March 2011 - Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-project] who is using softSqueak and standard Squeak

by Schwab,Wilhelm K

Great link! I have never been a fan of the colored windows, with one glowing exception: clay rose (very subtle tint) really works for the debugger. Dan also mentioned graph paper. Ledger green is a nice background color for reading text. What I want to see is a clean way to set text editor background colors for the various tools. I have found mentions of a Shout style for same, but I have never found it. As a further argument in favor of backgrounds, if we were to adopt wx or some other native framework for our tools, the non-client areas would be drawn for us and therefore unchangeable. Tools would need to distinguish themselves by icon, background colors, and finally overall appearance. Bill ________________________________________ From: pharo-project-bounces(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr [pharo-project-bounces(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr] On Behalf Of Helene Bilbo [thereluctantprogrammer(a)fastmail.fm] Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2011 8:20 AM To: pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] who is using softSqueak and standard Squeak "StÃ©phane Ducasseâ wrote: > > just out of curiosity who is using SoftSqueak and Standard Squeak theme? > I know that lukas like colored windows now may be specific new style with > this behavior could be done? > Hi, i use them and like them a lot. I also asked on the Squeak-List about the origins of colored windows and got an interesting response: http://forum.world.st/What-was-the-idea-behind-the-colorful-windows-td33153… Dan Ingalls on history of colorful windows.. Helene -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/who-is-using-softSqueak-and-standard-Squeak-tp3407241… Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

March 26, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] who is using softSqueak and standard Squeak

by Helene Bilbo

"StÃ©phane Ducasseâ wrote: > > just out of curiosity who is using SoftSqueak and Standard Squeak theme? > I know that lukas like colored windows now may be specific new style with > this behavior could be done? > Hi, i use them and like them a lot. I also asked on the Squeak-List about the origins of colored windows and got an interesting response: http://forum.world.st/What-was-the-idea-behind-the-colorful-windows-td33153… Dan Ingalls on history of colorful windows.. Helene -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/who-is-using-softSqueak-and-standard-Squeak-tp3407241… Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

March 26, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] Issue 3341 in pharo: use #= for integer comparison instead of #==

by pharo＠googlecode.com

Comment #7 on issue 3341 by stephane...(a)gmail.com: use #= for integer comparison instead of #== http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3341 Kernel changed integrated in 13112

March 26, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] Issue 1854 in pharo: We remove CodeLoader

by pharo＠googlecode.com

Comment #14 on issue 1854 by stephane...(a)gmail.com: We remove CodeLoader http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=1854 I think that the cleans proposed by adrien barreau and reviewed by me and igor looks better

March 26, 2011

[Pharo-project] [update 1.3] #13112

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

13112 ----- - Issue 2704: Tests for broken withNoLineLongerThan: behavior. Thanks Nicolas Cellier and Andreas Raab. - Issue 3864: [Failing Test] 1.3 ImageSegmentTestExport. - Issue 3341: use #= for integer comparison instead of #==. Kernel Part. - Less overrides in the system: around 100 left. :( Thanks you all. I feel that we are getting to the point where we will really move forward. Stef

March 26, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] Remove #class as a Compiler optimization

by Stefan Marr

Hi: On 25 Mar 2011, at 18:15, Camillo Bruni wrote: >>>> 13ms / 17ms * 100% = 76% => 25% speed improvement! in COG >>>> 50ms / 60ms * 100% = 83% => 17% faster > > So we have a nice Benchmarking framework on sqeaksource which we should use instead of relying on some pseudo valid results. It is not "there" yet, in terms of usability. And it is not trimmed for such kind of microbenchmarks. But it would be great to establish it as a standard to avoid those common traps, like the code did not get JITed... Mariano, if you do these kind of measurements often, please have a look at [1] and [2]. And perhaps, we can extend [3] to your liking. Best regards Stefan [1] A. Georges, D. Buytaert, and L. Eeckhout, âStatistically Rigorous Java Performance Evaluation,â SIGPLAN Not., vol. 42, no. 10, p. 57-76, 2007. [2] http://code.google.com/p/caliper/ [3] http://www.squeaksource.com/SMark.html -- Stefan Marr Software Languages Lab Vrije Universiteit Brussel Pleinlaan 2 / B-1050 Brussels / Belgium http://soft.vub.ac.be/~smarr Phone: +32 2 629 2974 Fax: +32 2 629 3525

March 26, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] Issue 3341 in pharo: use #= for integer comparison instead of #==

by pharo＠googlecode.com

Comment #6 on issue 3341 by stephane...(a)gmail.com: use #= for integer comparison instead of #== http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3341 Thanks this is nice to see some progress on this front too. We will get there.

March 26, 2011

[Pharo-project] who is using softSqueak and standard Squeak

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

Hi guys just out of curiosity who is using SoftSqueak and Standard Squeak theme? I know that lukas like colored windows now may be specific new style with this behavior could be done? Stef

March 26, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] Issue 3864 in pharo: [Failing Test] 1.3 ImageSegmentTestExport

by pharo＠googlecode.com

Updates: Status: Closed Comment #2 on issue 3864 by stephane...(a)gmail.com: [Failing Test] 1.3 ImageSegmentTestExport http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3864 in 13112

March 26, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] Issue 2704 in pharo: Tests for broken withNoLineLongerThan: behavior.

by pharo＠googlecode.com

Updates: Status: Closed Labels: Milestone-1.3 Comment #10 on issue 2704 by stephane...(a)gmail.com: Tests for broken withNoLineLongerThan: behavior. http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=2704 Thanks a lot. We have not much time for looking at these enhancements but there are still nice to have. So thanks Integrated in 13112

March 26, 2011