Pharo-dev

By thread

pharo-dev@lists.pharo.org

March 2012

119 participants
1488 messages

[Pharo-project] Pharo Core 1.3 - Build # 19 - Unstable!

by jenkins-pharo.ci.inria.fr＠jenkins-server.lille.inria.fr

March 8, 2012

[Pharo-project] Testing Morphic Designer

by Torsten Bergmann

Stef wrote: >We are getting thereâ¦ >Did you ever look at the code of both systems? No - not really. >I like the ui part now At least the videos look shiny ;) >yes we can express a model and given a spec we >can create a complex widget Sounds like UI specs in VW. Do we have that already? However - a builder/placer should be the goal. Writing specs by hand can get very complex... What I like about the videos from nullPointer is that it satisfies the common workflow expectation known from other UI builders (VisualStudio, Java IDEs): open the builder, add some widgets, set some properties, double click a button for the event handler, add code and run. But as you said - that says nothing about the implementation under the hood. Bye T. -- Empfehlen Sie GMX DSL Ihren Freunden und Bekannten und wir belohnen Sie mit bis zu 50,- Euro! https://freundschaftswerbung.gmx.de

March 8, 2012

Re: [Pharo-project] Adding a statement programmatically

by Sean P. DeNigris

Marcus Denker-4 wrote > > -> Compile the code to an RB AST, this then has all the interfaces needed > to replace nodes or add nodes. > You can then pretty print it back to source. > Thanks Marcus. That's what I was trying to do. I got the AST and created the node: body := (AbstractSound>>#initialize) parseTree body. body addNode: (RBParser parseExpression: 'envelopes := nil'). But then I couldn't figure out how to get the source back... "These both returned the statements without the header" body formattedCode. body newSource. "This returned the full method, but without the added node" body source -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Adding-a-statement-programmatically-tp4454447p4456824… Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

March 8, 2012

[Pharo-project] [update 1.4] #14383

by Marcus Denker

14384 ----- The following changes have been integrated:

March 8, 2012

Re: [Pharo-project] [update 1.4] #14383

by Tudor Girba

This sounds excellent! Doru On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven(a)beta9.be> wrote: > > On 08 Mar 2012, at 14:43, Benjamin wrote: > >> Now, to integrate a fix a generate a new Pharo version, they just have to execute on script which take the issues number as parameter :) >> >> And then, everything is fully automatic (even running the tests ;) ) > > Cool. > > Now even the smallest child could to do it - Duckingâ¦. ;-) > -- www.tudorgirba.com "Every thing has its own flow"

March 8, 2012

Re: [Pharo-project] [update 1.4] #14383

by Sven Van Caekenberghe

On 08 Mar 2012, at 14:43, Benjamin wrote: > Now, to integrate a fix a generate a new Pharo version, they just have to execute on script which take the issues number as parameter :) > > And then, everything is fully automatic (even running the tests ;) ) Cool. Now even the smallest child could to do it - Duckingâ¦. ;-)

March 8, 2012

Re: [Pharo-project] [update 1.4] #14383

by Benjamin

Now, to integrate a fix a generate a new Pharo version, they just have to execute on script which take the issues number as parameter :) And then, everything is fully automatic (even running the tests ;) ) Ben On Mar 8, 2012, at 2:22 PM, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote: > > On 08 Mar 2012, at 14:15, Marcus Denker wrote: > >> The automatic integrator is nearly working! > > I really hope for you that it makes the integrator work lighter. > > Sven

March 8, 2012

Re: [Pharo-project] [update 1.4] #14383

by Sven Van Caekenberghe

On 08 Mar 2012, at 14:15, Marcus Denker wrote: > The automatic integrator is nearly working! I really hope for you that it makes the integrator work lighter. Sven

March 8, 2012

Re: [Pharo-project] [update 1.4] #14383

by Marcus Denker

On Mar 8, 2012, at 2:11 PM, Marcus Denker wrote: > 14383 > ----- > > The following changes have been integrated: > The automatic integrator is nearly working! Just that the mail is empty. Is was : Issue 5448: Clean in SystemPreferences http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=5448 -- Marcus Denker -- http://marcusdenker.de

March 8, 2012

Re: [Pharo-project] Adding a statement programmatically

by Marcus Denker

On Mar 8, 2012, at 12:21 PM, Noury Bouraqadi wrote: > Hi Sean, > > Did you thought about: > -using method wrappers? > -object as methods. An object o put in a method dictionary instead of some method with selector #s. When #s is looked up, o receives the message > run: selector with: args in: originalReceiver > -proxies (look at Ghost) so you introduce an indirection to perform what ever action you want before performing the actual code > -> Compile the code to an RB AST, this then has all the interfaces needed to replace nodes or add nodes. You can then pretty print it back to source. Marcus -- Marcus Denker -- http://marcusdenker.de

March 8, 2012

Jump to page: