June 2011 - Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-project] PharoKernel 13269

by Pavel Krivanek

Thank you very much for the report! -- Pavel On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 8:43 PM, Yanni Chiu <yanni(a)rogers.com> wrote: > On 21/06/11 10:23 AM, Pavel Krivanek wrote: >> >> The Morphic initialization is now better and generated PharoCore image >> seems to be normally usable. Please try it on the Mac virtual >> machines. >> >> https://gforge.inria.fr/frs/download.php/28664/PharoKernel-13269.zip > > Running on: > Â System Version: Â Â Â Mac OS X 10.5.8 (9L30) > Â Kernel Version: Â Â Â Darwin 9.8.0 > > with Mac VM: > Â http://www.mirandabanda.org/files/Cog/VM/VM.r2434/ > > the results are as follows. > > PharoKernel-1.3-13269.image and PharoKernel-Gofer-1.3-13269.image > Â - Drag & drop the image onto Cog app > Â - VM icon appears on dock, Croquet menu appears at top > Â - since it's a headless image, everything seems okay (should have tested > with a startup script, and started the vm in a shell terminal) > Â - choose "Quit Croquet" from Apple menu bar, a blank Pharo window pops up. > Ctrl-. yields nothing (not surprising in Kernel image, I suppose) > Â - Use Activity Manager utility - "Quit" does not stop the process > Â - "Force Quit" does stop the process > > PharoKernel-Core-1.3-13269.image > Â - starts up just like the above two images, no Pharo window > Â - choose "Quit Croquet", then blank Pharo window opens, some partial > redraws appear > Â - missing sources file report > Â - after adding the sources file, get blank Pharo window > Â - Crtl-. causes a redraw and debugger window to appear > Â - closed the debugger > Â - opened a TestRunner, run all tests > Â - Running 7912 tests, stalled (after 5 or 10 minutes) with: > Â Â 2635 run, 2593 passes, 31 expected failures, 5 failures, 6 errors, 0 > unexpected passes > Â - have to "Force Quit" that image > Â - try again, without running the tests, able to open system browser, > transcript, file browser - things seem generally usable (except for the > image startup problems) > > >

June 21, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] PharoKernel 13269

by Yanni Chiu

On 21/06/11 10:23 AM, Pavel Krivanek wrote: > > The Morphic initialization is now better and generated PharoCore image > seems to be normally usable. Please try it on the Mac virtual > machines. > > https://gforge.inria.fr/frs/download.php/28664/PharoKernel-13269.zip Running on: System Version: Mac OS X 10.5.8 (9L30) Kernel Version: Darwin 9.8.0 with Mac VM: http://www.mirandabanda.org/files/Cog/VM/VM.r2434/ the results are as follows. PharoKernel-1.3-13269.image and PharoKernel-Gofer-1.3-13269.image - Drag & drop the image onto Cog app - VM icon appears on dock, Croquet menu appears at top - since it's a headless image, everything seems okay (should have tested with a startup script, and started the vm in a shell terminal) - choose "Quit Croquet" from Apple menu bar, a blank Pharo window pops up. Ctrl-. yields nothing (not surprising in Kernel image, I suppose) - Use Activity Manager utility - "Quit" does not stop the process - "Force Quit" does stop the process PharoKernel-Core-1.3-13269.image - starts up just like the above two images, no Pharo window - choose "Quit Croquet", then blank Pharo window opens, some partial redraws appear - missing sources file report - after adding the sources file, get blank Pharo window - Crtl-. causes a redraw and debugger window to appear - closed the debugger - opened a TestRunner, run all tests - Running 7912 tests, stalled (after 5 or 10 minutes) with: 2635 run, 2593 passes, 31 expected failures, 5 failures, 6 errors, 0 unexpected passes - have to "Force Quit" that image - try again, without running the tests, able to open system browser, transcript, file browser - things seem generally usable (except for the image startup problems)

June 21, 2011

[Pharo-project] #assert:equals: feels backwards

by Sean P. DeNigris

In my unit test, I want to make sure that my output equals the expectedOutput, but: TestCase>>assert: expected equals: actual It feels wrong to me. It seems that I want to make an assertion about my class's behavior and I would like to write: self assert: output equals: expectedOutput. What do you all think? Thanks. Sean -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/assert-equals-feels-backwards-tp3614760p3614760.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

June 21, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] [update 1.3] #13271

by Sven Van Caekenberghe

On 21 Jun 2011, at 16:12, Marcus Denker wrote: > 13271 > ----- > > Issue 4326: Connection timeout problem > http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=4326 > > Issue 4417: Zinc does not honour network proxy configuration > http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=4417 > > Issue 4428: New mechanism for Zinc servers start/stop handling after system startUp/shutDown > http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=4428 #thankYou

June 21, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] [update 1.3] #13272

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

Thanks for your effort Stef On Jun 21, 2011, at 4:53 PM, Marcus Denker wrote: > 13272 aka "ALL DONE" (no bug for core left) > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Issue 4429: Undeclared TooklBuilder > http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=4429 > Issue 4424: Cant execute comment in Finder > http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=4424 > > > > -- > Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de > INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD. > >

June 21, 2011

[Pharo-project] [update 1.3] #13272

by Marcus Denker

13272 aka "ALL DONE" (no bug for core left) ------------------------------------------------------------- Issue 4429: Undeclared TooklBuilder http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=4429 Issue 4424: Cant execute comment in Finder http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=4424 -- Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.

June 21, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] PharoKernel 13269

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

Thanks a lot pavel We should continue to work on Hazelnuts too. Stef On Jun 21, 2011, at 4:23 PM, Pavel Krivanek wrote: > Hi > > I uploaded new set of Pharo images. The generation is now much simpler > because Pharo already has all patches necessary for the generation of > the kernel image. > > The Morphic initialization is now better and generated PharoCore image > seems to be normally usable. Please try it on the Mac virtual > machines. > > https://gforge.inria.fr/frs/download.php/28664/PharoKernel-13269.zip > > Cheers, > -- Pavel >

June 21, 2011

[Pharo-project] PharoKernel 13269

by Pavel Krivanek

Hi I uploaded new set of Pharo images. The generation is now much simpler because Pharo already has all patches necessary for the generation of the kernel image. The Morphic initialization is now better and generated PharoCore image seems to be normally usable. Please try it on the Mac virtual machines. https://gforge.inria.fr/frs/download.php/28664/PharoKernel-13269.zip Cheers, -- Pavel

June 21, 2011

[Pharo-project] [update 1.3] #13271

by Marcus Denker

13271 ----- Issue 4326: Connection timeout problem http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=4326 Issue 4417: Zinc does not honour network proxy configuration http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=4417 Issue 4428: New mechanism for Zinc servers start/stop handling after system startUp/shutDown http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=4428 -- Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.

June 21, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] Merge tool. No way to cherry pick the changes?

by Gary Chambers

Indeed, MC only supports keep-current/use-incoming if the item is a conflict. I'd be happy to help with the UI if you want to have a go at making the model work ;-) Regards, Gary ----- Original Message ----- From: "Igor Stasenko" <siguctua(a)gmail.com> To: "Pharo Development" <Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr> Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2011 1:37 PM Subject: [Pharo-project] Merge tool. No way to cherry pick the changes? >I don't understand, when i merging, the merge tool showing me all the > difference between current version and > incoming one. > It says '0 conflicts' and its ok to merge, but what if i want to > choose to keep an old version for some methods, while merge the rest? > > What i see that there is no way to do that .. all menu items which > would allow me to do that, like > 'keep current version' > 'use incoming verison' > 'mark as conflict' > are disabled. > > Which means that once machine decided that there is no conflict, you > cannot do much. > I tried to quickly hack the UI and enable those menu items , but it > doesn't works, because the model itself seems like don't supports > that. > > So, the question is how we can change that? As to me, it is certainly > a missing feature, if i cannot freely choose between current and > incoming version at > my will, when merging. > > Gary (& all)? Any ideas? > > -- > Best regards, > Igor Stasenko AKA sig. >

June 21, 2011