March 2011 - Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-project] Issue 1507 in pharo: is LocatedMethod needed?

by pharo＠googlecode.com

Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #4 on issue 1507 by stephane...(a)gmail.com: is LocatedMethod needed? http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=1507 (No comment was entered for this change.)

March 12, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] Issue 3789 in pharo: convert MenuMorph reference to invoke UIManager

by pharo＠googlecode.com

Comment #3 on issue 3789 by stephane...(a)gmail.com: convert MenuMorph reference to invoke UIManager http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3789 ? UIManager>>newMenuIn: aThemedMorph for: aModel "Answer a new menu." ^ self subclassResponsibility MorphicUIManager>>newMenuIn: aThemedMorph for: aModel "Answer a new menu." "UIManager default" ^self theme newMenuIn: aThemedMorph for: aModel so what is the problem?

March 12, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] Issue 3387 in pharo: Package name should not contain crptic characters

by pharo＠googlecode.com

Comment #4 on issue 3387 by stephane...(a)gmail.com: Package name should not contain crptic characters http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3387 Cool 4ndr3r13ck did you sign the license agreement?

March 12, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] Pharo mailing list weekly summary #5

by Noury Bouraqadi

I'd rather prefer the actual date such as: 7-13 march 2011 Thanx FranÃ§ois any way. On 12 mars 2011, at 18:14, Geert Claes wrote: > Hi Francois, Excellent job again. Just one suggestion, can we use the actual > week number e.g. Pharo summary week 10, 2011? > > -- > View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-mailing-list-weekly-summary-5-tp3350331p3350535… > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > Noury Bouraqadi http://car.mines-douai.fr/noury -- -6th National Conference on âControl Architecture of Robotsâ 24-25 may 2011, Grenoble area, France http://car2011.inrialpes.fr/ -19th ESUG International Smalltalk Conference 22-26 August 2011, Edinburgh, UK http://www.esug.org/Conferences/2011 -19Ã¨mes JournÃ©es Francophones sur les SystÃ¨mes Multi-Agents (JFSMAâ11) http://www.univ-valenciennes.fr/congres/jfsma2011/ 17-19 Octobre 2011, Valenciennes, France

March 12, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] Pharo 1.2 builds green :)

by Noury Bouraqadi

Yes. This is what we noticed during the sprint. So, yes. It's time to release 1.2 and move on to 1.3! Thanks to all contributors :-) Noury On 12 mars 2011, at 11:50, Esteban Lorenzano wrote: > Hi, > ...well, they are blue, not green, but I can't get used to it :) > > So... is time to release it, finally? > > btw, before release it, can't we change default RealEstateAgent usedStrategy to #straggerFor:initialExtent:world:, so windows get a "normal" size? Current one is too small in my screen :( > > Cheers, > Esteban > > > Noury Bouraqadi http://car.mines-douai.fr/noury -- -6th National Conference on âControl Architecture of Robotsâ 24-25 may 2011, Grenoble area, France http://car2011.inrialpes.fr/ -19th ESUG International Smalltalk Conference 22-26 August 2011, Edinburgh, UK http://www.esug.org/Conferences/2011 -19Ã¨mes JournÃ©es Francophones sur les SystÃ¨mes Multi-Agents (JFSMAâ11) http://www.univ-valenciennes.fr/congres/jfsma2011/ 17-19 Octobre 2011, Valenciennes, France

March 12, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] Issue 3084 in pharo: DSM analysis Part 1

by pharo＠googlecode.com

Comment #3 on issue 3084 by stephane...(a)gmail.com: DSM analysis Part 1 http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3084 no we will revisit it. Right now it is fuzzy. I could not find inflateStream, Deprecation is ok were it is.... We should not keep all these issues forever.

March 12, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] Issue 3076 in pharo: Suggestion for Remodularisation -> Dependants on ToolSet

by pharo＠googlecode.com

Comment #4 on issue 3076 by stephane...(a)gmail.com: Suggestion for Remodularisation -> Dependants on ToolSet http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3076 This is more than that. The problem of this fix is that it is too large and general. In Hazelnut we will have to find a solution anyway. So we should close entry when no action can lead to a solution

March 12, 2011

[Pharo-project] Issue 3813 in pharo: [Hudson] polishing VM building process

by pharo＠googlecode.com

Status: Accepted Owner: siguc...(a)gmail.com CC: marcus.d...(a)gmail.com New issue 3813 by siguc...(a)gmail.com: [Hudson] polishing VM building process http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3813 We should provide a zipped (or tarball) of generated sources along with platform sources, ready to build VM. This should be triggered only after building VM succeeds. So, the idea is to run something like following: (in root of wrokspace) git archive --format=tar HEAD | (mkdir archive && cd archive && tar xf -) cp -R src archive/src cp -R build archive/build cd archive tar -czf <configName>-sources.tgz ( and build directory should not contain the files produced by cmake/make etc, only ones which are produced by image using CMakeVMMaker config)

March 12, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] Dependencies progress

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

yes we could. Stef > Once you have finished integrating all the dependencies, can we check the dependencies with Jannik tools of Moose and see how many dependecies did we fix ? > > thanks > > mariano

March 12, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] Issue 3076 in pharo: Suggestion for Remodularisation -> Dependants on ToolSet

by pharo＠googlecode.com

Comment #3 on issue 3076 by marianopeck: Suggestion for Remodularisation -> Dependants on ToolSet http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3076 It would be nice to let a comment when an issue is closed but not integrated. So...this was closed because it needed a huge refactoring? can we just let it open so that not to forget and maybe someone with time fix it in a future?

March 12, 2011