April 2011 - Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-project] Pharo 1.2.1 to Pharo 1.2.2

by Miguel CobÃ¡

Thanks, I understand. Cheers El miÃ©, 27-04-2011 a las 16:32 +0200, Marcus Denker escribiÃ³: > Hello, > > In 1.2 we did a bad change: updating is not possible as soon as there is no letter in the version name. > This means that you need to change the version number before you can updated. > > I fixe that in 1.2.2, though, so this is the last time this is needed. > > On Apr 26, 2011, at 2:09 AM, Miguel CobÃ¡ wrote: > > > El lun, 25-04-2011 a las 11:00 -0500, Miguel CobÃ¡ escribiÃ³: > >> How will this upgrade path will be handled? > >> > >> In some email of previous week this is mentioned: > >> > >> SystemVersion newVersion: 'Pharo1.2.2a'. > > > > I meant: > > > > SystemVersion newVersion: 'Pharo1.2.1a'. > > > > > >> > >> But evaluated in a Pharo 1.2.1 update 12345 starts updating from 12342 > >> and stops on 12345, so I think that is wrong. > >> > >> Evaluating > >> > >> SystemVersion newVersion: 'Pharo1.2.2a' > >> > >> begin the update from 12346 and stops on 12350 so I think that is the > >> correct one, right? > >> > >> Or should users begin with: > >> > >> https://gforge.inria.fr/frs/download.php/28436/PharoCore-1.2.2a-12345.zip > >> > >> and update from there? (This implies migrate to a new image, not so much > >> a update from 1.2.1 to 1.2.2 but a migration). > >> > >> Thanks in advance. > >> > >> > > > > Anyone? > > > > -- > > Miguel CobÃ¡ > > http://twitter.com/MiguelCobaMtz > > http://miguel.leugim.com.mx > > > > > > > > > > -- > Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de > INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD. > > -- Miguel CobÃ¡ http://twitter.com/MiguelCobaMtz http://miguel.leugim.com.mx

April 27, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] Hudson version 2.0 is available

by Marcus Denker

On Apr 27, 2011, at 4:49 PM, Esteban Lorenzano wrote: > Hi, > In case we upgrade, maybe we better move on to jenkins, since hudson was forked because some license issues (which I don't understand, but I think jenkins is better :) ) > Yes, we will move to Jenkins. > Cheers, > Esteban > > El 27/04/2011, a las 11:05a.m., Marcus Denker escribiÃ³: > >> >> On Apr 26, 2011, at 6:03 PM, Henrik Sperre Johansen wrote: >> >>> On 26.04.2011 17:32, DougEdmunds wrote: >>>> Pharo is being developed on a Hudson 1.358 server (2010/05/14). >>>> Hudson has recently released version 2.0 (2011/04/21). >>>> http://hudson-ci.org/ >>>> >>>> -- >>>> View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Hudson-version-2-0-is-available-tp3475761p3475761.html >>>> Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>>> >>> Takes some time to get INRIA operations to approve and do installation of new versions apparently :) >> >> Yes. I will ask again... >> >>> Anyways, I suspect the next installed version will be of Jenkins, not Hudson. >> >> -- >> Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de >> INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD. >> >> > > -- Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.

April 27, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] Hudson version 2.0 is available

by Esteban Lorenzano

Hi, In case we upgrade, maybe we better move on to jenkins, since hudson was forked because some license issues (which I don't understand, but I think jenkins is better :) ) Cheers, Esteban El 27/04/2011, a las 11:05a.m., Marcus Denker escribiÃ³: > > On Apr 26, 2011, at 6:03 PM, Henrik Sperre Johansen wrote: > >> On 26.04.2011 17:32, DougEdmunds wrote: >>> Pharo is being developed on a Hudson 1.358 server (2010/05/14). >>> Hudson has recently released version 2.0 (2011/04/21). >>> http://hudson-ci.org/ >>> >>> -- >>> View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Hudson-version-2-0-is-available-tp3475761p3475761.html >>> Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>> >> Takes some time to get INRIA operations to approve and do installation of new versions apparently :) > > Yes. I will ask again... > >> Anyways, I suspect the next installed version will be of Jenkins, not Hudson. > > -- > Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de > INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD. > >

April 27, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] Pharo 1.2.1 to Pharo 1.2.2

by Marcus Denker

Hello, In 1.2 we did a bad change: updating is not possible as soon as there is no letter in the version name. This means that you need to change the version number before you can updated. I fixe that in 1.2.2, though, so this is the last time this is needed. On Apr 26, 2011, at 2:09 AM, Miguel CobÃ¡ wrote: > El lun, 25-04-2011 a las 11:00 -0500, Miguel CobÃ¡ escribiÃ³: >> How will this upgrade path will be handled? >> >> In some email of previous week this is mentioned: >> >> SystemVersion newVersion: 'Pharo1.2.2a'. > > I meant: > > SystemVersion newVersion: 'Pharo1.2.1a'. > > >> >> But evaluated in a Pharo 1.2.1 update 12345 starts updating from 12342 >> and stops on 12345, so I think that is wrong. >> >> Evaluating >> >> SystemVersion newVersion: 'Pharo1.2.2a' >> >> begin the update from 12346 and stops on 12350 so I think that is the >> correct one, right? >> >> Or should users begin with: >> >> https://gforge.inria.fr/frs/download.php/28436/PharoCore-1.2.2a-12345.zip >> >> and update from there? (This implies migrate to a new image, not so much >> a update from 1.2.1 to 1.2.2 but a migration). >> >> Thanks in advance. >> >> > > Anyone? > > -- > Miguel CobÃ¡ > http://twitter.com/MiguelCobaMtz > http://miguel.leugim.com.mx > > > > -- Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.

April 27, 2011

[Pharo-project] GitFs / MCGit

by Camillo Bruni

Hi Max, I took another effort to work on the git bindings of MC. However I ran into troubles with FSGitFilesystem on commiting. 1. I fail when saving the repos in GitCommit >> parents when it starts to lazily load the object which does not exist yet... 2. GitRespository >> packedObjectWithSignature: aGitObjectSignature does not throw an exception but simply returns nil? does this make sense? maybe you have a clue how to solve this faster than I do :-) camillo

April 27, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] Hudson version 2.0 is available

by Marcus Denker

On Apr 26, 2011, at 6:03 PM, Henrik Sperre Johansen wrote: > On 26.04.2011 17:32, DougEdmunds wrote: >> Pharo is being developed on a Hudson 1.358 server (2010/05/14). >> Hudson has recently released version 2.0 (2011/04/21). >> http://hudson-ci.org/ >> >> -- >> View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Hudson-version-2-0-is-available-tp3475761p3475761.html >> Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> > Takes some time to get INRIA operations to approve and do installation of new versions apparently :) Yes. I will ask again... > Anyways, I suspect the next installed version will be of Jenkins, not Hudson. -- Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.

April 27, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] why getting the right infrastructure is the way to go!

by Igor Stasenko

On 27 April 2011 11:32, StÃ©phane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr> wrote: > all that for getting a method definition hidden by another one :(. > We should definitively changes the sources and changes absence of structure. > Amen! > changeRecordForOverriddenMethod: aMethodReference .... [vomit] .... > -- Best regards, Igor Stasenko AKA sig.

April 27, 2011

[Pharo-project] [update 1.2] #12351

by Marcus Denker

12351 ----- Issue 4078: New TextEditor mouse selection broken -- Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.

April 27, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] about the transcript: Model vs Morph

by Mariano Martinez Peck

On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 12:49 PM, Fernando Olivero <fernando.olivero(a)usi.ch>wrote: > Hi, I wanted to better understand the issues raised agains the (new) > Transcript. > > Many people are arguing against the current Morph widget displaying > the Transcript, complaining that it is read only. The fix is simple, > provide a new implementation of TranscriptMorph , which provides cut & > paste, scrolling , and the other functionality previously there. > > This is the announcement on the benefits of the new transcript made by > Juan. > > New Transcript > Fast (Calls return quickly) > Fast (Updates are immediate) > Thread safe > Can log to file in addition to Display > Display output is optional (for headless images) > Can work on a bare bones image (Doesn't need UI, dependency, events, > processes) > Optional morphic window for seamless integration in Morphic > UI framework agnostic. Can be used to debug Morphic, even with the > morphic window open, without crashing the image! > No longer a text editor. Display is read only. > > So according to the mails in the list, Pharo disagrees on the last > issue, but this means only improving the TranscriptMorph. > I dont have time to work on it, but will next week. > > Yes, but it is not only the last one. It is muuch more than that. We should be able to : 1) evaluate, print, inspect, copy, past, explore, debug, etc... with shorcuts 2) Do a right click, bring the context menu, and have what we normally have in every place 3) do shorcuts. For exmaple, ctrl + s use to clean the Trancript. I give an exmaple. Take the Pharo1.3 I sent today. I open the Transcript and it is full of crap. I saw "Ok...ctrl + s must clean." Ok...it doesn't. Ok...."maybe right click and clean"..There is no right click. Ok.."maybe from the options on the top right of the morph". No option. So...in summary I couldn't even clean the Transcript. > Are people actually complaining against the (new) Transcript model? I am speaing about user point of view. I have no idea how the previous Transcript was implemented nor how this one it is. All my "problems" are about user point of view. > or > just the TranscriptMorph missing features ? > > this one. > I recall Igor, wanting the Transcript to be polymorphic with the > protocol of a WriteStream. Which is already there. > > I have no idea. Best regards, -- Mariano http://marianopeck.wordpress.com

April 27, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] SqueakSource

by Philippe Marschall

On 04/27/2011 12:08 PM, Fabrizio Perin wrote: > Ok Squeaksource is up again. I did run a script that should load the > missing commits if they have been store on the disk. Please check if > they are there otherwise you just have to commit them again. The SeasideWip repository seems to be gone. If it can't be recovered can you send me the *.mcz files (AFAIK they're saved on disk) and I'll recreate it. Cheers Philippe

April 27, 2011