August 2011 - Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-project] PharoInbox broken?

by Sean P. DeNigris

Okay, I got it. The inbox has moved to http://ss3.gemstone.com/ss/PharoInbox However, the MC Browser in Pharo 1.4 still points to the old one. I started an issue (http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=4711) and fixed the only reference I found in the sources - MCHttpRepository class>>inboxRepository. Fix in *new* inbox - Monticello-SeanDeNigris.532 :) Sean -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/PharoInbox-broken-tp3774478p3774498.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Aug. 28, 2011

[Pharo-project] PharoInbox broken?

by Sean P. DeNigris

I'm getting an authentication error when trying to upload to PharoInbox and it is listed read-only on sqs. Sean -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/PharoInbox-broken-tp3774478p3774478.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Aug. 28, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] Omnibrowser in 1.4

by Sean P. DeNigris

StÃ©phane Ducasse wrote: > > So you see we are improving the core image. > Okay, I got it. Thank you Lukas and Steph. Sounds good. Sean -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Omnibrowser-in-1-4-tp3774180p3774411.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Aug. 28, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] Addition to "About Pharo" dialog

by GermÃ¡n Arduino

2011/8/28 StÃ©phane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr>: > The plan for SmalltalkHub are > Â Â Â Â - gemstone back-end > Â Â Â Â - inria hosting > Â Â Â Â - replication on three locations Replication: This is about what I talked on my previous mail, excellent. > > So soon (when nicolas decide) we will start a beta phase: we will push seaside pharo and a lot more in Smalltalkhub > and launch some queries to stress test. > > Then we will deploy on INRIA. > > Stef >

Aug. 28, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] Addition to "About Pharo" dialog

by GermÃ¡n Arduino

2011/8/28 StÃ©phane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr>: > > On Aug 28, 2011, at 4:32 AM, GermÃ¡n Arduino wrote: > >> I think that having problems in software is a common reality, unfortunately. >> >> May be Squeaksource and it's servers (I don't know) are having a lot >> in these days, but the point I would mention is that is needed to >> think in "availability" more than in have 0 problems. > > > > The problem of the instability of SS is that using files as a back end when you put hundred thousands of files in on folder > does not scale. > Guess how many files are in the seaside repository :) and the pharo? > Yes, I know. Then here the problem in the persistence in file system, were a possible solution could be a replicated file system: http://www.xtreemfs.org/ (To mention one example of what I'm talking about). > Stef > >> The problems will exist, sooner or later, with SmalltalkHub or >> Squeaksource3, the challenge is, in my point of view, to have >> availability (some ways of reaction) in front of different failures. > > no we hope not. > I hope the same, but we should work thinking in that the problems could exist (software, communications, servers, etc) then is good to think in terms of availability (Is not cheap, I know).

Aug. 28, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] Plan for releases: after 1.4 I propose that we do a stabilization release

by Luc Fabresse

2011/8/27 Sean P. DeNigris <sean(a)clipperadams.com> > > Damien Cassou wrote: > > > > and I think it is a good idea. > > > > +1. And it comes at a great time now that FS and Zinc will be in the image > - > they were so needed! > +1 It would be great to have RPackage also because it will imply a lot of changes that need stabilization. But if it is not possible, it will be for the next next one. Luc > > Sean > > -- > View this message in context: > http://forum.world.st/Plan-for-releases-after-1-4-I-propose-that-we-do-a-st… > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >

Aug. 28, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] Omnibrowser in 1.4

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

On Aug 28, 2011, at 12:45 PM, Sean P. DeNigris wrote: > > Lukas Renggli wrote: >> >> There are currently no plans to make OB work in upcoming Pharo >> versions; Pharo 1.4 is supposed to have its own much better browser >> framework. People can use OB if they want. Since we never maintained OB (only lukas and we are grateful for that) we will just continue like that. We cannot take responsibility to maintain something we do not understand in addition to all the rest. > Until that happens, all development in Pharo 1.4 will be done without a > refactoring browser? It was always like that in the past. Just that you use the image with the work of lukas loaded. Now for 1.4 yes we are fedup to use the old browser without RB. So Benjamin started to write some widgets for all the request question of RB engine so that Nautilus supports RB. So you see we are improving the core image. Stef > > -- > View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Omnibrowser-in-1-4-tp3774180p3774231.html > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >

Aug. 28, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] Omnibrowser in 1.4

by Sean P. DeNigris

Lukas Renggli wrote: > > There are currently no plans to make OB work in upcoming Pharo > versions; Pharo 1.4 is supposed to have its own much better browser > framework. > Until that happens, all development in Pharo 1.4 will be done without a refactoring browser? -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Omnibrowser-in-1-4-tp3774180p3774231.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Aug. 28, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] Omnibrowser in 1.4

by Lukas Renggli

There are currently no plans to make OB work in upcoming Pharo versions; Pharo 1.4 is supposed to have its own much better browser framework. On 28 August 2011 11:59, Sean P. DeNigris <sean(a)clipperadams.com> wrote: > Oh forgot to mention, "(Smalltalk at: #ConfigurationOfOmniBrowser) project > latestVersion load" from MetacelloRepository seemed maybe old, with > references to Preferences, and errors after loading. References to Preferences were removed from OB a long long time ago (> 1 year). Use the following script to get the latest code (for Pharo 1.3 core images): https://github.com/renggli/builder/blob/master/scripts/omnibrowser.st Lukas > > S > > -- > View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Omnibrowser-in-1-4-tp3774180p3774181.html > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > -- Lukas Renggli www.lukas-renggli.ch

Aug. 28, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] Omnibrowser in 1.4

by Sean P. DeNigris

Oh forgot to mention, "(Smalltalk at: #ConfigurationOfOmniBrowser) project latestVersion load" from MetacelloRepository seemed maybe old, with references to Preferences, and errors after loading. S -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Omnibrowser-in-1-4-tp3774180p3774181.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Aug. 28, 2011