February 2011 - Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

[Pharo-project] Issue 3684 in pharo: primitive: 'primitiveDirectoryLookup' module: 'FilePlugin' returns wrong creation date

by pharo＠googlecode.com

Status: Accepted Owner: damien.p...(a)gmail.com Labels: Type-ReportDefect New issue 3684 by damien.p...(a)gmail.com: primitive: 'primitiveDirectoryLookup' module: 'FilePlugin' returns wrong creation date http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3684 Pharo image: 1.2 full Pharo core version: #12330 Virtual machine used: Cog register mapping It seems primitive: 'primitiveDirectoryLookup' module: 'FilePlugin' returns the same value for file creation date and last modification date, while those are different on disk. Gofer new squeaksource: 'PharoTaskForces'; package: 'Filesystem'; load. FSDiskFilesystemTest debug: #testEntryDates (there is even a convenient breakpoint I forgot to remove if you get Filesystem-DamienPollet.100 :) In a unix shell: ls -lTU gooly # full time of creation ls -lT gooly # full time of modification, 2s later

Feb. 7, 2011

[Pharo-project] Canvas >>draw: anObject

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

Canvas>>draw: anObject ^anObject drawOn: self Now in SM we got SMxCanvas>>draw: anObject ^self clipBy: anObject bounds during: [ :c | anObject drawOn: c] and I'm wondering what is the exact difference. Any idea? Stef

Feb. 7, 2011

[Pharo-project] Canvas>>render:

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

Hi I have the impression that we could remove this method and friends since it definition on FormCanvas is render: anObject "Do some 3D operations with the object if possible" ^self asBalloonCanvas render: anObject But BalloonCanvas does not implement render: and Canvas>>render: anObject "Do some 3D operations with the object if possible" is a nop. Stef

Feb. 7, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] [SPAM] Re: [COTDC] 3 - HTTPClient

by Dale Henrichs

Haha, Perhaps there should also be a rating for class comments ... G, PG, R, NSFW... Dale On 02/07/2011 12:07 PM, StÃ©phane Ducasse wrote: > this is more HTTPSocket > I'm sure that philippe will love to answer :) > > Stef > > > On Feb 7, 2011, at 8:23 PM, Dmitri Zagidulin wrote: > >> Actually, can somebody explain the troll-mode comment? Why is the >> HTTPClient an example of how not to write code? Should we not be using >> this package in production? What does the comment about "hacker with >> telnet"-protocol mean? >> >> On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 2:12 PM, Luc Fabresse<luc.fabresse(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>> 2011/2/7 laurent laffont<laurent.laffont(a)gmail.com> >>>> >>>> FYI I put results >>>> here: http://code.google.com/p/pharo/wiki/CommentOfTheDayContest >>> >>> Thanks Laurent. >>> It is a really great because it document the system and I learn a lot at the >>> same time ;-) >>> #Luc >>> >>>> >>>> Laurent >>>> >>>> On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 4:33 PM, StÃ©phane Ducasse >>>> <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> :) >>>>> We should just merge the two :) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>> <trollmode> >>>>>>>> I'm a good example of how not to write code. Turn around, walk away, >>>>>>>> fast. I'm fully of bugs. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Somebody at some point thought that HTTP is a simple "hacker with >>>>>>>> telnet"-protocol. It's not. >>>>>>>> </trollmode> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> That's actually HTTPSocket, not HTTPClient. >>>>>> >>>>>> Although it is a negative comment, it is the truth. >>>>>> >>>>>> Still, adding some comments and lowering the pain for others is still a >>>>>> good idea. >>>>>> >>>>>> Sven >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> > >

Feb. 7, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] [COTDC] 3 - HTTPClient

by Sven Van Caekenberghe

On 07 Feb 2011, at 20:23, Dmitri Zagidulin wrote: > Actually, can somebody explain the troll-mode comment? Why is the > HTTPClient an example of how not to write code? Should we not be using > this package in production? What does the comment about "hacker with > telnet"-protocol mean? Well have a look at, for example, HTTPSocket class>>#httpGetDocument:args:accept:request: or HTTPSocket class>>#httpPostDocument:args:accept:request: Apart from the fact that, externally, the interface is at the same time too big and too small, this is just an enormeous procedural piece of code, without any object oriented structuring at all, let alone reusability. Furthermore, although it works more or less, it is incomplete and bloated at the same time. Nobody dares to touch it. But please, go have a look yourself ;-) Sven

Feb. 7, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] Issue 3659 in pharo: Task bar appearance does not make sense

by pharo＠googlecode.com

Comment #7 on issue 3659 by stephane...(a)gmail.com: Task bar appearance does not make sense http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3659 Yes dependent packages are not moved. the composite pattern is not complete. We hijiacked dependencies to have a group of packages saved and loaded together. Now there is no problem we accept cs too :)

Feb. 7, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] [SPAM] Re: [COTDC] 3 - HTTPClient

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

this is more HTTPSocket I'm sure that philippe will love to answer :) Stef On Feb 7, 2011, at 8:23 PM, Dmitri Zagidulin wrote: > Actually, can somebody explain the troll-mode comment? Why is the > HTTPClient an example of how not to write code? Should we not be using > this package in production? What does the comment about "hacker with > telnet"-protocol mean? > > On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 2:12 PM, Luc Fabresse <luc.fabresse(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> 2011/2/7 laurent laffont <laurent.laffont(a)gmail.com> >>> >>> FYI I put results >>> here: http://code.google.com/p/pharo/wiki/CommentOfTheDayContest >> >> Thanks Laurent. >> It is a really great because it document the system and I learn a lot at the >> same time ;-) >> #Luc >> >>> >>> Laurent >>> >>> On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 4:33 PM, StÃ©phane Ducasse >>> <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr> wrote: >>>> >>>> :) >>>> We should just merge the two :) >>>> >>>> >>>>>>> <trollmode> >>>>>>> I'm a good example of how not to write code. Turn around, walk away, >>>>>>> fast. I'm fully of bugs. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Somebody at some point thought that HTTP is a simple "hacker with >>>>>>> telnet"-protocol. It's not. >>>>>>> </trollmode> >>>>>> >>>>>> That's actually HTTPSocket, not HTTPClient. >>>>> >>>>> Although it is a negative comment, it is the truth. >>>>> >>>>> Still, adding some comments and lowering the pain for others is still a >>>>> good idea. >>>>> >>>>> Sven >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> >

Feb. 7, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] new Cog VMs available

by Francois Stephany

Thanks for your pointer and explanations Eliot ! > On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 6:52 AM, Francois Stephany > <tulipe.moutarde(a)gmail.com <mailto:tulipe.moutarde@gmail.com>> wrote: > > So StackToRegisterMappingCogit should be faster than the other ? If > so, why does the SimpleStackBasedCogit still exist ? > > > Juts in case people find bugs with the StackToRegisterMappingCogit that > are not in SimpleStackBasedCogit. SimpleStackBasedCogit is "mature"; > we've used it for almost two years at Teleplace, and while I've fixed > serious bugs in it in the past month it is quite possibly less buggy > than StackToRegisterMappingCogit. > > > (Sorry but I'm a total newbie) > > > One can only learn by asking questions. Not knowing, one is not in a > position to know whether a question is stupid or not, so one must not be > afraid of asking stupid questions if one wants to learn. Please continue. > > best, > Eliot

Feb. 7, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] [SPAM] Re: [COTDC] 3 - HTTPClient

by Dmitri Zagidulin

Actually, can somebody explain the troll-mode comment? Why is the HTTPClient an example of how not to write code? Should we not be using this package in production? What does the comment about "hacker with telnet"-protocol mean? On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 2:12 PM, Luc Fabresse <luc.fabresse(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > 2011/2/7 laurent laffont <laurent.laffont(a)gmail.com> >> >> FYI I put results >> here:Â http://code.google.com/p/pharo/wiki/CommentOfTheDayContest > > Thanks Laurent. > It is a really great because it document the system andÂ I learn a lot at the > same time ;-) > #Luc > >> >> Laurent >> >> On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 4:33 PM, StÃ©phane Ducasse >> <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr> wrote: >>> >>> :) >>> We should just merge the two :) >>> >>> >>> >>> <trollmode> >>> >>> I'm a good example of how not to write code. Turn around, walk away, >>> >>> fast. I'm fully of bugs. >>> >>> >>> >>> Somebody at some point thought that HTTP is a simple "hacker with >>> >>> telnet"-protocol. It's not. >>> >>> </trollmode> >>> >> >>> >> That's actually HTTPSocket, not HTTPClient. >>> > >>> > Although it is a negative comment, it is the truth. >>> > >>> > Still, adding some comments and lowering the pain for others is still a >>> > good idea. >>> > >>> > Sven >>> >>> >> > >

Feb. 7, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] Issue 3681 in pharo: [Failing Test] Tests.Release.ReleaseTest.testObsoleteClasses

by pharo＠googlecode.com

Updates: Status: Accepted Comment #3 on issue 3681 by laurent....(a)gmail.com: [Failing Test] Tests.Release.ReleaseTest.testObsoleteClasses http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3681 It's not a fix, just add more info. For 1.2 & 1.3

Feb. 7, 2011