April 2011 - Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-project] Hudson is not friendly to show us the used scripts ?

by Marcus Denker

On Apr 5, 2011, at 10:26 AM, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote: > Maybe it is me that I am not finding it in the web interface. I am really interested in being able to see the scripts that Hudson uses for its own usage. > > For example, how does Hudson run all the tests from code (not using the TestRunner) ? and how does he write that in the correct output that Hudson wants? > > It would be nice if all used Hudson scrips are available somehow. > There are two components: 1) The config of Hudson what to do for a Project. That you can see if you are admin. 2) The scripts used. These are the ones of Lukas: https://github.com/renggli/builder To edit these, one needs a shell-account on the build slave. Marcus -- Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.

April 5, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] Draft Pharo 1.2.1 Release Announcement

by laurent laffont

On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 10:07 AM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven(a)beta9.be>wrote: > > On 05 Apr 2011, at 09:47, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote: > > > Thanks Sven. I would like to remark the ammount of fixes issues. > > Is there an easy why to know this? > > Yeah, it would be cool to add some statistics, like N fixes or commits, R > issues solved, reduced the core complexity from X classes and Y methods to > X' classes and Y' methods, but I cannot easily get to that. > > Is it not so that 1.2 started with #12000 and that we are now on #12345, so > that makes 345 version tags, but of course not all of them are of equal > size/importance. > ahaha I thought revision #12345 was a dummy number :) Laurent > > If we can't get this half right, we probably better drop it, no ? > > >

April 5, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] ci.pharo-project.org redirect should be changed?

by Adrian Lienhard

I changed it. Adrian On Apr 5, 2011, at 07:01 , laurent laffont wrote: > On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 11:32 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck < > marianopeck(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi... currently ci.pharo-project.org redirects to >> https://pharo-ic.lille.inria.fr/hudson/view/Pharo/ >> but I think it should be https://pharo-ic.lille.inria.fr/ since >> everything inside there is Pharo. Pharo is not just the Pharo image. >> >> what do you think? >> > > > +1 > > Laurent > > >> >> -- >> Mariano >> http://marianopeck.wordpress.com >> >>

April 5, 2011

[Pharo-project] Hudson is not friendly to show us the used scripts ?

by Mariano Martinez Peck

Maybe it is me that I am not finding it in the web interface. I am really interested in being able to see the scripts that Hudson uses for its own usage. For example, how does Hudson run all the tests from code (not using the TestRunner) ? and how does he write that in the correct output that Hudson wants? It would be nice if all used Hudson scrips are available somehow. Thanks -- Mariano http://marianopeck.wordpress.com

April 5, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] Draft Pharo 1.2.1 Release Announcement

by Mariano Martinez Peck

On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 10:07 AM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven(a)beta9.be>wrote: > > On 05 Apr 2011, at 09:47, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote: > > > Thanks Sven. I would like to remark the ammount of fixes issues. > > Is there an easy why to know this? > > Yeah, it would be cool to add some statistics, like N fixes or commits, R > issues solved, reduced the core complexity from X classes and Y methods to > X' classes and Y' methods, but I cannot easily get to that. > > Is it not so that 1.2 started with #12000 and that we are now on #12345, so > that makes 345 version tags, but of course not all of them are of equal > size/importance. > > If we can't get this half right, we probably better drop it, no ? > > > Just a little note. #12345 is not the number of issues, but for updates. If we take that every update has an average o 3 integrated issues, then the amount of issues should be something like 1000 :) (345 * 3) -- Mariano http://marianopeck.wordpress.com

April 5, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] Draft Pharo 1.2.1 Release Announcement

by Marcus Denker

On Apr 5, 2011, at 9:48 AM, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote: > Thanks Sven. I would like to remark the ammount of fixes issues. > Is there an easy why to know this? > The bug tracker can be queried for issues of a certain tag: 57 for Full: http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/list?can=1&q=milestone%3D1.2-DevImage and 693 for Core: http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/list?can=1&q=milestone%3D1.2 For all versions, we had 3960 issue tracker submissions, out of which 473 are open. Marcus -- Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.

April 5, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] Draft Pharo 1.2.1 Release Announcement

by Sven Van Caekenberghe

On 05 Apr 2011, at 09:19, laurent laffont wrote: > On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 9:05 AM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven(a)beta9.be> wrote: > > On 05 Apr 2011, at 07:09, laurent laffont wrote: > > > Remarks: > > - group changed by categories: Morphic/Polymorph, Tools, Under the hood, ... > > - Mocketry is not included in Pharo 1.2 > > Thanks for the feedback, I applied your suggestions. > > For more publicity we can have a word on the new success stories: Inceptive ERP, Issys tracking and DrGeo in http://www.pharo-project.org/about/success-stories > > Laurent. > > > More comments ? > > Sven OK, I added a paragraph 'Success Stories', have a look: http://homepage.mac.com/svc/Pharo/pharo-1.2.1-release.html Are the download links correct ?? Sven

April 5, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] Draft Pharo 1.2.1 Release Announcement

by Sven Van Caekenberghe

On 05 Apr 2011, at 09:47, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote: > Thanks Sven. I would like to remark the ammount of fixes issues. > Is there an easy why to know this? Yeah, it would be cool to add some statistics, like N fixes or commits, R issues solved, reduced the core complexity from X classes and Y methods to X' classes and Y' methods, but I cannot easily get to that. Is it not so that 1.2 started with #12000 and that we are now on #12345, so that makes 345 version tags, but of course not all of them are of equal size/importance. If we can't get this half right, we probably better drop it, no ?

April 5, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] Draft Pharo 1.2.1 Release Announcement

by Mariano Martinez Peck

Thanks Sven. I would like to remark the ammount of fixes issues. Is there an easy why to know this? cheers mariano On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 9:19 AM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven(a)beta9.be> wrote: > > On 05 Apr 2011, at 07:09, laurent laffont wrote: > > > Remarks: > > - group changed by categories: Morphic/Polymorph, Tools, Under the hood, > ... > > - Mocketry is not included in Pharo 1.2 > > > Thanks for the feedback, I applied your suggestions. And uploaded a newer > version. > > More comments ? > > Sven > -- Mariano http://marianopeck.wordpress.com

April 5, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] Status of Weak enhancements in Pharo

by Igor Stasenko

On 5 April 2011 06:30, Miguel CobÃ¡ <miguel.coba(a)gmail.com> wrote: > What is the status of the Weak enhancements that were applied to Squeak > 4.2 (by Levente and Igor, mainly) and were targeted for inclusion in > Pharo? Is there a list of them somewhere? which ones are integrated and > which ones are not yet? > Yes, they are already in Pharo. To check if you running VM which supports new finalization, use: WeakFinalizationList hasNewFinalization > Other question, is the plan to take the enhancements as they are and > apply them on Pharo, that is, the versions in Squeak are the reference > or there are conflicting versions in Pharo that are to be keep instead. > I remember that some changes were made to Pharo in this regard. > Do not worry about it. We reviewed the code with Stephane, before integrating it. It was back in Dec 2010 (if i remember). > > Cheers > -- > Miguel CobÃ¡ > http://twitter.com/MiguelCobaMtz > http://miguel.leugim.com.mx > > -- Best regards, Igor Stasenko AKA sig.

April 5, 2011