September 2011 - Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-project] PetitParser + Amber

by Lukas Renggli

Hi Frank, Likely this has nothing to do with PetitParser. >From my understanding: In Clamato the parser was running at the language level (Smalltalk). JTalk introduced a dead-slow method lookup and as a consequence they optimize the parser by moving it to the implementation level (a JavaScript primitive). Lukas On 14 September 2011 09:30, Frank Shearar <frank.shearar(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Hi GÃ¶ran, > > Quick question: during your work on Amber, did you find any > particularly slow parts of PetitParser? > > Or, rephrased: while a hand-written parser is pretty much guaranteed > to run faster than PetitParser (or any general parser generator, I > reckon), are there any parts of PetitParser that leap out as being > ripe for optimisation? > > Thanks, > > frank > > -- Lukas Renggli www.lukas-renggli.ch

Sept. 14, 2011

[Pharo-project] [update 1.4] #14140

by Marcus Denker

14140 ----- Issue 4796: Fix ClassSearch http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=4796 Issue 4794: New method in AbstractTool http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=4794 Issue 4789: Improve the way morphs communicate with model http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=4789 -- Marcus Denker -- http://marcusdenker.de

Sept. 14, 2011

[Pharo-project] PetitParser + Amber

by Frank Shearar

Hi GÃ¶ran, Quick question: during your work on Amber, did you find any particularly slow parts of PetitParser? Or, rephrased: while a hand-written parser is pretty much guaranteed to run faster than PetitParser (or any general parser generator, I reckon), are there any parts of PetitParser that leap out as being ripe for optimisation? Thanks, frank

Sept. 14, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] [squeak-dev] anyone have a more up-to-date MethodWrappers for Squeak than MethodWrappers3.9-pmm.10?

by Noury Bouraqadi

Note that now in Pharo, we have Ghost (on squeaksource) that allows proxifying (building proxy for) any object includling classes and methods. It can be used as a good alternative to method wrappers and encourages clean design by separating messages capturing (trap) and the processing. Noury On 14 sept. 2011, at 01:37, Eliot Miranda wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck <marianopeck(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Eliot, you can take a look to > http://www.squeaksource.com/ObjectMetaTools > > Package MethodWrapper. Do you mean the implementation that uses the #run:with:in ? > > I'll take a look at this. I'd started looking at the older one. > > If anyone's interested attached are changes that restore generateWith:using: that allow one to create instances of subclasses of CompiledMethod. > > > Cheers > > > On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 11:42 PM, Eliot Miranda <eliot.miranda(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Hi All, > > the most up-to-date MethodWrappers I can find is for Squeak 3.9, pre-closures. Anyone have anything compatible with Squeak 4.1/4.2/Pharo 1.1/1.2/1.3? > > -- > best, > Eliot > > > > > > > > -- > Mariano > http://marianopeck.wordpress.com > > > > > -- > best, > Eliot > > <generateWith.st> Noury Bouraqadi Ecole des Mines de Douai http://car.mines-douai.fr/noury http://twitter.com/#!/NouryBouraqadi -- -19Ã¨mes JournÃ©es Francophones sur les SystÃ¨mes Multi-Agents (JFSMAâ11) http://www.univ-valenciennes.fr/congres/jfsma2011/ 17-19 Octobre 2011, Valenciennes, France -5th International Conference on Smalltalk Technologies http://www.fast.org.ar November 3th - 5th, 2011 Universidad Nacional de Quilmes (Argentina)

Sept. 14, 2011

[Pharo-project] [CI-Server] Hudson discontinued Oct 1st

by Marcus Denker

Hello, We have right now two integration setups: Hudson. Old https://pharo-ic.lille.inria.fr/hudson/ Jenkins. New https://ci.lille.inria.fr/pharo/ Running two setups is very confusing for everyone. Therefore, the old one will be turned *OFF* Oct 10th. All important projects will be migrated before that to Jenkins. Marcus -- Marcus Denker -- http://marcusdenker.de

Sept. 14, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] Pharo One Click 1.3 LNK file

by Peter Hugosson-Miller

+100!! -- Cheers, Peter. On 14 sep 2011, at 08:31, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker(a)inria.fr> wrote: > > On Sep 14, 2011, at 8:28 AM, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote: > >> >> On 14 Sep 2011, at 08:19, Marcus Denker wrote: >> >>> The One-Click here: >>> >>> https://gforge.inria.fr/frs/download.php/28922/Pharo-1.3-OneClick.zip >>> >>> Does not use a LNK File, it just has the exe in the main directory. And current VMs. >>> >>> (Yes, and the one click on the Build server is out of date... maybe we should remove it for now to have less confusion) >> >> Yeah, I saw that I had two different versions on my machine, not sure what the most recent was I followed the one on the page, >> >> http://www.pharo-project.org/pharo-download/release-1-3 >> >> to >> >> https://pharo-ic.lille.inria.fr/hudson/view/Pharo/job/Pharo%201.3/lastSucce… >> >> The one fresh of the build server should be the latest no ? That is using the LNK file though. >> > Latest from the image yes. VMs: no. > > Yes, this is all confusing and needs to be fixed... and the whole Hudson build server needs to be discontinued, ASAP. > (It's very confusing to have two. We are really good at doing very confusing things... we need to improve that). > > Marcus > > > > -- > Marcus Denker -- http://marcusdenker.de > >

Sept. 14, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] Pharo One Click 1.3 LNK file

by Marcus Denker

On Sep 14, 2011, at 8:28 AM, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote: > > On 14 Sep 2011, at 08:19, Marcus Denker wrote: > >> The One-Click here: >> >> https://gforge.inria.fr/frs/download.php/28922/Pharo-1.3-OneClick.zip >> >> Does not use a LNK File, it just has the exe in the main directory. And current VMs. >> >> (Yes, and the one click on the Build server is out of date... maybe we should remove it for now to have less confusion) > > Yeah, I saw that I had two different versions on my machine, not sure what the most recent was I followed the one on the page, > > http://www.pharo-project.org/pharo-download/release-1-3 > > to > > https://pharo-ic.lille.inria.fr/hudson/view/Pharo/job/Pharo%201.3/lastSucce… > > The one fresh of the build server should be the latest no ? That is using the LNK file though. > Latest from the image yes. VMs: no. Yes, this is all confusing and needs to be fixed... and the whole Hudson build server needs to be discontinued, ASAP. (It's very confusing to have two. We are really good at doing very confusing things... we need to improve that). Marcus -- Marcus Denker -- http://marcusdenker.de

Sept. 14, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] Pharo One Click 1.3 LNK file

by Sven Van Caekenberghe

On 14 Sep 2011, at 08:19, Marcus Denker wrote: > The One-Click here: > > https://gforge.inria.fr/frs/download.php/28922/Pharo-1.3-OneClick.zip > > Does not use a LNK File, it just has the exe in the main directory. And current VMs. > > (Yes, and the one click on the Build server is out of date... maybe we should remove it for now to have less confusion) Yeah, I saw that I had two different versions on my machine, not sure what the most recent was I followed the one on the page, http://www.pharo-project.org/pharo-download/release-1-3 to https://pharo-ic.lille.inria.fr/hudson/view/Pharo/job/Pharo%201.3/lastSucce… The one fresh of the build server should be the latest no ? That is using the LNK file though.

Sept. 14, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] Downloading configuration on Pharo1.3 and Pharo1.4 freezes my image

by Marcus Denker

On Sep 14, 2011, at 4:29 AM, Guillermo Polito wrote: > Hi! > > Some students had their Pharo1.3 and Pharo1.4 images freezed when executing the following script: > > Gofer it > squeaksource: 'ObjectBrowser'; > package: 'ConfigurationOfObjectBrowser'; > load. > > (ConfigurationOfObjectBrowser project version: #bleedingEdge) load > > I've reproduced it with the last images from Hudson/Jenkins, and they allways freeze on the Cleaning up step... > On the other hand, it loads correctly on latest 1.2... > > Does anybody have an idea of what's happening? > I think this is this bug: http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=4768 -- Marcus Denker -- http://marcusdenker.de

Sept. 14, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] Pharo One Click 1.3 LNK file

by Marcus Denker

On Sep 13, 2011, at 9:00 PM, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote: > There is a problem with the current Pharo One Click 1.3 LNK (.lnk) file on Windows. > > It refers to non existing paths and thus does not work. > > More specifically the 'Target' and 'Starts In' fields are wrong. > > I know close to nothing about Windows, can somebody else help here ? > > Ideally these should refer relatively to the right directories, so that when the containing directory changes its name or is moved things don't break. Similar to what the Linux .sh script does. > > An additional problem is that these one click artifacts are built on Linux where the .lnk file probably cannot be edited. > The One-Click here: https://gforge.inria.fr/frs/download.php/28922/Pharo-1.3-OneClick.zip Does not use a LNK File, it just has the exe in the main directory. And current VMs. (Yes, and the one click on the Build server is out of date... maybe we should remove it for now to have less confusion) Marcus -- Marcus Denker -- http://marcusdenker.de

Sept. 14, 2011