March 2011 - Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-project] Issue 3909 in pharo: ObjectStringConverter refactored

by pharo＠googlecode.com

Updates: Status: Duplicate Mergedinto: 3902 Comment #1 on issue 3909 by stephane...(a)gmail.com: ObjectStringConverter refactored http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3909 Duplicate of 3902

March 29, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] Issue 3902 in pharo: Text field converter refactoring

by pharo＠googlecode.com

Updates: Status: Closed Comment #1 on issue 3902 by stephane...(a)gmail.com: Text field converter refactoring http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3902 in 13118

March 29, 2011

[Pharo-project] Migration morph objects from 1.1 to 1.2

by Denis Kudriashov

Hello I have many morphs saved in files by smartReferenceStream. I doing it in pharo1.1 image. Now I want to load this objects to pharo1.2. When I doing this I have exception about absent TextConstants stuff. My saved Morph containes textMorph. I know pharo1.2 has textMorph refactored and TextConstants was removed. How old object can be migrated to new stuff? Is some rules exists? For example, when I import morph from file (created in pharo1.1) I see in debugger "TextConstants class at: index" where "index=#DefaultTabsArray" Best regards, Denis

March 29, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] Issue 3845 in pharo: Polymorph extension shortSummary is not programmed the object way

by pharo＠googlecode.com

Updates: Status: Closed Labels: Milestone-1.3 Comment #2 on issue 3845 by stephane...(a)gmail.com: Polymorph extension shortSummary is not programmed the object way http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3845 I'm currently going slowly in MC to understand how to integrate RPackage and I would have loved to get more comments (right now this is nearly zero)... so there is no problem with not factoring out such logic since it is simple Integrated in 1318

March 29, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] [ANN 1.2.1Core] pre-build 1.2.1 Core image

by Marcus Denker

On Mar 29, 2011, at 9:49 PM, Lukas Renggli wrote: > I don't care if we move to 6505, I will just have to update my build > server to use the new VM as well. So far I built with the old VM to > make sure that the images also work on older VMs. > It's actually good to build 1.2 with the old format... this simplifies life for people who don't want to update the VM (which can be difficult, e.g. because of plugins). Wit 1.3 we will be Cog only, StackVM and Jit, and retire the Squeak VM. And of course, for 1.3 we will automatize even more to have less things that need to be done by hand. Marcus -- Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.

March 29, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] Issue 3429 in pharo: Better Number performance

by pharo＠googlecode.com

Comment #4 on issue 3429 by stephane...(a)gmail.com: Better Number performance http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3429 in 13118

March 29, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] [ANN 1.2.1Core] pre-build 1.2.1 Core image

by Marcus Denker

On Mar 29, 2011, at 9:46 PM, Marcus Denker wrote: > > On Mar 29, 2011, at 9:38 PM, Lukas Renggli wrote: > >> Is this intentional that the image was saved with a newer VM than >> previous builds? >> >> This interpreter (vers. 6502) cannot read image file (vers. 6505). >> > > Oh, yes... I have a new VM on my system (one compiled by our build system). > Ok. So I will redo the image... Marcus -- Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.

March 29, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] [ANN 1.2.1Core] pre-build 1.2.1 Core image

by Lukas Renggli

I don't care if we move to 6505, I will just have to update my build server to use the new VM as well. So far I built with the old VM to make sure that the images also work on older VMs. Lukas On 29 March 2011 21:46, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker(a)inria.fr> wrote: > > On Mar 29, 2011, at 9:38 PM, Lukas Renggli wrote: > >> Is this intentional that the image was saved with a newer VM than >> previous builds? >> >> Â Â This interpreter (vers. 6502) cannot read image file (vers. 6505). >> > > Oh, yes... I have a new VM on my system (one compiled by our build system). > > And on the build server use right now Ian's latest unix vm that can read these images, too. > > This shows that 1.2 should have been released weeks ago. The world is moving on and it > gets really difficult to go back to the past just to relase 1.2. > > So what do we do? The shity gforge means that we would need to generate a new link. > > Maybe named "1.2.1 this time really final?". > > I am getting tired of 1.2... > > Â Â Â Â Marcus > > > > -- > Marcus Denker Â -- http://www.marcusdenker.de > INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD. > > > -- Lukas Renggli www.lukas-renggli.ch

March 29, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] [ANN 1.2.1Core] pre-build 1.2.1 Core image

by Marcus Denker

On Mar 29, 2011, at 9:38 PM, Lukas Renggli wrote: > Is this intentional that the image was saved with a newer VM than > previous builds? > > This interpreter (vers. 6502) cannot read image file (vers. 6505). > Oh, yes... I have a new VM on my system (one compiled by our build system). And on the build server use right now Ian's latest unix vm that can read these images, too. This shows that 1.2 should have been released weeks ago. The world is moving on and it gets really difficult to go back to the past just to relase 1.2. So what do we do? The shity gforge means that we would need to generate a new link. Maybe named "1.2.1 this time really final?". I am getting tired of 1.2... Marcus -- Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.

March 29, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] Issue 3429 in pharo: Better Number performance

by pharo＠googlecode.com

Updates: Status: Closed Comment #3 on issue 3429 by stephane...(a)gmail.com: Better Number performance http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3429 Thanks nicolas. In this moment we have some boost in changes so this is good to have some help :). I like the feel. I added ScaledDecimalTest>>testRounded self assert: 1.999s2 printString = '2.00s2'. self assert: -1.999s2 printString = '-2.00s2'

March 29, 2011