September 2011 - Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-project] System update with .sources file

by Marcus Denker

On Sep 27, 2011, at 6:52 PM, Norbert Hartl wrote: > I downloaded the 14163 image and did a system update. First I started it without copying the .sources file. While upgrading to 14164 I got a warning which you can see in the attached screenshot. Proceed is working. Then I tested it again with .sources file in place and I didn't got the warning. Is there an easy explanation for this? > > No idea.. running without source file is not done often, and this means it's never tested. So for sure it is broken. Marcus Denker -- http://marcusdenker.de

Sept. 28, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] Cannot do anything in Pharo 1.3

by Marcus Denker

On Sep 28, 2011, at 5:59 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote: > Ok...there is not a CI anymore for 1.3, so, If you take the jenkis image of FUel: > > You cannot do anything: > > 1) Type a class in a workspace and cmd + b to browse it -> MessageNotUnderstood: receiver of "classOrMetaClass:" is nil > ORClassDefinition >> shouldBeStyledBy: aPluggableShoutMorph > aPluggableShoutMorph classOrMetaClass: nil. > ^ true > > 2) Do a System -> About to see which version I am -> MessageNotUnderstood: SHTextStylerST80>>stylingEnabled: > PluggableTextMorph >> styled: aBoolean > self styler stylingEnabled: aBoolean > > I am the only one? The MetaCello Config needs to be updated... I should do it. Marcus -- Marcus Denker -- http://marcusdenker.de

Sept. 28, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] Cannot do anything in Pharo 1.3

by Lukas Renggli

You are having these problems likely due to incompatible packages after the recent changes with the syntax highlighting (http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=4609) This change basically affected all development tools related code. You need to update Shout, RB, OB, eCompletion, ... See the builds on http://jenkins.lukas-renggli.ch/ for a consistent configuration. Lukas On 28 September 2011 17:58, Mariano Martinez Peck <marianopeck(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Ok...there is not a CI anymore for 1.3, so, If you take the jenkis image of > FUel: > > You cannot do anything: > > 1) Type a class in a workspace and cmd + b to browse it -> > MessageNotUnderstood: receiver of "classOrMetaClass:" is nil > ORClassDefinition >> shouldBeStyledBy: aPluggableShoutMorph > Â Â Â aPluggableShoutMorph classOrMetaClass: nil. > Â Â Â ^ true > > 2) Do a System -> About to see which version I am -> MessageNotUnderstood: > SHTextStylerST80>>stylingEnabled: > PluggableTextMorph >> styled: aBoolean > Â Â Â self styler stylingEnabled: aBoolean > > I am the only one? > > -- > Mariano > http://marianopeck.wordpress.com > > -- Lukas Renggli www.lukas-renggli.ch

Sept. 28, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] looking for Kent Beck, in his roll of MongoTalk creator/admin

by Sean P. DeNigris

Esteban Lorenzano wrote: > > 2) write permission, if it is ok I to commit my changes there (a global > Read/Write would also be cool, but not everybody âincluding meâ likes it > everytime :) ) > Please, please, please, oh wonderful creators of SqS3 and SmalltalkHub, include a feature that overcomes this longstanding, frustrating problem. One good idea might be a per-project inbox, so at least all contributed code can be found in one place even if it can't/won't be integrated. Or maybe a forking feature, like git. Or both! Esteban Lorenzano wrote: > > 1) license information (it would be really cool if it is MIT ;)) > Research shows that when you get people to "do the right thing" by "making doing good the default option" [1]. Let's have the license default to MIT so that people who don't really care, don't know, forget to select an option end up with the choice most beneficial to the community. [1] http://www.bnet.com/blog/mba/do-the-right-thing-stanford-conference-discuss… : Make doing good the default option: Columbia Business Schoolâs Eric Johnson pointed to research showing that there is a much higher rate of organ donation in countries where people have to opt out of organ donation, rather than opt in. Similarly, people save more money when their companies automatically enroll them in a retirement savings plan. -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/looking-for-Kent-Beck-in-his-roll-of-MongoTalk-creato… Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Sept. 28, 2011

[Pharo-project] Cannot do anything in Pharo 1.3

by Mariano Martinez Peck

Ok...there is not a CI anymore for 1.3, so, If you take the jenkis image of FUel: You cannot do anything: 1) Type a class in a workspace and cmd + b to browse it -> MessageNotUnderstood: receiver of "classOrMetaClass:" is nil ORClassDefinition >> shouldBeStyledBy: aPluggableShoutMorph aPluggableShoutMorph classOrMetaClass: nil. ^ true 2) Do a System -> About to see which version I am -> MessageNotUnderstood: SHTextStylerST80>>stylingEnabled: PluggableTextMorph >> styled: aBoolean self styler stylingEnabled: aBoolean I am the only one? -- Mariano http://marianopeck.wordpress.com

Sept. 28, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] Webservices (any update)

by CÃ©drick BÃ©ler

Hi, I doubt it will help you but last year I started an incomplete WSDL implementation :-) . it's in squeak source (iWSDL). I don't remember what I achieved but this was to use our local web services. It was kind of working but needed too much work to be reliable (and working outside of my context). The idea was to generate ST classes with method to invoke WS. I used SoapOpera but wasn't pleased so I started to use more Zinc... and I gave up as no time and we ended up using php WS packages :( and moreover, we stopped using our local WS... (was too slow to be useable). Generation is not fished but could be quick to have a first version. Anyway, I just packed an image in case you find some interest in it. http://dl.dropbox.com/u/7909745/wipWSDL%26Dropbox.zip My 2 cents, CÃ©drick Le 27 sept. 2011 Ã 09:06, Torsten Bergmann a Ã©crit : > Whats used these days to connect to webservices using Pharo. > Is it possible to generate ST classes from a WSDL > and use them? > > Thx > T. > -- > Empfehlen Sie GMX DSL Ihren Freunden und Bekannten und wir > belohnen Sie mit bis zu 50,- Euro! https://freundschaftswerbung.gmx.de >

Sept. 28, 2011

[Pharo-project] [update 1.4] #14172

by Marcus Denker

14172 ----- Issue 4862: HashedCollection rehashAll crashes the VM http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=4862 -- Marcus Denker -- http://marcusdenker.de

Sept. 28, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] Odd TimeStamp from string issue

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

+1 On Sep 27, 2011, at 11:35 PM, Chris Cunningham wrote: > On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 2:04 PM, Pat Maddox <patmaddox(a)me.com> wrote: >> Might be sloppy writing because that last sentence seems to contradict the first one. At any rate, I wouldn't expect that to be valid. What is 24:00:01 ? > > TimeStamp fromString: '2011-09-27 24:00:01' -> '27 September 2011 12:00:01 am' > > As for contradictions (if it was from my message), this behavior is > not expected by me, but it may be expected by the rest of the > community (which is what I was asking about). It sounds like it > isn't, though. > > I think the method is too permissive - it probably should have > rejected my input as bad. > > The code path delegates the time portion off to Time, which delegates > it off to Duration (with no bounds checks), then asks for the seconds > and nanos back from Duration via #ticks, which hides the fact that a > date boundary has been exceeded: > > days := self days. > ^ Array > with: days > with: seconds - (days * SecondsInDay) > with: nanos > (the seconds - (days * SecondsInDay) part). > > -Chris >

Sept. 28, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] Odd TimeStamp from string issue

by csrabak＠bol.com.br

Sept. 28, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] Odd TimeStamp from string issue

by Pat Maddox

On Sep 27, 2011, at 2:35 PM, Chris Cunningham wrote: > On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 2:04 PM, Pat Maddox <patmaddox(a)me.com> wrote: >> Might be sloppy writing because that last sentence seems to contradict the first one. At any rate, I wouldn't expect that to be valid. What is 24:00:01 ? > > TimeStamp fromString: '2011-09-27 24:00:01' -> '27 September 2011 12:00:01 am' > > As for contradictions (if it was from my message), this behavior is > not expected by me, but it may be expected by the rest of the > community (which is what I was asking about). It sounds like it > isn't, though. Sorry I was referring to wikipedia as potentially having sloppy writing, because the final sentence of the paragraph I quoted appeared to contract the first. I would also expect TimeStamp fromString: to raise an error instead of just accepting it. Pat

Sept. 27, 2011