June 2012 - Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-project] ScriptManager config in 1.4

by Esteban Lorenzano

-1 IMO, what we need is to add a tab "Untrusted" to configurations browser (pointing to MetacelloRepository) and let people choose from there. Esteban On Jun 20, 2012, at 10:19 AM, StÃ©phane Ducasse wrote: > + 1 > >>>> and wonder why we dont use a >>>> http://ss3.gemstone.com/ss/MetaRepoForPharo20. >>> >>> We can use it too for now. >>> What is missing is the process behind >> >> Let's use that then: it is important that during 2.0 development, you can easily load (validated) metacello configs; many of us are using 2.0 daily, as in eating our own dogfood, if metacello configs + browser are the way forward, we should start using that now. >> >> Sven > >

June 20, 2012

Re: [Pharo-project] ScriptManager config in 1.4

by Esteban Lorenzano

but we need an inbox for configurations and a method to move thrusted configs to metarepo, otherwise, we will have same mess we have in MetacelloRepository really soon. On Jun 20, 2012, at 10:27 AM, StÃ©phane Ducasse wrote: > esteban > we should let people publish early and fix by hand and in parallel we work on it. > I will try to get a stab at a sketch today > > stef > On Jun 20, 2012, at 10:17 AM, Esteban Lorenzano wrote: > >> Problem is who validates the packages? (we are working in some automatization here, but it will take time) >> For example: ConfigurationOfSeaside30 in MetaRepoForPharo14 does not loads well (since it loads a stripped version of OB, if you have Nautilus it fails and if not it breaks Shout). >> It is easy to fix, but nobody seems to want... >> >> Esteban >> >> On Jun 20, 2012, at 10:13 AM, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote: >> >>> >>> On 20 Jun 2012, at 10:01, StÃ©phane Ducasse wrote: >>> >>>>> and wonder why we dont use a >>>>> http://ss3.gemstone.com/ss/MetaRepoForPharo20. >>>> >>>> We can use it too for now. >>>> What is missing is the process behind >>> >>> Let's use that then: it is important that during 2.0 development, you can easily load (validated) metacello configs; many of us are using 2.0 daily, as in eating our own dogfood, if metacello configs + browser are the way forward, we should start using that now. >>> >>> Sven >> >> > >

June 20, 2012

Re: [Pharo-project] ScriptManager config in 1.4

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

esteban we should let people publish early and fix by hand and in parallel we work on it. I will try to get a stab at a sketch today stef On Jun 20, 2012, at 10:17 AM, Esteban Lorenzano wrote: > Problem is who validates the packages? (we are working in some automatization here, but it will take time) > For example: ConfigurationOfSeaside30 in MetaRepoForPharo14 does not loads well (since it loads a stripped version of OB, if you have Nautilus it fails and if not it breaks Shout). > It is easy to fix, but nobody seems to want... > > Esteban > > On Jun 20, 2012, at 10:13 AM, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote: > >> >> On 20 Jun 2012, at 10:01, StÃ©phane Ducasse wrote: >> >>>> and wonder why we dont use a >>>> http://ss3.gemstone.com/ss/MetaRepoForPharo20. >>> >>> We can use it too for now. >>> What is missing is the process behind >> >> Let's use that then: it is important that during 2.0 development, you can easily load (validated) metacello configs; many of us are using 2.0 daily, as in eating our own dogfood, if metacello configs + browser are the way forward, we should start using that now. >> >> Sven > >

June 20, 2012

Re: [Pharo-project] Jenkins Pharo 2.0 build failing

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

yes probably Now a jenkins guy should have a look because I have no clue. I should get a jenkins tutorial > Wasn't that the problem we had last week and we needed a very last vm? > > On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 10:49 PM, Sean P. DeNigris <sean(a)clipperadams.com> wrote: > From the console output > (https://ci.lille.inria.fr/pharo/view/Pharo%202.0/job/Pharo-2.0/153/console) > it looks like maybe primitiveDirectoryEntry is returning nil... > > -- > View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Jenkins-Pharo-2-0-build-failing-tp4635571.html > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > > > -- > Mariano > http://marianopeck.wordpress.com >

June 20, 2012

Re: [Pharo-project] ScriptManager config in 1.4

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

+ 1 >>> and wonder why we dont use a >>> http://ss3.gemstone.com/ss/MetaRepoForPharo20. >> >> We can use it too for now. >> What is missing is the process behind > > Let's use that then: it is important that during 2.0 development, you can easily load (validated) metacello configs; many of us are using 2.0 daily, as in eating our own dogfood, if metacello configs + browser are the way forward, we should start using that now. > > Sven

June 20, 2012

Re: [Pharo-project] ScriptManager config in 1.4

by Esteban Lorenzano

Problem is who validates the packages? (we are working in some automatization here, but it will take time) For example: ConfigurationOfSeaside30 in MetaRepoForPharo14 does not loads well (since it loads a stripped version of OB, if you have Nautilus it fails and if not it breaks Shout). It is easy to fix, but nobody seems to want... Esteban On Jun 20, 2012, at 10:13 AM, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote: > > On 20 Jun 2012, at 10:01, StÃ©phane Ducasse wrote: > >>> and wonder why we dont use a >>> http://ss3.gemstone.com/ss/MetaRepoForPharo20. >> >> We can use it too for now. >> What is missing is the process behind > > Let's use that then: it is important that during 2.0 development, you can easily load (validated) metacello configs; many of us are using 2.0 daily, as in eating our own dogfood, if metacello configs + browser are the way forward, we should start using that now. > > Sven

June 20, 2012

Re: [Pharo-project] Jenkins Pharo 2.0 build failing

by Mariano Martinez Peck

Wasn't that the problem we had last week and we needed a very last vm? On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 10:49 PM, Sean P. DeNigris <sean(a)clipperadams.com>wrote: > From the console output > ( > https://ci.lille.inria.fr/pharo/view/Pharo%202.0/job/Pharo-2.0/153/console > ), > it looks like maybe primitiveDirectoryEntry is returning nil... > > -- > View this message in context: > http://forum.world.st/Jenkins-Pharo-2-0-build-failing-tp4635571.html > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > -- Mariano http://marianopeck.wordpress.com

June 20, 2012

Re: [Pharo-project] ScriptManager config in 1.4

by Sven Van Caekenberghe

On 20 Jun 2012, at 10:01, StÃ©phane Ducasse wrote: >> and wonder why we dont use a >> http://ss3.gemstone.com/ss/MetaRepoForPharo20. > > We can use it too for now. > What is missing is the process behind Let's use that then: it is important that during 2.0 development, you can easily load (validated) metacello configs; many of us are using 2.0 daily, as in eating our own dogfood, if metacello configs + browser are the way forward, we should start using that now. Sven

June 20, 2012

Re: [Pharo-project] ScriptManager config in 1.4

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

> > Pharo 2.0 is neither stable nor released thats why the repo is still > empty. Also the 2.0 repo is on SmalltalkHub (http://smalltalkhub.com/mc/Pharo/Packages20/main) and I dont > know whats planned here. Dont know about the state/progress of > SmalltalkHub Nicolas is adding support for search and user management. I do not know when it will be ready. Nicolas what is the agenda? I want to migrate to SmalltalkHub my projects. > and wonder why we dont use a > http://ss3.gemstone.com/ss/MetaRepoForPharo20. We can use it too for now. What is missing is the process behind > > Stef: any comments here? > > Bye > T. > -- > NEU: FreePhone 3-fach-Flat mit kostenlosem Smartphone! > Jetzt informieren: http://mobile.1und1.de/?ac=OM.PW.PW003K20328T7073a

June 20, 2012

[Pharo-project] ScriptManager config in 1.4

by Torsten Bergmann

>Why is the repo for the metacello config browser for 2.0 empty ? >Are these repos world writeable ? Usually the config browser repos should be filled with configs that work in a stable release. So www.squeaksource.com/MetaRepoForPharo14 includes anything that has proved to work on Pharo 1.4 and by copying the config from project repos or www.squeaksource.com/MetacelloRepository to www.squeaksource.com/MetaRepoForPharo14 it will appear in the list of Configuration Browser. I wrote it as a simple replacement for SqueakMap and for people like me who dont remember loading scripts and want to use the mouse for loading ;) And yes the repo for 1.4 is writeable. If you have a config that is known to work for 1.4. you can copy it there and it will be available. Make sure it contains a symbolic stable version for instance in ConfigurationOfScriptManager you will find: stable: spec <symbolicVersion: #stable> spec for: #'pharo1.1.x' version: '1.2'. spec for: #'pharo1.2.x' version: '1.2'. spec for: #'pharo1.3.x' version: '1.3'. spec for: #'pharo1.4.x' version: '1.4'. Pharo 2.0 is neither stable nor released thats why the repo is still empty. Also the 2.0 repo is on SmalltalkHub (http://smalltalkhub.com/mc/Pharo/Packages20/main) and I dont know whats planned here. Dont know about the state/progress of SmalltalkHub and wonder why we dont use a http://ss3.gemstone.com/ss/MetaRepoForPharo20. Stef: any comments here? Bye T. -- NEU: FreePhone 3-fach-Flat mit kostenlosem Smartphone! Jetzt informieren: http://mobile.1und1.de/?ac=OM.PW.PW003K20328T7073a

June 20, 2012