June 2012 - Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-project] **IMPORTANT** MUST READ: Pharo Association and Consortium

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

thanks! Stef On Jun 29, 2012, at 6:06 PM, Daniel Galdames GrÃ¼nberg wrote: > Hi > I will subscribe as a personal golden member (99EUR/year) > Daniel > El 30-06-2012, a las 8:09, StÃ©phane Ducasse escribiÃ³: > >> >> On Jun 30, 2012, at 12:46 PM, Herve Verjus wrote: >> >>> Hi All, >>> >>> thank you Stef for this piece of information. >>> >>> I will subscribe as individual member. >>> >>> Let's say, you're doing a good job, I enjoy a lot using Pharo, that let's me permit do/use funny and usefull things, teaching students, make some research software prototypes, etc. >>> I have to say I would probably not succeed in convincing my university staff to subscribe to the consortium. I personnaly vote for that, I will try and will do my best but I'am not optimistic :-( >>> I understand that the fees are intended for enterprises or organizations that aim to make business arround and/or with Pharo. I and my lab are not in such a perspective. Maybe I would succeed in convincing IAE director for some hundred euros for supporting your work...not for 1000 or more. Nevertheless, I will try. >> >> Thanks >> there is also the sponsoring possibility and the association can provide a bill for a pharo "distribution" >> So you can try to play with different budgets. >> >>> >>> All the best, >>> >>> Herve >> >> >

June 30, 2012

Re: [Pharo-project] SmalltalkHub update

by Mariano Martinez Peck

Excellent. Thanks Nicolas. On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Benjamin < benjamin.vanryseghem.pharo(a)gmail.com> wrote: > COOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL > > Ben > > On Jun 30, 2012, at 3:21 PM, petton.nicolas(a)gmail.com wrote: > > > > > Hi! > > > > SmalltalkHub received some love lately and now includes the following > > improvements: > > > > - Project pages now include a contributors tab > > - Contributors can now be set in the 'settings' tab of projects > > - The list of users watching are now visible in the 'watchers' tab > > - The search field in the header is now implemented. This is the first > > part of the search feature of SmalltalkHub, an advanced search page > > will be added later. > > > > Cheers, > > Nico > > > > -- > > Nicolas Petton > > http://nicolas-petton.fr > > > > > -- Mariano http://marianopeck.wordpress.com

June 30, 2012

[Pharo-project] [update 2.0] #20175

by Marcus Denker

20175 ----- Issue 6149: getSourceReplacingSelectorWith: dependent on Text http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=6149 Issue 3314: [Kernel Dependencies] InstructionStream / Computer http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3314 -- Marcus Denker -- http://marcusdenker.de

June 30, 2012

[Pharo-project] Help

by Lorenzo Schiavina

Hi, I am trying to insert a SVG component into a JQuery widget page. I have been able to insert it, but I am not able to manage the callback, because I do not know how to direct it to SVG component instead of to JQuery. Can anybody give me a hint? Many thanks Lorenzo

June 30, 2012

[Pharo-project] Odd inconsistency in Seaside One-Click 3.0.7

by Lawson English

I was reviewing the Seaside book while refreshing my skills, and I noticed this very strange, trivial, but fundamental bug/inconsistency: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2RyREN00Nok (less than 2 minute demo). The issue is hardly worth mentioning, except for totally new users, but I DO wonder what is going on that changes the behavior from the first right-click on the category pane to the second. L -- Squeak from the very start (introduction to Squeak and Pharo Smalltalk for the (almost) complete and compleate beginner). https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6601A198DF14788D&feature=view_all

June 30, 2012

Re: [Pharo-project] SmalltalkHub update

by Benjamin

COOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL Ben On Jun 30, 2012, at 3:21 PM, petton.nicolas(a)gmail.com wrote: > > Hi! > > SmalltalkHub received some love lately and now includes the following > improvements: > > - Project pages now include a contributors tab > - Contributors can now be set in the 'settings' tab of projects > - The list of users watching are now visible in the 'watchers' tab > - The search field in the header is now implemented. This is the first > part of the search feature of SmalltalkHub, an advanced search page > will be added later. > > Cheers, > Nico > > -- > Nicolas Petton > http://nicolas-petton.fr >

June 30, 2012

Re: [Pharo-project] SmalltalkHub update

by Guillermo Polito

Sexy! :D Tx Nico! On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 3:21 PM, <petton.nicolas(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi! > > SmalltalkHub received some love lately and now includes the following > improvements: > > - Project pages now include a contributors tab > - Contributors can now be set in the 'settings' tab of projects > - The list of users watching are now visible in the 'watchers' tab > - The search field in the header is now implemented. This is the first > part of the search feature of SmalltalkHub, an advanced search page > will be added later. > > Cheers, > Nico > > -- > Nicolas Petton > http://nicolas-petton.fr > >

June 30, 2012

[Pharo-project] SmalltalkHub update

by petton.nicolas＠gmail.com

Hi! SmalltalkHub received some love lately and now includes the following improvements: - Project pages now include a contributors tab - Contributors can now be set in the 'settings' tab of projects - The list of users watching are now visible in the 'watchers' tab - The search field in the header is now implemented. This is the first part of the search feature of SmalltalkHub, an advanced search page will be added later. Cheers, Nico -- Nicolas Petton http://nicolas-petton.fr

June 30, 2012

Re: [Pharo-project] **IMPORTANT** MUST READ: Pharo Association and Consortium

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

On Jun 30, 2012, at 12:46 PM, Herve Verjus wrote: > Hi All, > > thank you Stef for this piece of information. > > I will subscribe as individual member. > > Let's say, you're doing a good job, I enjoy a lot using Pharo, that let's me permit do/use funny and usefull things, teaching students, make some research software prototypes, etc. > I have to say I would probably not succeed in convincing my university staff to subscribe to the consortium. I personnaly vote for that, I will try and will do my best but I'am not optimistic :-( > I understand that the fees are intended for enterprises or organizations that aim to make business arround and/or with Pharo. I and my lab are not in such a perspective. Maybe I would succeed in convincing IAE director for some hundred euros for supporting your work...not for 1000 or more. Nevertheless, I will try. Thanks there is also the sponsoring possibility and the association can provide a bill for a pharo "distribution" So you can try to play with different budgets. > > All the best, > > Herve

June 30, 2012

Re: [Pharo-project] [Moose-dev] Magritte / XML bridge

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

>> >> > Well, it started as an excersize to avoid having to do things like that :) >>> hope that helps, >> >> Do you know how relationships are handled :) > > Relationships are one of the weaker points in magritte. Yes. I think that we should increase the use of magritte so that it can improve. > It would need some love to make it more usable. In Magritte-XML we took a few side ways. > When it comes to descriptions in relationships it is important who is in control of the "real" description of an object. In Magritte-Xml we support two use cases. The default option is to support inheritance. That means if you navigate a relationship each object is asked for its description. This way an object you get can be a subclass of the object you described. The second option I need more often is to inject descriptions into a relationship. Meaning the description of the relationship defines the description for the contained objects. This way I can alter the use of my objects by the way the objects are approached/by use case. This can be done by setting #reference: on your relationship description and by specifying "beDescribedByReference" to the relationship description. Sadly I couldn't come up with a nicer selector :) > As an example I use > > COUserSession>>#userDescription > <magritteDescription> > ^MAToOneRelationDescription new > accessor: #user; > label: 'User of App'; > classes: (Array with: COUser); > beDescribedByReference; > reference: (COUser new remoteDescription kind: COUser); > beXmlElement; > beInlined; > priority: 20; > yourself > > Here "remoteDescription" includes a reduced view of the user for remote usage. It contains just two values of the user instead of everything. By additionally defining "beInlined" you can prevent the relationship to create an additional element. Otherwise the relationship would create a xml element and the object as well. > While I'm writing this I'm not sure if the setting for kind: is still needed. Nick did something so you don't need to set it like this, I think. I hope he will read this and clarifies the use. Somehow. I have to play with it. And if you come at esug I would really like to sit with you. One of my simple use case is that I have a container and elements and I would like to save in xml the container and its elements. Now the relation between container and elements is a relationship. > > Regarding your other mail. I cannot tell much about the option descriptions in Magritte-Xml. I never used them myself and so I'm no expert. Jan could say something about them and IIRC Nick (again) did something with the multiple option description. I will look deeper into it now > > hope that helps, > > Norbert

June 30, 2012