March 2011 - Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-project] [update 1.2] #12345

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

lucky you It will be difficult to make it better On Mar 29, 2011, at 8:46 PM, Marcus Denker wrote: > What a beautiful update number... > > 12345 > ----- > > Release 1.2.1 > -- > Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de > INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD. > >

March 29, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] Can we get 1.2 on the pharo web site?

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

Yes please move on. Soon 1.2 will look so old :) Stef On Mar 29, 2011, at 8:33 PM, Marcus Denker wrote: > > On Mar 29, 2011, at 7:51 PM, Adrian Lienhard wrote: > >> Sure! I can help with updating the website. >> >> Is the list of changes [1] still work in progress or should I add as is? It would be nice to have it structured (I can do this) and a bit more detailed if possible. The site for the 1.1 release had a quite verbose summary [2]. >> >> Do we have the Pharo 1.2 and Pharo one click images ready already? >> > No. We don't even have a 1.2 Full release yet... > > Open bugs: > > http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/list?can=2&q=milestone=1.2-DevImage > > But I think we should just release... else we will never do it. > > Marcus > > > -- > Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de > INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD. > >

March 29, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] who is using softSqueak and standard Squeak

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

Hi helene this is not a question quarrels. I'm over that since some moment now. This is a question of removing/cleaning/organizing. So we will remove softSqueak and package it and save into the PharoTheme project so that people can load it if they want. I would like to get some beautiful looks that look like today standard. Stef On Mar 29, 2011, at 8:32 PM, Helene Bilbo wrote: > > "StÃ©phane Ducasseâ wrote: >> >> I would really like to remove the standard squeak because it is terrible. >> I set it up since some updates and >> I cannot work with it anymore. >> > > No, it is not terrible. It is very beautiful, and much more useful and > innovative than for example fake-windows or fake-macos themes. > People like me who came to Pharo after you forked from Squeak have no idea > of your quarrels with the Squeak-Community (i only read it afterwards in the > mailing-lists) and have therefore no problem with using the best from every > implementation (the beautiful theme from squeak and the random refactorings > from pharo ;) > And while i would have no problem with loading the theme by hand â if i > would remove themes it would not be the squeak theme.. > > Have a look at: > http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/17/princeton-study-shows-that-easy-fonts-ma… > Princeton study shows that easy fonts make things harder to remember: > "Fortune favors the bold (and the Italicized)" > > -- > View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/who-is-using-softSqueak-and-standard-Squeak-tp3407241… > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >

March 29, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] Issue 3429 in pharo: Better Number performance

by pharo＠googlecode.com

Updates: Status: FixProposed Comment #1 on issue 3429 by nicolas....(a)gmail.com: Better Number performance http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3429 Name: SLICE-Issue-3429-BetterNumberPerformance-nice.1 Dependencies: Kernel-nice.852 Integrate Levente's fast up (Fraction negative and SmallInteger printOn:) For ScaledDecimal, this is different, because they are printed rounded in Pharo, truncated in Squeak. BTW, Pharo version was wrong (shame on me) because rounded fractionPart can overflow and this was not taken into account (try 1.999s2 printString -> Error) So for the same SLICE, you got a patch. TODO: someone might want to add a non regression test for 1.999s2 printString = '2.00s2' And also test -1.999s2 printString = '-2.00s2'

March 29, 2011

[Pharo-project] [update 1.2] #12345

by Marcus Denker

What a beautiful update number... 12345 ----- Release 1.2.1 -- Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.

March 29, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] Can we get 1.2 on the pharo web site?

by Marcus Denker

On Mar 29, 2011, at 7:51 PM, Adrian Lienhard wrote: > Sure! I can help with updating the website. > > Is the list of changes [1] still work in progress or should I add as is? It would be nice to have it structured (I can do this) and a bit more detailed if possible. The site for the 1.1 release had a quite verbose summary [2]. > > Do we have the Pharo 1.2 and Pharo one click images ready already? > No. We don't even have a 1.2 Full release yet... Open bugs: http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/list?can=2&q=milestone=1.2-DevImage But I think we should just release... else we will never do it. Marcus -- Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.

March 29, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] Getting Pharo 1.2 on Hudson green/blue again

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

Thanks marcus. I will integrate some fixes after fixing some stuff with kids. Stef On Mar 29, 2011, at 8:31 PM, Marcus Denker wrote: > > On Mar 29, 2011, at 9:33 AM, Torsten Bergmann wrote: > >> Hi Markus, >> >> I think I've found out what the problem with the >> hudson build for Pharo 1.2 is: >> >> - the Pharo-1.2.st Skript used to build it includes this line: >> >> ((Smalltalk at: #ConfigurationOfPharo) project lastVersion) >> >> which now returns 1.3. instead of 1.2 since the config was extended. >> >> Guess who did it: ConfigurationOfPharo-MarcusDenker.148 >> on 22 March 2011, the day when the hudson build broke >> >> So change the line in Pharo-1.2.st to: >> >> ((Smalltalk at: #ConfigurationOfPharo) project version: '1.2-beta2') perform: #silently: with: true; perform: #load. >> >> and the build works. At least it does manually when I try it here. >> > Oh... > I fixed the build script. Hudson building now. > > >> If that works you either send me a beer or you take the time to >> exchange the VM to the customized ones I've sent you so we can >> move 1.2 out of the door and concentrate on 1.3... >> > I will do a release of 1.2.1 and then fix the one-click. > > Marcus > > > > -- > Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de > INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD. > >

March 29, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] who is using softSqueak and standard Squeak

by Helene Bilbo

"StÃ©phane Ducasseâ wrote: > > I would really like to remove the standard squeak because it is terrible. > I set it up since some updates and > I cannot work with it anymore. > No, it is not terrible. It is very beautiful, and much more useful and innovative than for example fake-windows or fake-macos themes. People like me who came to Pharo after you forked from Squeak have no idea of your quarrels with the Squeak-Community (i only read it afterwards in the mailing-lists) and have therefore no problem with using the best from every implementation (the beautiful theme from squeak and the random refactorings from pharo ;) And while i would have no problem with loading the theme by hand â if i would remove themes it would not be the squeak theme.. Have a look at: http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/17/princeton-study-shows-that-easy-fonts-ma… Princeton study shows that easy fonts make things harder to remember: "Fortune favors the bold (and the Italicized)" -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/who-is-using-softSqueak-and-standard-Squeak-tp3407241… Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

March 29, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] Getting Pharo 1.2 on Hudson green/blue again

by Marcus Denker

On Mar 29, 2011, at 9:33 AM, Torsten Bergmann wrote: > Hi Markus, > > I think I've found out what the problem with the > hudson build for Pharo 1.2 is: > > - the Pharo-1.2.st Skript used to build it includes this line: > > ((Smalltalk at: #ConfigurationOfPharo) project lastVersion) > > which now returns 1.3. instead of 1.2 since the config was extended. > > Guess who did it: ConfigurationOfPharo-MarcusDenker.148 > on 22 March 2011, the day when the hudson build broke > > So change the line in Pharo-1.2.st to: > > ((Smalltalk at: #ConfigurationOfPharo) project version: '1.2-beta2') perform: #silently: with: true; perform: #load. > > and the build works. At least it does manually when I try it here. > Oh... I fixed the build script. Hudson building now. > If that works you either send me a beer or you take the time to > exchange the VM to the customized ones I've sent you so we can > move 1.2 out of the door and concentrate on 1.3... > I will do a release of 1.2.1 and then fix the one-click. Marcus -- Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.

March 29, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] Issue 3736 in pharo: new Transcript from CUIS

by pharo＠googlecode.com

Comment #4 on issue 3736 by stephane...(a)gmail.com: new Transcript from CUIS http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3736 Thanks a lot this is really nice!

March 29, 2011