T. Lewis wrote: > I have updated CommandShell for Pharo 2.0, and made a few additional > updates to OSProcess also. In addition to CommandShell-Piping, the rest > of the CommandShell package (except for CommandShell-MVC) can now be > loaded into Pharo 2.0. CommandShellPharo provides the menu registration > to make "Command shell" available under "Tools" in the world menu. > > The repository is at http://www.squeaksource.com/CommandShell, and the > latest versions are: > > CommandShell-Base-dtl.29 > CommandShell-Piping-dtl.13 > CommandShell-Commands-dtl.13 > CommandShell-UI-dtl.10 > CommandShell-Morphic-dtl.2 > CommandShellPharo-dtl.2 > > Yes I know, it needs a ConfigurationOfCommandShell. > > There are test failures related to VM issues but the basic functionality > is now working, and both OSProcess and CommandShell should now be working > for Pharo on Unix/Linux (and hopefully Mac) VMs. > > Dave > > > On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 08:38:03PM -0500, David T. Lewis wrote: >> >> OSProcess and CommandShell-Piping should now load cleanly in Pharo 2.0. >> >> The latest versions are OSProcess-dtl.75 and CommandShell-Piping-dtl.13 >> in the SqueakSource repositories for OSProcess and CommandShell. >> >> Thanks to Damien Cassou for doing the original work for OSProcess support >> in Coral. I adapted his work so it will now load in both Squeak and Pharo. >> >> Unit test notes: >> >> The AioEventHandlerTestCase failures are due to AioPlugin not included in >> the VM. I expect the tests will pass if AioPlugin is added to VM builds. >> >> Many test rely on #forkSqueak to create cooperating OS processes for the >> tests. These tests fail on Cog, although this does not affect basic >> functionality of OSProcess itself. >> >> UnixProcessAccessorTestCase>>testRedirectStdOutTo fails due to a problem >> introduced in the oscog branch of the OSProcessPlugin. This should be fixed >> in the plugin but is a minor concern and does not affect normal usage >> of OSProcess. >> >> Dave >> >

Jan. 29, 2013

[Pharo-project] [update 2.0] #20496

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

>From santiago :) 20496 ----- Issue 7349: rootApplication does not exist in Pharo. Thanks Vanessa Pena and Pablo Estefo. http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=7349 Issue 7349: rootApplication does not exist in Pharo. Thanks Vanessa Pena and Pablo Estefo. http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=7349 Issue 7356: New comment in MessageTally> Thanks Alexandre and Milton. http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=7356. Issue 7328: diffmorph does not shows the middle separator. Thanks Sean De Nigris. http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=7328 Diff information: http://ss3.gemstone.com/ss/Pharo20/Tools-StephaneDucasse.1020.diff http://ss3.gemstone.com/ss/Pharo20/Refactoring-Tests-Core-StephaneDucasse.6… http://ss3.gemstone.com/ss/Pharo20/Polymorph-Widgets-StephaneDucasse.761.di…

Jan. 29, 2013

Re: [Pharo-project] I hate 'as yet unclassified'

by Benjamin

+1 :) Ben On Jan 29, 2013, at 5:06 PM, wam <camille.teruel(a)gmail.com> wrote: > 'CATEGORIZE ME' > Because smalltalkers hate upper cased letters, so everyone will categorize them quickly ;) > > On 29 janv. 2013, at 16:57, StÃ©phane Ducasse wrote: > >> >> I would like the change the intention of 'as yet unclassified' because this is a PLAGUE. >> It is like throwing papers on the floor. >> So we should have a different name to indicate that it should be fixed. >

Jan. 29, 2013

Re: [Pharo-project] I hate 'as yet unclassified'

by wam

'CATEGORIZE ME' Because smalltalkers hate upper cased letters, so everyone will categorize them quickly ;) On 29 janv. 2013, at 16:57, StÃ©phane Ducasse wrote: > > I would like the change the intention of 'as yet unclassified' because this is a PLAGUE. > It is like throwing papers on the floor. > So we should have a different name to indicate that it should be fixed.

Jan. 29, 2013

Re: [Pharo-project] I hate 'as yet unclassified'

by Esteban A. Maringolo

2013/1/29 StÃ©phane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr>: > Hi guys > > I spend my time recategorizing methods. > > I would like the change the intention of 'as yet unclassified' because this is a PLAGUE. > It is like throwing papers on the floor. > So we should have a different name to indicate that it should be fixed. > Any ideas? Recategorizing means assigning categories to methods, not classification, so "unclassified" is not the proper word. So for me "uncategorized" would be a good fit. Regards.

Jan. 29, 2013

Re: [Pharo-project] tuesday we will do a coding sprint here at Santiago

by Esteban Lorenzano

I'm sorry :( we could plan an entirely "hangout" sprint, for some day next week (probably wednesday)... so all who cannot join to fridays lille-sprint can help us to get ready to 2.0. I can run it if you are ok :) Esteban On Jan 29, 2013, at 4:49 PM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven(a)stfx.eu> wrote: > > On 29 Jan 2013, at 16:45, "Sean P. DeNigris" <sean(a)clipperadams.com> wrote: > >> Sean P. DeNigris wrote >>> Is the sprint still happening?? >> >> #sprint #fail >> >> I got up at 6am for thisâ¦ > > Sean, > > Yes this is frustrating, but at a Sprint people are so busy talking, coding and having fun that they are not reading mailing lists. > > A pure virtual Spring might be a better idea, then everybody is at the same levelâ¦ > > I am sure it is not about you ;-) > > Sven

Jan. 29, 2013

[Pharo-project] I hate 'as yet unclassified'

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

Hi guys I spend my time recategorizing methods. I would like the change the intention of 'as yet unclassified' because this is a PLAGUE. It is like throwing papers on the floor. So we should have a different name to indicate that it should be fixed. Any ideas? 'you are a dirty programmer - change me' Stef

Jan. 29, 2013