May 2012 - Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-project] thanks for pharoconf

by Norbert Hartl

Yes, was fun to see a lot of you. And I could add some new faces to my inventory. Great! Norbert Am 27.05.2012 um 00:12 schrieb Tudor Girba: > Hi, > > I had a good time at PharoConf. > > Thanks for organizing it. > > Cheers, > Doru > > > -- > www.tudorgirba.com > > "Beauty is where we see it." > > > >

May 27, 2012

Re: [Pharo-project] class message

by Milan Mimica

On 27 May 2012 11:02, Denis Kudriashov <dionisiydk(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > I add #class implementation from Object to ProtoObject and all SMock and > Mocketry tests become green. > Yes, that fixes any problems I can think of with it. Otherwise #class ends up in #doesNotUnderstand which is special for proxy objects... -- Milan Mimica http://sparklet.sf.net

May 27, 2012

Re: [Pharo-project] class message

by Mariano Martinez Peck

On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Denis Kudriashov <dionisiydk(a)gmail.com>wrote: > I found problem. > > Proxy classes in SMock and Mocketry are subclasses of ProtoObject which > not implements #class. > But proxy classes use "self class" in some methods (like #printOn: > implementation). > > I add #class implementation from Object to ProtoObject and all SMock and > Mocketry tests become green. > > So questions: > Is ProtoObject should implement #class? > Can we move #class method from Object to ProtoObject? > > ups....good catch! indeed, we should move it to ProtoObject. > > 2012/5/27 StÃ©phane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr> > >> > > no, the other way around, now #class is NOT bytecoded, and therefore >> is managed as a normal message send. >> > > >> > > That is much better. Thanks! I like progress even if it breaks old >> code. >> > >> > :) >> > But we always try to minimize else we would go much faster and btw >> class should not break older code :) >> > >> > It did break Mocketry (http://www.squeaksource.com/Mocketry) >> > >> > Thank's for report. >> > Try to fix it today. >> > Now I dont know how #class message can broke something. When I found >> answer I try to explain >> >> Thanks denis. >> I'm curious too. >> >> Stef >> > > -- Mariano http://marianopeck.wordpress.com

May 27, 2012

[Pharo-project] [stackoverflow] Parsing RDF?

by Damien Cassou

Hi, if someone knows how to parse RDF, please answer http://stackoverflow.com/questions/10772281/parsing-rdf-in-smalltalk Best -- Damien Cassou http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st "Lambdas are relegated to relative obscurity until Java makes them popular by not having them." James Iry

May 27, 2012

Re: [Pharo-project] thanks for pharoconf

by Alain Plantec

yes! thanks!!! Cheers Alain Le 27/05/12 00:12, Tudor Girba a Ã©crit : > Hi, > > I had a good time at PharoConf. > > Thanks for organizing it. > > Cheers, > Doru > > > -- > www.tudorgirba.com > > "Beauty is where we see it." > > > >

May 27, 2012

Re: [Pharo-project] class message

by Denis Kudriashov

I found problem. Proxy classes in SMock and Mocketry are subclasses of ProtoObject which not implements #class. But proxy classes use "self class" in some methods (like #printOn: implementation). I add #class implementation from Object to ProtoObject and all SMock and Mocketry tests become green. So questions: Is ProtoObject should implement #class? Can we move #class method from Object to ProtoObject? 2012/5/27 StÃ©phane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr> > > > no, the other way around, now #class is NOT bytecoded, and therefore > is managed as a normal message send. > > > > > > That is much better. Thanks! I like progress even if it breaks old > code. > > > > :) > > But we always try to minimize else we would go much faster and btw class > should not break older code :) > > > > It did break Mocketry (http://www.squeaksource.com/Mocketry) > > > > Thank's for report. > > Try to fix it today. > > Now I dont know how #class message can broke something. When I found > answer I try to explain > > Thanks denis. > I'm curious too. > > Stef >

May 27, 2012

Re: [Pharo-project] thanks for pharoconf

by Luc Fabresse

Yes, thanks to organizers and every participants for all of this positive energy! #Luc 2012/5/27 Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven(a)beta9.be> > +1 > > On 27 May 2012, at 00:12, Tudor Girba wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I had a good time at PharoConf. > > > > Thanks for organizing it. > > > > Cheers, > > Doru > > > > > > -- > > www.tudorgirba.com > > > > "Beauty is where we see it." > > I liked it a lot as well: interesting content, interesting people, > motivational. > > Thx, > > Sven > > -- > Sven Van Caekenberghe > http://stfx.eu > Smalltalk is the Red Pill > >

May 27, 2012

Re: [Pharo-project] class message

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

> > no, the other way around, now #class is NOT bytecoded, and therefore is managed as a normal message send. > > > > That is much better. Thanks! I like progress even if it breaks old code. > > :) > But we always try to minimize else we would go much faster and btw class should not break older code :) > > It did break Mocketry (http://www.squeaksource.com/Mocketry) > > Thank's for report. > Try to fix it today. > Now I dont know how #class message can broke something. When I found answer I try to explain Thanks denis. I'm curious too. Stef

May 27, 2012

Re: [Pharo-project] class message

by Denis Kudriashov

Hello 2012/5/26 Milan Mimica <milan.mimica(a)gmail.com> > On 26 May 2012 20:53, StÃ©phane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr> wrote: > >> > >> > What has changed in implementation "class" message in between Pharo 1.3 >> and 1.4? Is it compiled inline now or something like that? >> > >> > no, the other way around, now #class is NOT bytecoded, and therefore is >> managed as a normal message send. >> > >> > That is much better. Thanks! I like progress even if it breaks old code. >> >> :) >> But we always try to minimize else we would go much faster and btw class >> should not break older code :) >> > > It did break Mocketry (http://www.squeaksource.com/Mocketry) > > Thank's for report. Try to fix it today. Now I dont know how #class message can broke something. When I found answer I try to explain Best regards, Denis

May 27, 2012

Re: [Pharo-project] thanks for pharoconf

by Sven Van Caekenberghe

+1 On 27 May 2012, at 00:12, Tudor Girba wrote: > Hi, > > I had a good time at PharoConf. > > Thanks for organizing it. > > Cheers, > Doru > > > -- > www.tudorgirba.com > > "Beauty is where we see it." I liked it a lot as well: interesting content, interesting people, motivational. Thx, Sven -- Sven Van Caekenberghe http://stfx.eu Smalltalk is the Red Pill

May 27, 2012